Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • The Clock Has Struck Midnight for Trevor Larnach


    Ted Schwerzler

    The Minnesota Twins will have some internal decisions to make this offseason, and as they look to restructure their 40-man roster, some players will be pieced out in trades. One that seems likely and potentially valuable is Trevor Larnach.

    Image courtesy of Matt Blewett-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Minnesota drafted Trevor Larnach with the 20th overall pick during the 2018 Major League Baseball Draft. Derek Falvey and Thad Levine were still getting their feet wet in the front office, and while Sean Johnson was still in charge of the draft, Larnach’s selection indicated a new direction. 

    This current regime has leaned into college hitters with impressive exit velocities. As those sustain at the next level and give major league organizations something to work with, a player from a National Championship team in Oregon was plenty to get excited about. Three years into his big-league career, Larnach squeaked onto the Opening Day roster in 2023 but had been trending towards Triple-A for most of the spring.

    The one-time top-50 prospect had a .708 OPS through 47 games to start the season but got only brief stints in June and July while searching for his missing power. Despite being able to punish the baseball, Larnach’s game power has translated into just 20 dingers across his first 188 career games. Due to his inability to handle off-speed pitches at times, Larnach's lack of slugging prowess has held him back.

    When Joey Gallo went down late in the year for Rocco Baldelli’s Twins, it was Larnach who again got an opportunity. From the end of July to early September, Larnach had a .536 slugging percentage for the Saints, hitting seven home runs in a stretch of 38 games. The Twins were looking for that, and they were hoping it would finally translate.

    Filling in as Minnesota headed toward the postseason, Larnach drew starts in just four of eight games. Despite the sporadic playing time, he brought the power from St. Paul. Two of his four hits left the yard, and he doubled in a third. With a 5/3 K/BB, he showed solid plate discipline while stinging the ball when putting it in play, albeit in a small sample.

    There wasn’t much indication that Larnach would be on the postseason roster, even with Byron Buxton out of the equation. He is a corner outfielder blocked by both Max Kepler and Matt Wallner. That resembles much of the same situation Minnesota will find this offseason, with Kepler’s option already picked up. Although some luster has worn off for a soon-to-be-27-year-old, Larnach could be a late-bloomer, not yet arbitration-eligible until 2025.

    In dealing Larnach, Minnesota would be moving on from a position of surplus. The outfield corners are ripe with options for the Twins, and a major league-ready talent could be sold as a high-floor breakout candidate if the pitch is correct. 

    Sending Larnach out in a deal isn’t going to result in a blockbuster, and he won’t be the cornerstone of something massive. He does represent much more than a throw-in, though, and the team control he comes with could be appealing to plenty of suitors. Whereas the idea of trading for a young high-ceiling prospect like Yasser Mercedes may be titillating due to what you could dream on, Larnach is a more of the realized version with an opportunity to blossom.

    Ultimately, Larnach represents an ideal candidate to be moved by Minnesota this winter, and freeing up a spot on the 40-man roster by adding a more necessary talent is enticing. Sometimes draft picks and prospects are about future capital, and while Larnach wouldn’t be playing to his potential in the organization he initially joined, cashing in on him in the form of another provides a lengthened arc for the story.

    What do you think? Is Trevor Larnach in the Twins organization on Opening Day in 2024? What type of return do you see him bringing back?

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The underlying gist of this article is that Larnach has not fulfilled his promise and doesn’t look to be part of the Twins’ plans for the future.

    Assuming this is correct (and I for one am not there yet), the bigger questions are 1) how/why did this happen and 2) how do we get better at improving the results of our solid minor league prospects transitioning into the bigs?

    Larnach is not the first. There are many others.  Among the current crop, Miranda and, to a lesser extent, Kiriloff are similar examples.  How do we make sure Lewis, Julien, Wallner and Martin don’t fall into this category? Why did Steer, CES and Rooker, three of our “less heralded” prospects we traded instead of Miranda and Larnach, have such a successful transition? Sure we’ve had successes over the years, but a high success rate in the transition has to be the hallmark of any small to mid market team hoping to compete.

    With the batch of young talent transitioning in this year and over the following two seasons, one would think that substantial thought, data analysis, and resources would be devoted to this issue/opportunity.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Trevor L might just be one of those guys who needs to know coming into spring training he is the guy. I think if he came in and had a full year with no DL and wasn't fighting for a roster spot, maybe he might relax a bit and we could see some of those AAA numbers at the top level.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    42 minutes ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    The underlying gist of this article is that Larnach has not fulfilled his promise and doesn’t look to be part of the Twins’ plans for the future.

