Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Twins Daily Contributor
Posted

He’s here, folks. Luke Keaschall got the call. He’ll join the Twins Friday in Atlanta, after a rash of injuries to position players left the Twins roster thin on both quality and depth. What should we expect from Keaschall? How might he be deployed? Let’s dig in.

Image courtesy of © Chris Tilley-Imagn Images

This is one of those moments where it’s good to get excited. A homegrown prospect drafted a mere two years ago is making his debut in the majors. That, in itself, is a huge developmental win—for the organization, for the player development team, and for Keaschall himself.

This spring, I wrote about the completeness of Keaschall as a hitter. To summarize: he makes great swing decisions, and he has excellent bat-to-ball skills. He maximizes his average power by displaying increasing skill at pulling the ball in the air. That’s a great combination for a high-floored, everyday regular.

I think, though, it would be prudent for us to keep our expectations of Keaschall in check during his first taste of big-league action. Let’s dig into why.

The first question that crops up is, "Where is he going to play?" Keaschall is newly recovered from scheduled Tommy John surgery last August, which cut short an exceptional season in which he managed a .903 OPS (158 wRC+) at High-A Cedar Rapids and Double-A Wichita. In 14 games at Triple-A St. Paul in 2025, Keaschall has been deployed at DH in seven and at second base in seven. In the games he started in the field, he was usually replaced in the middle or late innings. 

When we consider that the Twins are easing him back in on defense after surgery, I think it’s fair to assume playing the outfield is out of the question. (That’s still a medium- to long-term possibility, though.) I’d imagine he’ll play some combination of second base against left-handed pitching (you get Chris Sale on Saturday, good luck), and DH. Not to be a downer, but it’s also a distinct possibility that he spends a good amount of time on the bench.

Another reality is that Keaschall probably had an equal chance of starting 2025 at Wichita or St. Paul. The Twins chose the latter (correctly, from this seat), but he’s had a 14-game stint at St. Paul after a 58-game stretch in Wichita to end 2024. It is unreasonable to expect him to come roaring out of the gates in the majors.

Keaschall has been solid in his limited Triple-A debut. In 14 games, he’s hit .261/.379/.348, with a home run, a double, and four stolen bases. That adds up to a 107 wRC+. Look, it’s been cold, wet, and the Saints have suffered from a highly disrupted schedule early on, but it’s been a transition punctuated by adjustments. 

The biggest difference between Keaschall’s 2024 and early 2025 numbers is erosion in his quality of contact. He’s not hitting the ball very hard. His ISO is a full .100 lower than in 2024. That’s what I’d expect for a player jumping a level. Just don’t expect Keaschall to set the world on fire immediately. That’s not reasonable, or fair.

If Keaschall is going to be successful in his first stint in the majors, it’ll be underpinned by excellent swing decisions. In the early going, he’s walking 15.5% of the time (even better than his 13.4% mark in 2024). He’s striking out 19% of the time—exactly the rate he managed at Wichita in 2024. His overall contact rate (81.4%) would be in the upper third of major-league hitters, while his in-zone contact rate of 89.7% would put him in a similar range.

Strong swing decisions and bat-to-ball skills provide Keaschall a sturdy platform for success. One unintended outcome of the skillset, now that the difficulty mode is being cranked up, might be pitchers frequently getting to leveraged counts against him due to his patience. That could lead to weak contact, as he battles to stay in at-bats.

I think a fully-formed Keaschall is a 2- or 3-win player. Most projection systems see him as a 1.5-win player in the short term. He has the athleticism, skillset, and track record to support long-term success. Don’t expect him to save the Twins offense in the short term, though. We’re not quite there yet.


View full article

Posted

Glad for the call-up.  But what’s the plan to continue his development?  What is Rocco/this coaching staff specifically going to do differently with respect to Keaschall’s transition that is different from how they’ve blown the transitions of so many others?  Because if the approach is the same, we just might ruin another top prospect.

