denarded Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/twins-pull-out-of-original-three-team-mookie-betts-trade-with-dodgers-red-sox-with-next-steps-uncertain/
Richie the Rally Goat Community Moderator Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/twins-pull-out-of-original-three-team-mookie-betts-trade-with-dodgers-red-sox-with-next-steps-uncertain/If you read the source LEN3 http://m.startribune.com/brusdar-graterol-stays-with-twins-as-their-portion-of-baseball-megadeal-falling-through/567695262/ “ According to two sources with knowledge of talks, the Twins were very pessimistic Saturday” Pessimistic does not mean they are out. It means they are exerting what little leverage they have. They were pessimistic on Donaldson too.
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I’d not be shocked if the Twins are our. But I’d never rely on Jim Bowden as a source.
darin617 Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I love it when everyone has a different answer to whether with Twins are still in the deal or not.
Doctor Wu Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I hate all of this uncertainty. Let's decide one way or the other. But how firm is this "deadline" that the Twins are talking about?
bighat Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 MLB reporter Mark Feinsand: "Latest on the Betts trade: per source, the Red Sox are focused on getting a deal done with the Dodgers above all else. The Twins appear to be out of the three-way deal, though a separate trade for Maeda remains in play."
Doctor Gast Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 This problem is not ours! It`s Boston`s & LA`s. We made a more than fair deal w/LA if Boston doesn`t like the deal that LA gave for Betts & Price, fine it`s not our responsiblty. FO quit wavering & put this team in limbo, complete our respect
howieramone2 Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 We're not wavering, nor is the team in limbo. There is no need to exaggerate.
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 This problem is not ours! It`s Boston`s & LA`s. We made a more than fair deal w/LA if Boston doesn`t like the deal that LA gave for Betts & Price, fine it`s not our responsiblty. FO quit wavering & put this team in limbo, complete our respectIf the Twins really want Maeda, their offer of Graterol plus someone in the 15-20 range is fair. Why Boston hasn't just accepted it is beyond me because it's so painfully obvious they will NOT get Graterol plus another top ten prospect. That's just silly. Step off the ledge, Bloom. Just take the deal already. You're not going to look better the longer you string this along.
strumdatjaguar Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I don’t like adding a player to get Maeda. At least have LA give up one of their 15-20 level prospect in return for our guy.
Mr. Brooks Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 If the Twins really want Maeda, their offer of Graterol plus someone in the 15-20 range is fair. Why Boston hasn't just accepted it is beyond me because it's so painfully obvious they will NOT get Graterol plus another top ten prospect. That's just silly. Step off the ledge, Bloom. Just take the deal already. You're not going to look better the longer you string this along.I think Graterol alone is already more than fair. I don't like adding another prospect, even a token one, when the deal is already more than fair. It sets a bad precedent for future trades.
Richie the Rally Goat Community Moderator Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I think Graterol alone is already more than fair. I don't like adding another prospect, even a token one, when the deal is already more than fair. It sets a bad precedent for future trades. that’s the Berrios arbitration logic too. If you give an inch, they’ll take a mile, and it’s up to you to manage prices.
rdehring Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I want to see Graterol coming into a game against the Red Sox with two on and one out in the 7th, then striking out the next two hitters. Then come in in the finale game two days later and closing it out with 3 K's in the ninth. So after all this chaos, I want to see Graterol in a Twins uniform. Lets try to work something out with the Dodgers for Maeda, something that doesn't include any of our top five prospects. If we don't get him, so be it. The most intriguing thing about Maeda is his contract, both the reasonable amount and length. Truth is we are gonna have too many starters come July, whether Hill is back or not. One of these kids is gonna out pitch many of the vets in spring training. When Pineda and Hill are back, we are gonna need at least one spot for Dobnak or Thorpe.
TopGunn#22 Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I agree rdehring, let Boston and the Dodgers work out the Mookie deal. Let's keep talking to the Dodgers about Maeda. Everything can work out fine if we separate the Twins and the Red Sox in this "schoolyard fight." The Dodgers are ready to move on from Maeda anyway. They're looking at young starters like Julio Urias and Dustin May and in the end, the BIG prize for L.A. is Mookie. SOMETHING will get done. I'm just not sure what the timeline is. And depending on what we send back to the Dodgers, I'm fine with having Graterol in our bullpen.