    Assuming this is correct (and I for one am not there yet), the bigger questions are 1) how/why did this happen and 2) how do we get better at improving the results of our solid minor league prospects transitioning into the bigs?

    Larnach is not the first. There are many others.  Among the current crop, Miranda and, to a lesser extent, Kiriloff are similar examples.  How do we make sure Lewis, Julien, Wallner and Martin don’t fall into this category? Why did Steer, CES and Rooker, three of our “less heralded” prospects we traded instead of Miranda and Larnach, have such a successful transition? Sure we’ve had successes over the years, but a high success rate in the transition has to be the hallmark of any small to mid market team hoping to compete.

    With the batch of young talent transitioning in this year and over the following two seasons, one would think that substantial thought, data analysis, and resources would be devoted to this issue/opportunity.

    I can agree with many of the things you say here.  It is certainly important to evaluate how the minor league pipeline translates into successful major leaguers.  It is especially relevant for a mid-market team.  However, it isn't unusual at all for players that have floundered a bit on one team to find just the right situation to succeed on another team.  Steer and CES may cause regrets for a while given the major injury to the primary target of the trade.  Rooker, on the other hand, bounced around quite a lot until he got to Oakland, a team without much in terms of talent, threw him in the lineup.  I'm glad he found success, but I don't think he likely sustains it. 

    I'm certain that plenty of thought, analysis, and resources go into talent evaluation, perhaps more now than ever before in Twins history, but it's definitely not an exact science. 

    Bottom line, Larnach is probably worth more in trade than he is to the MN Twins.  Time to package him and move on. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Where is this "surplus" of corner outfielders? With all the surplus on this roster that's talked about on almost every thread on TD it's crazy that they only won 87 games last year, and we shouldn't have any problem replacing Gray through trade with all these high value trade guys we have that aren't needed anymore.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am also having trouble with the surplus of OF after reading the various TD essays.  We are hurting at CF, we have Wallner and Kepler on the corners and seem to think Kepler will be gone.  We project sudden fame for Austin Martin without much proof and look at Castro and  Gordon as OFs even though they began as IFs and are really utility guys. 

    Now Larnach has really disappointed me and I was expecting so much more, but with the obvious evidence I ask why his addition to a trade would move the needle at all.  Other teams no more than we do.  

    Maybe the A's can pair him with Rooker, or the Tigers can add him to Baddoo, but I am not seeing value nor do I see a compelling reason to have him take a 40 man spot. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, mikelink45 said:

    I am also having trouble with the surplus of OF after reading the various TD essays.  We are hurting at CF, we have Wallner and Kepler on the corners and seem to think Kepler will be gone.  We project sudden fame for Austin Martin without much proof and look at Castro and  Gordon as OFs even though they began as IFs and are really utility guys. 

    Now Larnach has really disappointed me and I was expecting so much more, but with the obvious evidence I ask why his addition to a trade would move the needle at all.  Other teams no more than we do.  

    Maybe the A's can pair him with Rooker, or the Tigers can add him to Baddoo, but I am not seeing value nor do I see a compelling reason to have him take a 40 man spot. 

    I doubt anyone in baseball "values" Larnach more than we Twins fans.  And we are almost universally ready to trade him for a better player(s).  

    Unfortunately, that pretty much sums up his value for his most optimistic fans: not good enough for us, but somehow valuable enough to be major trade component.  The "logic" of this thinking should be obvious. 

    I'd love for him to truly surprise everyone and be a component OF/DH, but until that is proven, the most realistic expectation is his ceiling being a fourth OF limited by an inability to play CF.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You could bundle him with someone. But, right now, I like him as a possible outfielder. But this is his do-or-die season, before being passed by others. He ahs a slim chance of staying with the Twins, depending on what happens to Kepler eventually, and if Buxton can actually play the outfield. The Twins will have no problem filling a 4th outfielder position, and even have to make decisions on names like Gordon, too...especially with Castro playing well last season, and the minors still full of good "reserve" guys.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    one would think that substantial thought, data analysis, and resources would be devoted to this issue/opportunity.

    its funny to think that in this day and age that people here the front office operates like a forum.  Of course they put thought, data analysis and resources into this.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    100% against trading Larnach. He needs consistent work.

