Waiting on the Window: Byron Buxton and Twins’ Complicated Timeline

[Cody Christie]

Image courtesy of © Nick Turchiaro-Imagn Images

 

The Minnesota Twins’ competitive window has felt perpetually cracked open for the better part of a decade. Rarely slammed shut, never fully open. At the center of that uneasy balance sits Byron Buxton, the face of the franchise and its most complicated variable. Buxton has three years remaining on his team-friendly extension, and as things stand today, there is no clear indication that Minnesota will be a true World Series contender at any point during that stretch. That reality makes the next few seasons feel more like an evaluation period than an opportunity.

Still, baseball has a way of humbling certainty. Teams that look mediocre in March can find themselves dogpiling in October. Rosters that feel one move away can collapse overnight. Buxton’s presence alone keeps the Twins relevant, and his ceiling remains higher than almost any player in the organization. The question is whether the timing ever aligns.

Rumors are already unavoidable. If the Twins fall out of contention again and pivot further toward selling veteran pieces, Buxton’s name will surface in trade conversations. He holds a no-trade clause, but that protection does not mean immovability. Buxton is now in his early 30s, with a lengthy injury history and a finite number of games left in his career. The chance to play meaningful October baseball elsewhere could be tempting, especially if Minnesota’s direction becomes clearer by midseason.

Here’s a look at the next three seasons, what it could mean for the Twins, and how the Byron Buxton winning window is shrinking.

2026: Running It Back and Hoping
The most likely outcome for 2026 is familiarity. The Twins appear poised to run back much of last year’s roster and hope for organic improvement from their young core. FanGraphs’ initial projection of an 82-80 record paints the picture perfectly. Competitive, relevant, but far from secure.

Top prospects are waiting in the wings, and many are expected to debut during the season. Walker Jenkins, Emmanuel Rodriguez, and Gabriel Gonzalez all finished at Triple-A last season. That said, rookies are supplements, not saviors. Expecting them to replace established production is rarely realistic. For Buxton, 2026 represents another season of carrying disproportionate weight, both on the field and in how the franchise is perceived nationally.

 

2027: Chaos Creates Opportunity
The 2027 season may never resemble a normal year. A looming labor dispute brings a strong chance of a lockout that could delay the start of the season. If negotiations drag on, MLB may shorten the schedule and expand the postseason to preserve revenue. That kind of chaos can flatten the playing field.

More playoff teams mean more paths into October. For a club like Minnesota, that matters. The Twins saw this happen in 2020 during the COVID-shortened season. A hot month or two could be enough. By then, the young pitchers, like Mick Abel and Kendry Rojas, acquired in recent years, may be ready for the spotlight. Arms that currently feel theoretical could become the backbone of a playoff run. In October, structure matters less than momentum, and weird things tend to happen.

2028: Swan Song or Turning Point
The 2028 season could represent Buxton’s swan song in a Twins uniform. He has been clear about wanting to be a Twin for life, but the next three years will test that commitment on both sides. If his performance continues to resemble his 2025 campaign, extensions could remain on the table. If not, the cold reality of aging curves will loom.

Coming out of a potential lockout, this is the ideal time for Minnesota to push more aggressively. A young core featuring Jenkins, Rodriguez, Luke Keaschall, and Kaelen Culpepper could be ready to emerge. Supporting that group properly might finally align Buxton’s timeline with a legitimate window of opportunity.

The Twins do not need to choose between rebuilding and contending just yet, but they are running out of time to avoid that decision. Buxton’s contract provides flexibility, leverage, and pressure all at once. Whether Minnesota capitalizes on that window or watches it quietly close will define the next era of Twins baseball.

Do you believe the Twins can build a true contender before Buxton’s contract runs out, or is a difficult decision inevitable? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

 

 

View full article

[Nashvilletwin]

Finally, the truth behind why we aren’t trading our all-time highly valued assets all of whom will undoubtedly not be on the team in two years: we are going all in on having a “hot month or two” in the strike shortened ‘27 to make the playoffs. 2028 and beyond be damned.  It’s suddenly all so clear.

Now that is what the baseball experts in the Twins’ ownership group and front office would call a sound strategy.

BTW, we really could use a sarcasm font on the TD.

