Blake Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 First, a brief history of the number zero: According to Live Science, the Babylonians borrowed the concept of zero from the Sumerians, the first people in the world to develop a counting system. (probably invented the accountant, tax shelter and tax collector, too) Also, thanks to the invention of Zero, we’re able to perform sabermetrics, calculus, differential equations, algebra and show the real balance of a checkbook. (yeah, yeah, I know, sometimes the balance of the checkbook is less than zero. However, negative numbers aren’t a part of this thread. The TD Game Thread style sheet expressly forbids mentioning anything negative) Now that we’ve covered nothing, let us move on to something, KC versus the Twins. It’s early in the season and reasons for optimism abound. For instance, baseball has started. And, those who know have put forth their prognostications and declared the who will be in the post season. Some have even gone so far as to declare the winner of the World Series. Fortunately, those who know and write about baseball generally know about as much about how the season will progress as your humble scrivener. Which would be zero. Which bring me to expectations: Zero!! I am going to do my best to enjoy baseball and the season without any pre-conceived notions as to what should happen. Taking that approach, I have a near zero expectation of being disappointed. Some nothings to think about: 1. 0-4 = BA .0002. 0 errors = fielding percentage of 1.000%3. 0 WAR = scrub player4. 0 ERA = imaginary number*5. 1000 BA = imaginary number* *Over the course of the season. There is also a mathematical function known as an “imaginary number.” However, I decided against going down that rabbit hole. Pitching for the Twins: Hector Santiago Twins Lineup: 1. Brian Dozier ® 2B2. Max Kepler (L) RF3. Byron Buxton ® CF4. Joe Mauer (L) 1B5. Miguel Sano ® 3B6. Jason Castro (L) C7. Eduardo Escobar (S) SS8. Eddie Rosario (L) LF9. Robbie Grossman (S) DH Pitching for KC: Ian Kennedy Royals lineup to follow. Play Ball! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI
Blake Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Author Posted April 5, 2017 Sigh. Mods, would someone kindly correct the starting time of "Noon" to "Noon:10" Thanks. Royals lineup: Alex Gordon(L) LFMike Moustakas(L) DHLorenzo Cain® CFEric Hosmer(L) 1BSalvador Perez® CPaulo Orlando® RFCheslor Cuthbert® 3BAlcides Escobar® SSRaul Mondesi(S) 2B
BoofBonser Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Yay Twins baseball while I'm at school!Just so you all know, when I got home on Monday and turned the game on it was right when Kepler's bunt happened... You can blame it on me if we lose todayBut we're the Twins so that's not gonna happen!
Loosey Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Any explanation as to why Polanco is not in the lineup?
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Zero was also "outlawed" by the Church, since there could be no place where there was no God....hence, zero could not exist.
Respy Provisional Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Twins matchups against Ian Kennedy: Escobar is 6 for 14 against Kennedy, which may have factored into the decision to start Eduardo Escobar at SS.Dozier has 2 career HR against Kennedy in 15 ABMauer is only 2 for 14 (.143) lifetime against KennedyEddie Rosario is 4 for 8 (.500) lifetime against KennedyI think between some of these nice splits, and Santiago pitching, we might have a high-scoring affair today.
BoofBonser Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Any explanation as to why Polanco is not in the lineup? I assume he'll be splitting time with Escobar for the first month or two to see who takes the job.He didn't hit high in the lineup yesterday so maybe they don't value him as much as we thought
Respy Provisional Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Any explanation as to why Polanco is not in the lineup? Escobar has excellent career numbers against Kennedy. Molitor may also be making a 'Game 2 statement' as to the importance and role of Escobar on the team this year?
Mill1634 Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 I think Escobar has to due to the fact he is hitting .429 off Kennedy in 14 ABs. Very small sample size, but game 2 counts the same as game 162. Still questioning the decision to have Santiago #2 in the rotation. I'd like to see Gibson go today.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 People think they are deciding the lineup on 14 AB samples? I hope not.