    I wonder how many people for trading Larnach away before he’s been given a full look also were wanting to trade away the farm for Danny Jensen or another C last offseason when it was obvious Ryan Jeffers just needed a little more time and consistency. And look what happened. I fully believe Larnach is capable of the same if given a solid chance.

    Tom Kelly always preached 1500 AB’s. Maybe that’s too much but I think it’s more accurate than 700 inconsistently spread over 3 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Consistent at-bats could be the issue. Some players thrive in spot starts and pinch hitting. Some need consistent playing time and know that when they show up their name is on the lineup card. If anyone from our depth in the outfield should be traded I propose Kepler. The Yankees would take a pull hitting lefty to torch their short porch any day. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So explain to me how the middle chunk of this essay where he returned to St Paul, discovered how to hit breaking stuff and regained his power, and finally displayed this in his limited opportunities in Sept, logically leads to Larnach becoming a disposable fourth outfielder.  That's more than a little inconsistent.

    You keep him and let him build back some value. You wait to see if Wallner stays strong or goes all Miranda in his sophomore year. You see if Kepler is still here for April 1. Unless a team comes calling for Larnach with flowers and chocolates there's no reason for low value dumping like this; he's got an option and there's room on the roster to wait. 

    EDIT:  Trade Kepler now when everyone remembers his last two months rather than the thirty that preceded them.

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think the Twins have damaged Larnachs career as well as others.  This constant trying a young player thene goes 0 for 10 he is sent to AAA.  Remember last year when they first sent him down he was leading tge team in RBIs with like 36 at the time.  Some reward for doing a good job.  Same could  with Ober and others.  I think the Twins need to show more patience with their prospects once at the major league level.  Why in the world would any young players want to play in the Twins system?  I am for trading Larnach.  But for the chance to play regularly on a major league team.  He's earned it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Unless the team has decided there is something wrong with his makeup (an insight we'll never get until possibly long after the fact), I continue to think Larnach can be an overall above average corner outfielder, with a plus bat and so-so fielding.  It seems to me that his struggles at the plate when in the majors have coincided with injury.  I guess that would be another thing the team might decide will never get better, if they think he'll be plagued by muscle pulls and strains perpetually.  But absent that, I would not like to give up on him for only small return.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Nashvilletwin said:

    The underlying gist of this article is that Larnach has not fulfilled his promise and doesn’t look to be part of the Twins’ plans for the future.

    Assuming this is correct (and I for one am not there yet), the bigger questions are 1) how/why did this happen and 2) how do we get better at improving the results of our solid minor league prospects transitioning into the bigs?

    Larnach is not the first. There are many others.  Among the current crop, Miranda and, to a lesser extent, Kiriloff are similar examples.  How do we make sure Lewis, Julien, Wallner and Martin don’t fall into this category? Why did Steer, CES and Rooker, three of our “less heralded” prospects we traded instead of Miranda and Larnach, have such a successful transition? Sure we’ve had successes over the years, but a high success rate in the transition has to be the hallmark of any small to mid market team hoping to compete.

    With the batch of young talent transitioning in this year and over the following two seasons, one would think that substantial thought, data analysis, and resources would be devoted to this issue/opportunity.

    Miranda and Kirilloff have been bitten by injury. Miranda had a very solid rookie season and this year instead of taking the next step his hurt his shoulder and needed season-ending surgery after not being able to get back through rest and rehab. Kirilloff has performed well when healthy, and struggled when trying to play through injury. Steer & CES (especially CES) were well-regarded prospects that were moved in an attempt to improve pitching. Steer struggled mightily in his first taste of MLB and played very well last season (though him already moving down to 1B is not ideal for his long-term value); CES looks like the hitter we thought he was, but has the problem of not really having a defensive home. Rooker flunked out not only with the Twins, but also the Padres and the Royals, it wasn't until he joined the staggeringly awful A's that he performed well...and even then there's a real question whether he'd replicate that on a semi-competitive team.

    the only thing that's held Lewis back was injury; he's now locked in at 3B. Wallner has done great in moving to MLB. Julien got rookie of the year votes. not entirely sure what the Twins have done wrong there, other than maybe not giving Wallner more opportunity sooner?