[DJL44]

If they do want to compete in 2026-27, then they need to make some moves to make the 2026-27 team stronger at the expense of the 2028 and beyond teams. They loaded the minor leagues with tradeable prospects last summer. They can spend some of those to make the team better in the near-term.

Their plan seems to be rolling the same team out again and hoping the players all magically improve.

[Woof Bronzer]

16 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

Their plan seems to be rolling the same team out again and hoping the players all magically improve.

AKA the same plan as last offseason.  And that worked out great!

[tony&rodney]

First of all it is virtually impossible to know what value any player holds for another team. While fans see high value in their home team's players, other clubs may only be willing to trade excess prospects and/or suspect MLB guys for in any transactions. Secondly, we do not know what conversations have taken place between the Twins and any other teams. The speculation and guesses by folks, including the national writers, is at best just speculation and guesses. There is a relatively fair path to guesses based on past history.

The Twins made a significant splash when they traded Luis Arraez for Pablo Lopez. Early on it was reported by Miami bloggers and then national press that the Marlins really wanted to discuss scenarios for reaching a deal to acquire Arraez. From early reports, public statements, and later articles it seemed pretty fair to say that the Marlins pushed that transaction. Twins Daily was split on the trade with many people incensed to lose the fan favorite batting champ. Likewise, Seattle was very open about wanting to acquire Jorge Polanco and that wish was stated for a couple of years before the Twins-Mariners trade. Most of Twins Daily saw that trade as favoring Minnesota with some disagreement. 

How does that affect  Byron Buxton? I believe it is fair to say that the Twins, in their current iteration (Falvey Era), want to field a team that has some chance to win games but building a strong roster is not and has not been a priority. The Twins do not gamble or go big, to steal from Tom P. The second part of Mr. Christie's question can also be guessed in a fair manner. The Twins have not been apt to make difficult decisions, but choose instead to watch time go by and hope for the best possible outcome. Sometimes that has worked out ok, such as with Coulombe, France, and Bader last year. It didn't result in wins but those guys did their jobs. Other times, luck has been more elusive. I see the Twins as risk adverse. There may be legitimate reasons for this and many on Twins Daily support that strategy of wait and hope for a new result with a similar cast of characters. 

Don't wait for any action on Byron Buxton and it isn't likely the team steps forward to buttress the team via big blockbuster trades or free agent pickups. An easy improvement that cost significant money might have been possible despite the low odds of success if the Twins wanted Imai. Whether Buck himself has a mood change is unknown. The Twins are rolling it back for now, or at least that is what it looks like from various comments from leadership. 

[Blyleven2011]

1 hour ago, DJL44 said:

If they do want to compete in 2026-27, then they need to make some moves to make the 2026-27 team stronger at the expense of the 2028 and beyond teams. They loaded the minor leagues with tradeable prospects last summer. They can spend some of those to make the team better in the near-term.

Their plan seems to be rolling the same team out again and hoping the players all magically improve.

Their plan , it's always their plan  , for once i would wish for them to listen to the fans plan ...

Construct a consistent team capable to contend for a world series , window was open in 2023 and the pohlads slammed the window shut , no wonder why the fans are frustrated and have no love for the pohlads  ...

Falvey is no better , the 40 man roster has plenty of AAAA players on it and he won't move on from them even if we have players the could replace them and improve the team , falvey signs a 1st baseman every year or a veteran that's just plain unusable but they keep him playing them ...

Falvey found his acorn last offseason  ,,France,  Bader and coloumbe were his best crop of free agents he has signed  ...

Will Bell perform on offense , let's hope but he isn't going to win a gold glove ...

Still 6 weeks to go as spring training starts alittle earlier this year because of World baseball ...

[chpettit19]

1 hour ago, Woof Bronzer said:

AKA the same plan as last offseason.  And that worked out great!

Don't shortchange them. It's the same plan as the last TWO offseasons.

[DJL44]

5 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

Don't shortchange them. It's the same plan as the last TWO offseasons.

Trust the process....

[bean5302]

If the Twins are committed to a World Series attempt, they need to be in obvious build mode. They're not right now. This is not a team for which expectations of .500 ball or playoffs, let alone a potential World Series run is reasonable. The team's on the field product resembles a team at the tail end of a rebuild, the point at which a team identifies what they've got and what they need to build.

What they've got as playoff caliber guys right now. Byron Buxton, Joe Ryan, Pablo Lopez. 