USAFChief Twins Daily Contributor Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I want to see Graterol coming into a game against the Red Sox with two on and one out in the 7th, then striking out the next two hitters. Then come in in the finale game two days later and closing it out with 3 K's in the ninth. So after all this chaos, I want to see Graterol in a Twins uniform. Lets try to work something out with the Dodgers for Maeda, something that doesn't include any of our top five prospects. If we don't get him, so be it. The most intriguing thing about Maeda is his contract, both the reasonable amount and length. Truth is we are gonna have too many starters come July, whether Hill is back or not. One of these kids is gonna out pitch many of the vets in spring training. When Pineda and Hill are back, we are gonna need at least one spot for Dobnak or Thorpe.I'd put the chances we have too many starters, at any point this season, at roughly zero.
nicksaviking Community Moderator Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 The Twins can’t add more without losing face. The Red Sox are trying to get more to save face. The Dodgers could give more and still come away fine, but I could see the trade restructured so the Twins both give up and get more.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I really wan the FO to turn around and make a bigger trade somewhere else and get a pitcher better than Maeda.
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 Boston Red Sox have left the chat room. Good, let’s work specifically with LA to get this done. Let them focus on the Betts part of the return.
Hosken Bombo Disco Community Moderator Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I don’t think it’s as simple as a Graterol-Maeda swap if the partner is the Dodgers. Maeda being more valuable that Graterol, in my estimation.
ChrisKnutson Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 Who says Graterol needs to be dealt now that our trade partner is the Dodgers, we got plenty of quality pitching depth, Dodgers love their pitching depth so coming to an agreement shouldn’t be too difficult. While he obviously wouldn’t be the centerpiece, one arm I think would be of particular interest to the Dodgers could be Dobnak since he could provide value as both a starter and reliever. So pretty much a younger and more affordable Stripling/Maeda.
rdehring Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I'd put the chances we have too many starters, at any point this season, at roughly zero.I guess we are going to disagree on that Chief. Or maybe we disagree on the definition of starters. I see them have up to seven starters on opening day, Berrios, Odorizzi, Bailey, Thorpe, Dobnak, Smeltzer and Chacin. Now I don't anticipate that all of them are going to be worthy starters, but believe five will. Then you add Pineda a six weeks later and if Hill comes back in summer, you should have at least seven...without adding Maeda. So yes, I suspect that we will have too many starters after both Pineda and Hill return. Either someone will have to go or there will be no space for any of the rookies. And that would be a shame, in my opinion, as at least one of them is going to have earned the right to pitch every fifth day and it wouldn't surprise me if two do.
beckmt Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I think the biggest thing is the Dodgers may be facing a grivence if they do not give Maeda a chance to earn his incentives, or it will just look horrible and quite probably impact the Dodgers signing another Japanese or South Korean player. Maeda will be sent somewhere he can start, may not be the Twins, though for the Dodgers bullpen issues Gaterol for Maeda and maybe a little more from the Twins standpoint would make sense for the dodgers.
Halsey Hall Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 Looks as though an off field incident has halted this thing. Graterol screwed up with a camera, He left the workout room in tears yesterday after Rocco went in after being with Falvey.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 For whatever it's worth, lots of Dodger's fans on trubluela think they should to the Maeta/Graterol swap and ignore the Red Sox.
tvagle Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 How's this for a Maeda Trade Twins get: Maeda Dodgers get: SmeltzerRaley Basically becomes a change of scenery deal for Dozier and Maeda...Longest Trade in History!
tvagle Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 Looks as though an off field incident has halted this thing. Graterol screwed up with a camera, He left the workout room in tears yesterday after Rocco went in after being with Falvey.As Halsey is one of our boots on the ground guys, is this a Trump-take or did you really see this HH?
bunsen82 Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 I am guess we give up two hitting prospects. Larnach or Rooker and another player. I would have no idea how high on the prospect list the second prospect is.
RaymondLuxuryYacht Provisional Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 Looks as though an off field incident has halted this thing. Graterol screwed up with a camera, He left the workout room in tears yesterday after Rocco went in after being with Falvey.I am familiar with most of these words, but in this order, they don't make any sense to me
Doctor Gast Verified Member Posted February 9, 2020 Posted February 9, 2020 If the Twins really want Maeda, their offer of Graterol plus someone in the 15-20 range is fair. Why Boston hasn't just accepted it is beyond me because it's so painfully obvious they will NOT get Graterol plus another top ten prospect. That's just silly. Step off the ledge, Bloom. Just take the deal already. You're not going to look better the longer you string this along.Boston wants at least a top 100 starting pitcher prospect stud which Gaterol is, only he`s not ready in the beginning of the season & not good for much over 100 because MN want to use him right away as a reliever doesn`t change that. I don`t think Maeda is worth Graterol straight up much less w/ a 15-20 prospect. If people that think Maeda is the next Johan Santana they could trade w/ LA directly if they open for an OF prospect not thru Boston
Kyle DeBarge Wichita Wind Surge - AA 2B/CF On Friday night, DeBarge went 3-for-5 with a walk, his 17th double, and he also stole his 21st base. Explore Kyle DeBarge News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.