Did anyone like this pick, over the other guys available, other than the Twins FO? I mean, clearly I want him to succeed.....
Like you, Mike, I tend to think the takes from MLR and Dman and others reflect what many of us felt at the time. Frankly, any one of the next half-dozen selections would have given me more comfort.
MLR described it as possibly the FO getting "cute". I describe my own nagging suspicion this way: I wonder if they're prone to occasional bouts of hubris that encourages them to get cute, like at the trade deadline a couple years back.
I'm willing to withhold judgment on their drafts and on a few other questionable things, on the basis of some of the really positive moves they've made.
As for Cavaco, I don't have an opinion, just a general observation about what I see as a deficiency in talk about prospects. I think there's a giant chasm between an athlete's theoretical or assumed tools and and a player's skills. To me, the bet with Cavaco, like it was with Buxton for example, is that his inferior skills eventually catch up to his presumably superior tools. But roight now, it's sure hard to see how his tools are superior to Stott or Corbin, or how Priester's or Zack Thompsons vastly superior skills won't compensate for any what they might lack in tools.
I always feel a higher comfort level with prospects whose tools and skills aren't miles apart.
You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.
Twins fans seriously have to start letting the GM General manage and the manger manage and the players play. Getting really annoyed with twins fans in general these last few weeks.
Recommended Posts
Posted by bird,
Like you, Mike, I tend to think the takes from MLR and Dman and others reflect what many of us felt at the time. Frankly, any one of the next half-dozen selections would have given me more comfort.
MLR described it as possibly the FO getting "cute". I describe my own nagging suspicion this way: I wonder if they're prone to occasional bouts of hubris that encourages them to get cute, like at the trade deadline a couple years back.
I'm willing to withhold judgment on their drafts and on a few other questionable things, on the basis of some of the really positive moves they've made.
As for Cavaco, I don't have an opinion, just a general observation about what I see as a deficiency in talk about prospects. I think there's a giant chasm between an athlete's theoretical or assumed tools and and a player's skills. To me, the bet with Cavaco, like it was with Buxton for example, is that his inferior skills eventually catch up to his presumably superior tools. But roight now, it's sure hard to see how his tools are superior to Stott or Corbin, or how Priester's or Zack Thompsons vastly superior skills won't compensate for any what they might lack in tools.
I always feel a higher comfort level with prospects whose tools and skills aren't miles apart.
3 reactions
Go to this post
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now