Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Twins Daily Contributor
Posted

There have been plenty of “what-ifs” in Twins history. A situation that currently feels relevant is how the organization once mishandled pitching prospect Liam Hendriks. Can the Twins avoid a similar fate with Louis Varland?

Image courtesy of William Parmeter (Varland)

Liam Hendriks was once considered a top pitching prospect in the Twins organization, including making back-to-back Futures Game appearances in 2010-11. When Hendriks was expected to be a future starter, the Twins had him slotted into the rotation, resulting in 30 starts over three seasons. With a 6.06 ERA, 1.59 WHIP, and a -2.0 WAR in that role, it was clear that Hendriks wasn’t suited for an MLB starter role. Minnesota even designated him for assignment in December 2013 after not giving him a chance to stick as a full-time reliever. He was only 24 years old, and the team was amid four straight seasons of 90 losses or more. His roster spot shouldn’t have been in jeopardy. 

After leaving the Twins, Hendriks reinvented himself as a reliever, emerging as one of the best in the game with a 2.94 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, and a 32.7 K% rate between 2015 and 2022. He earned three All-Star selections and snagged two Mariano Rivera AL Reliever of the Year awards, proving that sometimes a change in role is all it takes to unlock a player’s full potential.

As the Twins look to solidify their bullpen for the future, Louis Varland finds himself at a crossroads that eerily echoes Hendriks’ early days. Varland’s numbers as a starter haven’t exactly set the world on fire, with a 5.27 ERA, 1.43 WHIP, and opponents batting a .851 OPS against him. Yet, there’s been a noticeable spark when Varland has been used out of the bullpen. In 16 relief appearances, he’s shown flashes of potential that suggest his skills might be best utilized in shorter stints. During the team’s playoff run in 2024, Varland pitched 12 relief innings in the season’s final weeks while allowing two runs (both solo home runs) with a 17-to-1 strikeout-to-walk ratio. 

The decision is unfolding almost organically. With injuries to key relievers like Justin Topa, Brock Stewart, and Michael Tonkin creating a void in the bullpen, the Twins now have a golden opportunity to tap into Varland’s potential. The front office and coaches have repeatedly spoken highly of his work in relief roles, and it appears they’ve learned from past missteps. Instead of forcing him to continue as a starter, where his performance has been less than inspiring, the plan is to ease him into a full-time reliever role starting in 2025.

“Getting a chance to see him throw an inning, kind of a revved-up inning,” Baldelli said this spring. “Letting him come in from the bullpen doing that gets him the work we’re looking for from him right now.”

This isn’t just a simple positional change, as it’s a strategic shift to maximize Varland’s skill set. Much like Hendriks, who finally found his niche in the bullpen after being shoehorned into a starting role, Varland might be on the verge of a breakthrough if given the right opportunity. The Twins are clearly eager not to repeat history. They remember the missed opportunity with Hendriks, a pitcher who eventually became a star reliever, and are now taking a more measured, patient approach with Varland.

There’s a genuine sense of optimism among those in the Twins’ inner circle. Coaches have remarked on Varland’s “stuff” when he’s been used in relief, and the organization’s willingness to make a long-term bet on him in that role shows that they believe in his potential. The Twins are making a calculated move to ensure that Varland can flourish without the added burden of pacing through an entire game. Instead, he will slide into the back of the bullpen and have the opportunity to show he deserves more late-inning opportunities as he gets settled into his new role. 

For fans, this transition is about reclaiming some of the magic that seemed to slip away with Hendriks. It’s a reminder that a player can reinvent himself with the proper guidance and opportunity, even in the face of early setbacks. Hendriks’ turnaround from a struggling starter to a dominant reliever has become a case study in player development. Varland’s situation now presents a similar narrative. The organization’s commitment to finding the proper role for each player is a testament to their long-term vision and willingness to adapt.

