Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Welcome to 2024, everyone! Can the offseason start for reals now?

The Twins have made no moves of note thus far in the "hot stove" season and it's still expected they will trade infielder Jorge Polanco. MLB Trade Rumors wrote an excellent breakdown of Polanco's best landing spots so check it out. 

The piece highlights the Blue Jays, Cubs, and Mariners as the best fit, as they're including Polanco as a potential third baseman in their evaluation. For example, the Cubs already have a dynamic duo up the middle in Nico Hoerner and Dansby Swanson but also have a gaping hole at third base.

In the following tier - we'll call it "good fit" - the piece talks about the Brewers, Giants, and Marlins. The Brewers are of particular interest in this conversation, as they're floating the idea they will move Corbin Burnes this winter.


View full rumor

Posted

My guess is to the NL. I also think it will be someone a little more established than the (mostly) prospects that were listed in the article or as targets, and I would guess we send a prospect (or multiple) with Polanco to get someone back. 
I don’t know who that is though, but I fully expect the majority of people who comment on the trade (whenever it is announced) to be underwhelmed. And maybe that’s ok too

Posted

I find it hard to envision a contending team looking at him as a third baseman; it's the same arm there as got him booted off of shortstop.  Even at second base his arm makes every grounder an adventure for the poor guy covering first.  The bat's good, if the health holds up, but I find it also hard to see a team offering a major league ready starting pitcher for him as a centerpiece; as Cory says above, significant additional pieces would have to accompany Jorge.

Posted

Brewers or Marlins…….aim high!

Brewers: Lost Woodruff to injury & FA…….traded Hauser……….going to trade Burnes by the deadline at the latest. They are rebuilding (even if they aren’t telling the fans) and want young controllable pieces that don’t cost anything. Along with this, Polanco helps keep them competitive for the fans sake over ‘24 & ‘25. Polanco - Larnach - Festa - Sands from Twins to attain Devin Williams. Larnach has OF upside & can DH at low cost……Festa provides long-term upside. Williams is an All-star under control for 2 years & he makes our Pen elite at a cost of $6.25M in ‘24.

Marlins: They need offense and we can offer the same upside with Larnach…….steadying, consistent bat and versatile defender with Polanco………immediate relief plug-in with Sands ……….future upside arm with Festa. These guys for Luzardo. He’s got 3 years left and is electric with stuff. IF needed, we dig deeper on prospects with E. Rodríguez to allow them some flexibility with how they use Jazz.

Moving Polanco for value is going to take a few other guys.

Posted

It's the same old song.

The prevailing thought last winter on Max Kepler still applies this winter to both Max and Jorge Polanco. If a team has an interest and can offer a player in return that makes the Twins a better team in 2024, then the Twins can trade either or both Max and Jorge. Conversely, it makes zero sense to trade either or both for a return that does not help the team in 2024. Unless, the Twins are rebuilding ...... then it doesn't matter and a lower level prospect is a good idea.

We can read sixty plus comments that include various numerical justifications to trade Polanco (and Kepler) and the adjoining guess that age plus injuries have muted their skills. The reality will remain that these two are on short term team friendly deals, both players have questions, and neither will return a significant starting pitcher/player or prospect of note by themselves. 

If Miami wants to trade one of Max Meyer or Edward Cabrera for Jorge Polanco, I think the Twins take a chance. I'm just not seeing these type of deals being completed right now. The old worn saying, "a bird in hand", probably applies to the Twins and Polanco/Kepler. I believe the loss of either or both players will be a loss the Twins cannot handle next season, unless we are talking about a major deal that returns a player on the order of Pablo Lopez. So unless the big deal is out there, Polanco and Kepler stay.

I guess I should address the money saved from a potential trade since it seems to come up often. The Twins are not going to sign Snell or Montgomery even if all of JP, MK, Farmer, and Vazquez are traded. If the Twins cannot field a team at $120 million next season, there are perhaps some bigger issues, which I do not predict or expect. If either or both of Max and Jorge are dumped for salary relief, I predict the Twins do not win the AL Central. 

