Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

KirbyDome89

Verified Member
  • Posts

    4,621
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

KirbyDome89 last won the day on February 2 2018

KirbyDome89 had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Location:
    DaveW's basement

Recent Profile Visitors

16,221 profile views

KirbyDome89's Achievements

Ft Myers Mighty Mussels

Ft Myers Mighty Mussels (6/14)

  • Get Off My Lawn
  • You Really, Really Like Me Rare
  • Mom's Basement Rare
  • NICE
  • Am I Okay?

Recent Badges

6.3k

Reputation

  1. Zebby's production is precisely what people are clamoring to replace, and argument that "vibes," are why some aren't on the Zebby train is backwards, i.e. his August (good vibes) is the only reason the current debate exists.
  2. Ok? Was there Zebby as the 5th starter next season momentum at the end of July? Are the Zebby vibes good so far in September? I mean....
  3. I mean yeah, he has, at least by ERA and FIP. Zebby is averaging basically one extra out per start over Kremer. I literally just said I wasn't a big Kremer fan, and nobody in this thread seems to be, yet the guy who's being touted as "earning it," hasn't really done anything to differentiate himself from the pitcher none of us are excited to see in the back end of the 2027 rotation. Kinda weird no? Assuming Kremer even gets the nod next year, Zebby is at worst, what, the 6th SP? That's not exactly being blocked, he's near guaranteed to see MLB action assuming the season happens.
  4. FWIW Kremer, in an obviously smaller sample, has been better for the Twins than Zebby. He (Kremer) also has a more solid track record. I'm far from a Dean Kremer stan, I'd be absolutely ok with the team upgrading the 4-5 spot in the rotation. I just think the "earned it," argument is weird. Apart from stringing together a few good starts in August, Zebby has been wildly inconsistent, and his overall numbers this season, and past seasons, just aren't very good. I don't think he's "earned," anything really.
  5. Past due, but it's a shot of life for a very stale team.
  6. Again, don't disagree with the bolded. I think Buxton playing is a case of the manager being deferential to his veteran star, and the fact that we've seen this org allow Buxton, and other players to "fight through it," at other times gives me pause if we're talking about Tom Pohlad's impact.
  7. I think it's a watered down AL more than anything, pretty sure we agree on that. Sure, I'll cede that if they had sold, and crashed out a la last year, Buxton might be more inclined to sit. I just have a hard time believing that Buxton, at 32, is willing to (in his mind) punt on a season, and activity at the deadline or not, I don't think the standings would be much different given how bad the AL is.
  8. I don't disagree at all with the bolded, I only brought up the past debacles to highlight why I don't think Tom Pohlad is driving (or even has a seat on) this bus.
  9. Nobody is accusing the Pohlad's of being decent, or even remotely competent owners. The last few years should've cemented that. Maybe heads do roll (I have my doubts) but the current Buxton situation isn't some wild departure from how this team has acted previously.
  10. If Tom Pohlad had said nothing, do you think Buxton is on the IL with this team trying to cling to a WC spot? I don't. Concur that the adults in the room need to act as such, but how the Twins handle these situations predates Tom Pohlad opening his mouth.
  11. What exactly has he been hands on with? He's a better public speaker than Joe, and I think he's been given undue credit because he's more polished, but there was time to spend over the winter and he opted to keep the checkbook closed. The deadline was definition half measure stuff. I guess the Twins are running more promotions? Of course he's accountable as the CEO, that's not what's being argued. The Pohlad's have meddled when it comes to payroll, and historically nothing else. They've largely been seen as a "hands off," ownership group when it comes to personnel decisions. Can you name a single instance where any of them stepped in to mandate playing time decisions? That's the claim here... Obviously they're not powerless, but this certainly isn't the first time Buxton has played injured, and it's not like the Twins in general have a great track record regarding keeping injured players on the active roster. How many times have we watched this club play short handed for a week+ only for somebody to hit the IL retroactively? I mean, Alex Jackson is literally just burning an active roster spot right now lol. Yeah, that's dysfunction, and terrible roster management, but if this club is ok with making that decision MULTIPLE times during an alleged playoff push, Idk why Buxton trying to play through injury is suddenly coming from the top. Tbh, I think you and a few others are conflating a lack of belief that Tom Pohlad is pulling day to day roster strings with some sort of weirdo Billionaire boot licking. Multiple things can be true at once. The Pohlads can be a terrible ownership group, and an overall plague on society, while the Twins FO can be prone to making awful roster decisions. Occam's Razor here; is Tom Pohlad dog whistling to Zoll through media comments, and the game of telephone trickles down to Shelton when he's filling out a lineup card, or does the manager see his best player (who is admittedly struggling) give him the thumbs up as far as availability? I'm more prone to believe it's the latter.
  12. I don't disagree that we don't know exactly what a guy like Roden is, but the Twins did this to themselves. Eh, you could say the same thing about Joey Gallo a few years ago. It took him months to reach a full crash out statistically, but you can't tell me 6 weeks into that 3-4 month slide that he wasn't actively hurting the team. I don't think the Twins have the luxury of being patient while trying to chase down a playoff spot. The Buxton comp feels a little reductionist. It's not remotely the same gamble.
  13. He'll be 28 next year, in his fourth big league season. If you're looking at optioning him at that point he's in the Matt Wallner category. A corner OF with no real power who is only playable against LHP is a really niche role.
  14. It's a special kind of skill. Yeah, I guess I'm not willing to go clean slate here. No fan club membership necessary, I'm just asking what type of production can we reasonably expect moving forward, and is that a wise investment over higher upside players if you're trying to win right now? Pretty bad is an understatement if we're talking about offensive production for either player, and this team needs offensive help. Agreed that the 26 man pressure will force their hand, it always does, and I think that's problematic. The Twins have been far more reactive than proactive with roster building and decision making, and IMO it's hurt them. I don't think you can have your cake and eat it too in this situation. If you're serious about winning, which the club has adamantly stated they are, then you need to make decisions that maximize games today. If that means a "quick hook," then so be it. Preaching patience here feels like another half measure, or middle ground type move because these guys actually are killing you offensively.
×
×
  • Create New...