What they've got as respectable every day players who aren't going to lift the team, but they shouldn't be concerned about upgrading. Ryan Jeffers.

After that, it's debatable whether or not they've got guys who will hold the team back, tread water or push the team into the playoffs. That's 22 other positions on the opening day roster which are question marks.

The Twins running out a status quo team is reckless and inconsistent with Tom Pohlad's comments.

[DJL44]

Brendan Donovan is very available, fits in the 2026-27 window, fills a gaping hole on the roster and fits in the budget. That's the kind of move they need to make if they are serious about contending in 2026 and 2027. If the team fails to "thread the needle" he's tradeable again at the deadline.

Other players who "fit the window"

Taylor Walls, Hyesong Kim, Lars Nootbaar

 

[JD-TWINS]

2 hours ago, Woof Bronzer said:

AKA the same plan as last offseason.  And that worked out great!

2025:

Wallner regressed!

Larnach was not platooned properly and was exposed v. LH pitching.

Lewis was bad or underperformed 80% of the games he played.

Lee was disappointing in his first true full season.

Those 4 guys could/should all play considerably better…… not big stars but acceptably……..that with our rotation and good baseball by Jeffers/Buxton/Bell/Keaschall and the Team has a real shot at being competitive.

Need a shot in the arm in PEN & at SS via Free Agency.

[LastOnePicked]

Pretending a window of competition is open doesn't actually open a window. There is zero chance that a slow, injury-prone 90-loss team with no significant roster upgrades will become a 90-win club. Zero.

I want Buxton to have a chance to play for a winner, and I want the Twins to maximize current value for future payoff. This nibbling approach to "contention" has been - and will be - the road to diminishing returns.

If some can find joy in watching Buxton, Ryan, Lopez and Jeffers waste away on a last-place club, more power to them, I guess.

[RpR]

1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

Don't shortchange them. It's the same plan as the last TWO offseasons.

Well Two years ago, it was the quite common Minn. Twins Sept. collapse; this year it started a LOT earlier.

Time will tell, but then France, Bader and a gaggle of other decent players were cut loose; that was a difference, to a degree.

[DJL44]

What would it take to swing a blockbuster trade with the Cardinals?

Brendan Donovan, Lars Nootbaar and JoJo Romero for ???

Is Emmanuel Rodriguez, Kyle DeBarge, Riley Quick, Ryan Gallagher, Marco Raya and Billy Amick enough?

How about a 1-for-1 with Roden for Nootbaar?

 

[Woof Bronzer]

1 hour ago, JD-TWINS said:

 

Those 4 guys could/should all play considerably better

Why? 

There's no evidence Brooks Lee can be a productive MLB SS.  We have far more evidence of Bad Royce than Good Royce.  If you expect Wallner to be anything other than Wallner I can't help you, he is what he is.  And Larnach doesn't even have a spot in the lineup.  

 

[Parfigliano]

5 hours ago, DJL44 said:

If they do want to compete in 2026-27, then they need to make some moves to make the 2026-27 team stronger at the expense of the 2028 and beyond teams. They loaded the minor leagues with tradeable prospects last summer. They can spend some of those to make the team better in the near-term.

Their plan seems to be rolling the same team out again and hoping the players all magically improve.

Seems like a really bad plan.

[Vanimal46]

I’m pretty much seeing my nightmare being played out. I said last year if we retained Falvey it would prolong the rebuild. That’s what is happpening now. 

[Major League Ready]

6 hours ago, DJL44 said:

If they do want to compete in 2026-27, then they need to make some moves to make the 2026-27 team stronger at the expense of the 2028 and beyond teams. They loaded the minor leagues with tradeable prospects last summer. They can spend some of those to make the team better in the near-term.

Their plan seems to be rolling the same team out again and hoping the players all magically improve.

My recollection of the practices of successful modest revenue teams is that they don't trade away cost controlled assets unless they have a team that is definitely a contender.  Even then, it's rare.   If they want to spend another $60M, great.  That would be far better than trading away their future.  The only option worse than running the status quo out would be to denigrate the future to "go for it with a roster that is not remotely close.  They would have to trade away several of their best prospects to enhance this roster anywhere near a serious contender.  That's a really good way to insure continued mediocrity or worse.  

