Twins 5, White Sox 1: Zebby Matthews Stops the Bleeding, Twins Avoid Sweep

[Wedman13]

4 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

I have said multiple times, Tom P. needs to walk across the street.  Tim C. is willing to make moves to make the team better even if it is not the conventional move.

Chess not checkers.  And we do (twins) have the pieces.  I do believe that.

baseball does need to fix itself though so all teams  have the ability to have kings and queens.  Otherwise we're left fighting over Roden, Jackson, Fedko, our ridiculously bad bullpen to begin the year while 3-4 teams have zero of those arguments.  Just my opinion 

but today was a good day

[RpR]

[GNess]

23 minutes ago, Wedman13 said:

From the grave, Don Baylor disagrees with you.

 

I agree with both of you - super old guy not awesome.

But the Twins have had some success over the years with the super old guys - Davis, Thome, Cruz in addition to Baylor all come to mind.

[mark allen]

Great game by Zebby. Great month also. Everyone saying to not resign Bell, butt if we had to pick a player to come up with a clutch hit, he's the one I would want to be batting. 

[tarheeltwinsfan]

22 minutes ago, Coach said:

Resign Bell. Talk done.

Re- sign or resign?

[RpR]

38 minutes ago, MeleMouth said:

I like Zebby and he got great results today, but we should go a little slower on projecting anything for him from this game, because the Sox hit him pretty hard.

Royce was en fuego the first half of August, then his great luck on batted balls flipped to bad in the second half of the month and the league started pitching him a little differently. His results for the last two weeks are probably somewhat bad luck, but his actual OPS for August 13-29 (not including today's 0-3) is .392 and even if he had normal luck it would be below .550. Historically, he has struggled to make adjustments. It's going to be an interesting September for him.

I'd also go slow on writing off Culpepper at SS. He's a great athlete and a smart guy; what we're seeing now might just be growing pains. He's also by far the most likely of all known candidates to start at SS when the 2027 season begins, so he's going to get more learning opportunities. 

Another version of Lee at Short Stop would be silly.

Keaschall can hit but sucks with his glove; if Culpepper turns into this , one has to go.

[LastOnePicked]

1 hour ago, Mike Sixel said:

WTF? Comparing him to SWR after a great start. Why? Why not just be happy?

Yeah, I'm probably the most pessimistic jerk here and even I thought that comparison went too far. :)

[LastOnePicked]

1 hour ago, Danchat said:

My initial thought is that Ober gets traded - not for a big return, but for something because teams need starting pitching.

Won't the Twins also need starting pitching? I can see Ober sneaking in quite a few starts as a #5 or #6 next year.

[MeleMouth]

5 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

Why don't you look at Matthew's results for the season, he has had 15 good starts out of 18 and is averaging almost 6 innings a start.  And he keeps his team in almost every game.  And he has gotten stronger in August.

And good job of cherry picking stats on Lewis.  Yes he has struggled the last two weeks of August but still has a batting ave of .277 and OPS of .708.  And he has been one of our top hitters since coming back from St. Paul.  Yet Clemens who has been ice cold the month keeps hitting in the middle of the order.

 

OK, look at Zebby's results for the season. The Twins have the 23rd ranked pitching staff in the league. Of 17 pitchers on the Twins with at least 20 IPs, Zebby's FIP is 15th on the Twins, with only Paredes and SWR below him. League-wide, of 108 pitchers with more than 100 IP, he's 95th in FIP. Again, I like Zebby, but this hasn't been a stellar year for him.

Boy, you really defend Royce, despite the fact that his wRC+ just since his return would tie him for 18th among qualifying 1B on a full-year basis. To compare him to Clemens, between Aug 13-29, Royce's OPS is .392, while Clemens, whom you said is "ice cold," has an .853 OPS. It seems reasonable that this .450+ OPS advantage for Clemens over the last two weeks could be a factor in batting order today. Yes, since Royce came back, his OPS is a decent .763, versus a slightly lower .743 for Clemens, but much of the "S" in Royce's OPS came in June. You say that since Royce came back he's been "one of our top hitters," but his OPS is 5th out of 11 players with more than 100 PAs, which is decent, but being in the middle is not really being "one of our top hitters."

Also, we shouldn't act as if Royce's awful start to the season didn't occur and shouldn't be taken into account when deciding batting order, particularly when his hitting is awful once again and he has a history of struggling to turn around slumps. Not to defend Clemens too much, but Royce's stats are mostly comparable to the "ice cold" Clemens and Clemens actually exceeds Lewis in several areas. Finally and most importantly, the target for Royce's offense is supposed to be much higher than Kody Clemens, whom, we must also recognize, contributes much more on defense.

[LastOnePicked]

29 minutes ago, Coach said:

The numbers dictate it, plus have you ever noticed the other players are always in his ear in the dugout?  Chili Davis reincarnated.

Re-sign him. Let him put up solid numbers, then trade him to the Rays for a starting pitching prospect. 

[TheLeviathan]

Great to see a start like that from Zebby.

[bean5302]

1 hour ago, HarmonK03 said:

Why don't you look at Matthew's results for the season, he has had 15 good starts out of 18 and is averaging almost 6 innings a start.  And he keeps his team in almost every game.  And he has gotten stronger in August.

And good job of cherry picking stats on Lewis.  Yes he has struggled the last two weeks of August but still has a batting ave of .277 and OPS of .708.  And he has been one of our top hitters since coming back from St. Paul.  Yet Clemens who has been ice cold the month keeps hitting in the middle of the order.

 

Looks like you consider any start under a 10.50 ERA to be a good one. I guess we have different definitions of "good"