It's weird to me that in a near-meaningless game, where the move actually gives the team a better chance to win is the breaking point for some.
I generally think people focus too much on moves that don't go well. Meanwhile, in the last few series, he's had some moves that really paid off in the pinch-hitting and pinch-running department. Those mostly go un-noticed. There's not often posts where people say they are jumping on the Baldelli Bandwagon because he pinch ran Andrew Stevenson who forced the opposing team into errors to score a key run.
If you'd have said that a manager's two best players are going to underperform for the season and that he's still going to lead that team to win the division, most of us would be praising that manager (and he is going to get votes for Manager of the Year).
Sure, it's the weakest division in the league, but would you rather he not actually win it? If he'd had the roster that he has now for the whole season (and Kepler hadn't been a dead weight during the first half), this team would easily have won 90 games. I generally don't think that managers matter as much as people think, but I do think he's well liked by the players and so many of his moves were under a microscope early in the season because of all the close games and an underperforming offense.
You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.
I am not a follower of Donald Trump. I have participated in several no kings rallies and am disgusted with what he and his followers have done to our country and the world. I would like to know what most Brazilians feel about the United States now and about the folks our citizens have elected to represent us.
Recommended Posts
Posted by Alex,
It's weird to me that in a near-meaningless game, where the move actually gives the team a better chance to win is the breaking point for some.
I generally think people focus too much on moves that don't go well. Meanwhile, in the last few series, he's had some moves that really paid off in the pinch-hitting and pinch-running department. Those mostly go un-noticed. There's not often posts where people say they are jumping on the Baldelli Bandwagon because he pinch ran Andrew Stevenson who forced the opposing team into errors to score a key run.
If you'd have said that a manager's two best players are going to underperform for the season and that he's still going to lead that team to win the division, most of us would be praising that manager (and he is going to get votes for Manager of the Year).
Sure, it's the weakest division in the league, but would you rather he not actually win it? If he'd had the roster that he has now for the whole season (and Kepler hadn't been a dead weight during the first half), this team would easily have won 90 games. I generally don't think that managers matter as much as people think, but I do think he's well liked by the players and so many of his moves were under a microscope early in the season because of all the close games and an underperforming offense.
For a counter pov
Recommended by Squirrel
6 reactions
Go to this post