On to speculative trades .... many have been floated. Brewers? Burnes plus Quero for Polanco plus Ryan and Raya. Miami? Alcantara plus Cabrera for Polanco plus Jeffers. Seattle? Polanco plus Lee and Raya for Gilbert. I don't believe any of those will work, nor suggest they should. Just throwing Polanco in a few trades. Polanco is not a player to trade if the Twins are looking for a starting pitcher or hoping to win the AL Central in 2024. He has more value for the Twins than for another team to give up a stud pitcher. Catch-22.

Posted

I think the best bet fir the twins is to trade Kepler and Polanco together in a trade with perhaps a prospect or 2 to aquire Logan gilbert from the Mariners, they have a need for both infield and outfield help and moving gilbert makes room for them sign Seattle native blake snell who wants to play there

Posted

If trading Polo, of course along with others, can help get us some quality starting pitching, sign me up. I love Polo, the guy has a great bat when healthy and I think this off-season he is healthy. The contract with the team option has good value. Just get a good starter so Louie can champ at the bit in St Paul awaiting his chance and honing his pitches. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Fatbat said:

The way guys talk about polo, one would think he is barely worth a bag of baseballs.  I hope he doesn’t get traded and I am a huge fan of Julien and Lee getting every day time in the bigs.

I understand if someone thinks he would be great, won't get injured again and shouldn't be traded. I also understand if someone thinks there are way too many miles on his legs, will continue to get injured and his defense has gotten bad (can't play 3B or SS at all now) and we should trade him. What I don't understand are the people who say he's great for the Twins but that we won't get anything for him in a trade.

Posted
25 minutes ago, FlyingFinn said:

I understand if someone thinks he would be great, won't get injured again and shouldn't be traded. I also understand if someone thinks there are way too many miles on his legs, will continue to get injured and his defense has gotten bad (can't play 3B or SS at all now) and we should trade him. What I don't understand are the people who say he's great for the Twins but that we won't get anything for him in a trade.

Being great for one team , often, does not carry over to the next.

Posted
1 hour ago, FlyingFinn said:

What I don't understand are the people who say he's great for the Twins but that we won't get anything for him in a trade.

RpR gives a good response. I used Catch-22 in much the same manner. Perhaps that needs some further explanation.

Polo nor any other Twin  has the ability on their own to return a Logan Gilbert or George Kirby. Teams that are trading for Jorge want to win and are not giving up their best pitchers. Polanco also does not have the future value to return a top young prospect. Trading him for a player that does not improve the team for the coming year weakens the team because the Twins can certainly use the depth, experience, and level of professionalism that Polanco brings to the field. I hope that makes sense or helps somewhat. 

The unknown is whether the Twins would put together an aggressive deal that includes several players to potentially lure a GM into trading a #2 type starting pitcher. Polanco, really anyone could be in such a transaction.

This assumes we are talking about just this coming season and not trying to engineer some mini rebuild for 2-3 years from now.

Posted

He will not be flipped for Burns.  If the Brewers trade him they will be saying we need a rebuild, of some kind, and they are not pushing to win this year, unless they also get MLB ready pitching to replace him with as part of a trade.  So unless we include someone like Ober a trade surrounding Burns will not have Polanco as the only MLB ready piece to return.  

I could see Blue Jays or Seattle as good fits to match with.  Both have pitching depth to deal from, and both have a need for an infielder.  Miami could as well, but it will be more than Polanco for a pitcher most likely. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Fatbat said:

The way guys talk about polo, one would think he is barely worth a bag of baseballs.  I hope he doesn’t get traded and I am a huge fan of Julien and Lee getting every day time in the bigs. We still need depth.

Depth & availability ……Polanco, 104 games in ‘22 & 80 games in ‘23. Career .270 hitter - hit .235 in ‘22 & .255 in ‘23. Less of a defender than Farmer at 2B & 3B. IMO, Farmer is the depth answer with some combination of Martin & Lee as the season progresses.

Polanco, (not considered a bag of balls, but regressing) bundled with a couple other guys may get us an arm of consequence……again, to me, that is the depth that is needed.

Posted
15 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

It's the same old song.

