Seth Stohs Site Manager Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 According to the Twitter feed of the Atlanta Braves, the Minnesota Twins acquired right-handed pitcher Kevin Chapman in exchange for utility man Danny Santana.The Twins acknowledged the trade with a press release. The Twins designated Santana for assignment late last week, giving them ten days to work out a trade or place him on waivers. The 29-year-old Chapman has struggled early this season, posting a 7.71 ERA in 11.2 innings for Gwinnett, Atlanta's AAA team. He had spent parts of the previous four seasons with the Houston Astros. He had a 3-1 record with a 4.09 ERA in 55 big league innings over that time. In those 55 innings, he walked 31 and struck out 48. While Chapman is far from a prospect, the fact that Thad Levine was able to find a taker for the athletic Santana is great. The fact that Chapman is not on the 40-man roster is even better.Santana was one of the longest-tenured Twins players, having signed back in 2007 out of the Dominican Republic. He debuted for the Twins in 2014 and put up a terrific rookie season. He has not been able to replicate that success, however, in the two-plus seasons since. Santana was DFAd to make room for Ehire Adrianza. Also over the weekend, the Twins DFAd RH RP Michael Tonkin, giving them ten days to work out a trade for him or put him on waivers at some point. Click here to view the article PseudoSABR and glunn 2
Dave The Dastardly Verified Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Okay, I give up. The headline says LHP, the blurb says RHP, the photo shows LHP. What is this guy? Ambidextrous? More importantly, how bad is he? I mean what's the market value on a slightly used D Santana? Just north of a box of new baseballs? bighat and glunn 2
Pardon My Dinger Verified Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Lesser known Chapman for lesser known Santana. Gotta say, this deal works on paper. LA Vikes Fan, twinssouth, KirbyDome89 and 8 others 11
mlhouse Verified Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Okay, I give up. The headline says LHP, the blurb says RHP, the photo shows LHP. What is this guy? Ambidextrous? More importantly, how bad is he? I mean what's the market value on a slightly used D Santana? Just north of a box of new baseballs? He is so bad that I am sure the Twins will find a way to get him right up on the major league pitching staff. snap4birds, hybridbear, KirbyDome89 and 9 others 12
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Nice move. I didn't expect the Twins to get anything for Santana and a questionable lefty bullpen arm seems like a fair deal. jimbo92107, Taildragger8791, BigSkyTwinsFan and 7 others 10
PseudoSABR Verified Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 I like acquiring a non-40-man pitcher with experience. It gives the Twins flexibility and a low-end arm to potentially fill out the bullpen should it come to that without the use of a roster space.
notoriousgod71 Verified Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 My initial reaction is meh. My second reaction is both players will be lucky to survive the season with their new organizations. Maybe the Twins absolute travesty of a bullpen will force them to keep Chapman around. DaveW 1
wsnydes Old-Timey Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Can't complain about this. Chapman is exactly a haul, but getting anything for Santana is a bonus. A player AND cash is incredible. I really like that they cleared the 40 man spot on top of everything. rghrbek, Vanimal46, HitInAPinch and 1 other 4
KirbyHawk75 Verified Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Now will Santana become the next Aaron Hicks? Probably not... bighat 1
PseudoSABR Verified Member Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Now will Santana become the next Aaron Hicks? Probably not...Let's give Hicks some more at bats before he becomes the standard of bad trades. He was really awful last year. Thrylos, gunnarthor, TheLeviathan and 14 others 17
bighat Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Now will Santana become the next Aaron Hicks? I don't think he'll become Hicks, but I do think he has a future in MLB. I see him being a somewhat valuable role player for an NL team down the road. I don't think he's a good fit with the Twins but again I don't think he's total garbage. Chapman, on the other hand...well I'm guessing we'll see him sooner or later! David HK, nokomismod and KGB 3
Blake Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 That Falvey and company got anything for Santana surprises me. Best of luck to Santana and I hope he succeeds. Oldgoat_MN, TheGiantTeapot, David HK and 6 others 9
Winston Smith Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Let's give Hicks some more at bats before he becomes the standard of bad trades. He was really awful last year. And how is Murphy doing? Kwak, Blake, DaveW and 1 other 4
Shaitan Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Santana hasn't made a single out or error for ATL yet. Hosed again. Thrylos, HitInAPinch, Mike Sixel and 1 other 4
Kwak Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Anybody remember Drew Butera--and how some proclaimed "we won that deal"? HitInAPinch 1
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 And how is Murphy doing?Better 2017 WAR than Santana James 1
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 I don't think he'll become Hicks, but I do think he has a future in MLB. I see him being a somewhat valuable role player for an NL team down the road. I don't think he's a good fit with the Twins but again I don't think he's total garbage. Chapman, on the other hand...well I'm guessing we'll see him sooner or later!He's gonna have to improve all aspects of his game to be a contributor for an NL or any team. He had one of the 3 lowest WARs in baseball over the last 2 years.