Blake Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Author Posted April 5, 2017 Zero was also "outlawed" by the Church, since there could be no place where there was no God....hence, zero could not exist. Evidently the Church wasn't paying attention to scripture because there is a place where there is no God, and that would be the void known as "H*ll."
Craig Arko Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 There's a nice book about a modern mathematician's hunt for the origin of the numeral zero (not necessarily the number). Looks like it may be in what is now Cambodia. https://www.amazon.com/Finding-Zero-Mathematicians-Odyssey-Uncover/dp/1137279842/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1416420900&sr=1-1&keywords=finding+zero
stringer bell Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Great intro Blake! OOhh Math! Imaginary numbers, negative numbers, placeholders. I love it!
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 I highly recommend this book: E=mc2: A biography of the world's most famous equation. *too lazy to figure out how to do the squared sign correctly....
spinowner Provisional Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 I'll be there with my daughter. I'm wearing a navy TC hoodie, daughter will be more generic. Don't know yet where we'll be sitting but it probably won't be the same place the whole game. If the game is videoed in some way you can look for us.
spinowner Provisional Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 I highly recommend this book: E=mc2: A biography of the world's most famous equation. *too lazy to figure out how to do the squared sign correctly....That may be the most famous equation, but check out this and my sig line. http://www.livescience.com/51399-eulers-identity.html
Blake Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Author Posted April 5, 2017 Great intro Blake! OOhh Math! Imaginary numbers, negative numbers, placeholders. I love it!Well, when I consult the muse, sometimes it's bit scary as to what may flow from my keyboard.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Evidently the Church wasn't paying attention to scripture because there is a place where there is no God, and that would be the void known as "H*ll." maybe I should stop, to avoid annoying anyone.
Blake Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Author Posted April 5, 2017 maybe I should stop, to avoid annoying anyone.Didn't bother me. I found your historical observation to be very interesting. I was merely pointing out the position of the early Church was inaccurate.
Craig Arko Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 That may be the most famous equation, but check out this and my sig line. http://www.livescience.com/51399-eulers-identity.htmlAnd to run with that, as I absolutely adore Euler's Identity; http://www.ctralie.com/Teaching/Euler/
GP830 Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 I would like to have seen Polanco again today, just to keep the infield unit together-- but boy, you sure can't argue with 14 at bats...
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 That may be the most famous equation, but check out this and my sig line. http://www.livescience.com/51399-eulers-identity.html I have noticed that, and wondered what it was about....now I've read that article, and I only understood half of it. haven't done math like that in a decade or two....and I'm rusty at best (that's on top of being mediocre at it in the first place). thanks!
Blake Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Author Posted April 5, 2017 Any explanation as to why Polanco is not in the lineup? Polanco doesn't play on any day ending in "y?"
GP830 Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Polanco doesn't play on any day ending in "y?"But Hey, that means...
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Great intro Blake! OOhh Math! Imaginary numbers, negative numbers, placeholders. I love it!You love it.... I'm having nightmares about college calculus again. I'm going to go hide in the corner until the math wizards figure this out!
D. Hocking Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 Evidently the Church wasn't paying attention to scripture because there is a place where there is no God, and that would be the void known as "H*ll." I have heard the only thing in that void is Hawk Harrelson's voice on an endless loop.
Blake Verified Member Posted April 5, 2017 Author Posted April 5, 2017 You love it.... I'm having nightmares about college calculus again.I'm going to go hide in the corner until the math wizards figure this out!You do realize the analytics crowd is about to disown you, right?
Squirrel Community Moderator Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 I thought my math career ended years ago with linear algebra ... thanks a lot for those who continue to bring math to the thread ...
COtwin Provisional Member Posted April 5, 2017 Posted April 5, 2017 What are the odds Joe hits into a double play out of the four hole today?
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS On Saturday, Houston went 3-for-5 and scored two runs. After a short slump, he is now back over .290 on the season. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.