The prevailing thought last winter on Max Kepler still applies this winter to both Max and Jorge Polanco. If a team has an interest and can offer a player in return that makes the Twins a better team in 2024, then the Twins can trade either or both Max and Jorge. Conversely, it makes zero sense to trade either or both for a return that does not help the team in 2024. Unless, the Twins are rebuilding ...... then it doesn't matter and a lower level prospect is a good idea.

We can read sixty plus comments that include various numerical justifications to trade Polanco (and Kepler) and the adjoining guess that age plus injuries have muted their skills. The reality will remain that these two are on short term team friendly deals, both players have questions, and neither will return a significant starting pitcher/player or prospect of note by themselves. 

If Miami wants to trade one of Max Meyer or Edward Cabrera for Jorge Polanco, I think the Twins take a chance. I'm just not seeing these type of deals being completed right now. The old worn saying, "a bird in hand", probably applies to the Twins and Polanco/Kepler. I believe the loss of either or both players will be a loss the Twins cannot handle next season, unless we are talking about a major deal that returns a player on the order of Pablo Lopez. So unless the big deal is out there, Polanco and Kepler stay.

I guess I should address the money saved from a potential trade since it seems to come up often. The Twins are not going to sign Snell or Montgomery even if all of JP, MK, Farmer, and Vazquez are traded. If the Twins cannot field a team at $120 million next season, there are perhaps some bigger issues, which I do not predict or expect. If either or both of Max and Jorge are dumped for salary relief, I predict the Twins do not win the AL Central. 

On to speculative trades .... many have been floated. Brewers? Burnes plus Quero for Polanco plus Ryan and Raya. Miami? Alcantara plus Cabrera for Polanco plus Jeffers. Seattle? Polanco plus Lee and Raya for Gilbert. I don't believe any of those will work, nor suggest they should. Just throwing Polanco in a few trades. Polanco is not a player to trade if the Twins are looking for a starting pitcher or hoping to win the AL Central in 2024. He has more value for the Twins than for another team to give up a stud pitcher. Catch-22.

I think this is pretty spot on.  I'm not sure Polanco by himself nets a number 5 starter from another team without adding something to the mix.  Prospect wise you are likely looking in the 5-10 spots of other teams top 30.  

I do think Miami would like to get something done with the Twins as things worked out well last time and Polanco's offensive skillset would make Miami a better team.  They could move Arraez to 1st and mix and match their infield and DH spot.  Still if the Marlins are moving another starter in a Polanco deal it seems like they would at minimum need a AAA starter to replace what they would be losing as they don't have ton of depth themselves.  I don't see Miami dealing Luzardo without exacting a heavy price and I don't think the Twins would be willing to overpay, but this FO has surprised before. Like you I see Cabrera and Meyer as more likely options.  Cabrera is tricky as they will likely want some close to MLB pitching along with Polanco so that means they would need Festa or SWR included and likely other pieces from Miami.  Not sure how the Twins feel about Cabrera versus Festa as is and the trade likely wouldn't be a needle mover IMO.  I don't know how Miami or the Twins view Max Meyer.  Is he still a starter or more likely a pen arm ala Duran?  Might be too much risk both ways to get a deal done there.

Again as you stated Polanco has pretty significant win now value to the Twins as is.  Lewis has never played a full year at the MLB level and they can move infield pieces around to keep Polanco in the lineup as is. He takes good at bats and is good in clutch situations.  Lee might be an option next year or he might struggle all year at AAA we have no idea, but if he is lighting it up they could always deal Polanco at the deadline.

It just seems hard to see one of those teams wanting\needing Polanco more than the Twins and giving up something more meaningful than just keeping him, but who knows.  Maybe once the pressure is on another team will cave.  Just have to wait and see.

 

 

Posted
15 hours ago, Jim wyllie said:

I think the best bet fir the twins is to trade Kepler and Polanco together in a trade with perhaps a prospect or 2 to aquire Logan gilbert from the Mariners, they have a need for both infield and outfield help and moving gilbert makes room for them sign Seattle native blake snell who wants to play there

Seattle has its own financial constraints and is unlikely to take on the combined $21 million owed Jorge Polanco and Max Kepler this year, much less the annual $25 million-plus needed to land Blake Snell.

The Mariners may well have interest in Kepler but have little need for Polanco.