[TNtwins85]

6 hours ago, DJL44 said:

If they do want to compete in 2026-27, then they need to make some moves to make the 2026-27 team stronger at the expense of the 2028 and beyond teams. They loaded the minor leagues with tradeable prospects last summer. They can spend some of those to make the team better in the near-term.

Their plan seems to be rolling the same team out again and hoping the players all magically improve.

Unless they make a big move before spring training then I’m convinced that the first half of the year is the barometer. If everyone produces and they’re in the mix come the trade deadline then they’ll buy themselves in. If not, and that seems to be where they will trend with the current group, then they’ll sell and they should absolutely clear the slate and get what they can for everyone they can get something for. Do they? If the 3rd generation of Pohlads is anything like the 1st or 2nd then they’ll  screw that up by keeping whoever they can and simply let them walk. Either way I’m not confident in the Pohlads bringing this team back to contention this decade. If things are truly bad as believed then yes the Twins will be the Pirates or Marlins. This all sits on the lynchpin of one big move and a few smaller moves before spring training. Do they do it? We’ve got 2 months to see what the Twins next move is. It may not be a move and that will say a lot. 

[KirbyDome89]

4 hours ago, bean5302 said:

That's 22 other positions on the opening day roster which are question marks.

People don't seem to understand how talent deficient this roster really is. The Twins were legitimately worse than the White Sox for the last 2 months of 2025, that doesn't happen just because you sold the top end of your bullpen. 

[KirbyDome89]

2 hours ago, Woof Bronzer said:

Why? 

There's no evidence Brooks Lee can be a productive MLB SS.  We have far more evidence of Bad Royce than Good Royce.  If you expect Wallner to be anything other than Wallner I can't help you, he is what he is.  And Larnach doesn't even have a spot in the lineup.  

 

Brooks Lee might not even be a decent utility IF off the bench if he can't figure out how to at least be a passable hitter. He looks stretched at SS, Idk about 2B. No team remotely serious about competing is giving up a roster spot for that profile. 

[DJL44]

1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

My recollection of the practices of successful modest revenue teams is that they don't trade away cost controlled assets unless they have a team that is definitely a contender.  Even then, it's rare.   If they want to spend another $60M, great.  That would be far better than trading away their future.  The only option worse than running the status quo out would be to denigrate the future to "go for it with a roster that is not remotely close.  They would have to trade away several of their best prospects to enhance this roster anywhere near a serious contender.  That's a really good way to insure continued mediocrity or worse.  

They also trade away short-term veterans in that same situation.

[GNess]

If true, focusing on a loophole (such as the possibility of a shortened season) to contend for a championship is hardly commendable. 

But even to do this successfully would require the Twins to add some talent to the lineup and bullpen at a minimum.

[Whitey333]

First FanGraphs is one of the least accurate and dependable baseball analysts.  Second why is the Buxton contract considered "team friendly?"  If you just took 2025 then yes he was under paid for THAT season.  But what about all the other years where he only plaid half or slightly more of a season.  We could call them " player friendly" for being a part time player.  I mean really the Twibs paid him $100 million dollars for a part time player.  As I recall I don't think they held a gun to Buxtons head to make him sign.  He obviously thought the deal was good enough and he signed it.  As this season approaches it looks like another "run it back" philosophy that has failed.  I hope all these over hyped prospects do pan out.  Ive been waiting for good baseball for quite sometime.  Maybe the question will be will anyone attend the games at beautiful Target Field.

[TNtwins85]

3 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

Brooks Lee might not even be a decent utility IF off the bench if he can't figure out how to at least be a passable hitter. He looks stretched at SS, Idk about 2B. No team remotely serious about competing is giving up a roster spot for that profile. 

That’s pretty off base. He’s at least a decent utility INF. Polanco wasn’t a good SS either and there’s a reason Willi Castro was signed as a 25 year old FA. If he can improve enough to make the plays he should make as a young Castro could and provide even a sliver of what Polanco did with the bat as a SS he’ll be fine. He’s not far off if he improves even moderately. The 16 bombs is a very positive sign and he passed the eye test defensively at the end of the season. You don’t need a prime Correa at SS to win. You do need consistency and competence. He’s not that far off. What worries me is the lack of another reliable hitter. That should be Lewis. Does he take the next step? It’s time for Lewis to take that step or be relegated to bust territory. Lee was never gonna be an AS out of the gate. That expectation was always unrealistic. Even when he hit .330 at AAA. I believe he’ll be just fine at SS. If he hits to even half his potential.