Ultimately, the move to shift Varland into a full-time relief role isn’t just a reaction to injuries or numbers. It’s a deliberate effort to harness a player’s true potential. It’s a lesson in patience and adaptability, and if Varland can capitalize on this fresh start, the Twins might add another ace to their bullpen. The road ahead isn’t without its challenges, but with the organization’s backing and a renewed focus on player development, this could be the beginning of a promising new chapter for both Varland and the Twins’ relief corps.

What are your expectations for Varland as a reliever, now that the role switch is officially official? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 


View full article

Posted

Hendriks is a very different pitcher than Varland, and Hendiks' transition to reliever resulted in a much more dramatic change. 

Hendriks picked up 4mph going from averaging 91.5mph to 95.5mph in his first year as a reliever. His velocity peaked at over 97.5mph meaning a total of 6mph improvement. Varland only goes up 1-2mph since he was already throwing hard.

In terms of stuff, Hendriks has developed 2 plus pitches, he's more like Griffin Jax. Varland probably has no plus pitches. The curve might work out for him as a good plus pitch, but he rarely threw it last year. Varland's other offerings are pretty average.

I expect Varland to be a mediocre reliever with stuff that doesn't move well so it gets barreled up, and velo which isn't overpowering relative to the average reliever. Varland's results as a reliever thus far have not been inspiring.

Posted

I was in favor & advocated last season, that Varland not waste his bullets in AAA to be a SP but be brought up & kept up as a RP. When he was brought up as a SP, he was unimpressive. Many short-sighted fans completely gave up on Varland, I have always seen Varland's value as a RP. IMO Varland could become a SP but his avenue is 1st via the BP.

Posted

A lot of people are big on his velo, which we've seen touch 100mph. While that is nice, his fastball is very straight which means its easier to hit. And with that velo when it does get hit, it gets hit hard. If he can find a way to get some movement on his pitches and develop a good offspeed pitch, maybe he can be a solid reliever. I am glad they finally are putting him in the pen fulltime. He is cooked as a starter and has been for awhile. I wish him the best of luck, you can never have to many weapons out there in the pen...

Posted
2 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

My only question is - why did it take so long?

Because he had just enough success early on as a starter to make it possible to foresee a scenario where that worked out for him. And if he could have made it as a starter, that has more value for the team, especially when this journey started. It's a lot easier to push Varland to the 'pen when you have Festa, Matthews, Morris, Raya, and Lewis at AAA, coming off a season when SWR was effective in MLB for most of the seasons, and Paddack looks healthy. Starting pitching depth was in a different place entering 2023 or even 2024.

Posted

Yeah, OK...I know...I know...its just Spring Training...but....WHO DO YOU LIKE?

CLE:  10-17  added Santana, Resigned Bieber, lost Boyd, Cobb, Gimenez, Josh Naylor, Eli Morgan

CWS:  10-16  added Perez, Slater, Tachman, WIlson, Rojas, Taylor, Gilbert, Thaiss, lost Leone 

MIN:  10-15 added Bader, France, Coulombe, lost Farmer, Kepler, Santana, Thielbar, Moran

DET:  12-12  added Flaherty, Torrez, Urquidy

KC:   18-11  added ZJonathan India, Estevez, lost Robbie Grossman, Will Smith, Singer, Frazier, Pham DeJong, Gurriel

Posted

The results as a reliever in 2024 weren’t great…but under the covers there was a significant improvement from his starter numbers.
 

I do think there’s a shot for him to be an above-average reliever in short stints. IMO, the fastball is good enough if he commands it well. And a solidly average secondary pitch might be enough…as a short reliever. I think he’s going to get the opportunity to make that happen. We’ll see.

Posted
6 hours ago, Doctor Gast said:

I was in favor & advocated last season, that Varland not waste his bullets in AAA to be a SP but be brought up & kept up as a RP. When he was brought up as a SP, he was unimpressive. Many short-sighted fans completely gave up on Varland, I have always seen Varland's value as a RP. IMO Varland could become a SP but his avenue is 1st via the BP.