Last season Seattle received 1.2 fWAR in 46 games from Josh Rojas and 2.2 fWAR in 104 games from rookie Jose Caballero. That’s a combined 3.4 fWAR in 150 games from the potential 2024 second-base platoon of the lefthand-hitting Rojas and righthand-hitting Caballero.

As a point of reference, last season 30-year-old Jorge Polanco posted 1.5 fWAR in 80 games. For Seattle, the 29-year-old Rojas and 27-year-old Caballero each accrued 2023 WAR at a per-game rate that matched or exceeded that of Polanco. A platoon might not be necessary.

The Mariners await the projected 2024 debut of intriguing prospect Ryan Bliss, a starting second baseman in the 2023 Futures Game and Defensive Player of the Year in the Arizona Fall League. Last year across Double A and Triple A, the now 24-year-old Bliss posted a .304/.378/.524/.902 line with 23 home runs and 55 stolen bases.

Seattle has offseason needs but Polanco would add little to the roster.

Posted
16 hours ago, Fatbat said:

The way guys talk about polo, one would think he is barely worth a bag of baseballs.  I hope he doesn’t get traded and I am a huge fan of Julien and Lee getting every day time in the bigs. We still need depth.

I think he's a great player, and would prefer that he stay with the Twins, playing multiple positions and DHing this season. He makes the lineup stronger and I love his switch-hitting. The only way he should be moved is if we get real value for him, the kind of value for a player that would have been the #1 2B option if he were a free agent and would have gotten a multi-year deal we a substantial raise over his current deal.

He's no bag of balls, he's the Twins best trade asset because we have depth at his best positions, he has a good contract, and he's a proven veteran. His only real deficit is health, but he finished the season healthy and played well (and was healthy) the last 2 months of the season, so it shouldn't be the biggest issue.

I'd rather keep him, he's still one of the Twins better players and a consistent producer. By all accounts he's a good dude and great teammate. But because of our self-imposed payroll reduction, he makes sense to be a trade option. If he's given away in a salary dump, I'm going to be furious. As part of a package that lands us the starter we need, I can live with dealing Polanco, but I'll be bummed to see him go. 

Posted

If the Twins had Meyer (24+) controlled until 2030 (I think), Cabrera (25+) until 2029, or Luzardo(26) until 2027, would you trade any of them for two years of Polanco and a 23+ old Festa?

I wouldn't, maybe after Polanco proved he was healthy and productive.

Posted
28 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

If the Twins had Meyer (24+) controlled until 2030 (I think), Cabrera (25+) until 2029, or Luzardo(26) until 2027, would you trade any of them for two years of Polanco and a 23+ old Festa?

I wouldn't, maybe after Polanco proved he was healthy and productive.

Not a chance for those 2 guys!

Luzardo is a top 20 pitcher going into ‘24. He’s the guy I coveted for Arraez last year (no complaints with Pablo!).

Polanco - Larnach (float Kepler) - Festa - Winder or Sands - maybe another prospect of their choice? ……..any 26 man guys & Lee & Jenkins are staying put…….maybe add Vazquez + $3.5M/year?

Add Larnach & his upside to a corner spot with Marlins along with Polanco at 2B……..Jazz in CF - Bell at 1B - Arraez as DH ….can rotate Bell, Arraez, & Polanco between those 3 spots.

For Luzardo, if Marlins want to spend the $$, I would roll the dice & trade ………… Kepler/Polanco/Festa/Winder/………another prospect……..maybe E. Rodriguez would be more attractive for corner OF spot than Larnach or Kepler?

Focus on Luzardo & do whatever is necessary, IMO.

Posted
14 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

If the Twins had Meyer (24+) controlled until 2030 (I think), Cabrera (25+) until 2029, or Luzardo(26) until 2027, would you trade any of them for two years of Polanco and a 23+ old Festa?

I wouldn't, maybe after Polanco proved he was healthy and productive.

I would not trade Festa for Meyer and would hesitate to trade him for Cabrera. Then again, admittedly, I see much higher potential from David Festa than most and time will tell on that guess.