    Once Larnach started figuring things out in AAA again, there wasn't much opportunity in MLB. Why would you give him ABs over Kepler and Wallner, who were both playing very well? Would I had rather had him than Gallo? Sure, but it still wouldn't have freed up many ABs, especially unless Larnach learned to play 1B in a hurry.

    I'm fine with moving on from Larnach if we need to, but if he still has an option left I wouldn't send him packing without a good offer, and after last season who knows if we get one? I think the more likely one to get moved might be Gordon from the LH OFs. Gordon doesn't have an option left and without an injury doesn't have a roster spot, unless he's become a heck of a lot better CF than I remember.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The good news is we have many ways to build a trade package for a starting pitcher.  We have players on the MLB team, young players, and good prospects at all levels of the minors.  Hopefully we can find an agreeable combo to get a deal done.  As for the bench we have a desirable opportunity for back up CF to get lots of playing time on a contender so we should be able to get one.  I think we should hang on to Larnarch unless he is part of a package for a starting pitcher.  This should be an easy offseason unless the Twins decide to get cute and trade either Polanco or Kepler creating more holes/ less depth….. I’m just sitting back and watching this unfold.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    58 minutes ago, Whitey333 said:

    I think the Twins have damaged Larnachs career as well as others.  This constant trying a young player thene goes 0 for 10 he is sent to AAA.  Remember last year when they first sent him down he was leading tge team in RBIs with like 36 at the time.  Some reward for doing a good job.  Same could  with Ober and others.  I think the Twins need to show more patience with their prospects once at the major league level.  Why in the world would any young players want to play in the Twins system?  I am for trading Larnach.  But for the chance to play regularly on a major league team.  He's earned it.

    IT is a TEAM sport, not a single player on the team sport.

    Front Office does what they think is good for the team, whether we like it or not.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What none of us knows is what the organization thinks about him. I mean, did he figure something out at AAA to indicate his finish to the season is for real? If so, whatever he's figured out gives more value to him within the organization now, and going forward, than he had the bulk of 2023.

    Why would anybody want him? He's a former top prospect, LH bat with power and a good arm in the OF. He's struggled some, to be sure. But he's also flashed, often before becoming injured, (twice but each different), or sick, which happened last year, IIRC.

    There's virtually nothing on the FA market to match him, so why not a young-ish, inexpensive, former 1st rounder and top prospect that might be ready to bloom with regular playing time?

    There is no logjam of corner OF at the moment. The Twins might want to hold on to Larnach for depth, and a belief that maybe the last half of 2023 offered real encouragement going forward. But he could also be a potential steal as part of a package for a team looking for LH power.

    Not close to midnight yet. Don't think the sun has even set.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Might a spot open for Larnach if Kepler needs to cover center field? Who would be ahead of him in that case? I don't think we're going to sign a Michael A. Taylor type this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    Where is this "surplus" of corner outfielders? With all the surplus on this roster that's talked about on almost every thread on TD it's crazy that they only won 87 games last year, and we shouldn't have any problem replacing Gray through trade with all these high value trade guys we have that aren't needed anymore.

    If you have a ton of average players that doesn't mean you'll win more than the average number of games. It just means when one guy gets hurt there isn't a dropoff in performance.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    When he has been healthy he has shown promise & this year he started strong, played in more games & led the Twins in RBIs, I don't care about the decrease of HRs if he's hitting, But with the longer exposure they found a crack in his armour. The Twins should have known his weakness & corrected it by now, at 27. His trade value because of years of availibility is comparable to Kepler. If he's part of a reasonable trade I'd do it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    31 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    If you have a ton of average players that doesn't mean you'll win more than the average number of games. It just means when one guy gets hurt there isn't a dropoff in performance.

    That is, assuming, the replacement is of equal talent  both fielding and with a bat as the one he replaces.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Whitey333 said:

    I think the Twins have damaged Larnachs career as well as others.  This constant trying a young player thene goes 0 for 10 he is sent to AAA.  Remember last year when they first sent him down he was leading tge team in RBIs with like 36 at the time.  Some reward for doing a good job.  Same could  with Ober and others.  I think the Twins need to show more patience with their prospects once at the major league level.  Why in the world would any young players want to play in the Twins system?  I am for trading Larnach.  But for the chance to play regularly on a major league team.  He's earned it.

    https://sabr.org/journal/article/willie-mays-first-season/ I keep thinking about Willie Mays and how Durocher and the Giants stuck with him as he struggled.  That is a rare thing and it  might be what Larnach needed. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, Rosterman said:

     this is his do-or-die season, before being passed by others. 