Varland in 2023 was impressive in the bullpen at season's end and playoffs , why management continued to pitch him as a starter in 2024 ( depth as a starter isnt a good enough reason when others , like Festa and others were better options as a starter  )  , one never knows why  ...

Im just hoping management didn't wait to long in making him a bullpen arm and he can continue as a dominant arm ...

Posted
6 hours ago, Doctor Gast said:

I was in favor & advocated last season, that Varland not waste his bullets in AAA to be a SP but be brought up & kept up as a RP. When he was brought up as a SP, he was unimpressive. Many short-sighted fans completely gave up on Varland, I have always seen Varland's value as a RP. IMO Varland could become a SP but his avenue is 1st via the BP.

Varland in 2023 was impressive in the bullpen at season's end and playoffs , why management continued to pitch him as a starter in 2024 ( depth as a starter isnt a good enough reason when others , like Festa and others were better options as a starter  )  , one never knows why  ...

Im just hoping management didn't wait to long in making him a bullpen arm and he can continue as a dominant arm ...

Posted
7 hours ago, bean5302 said:

Hendriks is a very different pitcher than Varland, and Hendiks' transition to reliever resulted in a much more dramatic change. 

Hendriks picked up 4mph going from averaging 91.5mph to 95.5mph in his first year as a reliever. His velocity peaked at over 97.5mph meaning a total of 6mph improvement. Varland only goes up 1-2mph since he was already throwing hard.

In terms of stuff, Hendriks has developed 2 plus pitches, he's more like Griffin Jax. Varland probably has no plus pitches. The curve might work out for him as a good plus pitch, but he rarely threw it last year. Varland's other offerings are pretty average.

I expect Varland to be a mediocre reliever with stuff that doesn't move well so it gets barreled up, and velo which isn't overpowering relative to the average reliever. Varland's results as a reliever thus far have not been inspiring.

 

I agree with most of this except the last paragraph. I expect or maybe hope for more of a Jax type when it's all said and done. But not a Hendrik outcome.

Posted

I hope for this transition to go well. I'm 50/50 on what I think the results will be. The woulda, coulda shoulda with past players kind of bugs me. We've benefited from it plenty of times as well from other teams' players. 

Posted

The only thing holding Varland back is his attitude. He insists he should be a starter while his stats prove otherwise. If he would ever embrace a relievers role he could be exceptional.

Posted
On 3/22/2025 at 7:30 AM, Cody Christie said:

After leaving the Twins, Hendriks reinvented himself as a reliever, emerging as one of the best in the game with a 2.94 ERA, 1.05 WHIP, and a 32.7 K% rate between 2015 and 2022. He earned three All-Star selections and snagged two Mariano Rivera AL Reliever of the Year awards, proving that sometimes a change in role is all it takes to unlock a player’s full potential.

I really disagree with @Cody Christie’s assertion that the failure to try Hendriks as a reliever was the mistake. The Twins released him after the 2013 season. After that he went from the Cubs to the Orioles to the Blue Jays to the Royals back to the Blue Jays and then to the A’s. He pitched in relief 201 times in that span and earned one save.

His ERA’s in his first three seasons with the A’s were a mediocre 3.76, 4.22 and 4.13 as a middle inning reliever throwing a fastball in the 94s. Something happened at age 30 in 2019 and his velocity the next few seasons was 97 and the ERAs were under 2.

The Twins didn’t make a mistake of not giving a chance to a reliever throwing in the 94s. If there was a mistake it was a failure to help him find that 97 mph fastball.  All of the other coaching staffs he encountered on his path from 2013 to 2018 had the same failure. The Twins can’t make that same mistake with Varland. They have already helped him get to a velocity in the upper 90s.

 

Posted
7 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

My only question is - why did it take so long?

For the same reasons Austin Martin played SS in the minors for 115 games. The same reason half the team plays 2B when they need a 1B. A mystery as old as this regime!