Cabrera is out of options, has great stuff, but struggles to throw strikes. His issues are seemingly growing, not receding. We do not know where Falvey or the Marlins sit on Cabrera. I still would like to see the Twins acquire Cabrera but don't have a feel for what Miami wants in return. Certainly, Polanco, SWR, and maybe a rookie league guy, at least. I don't believe they will entertain offers for Meyer though.

Money and years of control is a real thing for teams like Miami, Milwaukee, Seattle, and Minnesota among others. Large market teams would place greater value on Polanco and not be interested in moving him. Jorge looked pretty healthy in October. I don't think other teams or the Twins feel Polanco has to prove himself. He is an established MLB ballplayer who is highly respected around baseball even if some Twins fans are now giving him the Mauer treatment.

Luzardo is on another level of projected value, similar to Royce Lewis. What intrigues me is whether Miami has financial concerns which would facilitate a move of the injured Alcantara to save money which would reduce the cost of a Cabrera. However, perhaps the Twins have more serious money troubles. It is a difficult offseason to read.

Posted
16 hours ago, Jim wyllie said:

I think the best bet fir the twins is to trade Kepler and Polanco together in a trade with perhaps a prospect or 2 to aquire Logan gilbert from the Mariners, they have a need for both infield and outfield help and moving gilbert makes room for them sign Seattle native blake snell who wants to play there

I'd be fine with that, but I don't think most teams would be looking to take on their combined 20M salary next year. One or the other, but probably not both.

Posted
9 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

I would not trade Festa for Meyer and would hesitate to trade him for Cabrera. Then again, admittedly, I see much higher potential from David Festa than most and time will tell on that guess.

Cabrera is out of options, has great stuff, but struggles to throw strikes. His issues are seemingly growing, not receding. We do not know where Falvey or the Marlins sit on Cabrera. I still would like to see the Twins acquire Cabrera but don't have a feel for what Miami wants in return. Certainly, Polanco, SWR, and maybe a rookie league guy, at least. I don't believe they will entertain offers for Meyer though.

I don't want Cabrera due to his control issues, and I doubt the Twins do either, but Festa has his own control issues and actually has a worse walk profile in the minors than Cabrera did.

I'm not going to give him away, but I'm very open to using Festa as part of a package to get a top of the line starter. Like, he's the first of the top prospects that I offer up.

Posted
18 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

I would not trade Festa for Meyer and would hesitate to trade him for Cabrera. Then again, admittedly, I see much higher potential from David Festa than most and time will tell on that guess.

Cabrera is out of options, has great stuff, but struggles to throw strikes. His issues are seemingly growing, not receding. We do not know where Falvey or the Marlins sit on Cabrera. I still would like to see the Twins acquire Cabrera but don't have a feel for what Miami wants in return. Certainly, Polanco, SWR, and maybe a rookie league guy, at least. I don't believe they will entertain offers for Meyer though.

Money and years of control is a real thing for teams like Miami, Milwaukee, Seattle, and Minnesota among others. Large market teams would place greater value on Polanco and not be interested in moving him. Jorge looked pretty healthy in October. I don't think other teams or the Twins feel Polanco has to prove himself. He is an established MLB ballplayer who is highly respected around baseball even if some Twins fans are now giving him the Mauer treatment.

Luzardo is on another level of projected value, similar to Royce Lewis. What intrigues me is whether Miami has financial concerns which would facilitate a move of the injured Alcantara to save money which would reduce the cost of a Cabrera. However, perhaps the Twins have more serious money troubles. It is a difficult offseason to read.

The question was if you were Miami would any of those 3 pitchers for trade Polanco and Festa? I am guessing you are saying you would for Meyer, maybe on Cabrera and no on Luzardo.

as for the rest that is why I put their age and controllable years.

Posted

Unfortunately, the younger guys (Julien, Lewis, Lee, Wallner and to a lesser extent Kirilloff, Larnach and maybe Miranda) will get a better return.

Also, unfortunately, Buxton's health will play into how many PA's some of those guys get - if he's healthy and plays mostly CF, the others can get PA's at DH, if he is the everyday DH, they don't.

Maybe Polanco can copy Carew and move from 2B to 1B and can stay healthy and productive. Might be worth a shot.

