Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ESPN Insider - Lineup Rankings

amjgt

By amjgt
in Minnesota Twins Talk

Recommended Posts

KFEY93 College Ball

KFEY93

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

Im guessing the only thing we really didnt excel at was OBP....but even then we had to have been above average. That or they account half our line up to get injured at once and drop off the face of the earth. Who was #1? 

nicksaviking MVP

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted

 

Im guessing the only thing we really didnt excel at was OBP....but even then we had to have been above average. That or they account half our line up to get injured at once and drop off the face of the earth. Who was #1? 

 

Twins were 6th in OBP. 4th in fWAR but that takes into account defense.1st in ISO, 2rd in SLG, wRC+, wRC, wRAA and wOBA.

 

But I'm guessing signing Josh Donaldson and losing Jonathan Schoop is going to make those numbers take a dive.

amjgt FCL Twins

amjgt

Verified Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

Im guessing the only thing we really didnt excel at was OBP....but even then we had to have been above average. That or they account half our line up to get injured at once and drop off the face of the earth. Who was #1? 

 

Astros

 

 

amjgt FCL Twins

amjgt

Verified Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted

They ranked each team on 5 categories. Here are the categories and how they ranked the Twins on each:

 

Contact: 19 | Patience: 8 | Power: 10 | Speed: 23 | Balance: 10

 

 

Power 10th?!?!?! OMG. You can't make this up.

KFEY93 College Ball

KFEY93

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

Astros

 

Lol seriously?  Is that a joke article. I guess they were last year but after all this stink they still have them at 1?

KFEY93 College Ball

KFEY93

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

They ranked each team on 5 categories. Here are the categories and how they ranked the Twins on each:

 

Contact: 19 | Patience: 8 | Power: 10 | Speed: 23 | Balance: 10

 

 

Power 10th?!?!?! OMG. You can't make this up.

Sounds like a dead season article to get clicks..like most of BSPNs articles. 

nicksaviking MVP

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted

 

They ranked each team on 5 categories. Here are the categories and how they ranked the Twins on each:

 

Contact: 19 | Patience: 8 | Power: 10 | Speed: 23 | Balance: 10

 

 

Power 10th?!?!?! OMG. You can't make this up.

 

Contact was 19? They had the 4th lowest strikeout % last year.

 

Speed seems generous though. Is 23 their ranking or total number of SB last year?

Doctor Gast Wichita Wind Surge

Doctor Gast

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

Even more shocking, ESPN charges a fee for that content.

Thought the same, I wouldn`t check out anything for free what this writer would write

bird College Ball

bird

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

Twins were 6th in OBP. 4th in fWAR but that takes into account defense.1st in ISO, 2rd in SLG, wRC+, wRC, wRAA and wOBA.

 

But I'm guessing signing Josh Donaldson and losing Jonathan Schoop is going to make those numbers take a dive.

 

That and the loss of Jason Castro.

TFRazor First Round Pick

TFRazor

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

 

I believe this is all based on some guy's projection system.

 

When I was scrolling and saw the Mets in the top 5, I immediately LOL'ed.

Pretty sure that's just Pete Alonso. Rest of the team would've dragged their ratings down

IndianaTwin Wichita Wind Surge

IndianaTwin

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

They should trash this article

 

That's such a 2017 response. The new approach is: 

 

Toothpick on the left = fastball.

Toothpick on the right = breaking ball.

 

And maybe that's the issue. Are these ratings perhaps from 2017?

 

Thrylos St Paul Saints

Thrylos

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

 

They ranked each team on 5 categories. Here are the categories and how they ranked the Twins on each:

 

Contact: 19 | Patience: 8 | Power: 10 | Speed: 23 | Balance: 10

 

 

Power 10th?!?!?! OMG. You can't make this up.

That's what happens when scout types make up their minds based on what they see without looking at subjective measures.

 

2019 Twins' ranking in hitting categories:

 

2nd in wOBA,

3rd in wRC+,

2nd in BA,

tie 5th in OBP,

2nd in SLG%,

tie 4th in K%,

20th in BB%,

1st in IsoP,

3rd in % Hard hit balls,

21st in out of zone swinging %,

10th in Contact %.

30th in fangraphs spd.

 

Plus the addition of Donaldson, and a full season of Arraez and hopefully Buxton should help a bit.

 

Not sure what that "balance" thing is.   As far as speed goes, the ranking is fair, if not generous. Patience are overrated at 9th, since they were 20th in BB% and 21st in OOZSW%.  Contact they should be 10th, power should have been 1st or 2nd.

 

I guess that they ignore defense in the lineup for some reason.

 

The other thing is that not all of those things should weigh equally.  The bottom line is that the better the lineup, the more runs it will score, and the Twins were second in runs scored and third in wRC+ in the majors, so their lineup should be ranked about second or third in the majors...

TFRazor First Round Pick

TFRazor

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

That's such a 2017 response. The new approach is: 

 

Toothpick on the left = fastball.

Toothpick on the right = breaking ball.

 

And maybe that's the issue. Are these ratings perhaps from 2017?

toothpick in the middle = hockey player

bobs Draft Eligible

bobs

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

I'm surprised anyone at ESPN even knows there's a team in Minnesota.  Why are we surprised they would underrate the Twins?!

mikelink45 Minnesota Twins

mikelink45

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted

I have always laughed at East Coast bias and the Yankees ranking 9 is an argument that it does not exist, however, the Mets!!! You have to be kidding.  Yes I would take Alonso (but maybe there will be some regression) and the rest - are you kidding, Cano has been on a regression slide.  The Angels?  Two good hitters versus nine?

 

Oh well, at the end of the year we can send them an update.

TFRazor First Round Pick

TFRazor

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

 

I have always laughed at East Coast bias and the Yankees ranking 9 is an argument that it does not exist, however, the Mets!!! You have to be kidding.  Yes I would take Alonso (but maybe there will be some regression) and the rest - are you kidding, Cano has been on a regression slide.  The Angels?  Two good hitters versus nine?

 

Oh well, at the end of the year we can send them an update.

I think you can give the Angels credit for 3 good hitters. Trout, Rendon, Ohtani

twinsfanstreif Draft Eligible

twinsfanstreif

Provisional Member
Posted
Posted

man, no wonder ESPN's having tough times. They are literally pushing out clickbait these days. I'd like to see the reactions of actual baseball analysts when they read that list. I think it'd be egregious if we weren't in the top 4

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    20,441
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    Paweł Dąbrowski
    Newest Member
    Paweł Dąbrowski
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...