My vote: let him play.  Give him the ABs - against both righties and lefties.  When his arm is healed, give him a position and let him build a major league prowess there.  Give him confidence - don’t make him feel like every AB could be his last.  Teach him to be a pro’s pro doing the prep every day and doing the little things right.  Make the investment. Tell Rocco he will be held accountable for how Keaschall and a handful of the other young guys (Lee, Wallner, Julien, and Larnach) develop this season and that development is his #1 priority. 

If we are all being honest, this season is done (there, I’ve just guaranteed the Twins win the division, haha).  Let’s build this team for the future. Emphasize the future core,  de-emphasise the “one and dones”.  If we have to trade some veteran players who might not be part of that core, so be it.  If we need to find a new manager/coaching staff who is better able to develop those players, then make the call.  Commercially, it will be the best choice in the mid/long-term; ironically, given how this team is playing and drawing at the gate now, it’s also likely the better commercial decision in the short-term as well.

 

 

Verified Member
Posted

It’s not over. Only 4 back in April with a lot of pitching depth and a weak division. But agree on building for the future and love getting Keaschall a (hopefully) quick taste of the majors before he spends a few months in St Paul and then back for the stretch. Future is still very bright!  

Posted
16 minutes ago, Nashvilletwin said:

If we are all being honest, this season is done (there, I’ve just guaranteed the Twins win the division, haha).  

I think it a little harsh/myopic to declare the season over at this point. Last year, on April 18, 2024, the Texas Rangers were leading the AL West and the Astros were in last place with a 6-14 record. That completely flipped by the end of the year. In fact two of the six teams to make the play-offs in both leagues would not have been in the play-offs at this point in time last year. 

Baseball is unlike any of the other major sports, just based on the number of games played in the regular season. My suspicion is the Twins would have gladly cut the last 19 games off of last year's schedule. A lot can change when you play 162 games.

Posted
37 minutes ago, Nashvilletwin said:

Glad for the call-up.  But what’s the plan to continue his development?  What is Rocco/this coaching staff specifically going to do differently with respect to Keaschall’s transition that is different from how they’ve blown the transitions of so many others?  Because if the approach is the same, we just might ruin another top prospect.

My vote: let him play.  Give him the ABs - against both righties and lefties.  When his arm is healed, give him a position and let him build a major league prowess there.  Give him confidence - don’t make him feel like every AB could be his last.  Teach him to be a pro’s pro doing the prep every day and doing the little things right.  Make the investment. Tell Rocco he will be held accountable for how Keaschall and a handful of the other young guys (Lee, Wallner, Julien, and Larnach) develop this season and that development is his #1 priority. 

If we are all being honest, this season is done (there, I’ve just guaranteed the Twins win the division, haha).  Let’s build this team for the future. Emphasize the future core,  de-emphasise the “one and dones”.  If we have to trade some veteran players who might not be part of that core, so be it.  If we need to find a new manager/coaching staff who is better able to develop those players, then make the call.  Commercially, it will be the best choice in the mid/long-term; ironically, given how this team is playing and drawing at the gate now, it’s also likely the better commercial decision in the short-term as well.

 

 

It took two whole sentences to turn what should be an optimistic discussion into a blame Rocco discussion. I have to admit I am impressed it took that long...

Posted

They need to play him a lot.  I agree with other posters that the Twins do a poor job of handling prospects.  To bring him up and have him ride the bench would do a great disservice to him and the team.  Too many times our prospects come up and ride the bench and stuck in this strict platoon system.  They play in the minors full time come up here and play half time.  Not a great way to develop players. Bring him up.  We want to see him play.  Play him.

Posted

Yesterday our hopes are soaring with the possibility of keashall helping the offense ...

This article kind of deflates that hope some as he may not be ready ...

Either he performs or fails , it's worth the try ...

I'm in agreement with others of our coaching at the major league level  , they haven't done well in taking talent and coaching players to major league talent ...

