Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can anyone give a good reason why they didn't unload him? God forbid this means they want to bring him back. Even then, that could have happened after the season was over. Just another straw for the camel I guess.

Posted
2 minutes ago, sampleSizeOfOne said:

Funny, i *just* came from checking the twins new there and nothing since designating 6... Evidently this is only Yankee news?

It's not under the Twins because the Twins are never mentioned in it.

Posted

After reading the article, I’m more skeptical of the report. Why was it never reported before? Why is the first mention of it a small handful of throwaway words in an article about this off-season?

I’m going to need someone to show their work on this one.

Maybe it’s true. In that case I vehemently disagree with the decision. But I need to see the work. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

If they plan to retain Pineda and didn’t receive any decent offers, I can understand keeping him.

I literally would have given Simmons away to anyone who would take him. 

So take the Powerball ticket and sign him as a FA? It's nowhere near the top 5 as far as mistakes go, but the rationale that the team needed to maintain respectability was pretty laughable.

Community Moderator
Posted
10 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

After reading the article, I’m more skeptical of the report. Why was it never reported before? Why is the first mention of it a small handful of throwaway words in an article about this off-season?

I’m going to need someone to show their work on this one.

Maybe it’s true. In that case I vehemently disagree with the decision. But I need to see the work. 

It's odd that we are just now hearing this.  And we have no details as to what the Yankees supposedly offered.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Hosken Bombo Disco said:

It’s not hard to imagine that the Yankees called the Twins inquiring about Simmons, and that would be enough to call it “interest.” 

Still, the response from the Twins should have been: DoneDeal!He’syoursNoBacksies TooBadSoSad *click*

We don't actually know what transaction was discussed.  Maybe the Twins would have had to eat half of the remaining salary just to be rid of him, with Ryan LaMarre coming back as a fig leaf for dignity's sake, and the discussion never progressed from that kind of insult.  I don't believe the Yankees actually acquired any middle infielders at the deadline, so whatever discussion there was was likely brief and not terribly motivated.

Posted
31 minutes ago, glunn said:

It's odd that we are just now hearing this.  And we have no details as to what the Yankees supposedly offered.

And as I said in a chat with friends, if there is news about what the Yankees are doing, it’s reported. Is there a more media-smothered team in all of sports than the Yankees?

Posted
14 minutes ago, ashbury said:

We don't actually know what transaction was discussed.  Maybe the Twins would have had to eat half of the remaining salary just to be rid of him, with Ryan LaMarre coming back as a fig leaf for dignity's sake, and the discussion never progressed from that kind of insult.  I don't believe the Yankees actually acquired any middle infielders at the deadline, so whatever discussion there was was likely brief and not terribly motivated.

Just moving on from Simmons and allocating those ABs and defensive innings elsewhere would've been a win. If a team was willing to pay any part of what was left on his deal, it should've been a no brainer. I don't see the insult. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, ashbury said:

I don't believe the Yankees actually acquired any middle infielders at the deadline, so whatever discussion there was was likely brief and not terribly motivated.

Right. There’s a difference between serious discussion and “just asking”.

Posted
18 minutes ago, KirbyDome89 said:

Just moving on from Simmons and allocating those ABs and defensive innings elsewhere would've been a win. If a team was willing to pay any part of what was left on his deal, it should've been a no brainer. I don't see the insult. 

I agree in that I would have given him for nothing.

My problem comes with the report itself, which is beyond sketchy. It’s a throwaway line in an article about a different subject, two months after the deadline during which we heard zero reports about Simmons and the Yankees.

Posted
3 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

My problem comes with the report itself, which is beyond sketchy. It’s a throwaway line in an article about a different subject, two months after the deadline during which we heard zero reports about Simmons and the Yankees.

The MLBTR article links to a piece by Andy Martino, who in turn used the usual phrase, "according to sources."  He seems to have a reputation to keep, so I'm inclined to accept that this was passed to him by someone in the Yankees organization who had knowledge.  Martino's the author of a book about the Astros cheating scandal, so I am predisposed to like him.  Then again he covers New York teams, so there's that.  :)

Posted
23 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

I agree in that I would have given him for nothing.

My problem comes with the report itself, which is beyond sketchy. It’s a throwaway line in an article about a different subject, two months after the deadline during which we heard zero reports about Simmons and the Yankees.

If there was no contact, or NY simply didn't want him regardless of price that's another story. Short of that, it's questionable at best from the Twins standpoint. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

Oh FFS. Come on, they had a chance to move that guy and didn't leap at the opportunity?

Yuck. Just yuck.

I guess the Yankees didn't have a bucket of baseballs handy to complete the trade. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Sousy said:

“Look - legally you have to give up something in a trade. Don’t you have a dollar in your pocket or something?”

"We already went over this.  You give us the rights to Andrelton Simmons's contract.  We give you the right to no longer have Simmons.  Is that not clear enough?"

Posted
6 hours ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

If they plan to retain Pineda and didn’t receive any decent offers, I can understand keeping him.

I literally would have given Simmons away to anyone who would take him. 

I would almost guess that that is the case. My assumption is that the Twins would have had to add a decent prospect to take it on... My guess is this was a throw-away sentence. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...