Posted
2 hours ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

The question was if you were Miami would any of those 3 pitchers for trade Polanco and Festa? I am guessing you are saying you would for Meyer, maybe on Cabrera and no on Luzardo.

as for the rest that is why I put their age and controllable years.

Correct. I do realize that few hold Festa in as high of a position as I do. I would agree to trade Polanco, Festa, and another for any of Kirby, Gilbert, or Luzardo. If I am looking from Miami's or Seattle's view, I do not trade those pitchers. 

FWIW, I do believe that both the Marlins and Mariners are in a bit of a bind because they should keep their pitchers but their bats are not going to cut it. I get the move by Seattle to cut strikeouts. Apparently salary was also a key factor in their trades. Losing Gonzales, White, Suarez, Hernandez, and Murphy plus the end of other lost money to players no longer around from 2023 has saved the Mariners a pile of dough. I'm not privy to their financial stability, but it seems like they will mostly sit out the larger free agent market. Mitch Garver could be ok for them. If I am a Mariner's fan, I'm nervous about 1B, 2B, 3B, LF, and RF. Some people like the guys they hold in those positions now, but Sometimes it is as easy as pretending to pick teams and then the Mariners look weak. Thing is they play the games and it all tells us the story at the end of each season. Long way of saying that SEA & MIA will probably be calling Falvey from time to time.

Posted
1 hour ago, tony&rodney said:

Correct. I do realize that few hold Festa in as high of a position as I do. I would agree to trade Polanco, Festa, and another for any of Kirby, Gilbert, or Luzardo. If I am looking from Miami's or Seattle's view, I do not trade those pitchers. 

FWIW, I do believe that both the Marlins and Mariners are in a bit of a bind because they should keep their pitchers but their bats are not going to cut it. I get the move by Seattle to cut strikeouts. Apparently salary was also a key factor in their trades. Losing Gonzales, White, Suarez, Hernandez, and Murphy plus the end of other lost money to players no longer around from 2023 has saved the Mariners a pile of dough. I'm not privy to their financial stability, but it seems like they will mostly sit out the larger free agent market. Mitch Garver could be ok for them. If I am a Mariner's fan, I'm nervous about 1B, 2B, 3B, LF, and RF. Some people like the guys they hold in those positions now, but Sometimes it is as easy as pretending to pick teams and then the Mariners look weak. Thing is they play the games and it all tells us the story at the end of each season. Long way of saying that SEA & MIA will probably be calling Falvey from time to time.

In his ZiPS writeup on December 13, FanGraphs columnist Dan Szymborski projected 85-90 wins for the 2024 Seattle Mariners before the signing of Mitch Garver but after Jarred Kelenic, Teoscar Hernandez and Eugenio Suarez were jettisoned:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2024-zips-projections-seattle-mariners/

Seattle's starting rotation and bullpen are highly touted but the Mariners also return three position players who last year combined for 15.5 fWAR (in their age 22, 26 and 28 seasons). Early last month Seattle PBO Jerry Dipoto said the Mariners were pursuing a designated hitter and "1-1/2 corner outfielders." The M's have since signed Garver to DH.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2023/12/jerry-dipoto-discusses-mariners-offseason-plans-2.html

After clearing payroll, the Mariners remain in the market to complement their strong core of position players.

Posted

I normally don't speculate much on trades as they are so impossible to predict. I mean, never saw the Gray trade, the Lopez trade was somewhat of a surprise, and the Odorizzi trade a few years ago blew me away.

What do all of those trades have in common besides being a general, non-rumored surprise? What was traded SEEMED to favor the Twins side of things. 

So who knows what will happen? But I have a weird SENSE that Julien, Lee, and E Rodriguez are off limits unless blown away by opportunity. (It shouldn't have to be stated Jenkins is off the table). I think almost anyone else is available, prospect wise, along with Polanco, and possibly Kepler.

As to the primary trade destinations/targets for Polanco? (And I've already the mentioned ML Traderumors article).

MILWAUKEE:

Are they rebuilding or trying to re-tool? I can't see anyone other than Burnes for Polanco and a couple solid prospects. Would the Twins go, more or less, "all in" for 1yr of Burnes? ONLY if they felt confident they could add an arm again in 2025 via trade or promotion. Doesn't make sense from their normal MO.