The coaching does not stop at MLB , but it's different for every player on how to get the most production  ...

Let the kid hit and run while he's here filling in for injured players ...

Posted
1 hour ago, Nashvilletwin said:

Glad for the call-up.  But what’s the plan to continue his development?  What is Rocco/this coaching staff specifically going to do differently with respect to Keaschall’s transition that is different from how they’ve blown the transitions of so many others?  Because if the approach is the same, we just might ruin another top prospect.

"Top prospects" are a dime a dozen. Nearly every team has several each year that make at least one of the top 100 prospects lists - they can't all possibly become MLB regulars, let alone stars. My guess is more of them 'ruin themselves' because they just don't have the innate ability or willingness to adjust to make it at the MLB level than have ruination foisted upon them.

Honestly, the abuse heaped upon Rocco and his coaching staff baffles me sometimes. He has a lifetime winning record, he did something the Twins hadn't done since 2002 (win a play-off series), and he's done it with a below average payroll. He's not the best manager in MLB (although he did win AL manager of the year back in 2019), but he's gotten about as much in results out of the talent that surrounds him as could be expected.

Posted

Excited to see Keaschall at the MLB level. Hope he performs well enough that he makes it a tough decision when dudes on the IL return. I am wondering what the corresponding move is? What does this mean for Correa/Castro?

Posted

What I expect is (or really hope) is that he plays 5 out of every 6 games and doesn't look over matched at the plate, the results probably won't look great but as long as he is competing and playing I will be happy. If his at bats look like Keirsay's have so far, I will be sad and disappointed and ready to sent him back down fairly soon

Posted
1 hour ago, NYCTK said:

Larnach on the hot seat. If Luke hits and Larnach continues to falter, he's basically done as a Twin. 

He’s going to have to hit for a pretty extended period before his performance has any bearing on Larnach’s future. It’s possible Bader hits .160 over the next month and Larnach hits .280……….. no history that says this scenario isn’t likely. To me, Kiersey is the obvious guy that’s out over time if Keaschall succeeds. Castro would move to “role” OF with Keaschall playing at 2B 20-30% of the time………, assuming Gasper will be the move today.

No 40-man & obviously no 26-man move involving Keaschall yet on the net……just media reports. Gasper or Kiersey being displaced? Bride has taken Wallner’s spot.

Posted
18 minutes ago, arby58 said:

"Top prospects" are a dime a dozen. Nearly every team has several each year that make at least one of the top 100 prospects lists - they can't all possibly become MLB regulars, let alone stars. My guess is more of them 'ruin themselves' because they just don't have the innate ability or willingness to adjust to make it at the MLB level than have ruination foisted upon them.

Honestly, the abuse heaped upon Rocco and his coaching staff baffles me sometimes. He has a lifetime winning record, he did something the Twins hadn't done since 2002 (win a play-off series), and he's done it with a below average payroll. He's not the best manager in MLB (although he did win AL manager of the year back in 2019), but he's gotten about as much in results out of the talent that surrounds him as could be expected.

It does seem like “pre-blaming” Rocco and the coaching staff is an easy out for the performance of a player who may or may not be ready.  IF he were totally healthy and wouldn’t have had TJ surgery, this would be an expected time table for his appearance in the majors.  However, given those things, it seems obvious that he wouldn’t be getting a sniff yet if it weren’t for the current injury situation.  

I think a realistic expectation is that he comes up and hits a little, but not a ton — enough so that we can see the potential.  When the injury situation abates itself on the major league club, he goes back down — wiser for his first taste of MLB but ready for a little more development (and to finish his recovery).  At this point in his career he’s not the savior of the season, but he might wind up being very good at a point down the line. 

Posted

I know this article is about Keaschall but he is getting less ink than someone named Rocco.  To respond to the topic, I hope Keaschall is given an extended opportunity to show his potential.  But I'm afraid he will be used as a late-inning pinch hitter/runner.  Pretty much a waste of his time.  Might as well use Bride for that.

