Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Image courtesy of © Eric Hartline-Imagn Images

The offseason always brings surprising conversations, but few topics around the league have created more quiet buzz than the idea of Baltimore listening on Adley Rutschman. The Orioles remain well-positioned to contend, yet their roster is reaching a point where difficult decisions are unavoidable. Rutschman, once viewed as the foundation of their turnaround, is now part of a more complicated catching picture after a frustrating 2025 season and the rise of Samuel Basallo.

Rutschman hit below expectations this past year (90 OPS+) after back-to-back All-Star campaigns (117 OPS+), and multiple oblique injuries limited both his availability and overall impact. Meanwhile, Basallo arrived in the big leagues, and the organization doubled down by locking him in for eight seasons at an affordable rate, giving them long-term cost certainty behind the plate. With Rutschman entering his fifth year and only under control through 2027, the Orioles suddenly face a reality in which their younger, cheaper option may fit their long-range structure more cleanly.

That does not mean Baltimore is eager to subtract a two-time All-Star. It simply means they are willing to hear what other teams are willing to pay. Early reports suggest that several clubs have reached out, and any realistic offer would need to feature proven major leaguers rather than long-term development projects. For a team intent on staying in the thick of the playoff picture, a Rutschman trade only makes sense if it helps them win immediately.

This is where the Twins enter the conversation. Minnesota is at a crossroads of its own after two disappointing seasons and a roster full of difficult long-term decisions. Trading Joe Ryan or Pablo López is not something the front office would take lightly, but both pitchers hold significant value in a market light on dependable starters. The question is whether the Twins could justify moving from a strength to solidify a position that could quickly become a weakness.

Ryan Jeffers has been a major success story, but he is approaching his final year of club control and will be one of the most intriguing free agent catchers next winter. Minnesota has no clear succession plan behind him, and catching depth throughout the organization remains thin. Adding a player like Rutschman, even after a down year, would immediately provide stability, upside, and long-term certainty at a premium position. His ability to control the zone, elevate an offense, and handle pitching staffs still stands out even after a season of setbacks.

For Minnesota, dealing Ryan or López would hurt, but each presents a different type of fit for Baltimore. López offers frontline ability and several years of team control at a competitive price. Ryan brings All-Star potential, strong strike-throwing, and the type of personality that meshes well in a young clubhouse. He also comes at a cheaper price point for an Orioles ownership group that has kept payroll in the middle of the pack. Either pitcher would give the Orioles the ready-made, playoff-caliber rotation help they currently lack and cannot easily acquire through free agency, as many fans assume.

Would either side consider a one-for-one swap? In theory, it is possible. Catchers with Rutschman’s pedigree rarely become available, but frontline or near frontline pitching with multiple years of control is just as scarce. The Twins would be betting heavily on Rutschman returning to his All-Star form, while the Orioles would be betting that their internal catching depth remains strong enough to support a return to October baseball. 

The more likely outcome would involve additional pieces to balance risk, but the framework is not unrealistic. It solves a looming problem for each franchise. Minnesota gains a catcher capable of anchoring the roster for years, and Baltimore adds the type of rotation stability that may be the difference between a strong regular season and a playoff run.

With both clubs navigating complicated offseasons and both showing a willingness to at least consider impactful moves, this is a scenario worth watching closely. If the Orioles decide that Basallo is ready to take over and the Twins determine that this is the moment to reimagine their core, an unlikely match could suddenly make perfect sense.

Should the Twins and Orioles connect on a trade? Who should Minnesota center the trade around, Lopez or Ryan? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 


View full article

Posted

Are the Twins going to immediately extend Rutschman? If not, then I don't think this makes much sense. It puts them in the same position with him as they're in with the pitchers now. They're not going to be competitive in 2026 and then you're down to 1 year of team control on him in a season where you're not likely a true competitor and you don't want to then lose him for just a comp pick.

Trading those pitchers is about getting talent that better aligns with their window in terms of team control. Adley doesn't accomplish that goal unless they're going to extend him immediately. Trading Lopez or Ryan for the chance to see if Adley is toast or can bounce back and not having control of him when you're most likely to be competitive doesn't seem ideal.

Posted
21 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

Are the Twins going to immediately extend Rutschman? If not, then I don't think this makes much sense. It puts them in the same position with him as they're in with the pitchers now. They're not going to be competitive in 2026 and then you're down to 1 year of team control on him in a season where you're not likely a true competitor and you don't want to then lose him for just a comp pick.

Trading those pitchers is about getting talent that better aligns with their window in terms of team control. Adley doesn't accomplish that goal unless they're going to extend him immediately. Trading Lopez or Ryan for the chance to see if Adley is toast or can bounce back and not having control of him when you're most likely to be competitive doesn't seem ideal.

Exactly!  No way you trade for any player who is not going to be available to be on the roster in 2028. 

Posted

Agree with other posters, I don't see it. He has only one more year of control than Jeffers and has taken a major step back offensively from Jeffers. But because he was once a top prospect, his arbitration figure is higher and the ask from Baltimore will likely be higher.