SEATTLE:

There IS a fit here that includes Polanco and various other pieces. The Mariners state they don't want to trade young arms, and despite some additions, they've also cleared some $ and might want to clear more based on their acquiring broadcast rights. 

It still seems to me the ideal opportunity for both clubs is to move Castillo. The Mariners add Polanco, a couple other solid prospects that are open to debate, free up about $10M in salary, keep their young arms, and the Twins only add about $11M in net salary that makes sense and is affordable. 

HOWEVER, I now understand Castillo might have a no-trade or limited no-trade option. If so, he and his agent will be looking for some kind of bonus or bump. While this trade might be ideal for both parties, the Twins would probably balk at any additional $ or guarantees.

BLUE JAYS:

Again, a fit for Polanco at 2B, DH, utility, good veteran, etc, probably with some sweeteners for Alek Manoah. But despite being young, talented, and controllable, I think the Twins are taking a risk here. Manoa had a good rookie season in 2021 in 20GS with nice peripherals. He was even better in 2022, despite a drop in K %. And then the wheels fell off in 2023. He could be a #2 SP in 2024, or a head case who is a #5 and potential washout. I don't want to say that about a not yet 26yo arm that is so talented, but you hear and read a lot of things. Is the juice worth the squeeze?

MIAMI:

BOTH teams turned out just fine in last year's trade. And BOTH teams are a match now as well. Polanco fits at 2B, 1B, DH, and so does Arraez. Bell figures in to 1B and DH. 

IF...and I think it's a BIG IF...the Twins made a move for Luzardo, it's going to cost Julien, or Lee, or E Rodriguez, probably, to get the trade made. I'm not sure Polanco and adds like Larnach, Severino, Mercedes, Festa, J Rodriguez, Camargo, etc get it done without including Julien or Lee or E Rodriguez. 

But then again, I NEVER saw Alcala for Lopez plus a couple A players either.

Cabrera is similar to Manoah from Toronto as far as having some risk involved. But despite some control issues, he's still very young, has some lightening in his arm, and might just be a few adjustments away from being a top of the rotation arm as soon as 2024. And he sure would cost less than Luzardo. The Twins surely know the Marlins roster, and vise versa from last year. 

Local product Max Meyer has been mentioned by some. He's intriguing, of course, but only a year younger than Cabrera, but has virtually zero ML experience. You're trading for a rookie and future help, but how does he affect 2024 to make a difference?

Only Falvey and Levine and Maki, and other scouts know what they think of Cabrera and his potential and what they can do with him. Lopez might even prove some insight in to the kid. 

Everything I look at tells me the Marlins are the #1 fit and the Mariners are #2. The actual package cost is TBD. 

 

Posted

The Twins FO MO is to trade for pitchers with multiple years of control, usually on an affordable contract, that don’t have astronomical trade values (ie wont cost a top prospect to get).

Corbin Burnes (1 year) and Luis Castillo (owed $80mm) Jesus Luzardo and Logan Gilbert (both cost too much) do not fit their MO in my view.

Alek Manoah and Edward Cabrera do.

Posted
22 hours ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

If the Twins had Meyer (24+) controlled until 2030 (I think), Cabrera (25+) until 2029, or Luzardo(26) until 2027, would you trade any of them for two years of Polanco and a 23+ old Festa?

I wouldn't, maybe after Polanco proved he was healthy and productive.

Exactly!  This discussion is so farfetched it's laughable.  Miami IS NOT going to trade for an older player like Polanco in exchange for one of its prized starters.  It's just foolish to think otherwise.  The only way that happens is if the Twins throw in Brooks Lee or Walter Jenkins, (possibly both) to get Luzardo or Cabrera, which there's no way in Hades the Twins do that, but that's what it would take.

What the Twins COULD do is work out a deal for Sandy Alcantara who just underwent UCL TJ and will miss all of 2024.  You might be able to swing something with Miami that's not as painful and get him without emptying the farm knowing that he's a free agent in 2028.  Of course that does nothing to help the Twins this season in the starting pitching department.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...