Posted

I'll limit my comments to Varland only.  My impression is that when you have great velocity, you can reduce to "very good" velocity and likely add not insignificant movement.  I know this is an oversimplification, but also a good generalization.  

I believe Varland can be a lights-out reliever. He gains speed with short (1 inning) bursts,  and can leverage/trade some of that for better action.  IF this is successful, his middling secondary offerings can play.  And as he develops,  those same secondary offerings could become plus.  I see the path.  

Posted
1 hour ago, FargoFanMan said:

For the same reasons Austin Martin played SS in the minors for 115 games. The same reason half the team plays 2B when they need a 1B. A mystery as old as this regime!

Are you suggesting the Twins are rudderless?

Posted

Not at all. They just have an affinity for keeping guys at certain positions when they have no business being there or not putting obvious choices in certain positions of weakness. For instance Wallner other than his arm seems to be average at best in RF. They are weak at 1B. When Erod and Jenkins come up who are superior OF’s where will Wallner play? No reps at 1B at all when he’s a natural fit. Same with Varland. He should have been in the BP last year. Wasted a whole year at AAA just to come to the obvious conclusion a year later.

Posted
10 hours ago, FargoFanMan said:

Not at all. They just have an affinity for keeping guys at certain positions when they have no business being there or not putting obvious choices in certain positions of weakness. For instance Wallner other than his arm seems to be average at best in RF. They are weak at 1B. When Erod and Jenkins come up who are superior OF’s where will Wallner play? No reps at 1B at all when he’s a natural fit. Same with Varland. He should have been in the BP last year. Wasted a whole year at AAA just to come to the obvious conclusion a year later.

He pitched 49 innings for the twins last year. He wasn’t very effective and it turned into a lot of garbage time as a SP.  I do agree they should have moved him to the bullpen sooner but HE insisted at trying to be a SP. If that had been more successful, we would’ve not seen SWR as much and certainly less of Festa and Matthews. 
Now that he has accepted his bullpen roll, he understands that max effort is how he gets people out. His stuff will always play and the bullpen will be better with him in it. If he can got 2 innings per outing, he could become a legendary stopper. 
 

Posted
21 hours ago, bean5302 said:

Hendriks is a very different pitcher than Varland, and Hendiks' transition to reliever resulted in a much more dramatic change. 

Hendriks picked up 4mph going from averaging 91.5mph to 95.5mph in his first year as a reliever. His velocity peaked at over 97.5mph meaning a total of 6mph improvement. Varland only goes up 1-2mph since he was already throwing hard.

In terms of stuff, Hendriks has developed 2 plus pitches, he's more like Griffin Jax. Varland probably has no plus pitches. The curve might work out for him as a good plus pitch, but he rarely threw it last year. Varland's other offerings are pretty average.

I expect Varland to be a mediocre reliever with stuff that doesn't move well so it gets barreled up, and velo which isn't overpowering relative to the average reliever. Varland's results as a reliever thus far have not been inspiring.

I don’t have a bunch of stats but he did seem to be effective in a few relief appearances at end of ‘23 - at least a couple in prime time situations.

Note from above calls out 12 relief innings late in ‘24 with 17-1 strikeout to walk ratio.

Seems to me there should be a bit of optimism with Varland throwing to guys that only get to see him once in an outing. He comes off as a touch wild occasionally & he looks like he’s on speed in most of his outings - can’t make hitters very comfortable!

I think his attention span plays better in one inning outings as well - his personality just seems to thrive in the one inning, let it fly, situations.

Posted

I am not shy about criticizing the Twins on player evaluation but I think it’s really a stretch to say they blew it with Hendricks.  He got passed around to several teams due to ineffectiveness after the Twins let him go.  Finally he starts throwing substantially harder and becomes a good reliever.  It’s interesting because he was kind of a slightly built guy with the Twins - when he had success he was built like a linebacker so he must have really hit those, ahem, weights.