I've really had enough of the Twins chasing post-hype prospects and rebound players. It's pretty much all they trade for and sign as free agents. When you need 90% of your roster to 'bounce back' you're basically making long-shot bets on 20+ players on your roster. Go get good players, not players who used to be good.

Posted

They absolutely should try to get Rutschman. That would show commitment from ownership. Commitment means keeping Ryan also. They do have the prospect deal to make a competitive offer for Rutschman.

I know the Orioles are looking for starting pitching but they are going to need to trade prospects to get it. Trading Rutschman for prospects will enhance their prospect pool.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

My mind is boggled that people keep suggesting this. He's not going to be here in 28. He's not cheap. He's declining. This is a bizarre thing to suggest. Truly. I'm mad at myself for even skimming this article. 

I dint think he is declining in skill. His contact numbers are all in line with his rookie season, he had the best exit average exit velocity last year. He also had a low BABIP relative to his career.

Posted
4 minutes ago, jorgenswest said:

I dint think he is declining in skill. His contact numbers are all in line with his rookie season, he had the best exit average exit velocity last year. He also had a low BABIP relative to his career.

That's fine. I'm still not doing it. He's a FA in 2 years. He's not cheap now. I just don't get this at all from a timing perspective (I think you think they can compete this year, which we disagree on completely - Clemens at first? Lee at SS?, one RP? - no chance).

Posted
7 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

That's fine. I'm still not doing it. He's a FA in 2 years. He's not cheap now. I just don't get this at all from a timing perspective (I think you think they can compete this year, which we disagree on completely - Clemens at first? Lee at SS?, one RP? - no chance).

I do appreciate you Mike. You nailed it. I will think they can compete until they don’t. Adding Rutschman would help. Fighting every day to compete is a big part of who I am. I just don’t get how it isn’t part of the Pohlad’s nature.

Maybe I can sell it this way. Rutschman could easily be a buy low. If he hits like he did his first two years his trade value will go up. If he isn’t a buy low then I am with you and the Twins should not trade assets.

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, nicksaviking said:

Agree with other posters, I don't see it. He has only one more year of control than Jeffers and has taken a major step back offensively from Jeffers. But because he was once a top prospect, his arbitration figure is higher and the ask from Baltimore will likely be higher.

I've really had enough of the Twins chasing post-hype prospects and rebound players. It's pretty much all trade for and sign as free agents. When you need 90% of your roster to 'bounce back' you're basically making long-shot bets on 20+ players on your roster. Go get good players, not players who used to be good.

TC payroll can only accommodate players that used to be good.

Posted

This feels more like an article to generate engagement.

There is no way in all the lakes in Minnesota, or the Hamm's Bear or Paul Bunyon and Babe the Blue Ox I make this trade or even consider it as it is crafted here.

If Ryan is leaving the Twins roster, he better bring back a significant haul. Very similar with Pablo.

As much as the Twins crashed and burned, TWICE, there is good players here.

Relief pitching: at this time is more like the sale bin Blue Light Special from KMart.

Starting Pitching: Ryan and Lopez.  Both teetering on the next step to up the pitching ranking ladder.

Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, if we can get our players not named Buxton, to HIT and the players not named Buxton to play defense and the fact they are in the Central Division, there is always hope.

Big IFFs and so far they have led to Big WHIFFSSsss.

Posted
1 hour ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

"Adding a player like Rutschman, even after a down year, would immediately provide stability, upside, and long-term certainty at a premium position."

"Minnesota gains a catcher capable of anchoring the roster for years"

Cody, both of these quotes in the OP strongly suggest that we extend him to avoid FA since you mention long-term certainty. 

I was going to comment on those 2 paragraphs too ...

Rutschman is a very good defensive catcher and probably the best catcher at leading the club on the field  , did injuries dampen his offense in 2025 , sorta , maybe , probably  ...

Baltimore wants major league players in return , the twins should want the same if they are trading either of Lopez or ryan  , , if we are trading for Rutschman  , we can also include jeffers to Baltimore for their 2nd catcher and larnach but would prefer wallner , Baltimore's outfield was kind of deflated after the deadline ...

Baltimore would have to increase their offer significantly to obtain a high  commodity solid starting pitcher , what their offer would be after Rutschman I wouldnt know ,  I'm not familiar with Baltimore's system  , but mountcastle and mayo ...

One of Lopez or ryan  , or both will be dealt this offseason  and our experts better get players in return that can play this game , major or major league ready players  ...

Posted

From MLBTradeRumors: 

Elias also addressed the club’s catcher situation, saying that Adley Rutschman will be the club’s primary backstop. Rutschman once seemed well establish in that role but his performance has dipped in recent years. He had a .268/.369/.439 batting line through 2023 and was continuing in that fashion through the first half of 2024. However, he appeared to injure his hand when it was struck by a foul ball, which led to a .207/.282/.303 line in the second half of last year.