    I've also have said the same , and if it is his  last chance  I think it would be encouraging for him to go to driveline  this winter  and get someone to help him with the offspeed pitches  and also identifying the pitches would help ,

    This is definitely his last chance with the twins in 2024 and I would like to see him capitalize  on it ...

    Remember he was leading the Twins  in rbi's and has some pop  in his bat that the front office likes ...

    he needs help and it's up to him ...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, jmlease1 said:

    Miranda and Kirilloff have been bitten by injury. Miranda had a very solid rookie season and this year instead of taking the next step his hurt his shoulder and needed season-ending surgery after not being able to get back through rest and rehab. Kirilloff has performed well when healthy, and struggled when trying to play through injury. Steer & CES (especially CES) were well-regarded prospects that were moved in an attempt to improve pitching. Steer struggled mightily in his first taste of MLB and played very well last season (though him already moving down to 1B is not ideal for his long-term value); CES looks like the hitter we thought he was, but has the problem of not really having a defensive home. Rooker flunked out not only with the Twins, but also the Padres and the Royals, it wasn't until he joined the staggeringly awful A's that he performed well...and even then there's a real question whether he'd replicate that on a semi-competitive team.

    the only thing that's held Lewis back was injury; he's now locked in at 3B. Wallner has done great in moving to MLB. Julien got rookie of the year votes. not entirely sure what the Twins have done wrong there, other than maybe not giving Wallner more opportunity sooner?

    Once Larnach started figuring things out in AAA again, there wasn't much opportunity in MLB. Why would you give him ABs over Kepler and Wallner, who were both playing very well? Would I had rather had him than Gallo? Sure, but it still wouldn't have freed up many ABs, especially unless Larnach learned to play 1B in a hurry.

    I'm fine with moving on from Larnach if we need to, but if he still has an option left I wouldn't send him packing without a good offer, and after last season who knows if we get one? I think the more likely one to get moved might be Gordon from the LH OFs. Gordon doesn't have an option left and without an injury doesn't have a roster spot, unless he's become a heck of a lot better CF than I remember.

    Agree with the overview of Larnach - the desire to give him a chance - couldn’t play him at 1B ahead of Gallo (not an option) late ‘23 - Gordon should maybe be offered up first….etc.

    To me, heavy watcher of MLB Network ….skimmer of The Athletic…….every day reader of TD Forum, there’s no obvious trade partners for pitching ……..who wants to trade proven starters or arms in general???? …….NOBODY, except maybe the Brewers.

    My slant is the following:

    Either Miranda or Larnach (1 of them minimum) has a chance to be on an MLB roster for a number of years - maybe both. Maybe not stars but functional, depth pieces at a minimum - reasonable thought?

    Winder (when healthy was on a Bailey Ober level in ‘22) Moran - Sands (1 of them minimum) have a real chance at an MLB roster year in & year out - maybe 2 of the 3 - reasonable thought?

    Rodriguez our 20 year old power hitting CF…..a highly regarded prospect with a nice upside.

    Jorge Polanco - would rank #1 or #2 Free Agent 2B available IF a FA. Solid D & switch hitter with Pop, when healthy……$10.5M salary  comes with him.

    We trade these 7 guys to Milwaukee for Corbin Burnes & Devin Williams……one year rental on Burnes & Williams for a couple years. Our staff becomes elite immediately!

    Brewers shed salary and start their rebuild with 6 guys under team control for a handful of years……..the assumption is they do not want Polanco’s salary so they investigate a separate trade partner for Polanco to get a couple of prospects to help their rebuild.

    Can others out there get behind this thinking? Maybe we alter it a guy but the gist is we believe in our offense and with these two guys  totaling $18-$22M total (saved $10.5M with Polanco move & have now to spend) we have the best set-up guy in the game, in Williams, to go with our best closer in the game, Duran. We then have Stewart - Jax - Varland - Funderburk - Balazovic/Alcala - Thielbar to go along with Williams & Duran.

    Corbin Burnes added to our rotation along with Chris Paddack gets us back, at a minimum, to where we were with Gray & Maeda in ‘23!!

    Best staff in the game and we don’t alter our core with Polanco, being the only real contributor being moved, and Julien/Farmer platoon at 2B to take up the slack.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...