Posted
55 minutes ago, Fire Dan Gladden said:

It took two whole sentences to turn what should be an optimistic discussion into a blame Rocco discussion. I have to admit I am impressed it took that long...

So what is his record developing position players?  Jeffers, a catcher?  Wallner?

We are a small/mid-market team.  To compete we need to develop internally.  And Rocco has done a poor job of it. People can have views on how well he’s performed the rest of his duties.  But taking top position player prospects and turning them into average or above every day major leaguers is not one of his strengths.  Sorry my friend, we cannot free agent our way to success - our market and owners dictate that.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Nashvilletwin said:

So what is his record developing position players?  Jeffers, a catcher?  Wallner?

We are a small/mid-market team.  To compete we need to develop internally.  And Rocco has done a poor job of it. People can have views on how well he’s performed the rest of his duties.  But taking top position player prospects and turning them into average or above every day major leaguers is not one of his strengths.  Sorry my friend, we cannot free agent our way to success - our market and owners dictate that.

As usual, the point of my comment is missed. This article is about Keaschall and what he may be able to bring to the table.  As seems to be the TD masses singular argument at the moment, there is an immediate attack  on Rocco.

To your point, if you are going to blame Rocco for the entirety of a players development... well, nothing I say is going to change that tunnel view approach.

Posted
1 hour ago, JD-TWINS said:

He’s going to have to hit for a pretty extended period before his performance has any bearing on Larnach’s future. It’s possible Bader hits .160 over the next month and Larnach hits .280……….. no history that says this scenario isn’t likely. To me, Kiersey is the obvious guy that’s out over time if Keaschall succeeds. Castro would move to “role” OF with Keaschall playing at 2B 20-30% of the time………, assuming Gasper will be the move today.

No 40-man & obviously no 26-man move involving Keaschall yet on the net……just media reports. Gasper or Kiersey being displaced? Bride has taken Wallner’s spot.

I guess, I'm just looking from the standpoint of Trevor Larnach being a very serious non-tender candidate. A 28 year old bat-only player with a career 99 OPS+. He BETTER feel like he's in the hot seat because it should be. 

Luke should be receiving most of the playing time at DH, meaning Larnach will be forced to play in the OF, something he's done very poorly and increasingly less frequently. 

Posted

Keeping strictly to the question, we can expect that Keaschall will be aggressive at the plate while mostly having a good amount of discipline with the strike zone. Luke has a quick bat and a solid approach. The last few weeks at AAA with the Saints he has faced some of the top pitchers in the minor leagues. There have been some out of tune swings and sometimes a little bit overboard on the upper cut, but Keaschall is a tough out for any pitcher. Put him at DH 4-5 days a week and let him hold down 2B twice week. The Twins  made the move to call him up. LK isn't some soft kid that needs to be handled carefully. Put him in the lineup and let him play, every day. If June comes and Keaschall is hitting .150 he may need to go down, but give him a regular spot.

What will the Twins do? That is for another article.

Posted
1 hour ago, terrydactyls said:

I know this article is about Keaschall but he is getting less ink than someone named Rocco.  To respond to the topic, I hope Keaschall is given an extended opportunity to show his potential.  But I'm afraid he will be used as a late-inning pinch hitter/runner.  Pretty much a waste of his time.  Might as well use Bride for that.

Nostradamus is back…….how about we add him to the roster and he grabs a bat & then we start discussing all the ways the coaching staff & Baldelli will mess him up? Everyone’s “afraid” of nearly every move the Team makes.  95% of the moves are so logical they could be made from somebody’s couch in Hibbing.