 

It's not surprising that Basallo's presence would create "calls and texts about catchers," which is all the article in The Athletic says about Rutschman, but pretty much every article I've seen on Rutschman/Basallo has said that the Orioles don't view Basallo as a long-term catcher and that a time-share at the position would tilt in Rutschman's direction. 

Posted

There is no comparison between Jeffers (1 year) to Rutschman (2 years). You are comparing a slightly below-average defensively/slightly above-average hitting catcher to an elite catcher, who slumped some to where he was, but still had good offense for a catcher. 

BAL will not easily trade Rutschman; it'd take a Ryan trade to maybe draw him away. If handled correctly, Rutschman will bounce back to have a great offensive season to go along with his elite defense. Jeffers has only 1 year left, Boras is his agent, so he's not coming back after next season. If they extend him for another year, he could be more expensive than Rutschman. Rutschman is a primary catcher; Jeffers is not.

Yeah, I'd trade for him, even if we don't extend him, because he'll have a bounce-back year & we can trade him for a bundle.

Posted

Wonder what other teams value Lopez and Ryan at. Lopez hurt a lot, Ryan was hurt late last year and this year was terrible in September. Both getting older as well. Maybe we over estimate their value.

Posted
19 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

Are the Twins going to immediately extend Rutschman? If not, then I don't think this makes much sense. It puts them in the same position with him as they're in with the pitchers now. They're not going to be competitive in 2026 and then you're down to 1 year of team control on him in a season where you're not likely a true competitor and you don't want to then lose him for just a comp pick.

Trading those pitchers is about getting talent that better aligns with their window in terms of team control. Adley doesn't accomplish that goal unless they're going to extend him immediately. Trading Lopez or Ryan for the chance to see if Adley is toast or can bounce back and not having control of him when you're most likely to be competitive doesn't seem ideal.

Well thought out post. I agree. 

Posted
19 hours ago, DJL44 said:

You don't trade cheap, top of the rotation pitchers for average catchers in their last years of arbitration. If the Orioles want Ryan or Lopez, they need to send back YOUNG talent in return. Joe Ryan for Basallo would make sense 1 for 1.

I am not wanting to trade Ryan for Basallo, who is only 21. I'd rather use Jeffers next year with a FA like Caratini (WAR 2,7, age 32), Jansen (WAR 1.7, age 31)  or Vazquez (WAR 1.0, age 35) and hope Tait continues to be wildly successful in his journey to the Twins.  After all, the Twins gave up the number 2 reliever in all of baseball for 2025 to get Tait and Able.

Posted

The Twins are in rebuild mode. The only question is whether they’re going to tear it down to the studs and start over, or do it halfway. Either way, trading for Rutschman for two years, with 2027 being a potential lockout, doesn’t make sense. And it weakens the starting pitching. If they trade either Ryan or Lopez, or both, it needs to be for young highly rated cost control talent.

Posted
1 hour ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

I am not wanting to trade Ryan for Basallo, who is only 21. I'd rather use Jeffers next year with a FA like Caratini (WAR 2,7, age 32), Jansen (WAR 1.7, age 31)  or Vazquez (WAR 1.0, age 35) and hope Tait continues to be wildly successful in his journey to the Twins.  After all, the Twins gave up the number 2 reliever in all of baseball for 2025 to get Tait and Able.

If they trade Ryan, they're probably also trading Jeffers and Lopez and Ober. There is plenty of room on the roster for both Tait and Basallo.

Posted

With only one more year of control than Jeffers, I don't see how this helps us. Tait and Jiminez are years away. If we are aquiring a catcher it needs to be someone with years of control who can legitimately hold down the starting catcher role until these kids are ready...

Posted

Trading a top line starter for a catcher with 2 yrs of control? Who isn't better than Jeffers. That would be insane. Then again , just the kind of stupid thing the Twins would do. I want WalkerJenkins & a catcher for Joe or Pablo. 

Posted

Ryan Jeffers is a solid 1.5-2.0ish WAR catcher. League average-ish bat, defensively below average. He's an average-ish starting catcher, but below the median.

Rutschman is a big of an enigma at this point. He was a legitimate 4.0 WAR catcher, but the near RoY followed with back to back All Star game player has fallen off at the plate. It's hard to see what has caused that drop off in the batted ball metrics. Nothing looked crazy to me. The xwOBA was 25pts higher than actual last year, and history doesn't support there being a big difference.

Rutschman carries a BTV surplus value for +25. Joe Ryan is more like +53. Trading Ryan for Rutschman would be insane. Lopez is +16 due to his substantial salary. Rutschman is similar to Emmanuel Rodriguez or Matt Wallner for all the guys who hate Wallner around here, haha.

The changes Rutschman is an upgrade over Jeffers is probably high, IMHO, but there's little extra control for the Twins who are not exactly obvious playoff favorites in the next year or two. I don't really understand the move unless the Twins are confident locking up Rutschman long term.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...