As far as Varland goes I hope he succeeds but the jury is still out on him even in relief.  He has the velocity but his fastball is pretty straight.  He has no effective secondary pitches with the possible exception of a baby cutter.  If he can really spot those two pitches he could be a good reliever but the margin for error is pretty slim.

Posted

Although Varland has expressed the desire to start, it’s hard to argue with the idea of him pitching out of the bullpen, where he has had success and where his stuff plays up. 

Posted
13 hours ago, FargoFanMan said:

For the same reasons Austin Martin played SS in the minors for 115 games. The same reason half the team plays 2B when they need a 1B. A mystery as old as this regime!

Martin was drafted as a shortstop. So if your point is that Martin shouldn’t have played there, you are wrong. Obviously, they needed to find out if he could play shortstop, and if it took 115 games to see if this high draft choice could actually play his college position, so be it. As for filling the black hole at first base, they have tried both Julien and Miranda there. But I get your point. First base should be the easiest infield position to fill, requiring less fielding skills, speed and athleticism than the other infield positions. And it does make sense to experiment with Wallner at first, given Jenkins and EROD seem to be close to making the team, especially EROD. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Otaknam said:

Martin was drafted as a shortstop. So if your point is that Martin shouldn’t have played there, you are wrong. Obviously, they needed to find out if he could play shortstop, and if it took 115 games to see if this high draft choice could actually play his college position, so be it. As for filling the black hole at first base, they have tried both Julien and Miranda there. But I get your point. First base should be the easiest infield position to fill, requiring less fielding skills, speed and athleticism than the other infield positions. And it does make sense to experiment with Wallner at first, given Jenkins and EROD seem to be close to making the team, especially EROD. 

Wallner is just getting to the point of becoming a regular OF. Sending him to 1B is probably premature. The FO was counting on AK to be 1B before his retirement that just happened so there is gonna be some transition time involved. Hopefully France is back to his allstar status vs. injury plagued barf of 2 seasons. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, Otaknam said:

Martin was drafted as a shortstop. So if your point is that Martin shouldn’t have played there, you are wrong. Obviously, they needed to find out if he could play shortstop, and if it took 115 games to see if this high draft choice could actually play his college position, so be it. As for filling the black hole at first base, they have tried both Julien and Miranda there. But I get your point. First base should be the easiest infield position to fill, requiring less fielding skills, speed and athleticism than the other infield positions. And it does make sense to experiment with Wallner at first, given Jenkins and EROD seem to be close to making the team, especially EROD. 

Austin Martin was never destined to be a SS. At least not a good one at the major league level. Doesn’t have the arm. In college an athletic guy can get away with pure athleticism. It shouldn’t have taken 115 games in the minors to find that out. Also, he played all over in college as well. He was drafted high for his bat and athleticism. Not because he was a superior SS. He played mostly 3B in college. I like that they encourage guys to play all over but as we’ve seen with the Twins defense over the years not having a a home position for guys to hone their craft defensively hurts as much as it helps. 

Posted

Roster management is always a factor. The Twins almost lsot Jax because they kept him in the reserve rotation role too long. Also remember that names like Guardado and Hawkins and Perkins were all bad starters that the Twins managed to convert to bullpen arms.

Rick Aguilera and Joe Nathan were also rotation arms before finding success as a starter. Rick actually returned to the rotation, albeit with limited results, rather than fully embrace the closer opportunities.

In the end, there are twice as many ways to make a roster as a bullpen arm, than a rotation arm, especially when at least three spots in a rotation are usually long-term with less turnover opportunities. The joy of being a young guy trying to be a starter is that once you get on the 40-man, you ARE THE DEPTHG is soemthing happens. Unfortunately, bullpen arms aren't paid as well as starters (but you don't get paid if you don't produce) and although you may have a long career, you may be on that minor/major shuffle for most of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...