Players play…….. they shouldn’t need to be reminded every other inning to be aggressive on the bases ……. make contact with 2 strikes …… go first to third on a ball hit to right ……. make good solid throws to the first baseman’s chest from the mound. I haven’t played baseball for nearly 50 years as I got into Tennis as a teen. These basic things are so simplistic and yet people here act like Baldelli is 100% responsible for the players knowledge on how to make every play. When does responsibility fall on guys making between $760K - $37M 

Baldelli hit .290 the first 3 years he was in MLB and averaged 3.0 WAR …… age 21-24. The people at TD don’t think he knows how to help mentor a young hitter coming up? I just don’t get the never ending Chicken Little viewpoint with the club & the Manager.

7-13 to start ‘24 and then 23 games over .500 for next 4 months. No guarantees for ‘25 but it’s only April 18th.

Keaschall is up now because Martin/Miranda/Lewis are all hurt & Gasper sucks. He’s needed depth for the Show - that’s it, he’s not ideally ready for this opportunity. I too would love to see him get a bunch of at bats at DH but Baldelli’s job, contrary to many, is not to “let guys get AB’s and hope” it’s to WIN games with best possible line-up & strategy…….hopefully, Keaschall will earn time over next few weeks. Been asking for Keaschall to be a key piece since January but he’s not 100% yet and will be used as needed.

Posted

It would be a laugh if Twins hitting development tried to take credit for this guy.  You draft one guy (not considered the #1 for most years--Jenkins) who shines.  It's just a random occurrence at this point.

Posted
4 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

Glad for the call-up.  But what’s the plan to continue his development?  What is Rocco/this coaching staff specifically going to do differently with respect to Keaschall’s transition that is different from how they’ve blown the transitions of so many others?  Because if the approach is the same, we just might ruin another top prospect.

My vote: let him play.  Give him the ABs - against both righties and lefties.  When his arm is healed, give him a position and let him build a major league prowess there.  Give him confidence - don’t make him feel like every AB could be his last.  Teach him to be a pro’s pro doing the prep every day and doing the little things right.  Make the investment. Tell Rocco he will be held accountable for how Keaschall and a handful of the other young guys (Lee, Wallner, Julien, and Larnach) develop this season and that development is his #1 priority. 

If we are all being honest, this season is done (there, I’ve just guaranteed the Twins win the division, haha).  Let’s build this team for the future. Emphasize the future core,  de-emphasise the “one and dones”.  If we have to trade some veteran players who might not be part of that core, so be it.  If we need to find a new manager/coaching staff who is better able to develop those players, then make the call.  Commercially, it will be the best choice in the mid/long-term; ironically, given how this team is playing and drawing at the gate now, it’s also likely the better commercial decision in the short-term as well.

 

 

Is it inferior instruction at the MLB level, or are these prospects perhaps more flawed than fans are willing to believe? Why not point a finger at the FO who built this development system?

What top prospect, or really any prospect of note, hasn't had an actual opportunity to play? These guys still have to hit, pitch, or play some semblance of defense if they want to stick on a MLB roster. 

Posted

What should we honestly expect? We should expect Keaschall to fail in his first major league playing time. That's not an indictment of his talent - most prospects fail and go back to the minors to work on their game.

Pitching in MLB is incredibly difficult to hit. Keaschall has all of 325 plate appearances above A-ball. If we translate those AA and AAA plate appearances to an MLB talent level, we should expect an OPS a little below 600. The only players I feel confident he'll out-hit in his first time in MLB are Gasper and Keirsey.

Posted
5 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

What should we honestly expect? We should expect Keaschall to fail in his first major league playing time. That's not an indictment of his talent - most prospects fail and go back to the minors to work on their game.

 

Now maybe, he will do like a  number of Twins rookies and come out of the gate looking like the next Joe Mauer. The Twins could use that right now even if he sputters out after awhile.

 

Posted

The most likely result here is that Keaschall will come up, show some potential, but not be ready for Bigs. Notching wrong with that. If we get lucky, he will be ready and can help us with the OBP and speed we need while his power develops. The key is he needs to play, and play almost every day so we can see what we got. No need to force time for Castro or Bride - force time for Keaschall. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...