Otto von Ballpark Old-Timey Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Chapman was available to us twice on waivers back in March. The second time he cleared completely, which is why Atlanta was able to outright him off their 40-man. by jiminy, h2oface, ashbury and 2 others 5
Richie the Rally Goat Community Moderator Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Chapman was available to us twice on waivers back in March. The second time he cleared completely, which is why Atlanta was able to outright him off their 40-man.The DFA'd DanSan who clearly was claimed. Getting anything not on the 40 man is better than nothing WLFINN and Danchat 2
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Anybody remember Drew Butera--and how some proclaimed "we won that deal"?Didn't we? Am I mistaking my trades but didn't we turn him into Nunez and eventually Mejia? James and Danchat 2
jimbo92107 Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Nice move. I didn't expect the Twins to get anything for Santana and a questionable lefty bullpen arm seems like a fair deal.Unfortunately, a "questionable" player begs the question... ;-) You're right, though. Santana is a questionable player, too. Maybe both guys can benefit from a change of scenery. Blake 1
Otto von Ballpark Old-Timey Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 The DFA'd DanSan who clearly was claimed. Getting anything not on the 40 man is better than nothingActually Santana wasn't claimed -- he was never waived. Likely he would have been claimed by a couple clubs, though, and the Braves offered Chapman to essentially jump the line. Richie the Rally Goat and KirbyDome89 2
Otto von Ballpark Old-Timey Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 And while Chapman not being on the 40-man is nice, the Twins actually have an open 40-man spot with Tonkin removed. And if we add Chapman at any point, he is out of options which might limit our flexibility.
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 The biggest win here is Santana is not around to get 200 AB and accumulate a negative win or two Danchat, Mike Sixel, KirbyDome89 and 5 others 8
Oldgoat_MN Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 (edited) Didn't we? Am I mistaking my trades but didn't we turn him into Nunez and eventually Mejia?We sent Butera to the Dodgers and received Miguel Subaran in return.Sulbaran pitched for the NYY AA and AAA teams last year.He wasn't very good at it, though I don't know why we gave up on a 20 year old in A ball. Did we trade him? Edited May 9, 2017 by Oldgoat_MN EddieMatthews 1
Rosterman Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 Yes...better than nothing. No need to keep a roster space for him, yet. Him and Boshers can be the setup guys at Rochester (sic).
Richie the Rally Goat Community Moderator Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 And while Chapman not being on the 40-man is nice, the Twins actually have an open 40-man spot with Tonkin removed. And if we add Chapman at any point, he is out of options which might limit our flexibility.he passed waivers twice. Why is this a concern? Dave The Dastardly and jud6312 2
drjim Provisional Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 We sent Butera to the Dodgers and received Miguel Subaran in return.Sulbaran pitched for the NYY AA and AAA teams last year.He wasn't very good at it, though I don't know why we gave up on a 20 year old in A ball. Did we trade him?Yes, traded him for Nunez. Then traded for Mejia. dbminn, WLFINN, EddieMatthews and 1 other 4
Tweety Verified Member Posted May 9, 2017 Posted May 9, 2017 So is the free 40-man spot gonna go to Park? Thrylos and HitInAPinch 2
Quentin Young Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A SS/3B The Young infielders knocked his 11th home run of the season on Wednesday morning. It accounted for three of his four RBI in the game. Explore Quentin Young News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now