Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

James

Gold Caretaker
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,774

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Gold Caretaker - Yearly subscriber

About James

  • Birthday 12/01/1982

Profile Information

  • Location:
    The dive bars of NE Minneapolis

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

James's Achievements

GCL Twins

GCL Twins (5/14)

  • Get Off My Lawn
  • Am I Okay?
  • Fortnighter
  • It's Been...
  • Gettin' Noticed Rare

Recent Badges

1.9k

Reputation

  1.    Vanimal46 reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  2. James
  3.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  4. James
    Why would that deter FA from signing in AZ? Bumgarner is still going to get paid.
  5.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  6.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  7.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  8. James
  9. James
    Yes
  10. James
  11.    RpR reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  12. James
    They loaded the lineup with lefthanded batters. Buxton might be in later.
  13.    MMMordabito reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  14.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  15. James
    Well, this is certainly not the start that I was hoping for.
  16.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  17.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  18. James
    KKKKKepler, huh?
  19.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Game Thread: Twins v Red Sox, 4/20 @ 12:35pm CT
  20.    USAFChief reacted to a post in a topic: Polanco could be activated in 1 week
  21.    ashbury reacted to a post in a topic: Polanco could be activated in 1 week
  22.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Reinforcements Are Coming, Who Loses Out?
  23.    James reacted to a post in a topic: Reinforcements Are Coming, Who Loses Out?
  24.    Squirrel reacted to a post in a topic: Polanco could be activated in 1 week
  25. James
    Yes
  26.    roger reacted to a post in a topic: BREAKING: Twins Finalizing an Extension with Star Pitcher Pablo Lopez
  27.    NotAboutWinning reacted to a post in a topic: BREAKING: Twins Finalizing an Extension with Star Pitcher Pablo Lopez
  28.    Hosken Bombo Disco reacted to a post in a topic: BREAKING: Twins Finalizing an Extension with Star Pitcher Pablo Lopez
  29.    LA VIkes Fan reacted to a post in a topic: BREAKING: Twins Finalizing an Extension with Star Pitcher Pablo Lopez
  30. James
    Or is this the type of move that the FO has been trying to make for a while and the now they have an owner that is on board?
  31. James
    I'm not surprised it's only 4 years. The Twins are buying his prime athletic years and nothing more. They always have the chance to add another extension if he still is pitching great near the end of that contract. On the Lopez side, he gets good money and becomes a FA with another chance to cash in big if he wants. This is a big win for both sides. Lopez probably get about $8M more than he'd get in arbitration, plus a decent rate for the next 3 years after. They Twins get a controllable pitcher with high upside at a reasonable price. Needless to say that I'm excited about this deal.
  32. James
  33. James
    They wanted to preserve that 1.000 fielding %.
  34. James
  35. James
    They didn't. They brought him as a defensive replacement in the OF. What Chief said.
×
×
  • Create New...