[RpR]

26 minutes ago, TNtwins85 said:

That’s pretty off base. He’s at least a decent utility INF. Polanco wasn’t a good SS either and there’s a reason Willi Castro was signed as a 25 year old FA. If he can improve enough to make the plays he should make as a young Castro could and provide even a sliver of what Polanco did with the bat as a SS he’ll be fine. He’s not far off if he improves even moderately. The 16 bombs is a very positive sign and he passed the eye test defensively at the end of the season. You don’t need a prime Correa at SS to win. You do need consistency and competence. He’s not that far off. What worries me is the lack of another reliable hitter. That should be Lewis. Does he take the next step? It’s time for Lewis to take that step or be relegated to bust territory. Lee was never gonna be an AS out of the gate. That expectation was always unrealistic. Even when he hit .330 at AAA. I believe he’ll be just fine at SS. If he hits to even half his potential.

He is not error prone, so far, but his lack of range leaves a large hole at Short Stop.

[Major League Ready]

14 hours ago, DJL44 said:

They also trade away short-term veterans in that same situation.

Actually, those teams have traded away very good established players with short-term control even when they expect to win.  Milwaukee won 92 games the year prior to trading Corbin Burnes and 93 they year after trading him.  Cleveland traded away Lindor in 2020 which was the Covid season but they had a .588 win percentage.  They won 93 games the year they traded away Kluber for Clase.  They got Kluber as a prospect by trading Jake Westbrook.  So, Westbrook turned into 6 years of Kluber and 6 years of Clase.  It's a sacrifice short-term and it has the risk of producing nothing but it also has a very high upside.  That's the type of risk modest revenue teams need to embrace.

[Nashvilletwin]

13 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

I’m pretty much seeing my nightmare being played out. I said last year if we retained Falvey it would prolong the rebuild. That’s what is happpening now. 

Yeah, I’m starting to get concerned that it was actually the “I’m way over my skis” original Nephew who favored the complete rebuild and now it’s his replacement T-Cubed who favors the “let’s ensure ongoing mediocrity at best” nibbling at the edges plan.

Geez, I hope I’m wrong.

[Nashvilletwin]

18 hours ago, bean5302 said:

If the Twins are committed to a World Series attempt, they need to be in obvious build mode. They're not right now. This is not a team for which expectations of .500 ball or playoffs, let alone a potential World Series run is reasonable. The team's on the field product resembles a team at the tail end of a rebuild, the point at which a team identifies what they've got and what they need to build.

What they've got as playoff caliber guys right now. Byron Buxton, Joe Ryan, Pablo Lopez. 

What they've got as respectable every day players who aren't going to lift the team, but they shouldn't be concerned about upgrading. Ryan Jeffers.

After that, it's debatable whether or not they've got guys who will hold the team back, tread water or push the team into the playoffs. That's 22 other positions on the opening day roster which are question marks.

The Twins running out a status quo team is reckless and inconsistent with Tom Pohlad's comments.

Exactly. Yes, I’ve been writing on this for months. Four major leaguers on the team:

Two starters who will pitch 5-6 innings every five games, but have no run support and no bullpen to protect any lead that might have when pulled. (To be fair, SWR and Ober are likely passable #4/5 type starters, but the lack of run support and BP help makes things only worse for them when they only last 4-5 innings and give up three or more runs),

A stud CF who might only play 100 games if, let’s face it, we get lucky.

A decent starting C who also will only likely play 100 games at most.

So even our four definitive major leaguers are constrained in their likely contributions due to games played limitations and supporting roster construction.

[TNtwins85]

2 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

Yeah, I’m starting to get concerned that it was actually the “I’m way over my skis” original Nephew who favored the complete rebuild and now it’s his replacement T-Cubed who favors the “let’s ensure ongoing mediocrity at best” nibbling at the edges plan.

Geez, I hope I’m wrong.

Yes, it’s the way the Pohlads have operated the previous 2 downturns. I wouldn’t expect it any other way really. When faced with the choice of completely tearing it down and maximizing prospect value they’ve always turned to the let’s try and stay respectable model which is great for keeping a few butts in the seats but leaves you short at the other end of the rebuild. Which has been the case the last 2 rebuilds. If they don’t make a move for another competent hitter then that’s the path pending a trade deadline sell off this year.