Burn Bright, Fade Fast: Remember Addison Reed Before You Pay a Reliever

The Minnesota Twins have rarely been willing to make significant financial commitments to free-agent relievers. Over the years, the organization has generally preferred short-term contracts, minor-league signings, internal options and trades when trying to improve its bullpen.

There was one notable exception in January 2018. Coming off a playoff appearance, the Twins signed right-handed reliever Addison Reed to a two-year, $16.75 million contract. It was an unprecedented investment for the franchise, representing a significant commitment to a pitcher who had established himself as one of baseball's more reliable bullpen arms.

Unfortunately, the deal did not work out as Minnesota had hoped. Reed struggled during his first season, injuries derailed his second, and he never pitched in another major-league game. As the Twins consider how aggressively to invest in their bullpen, Reed's brief time in Minnesota offers a useful lesson about the risks of committing multiple years to relief pitchers.

Why the Twins Invested in Addison Reed

When Minnesota signed Reed, there were plenty of reasons to believe he could help stabilize its bullpen. Reed was 29 years old and already had seven seasons of major-league experience. He had pitched for the Chicago White Sox, Arizona Diamondbacks, New York Mets, and Boston Red Sox, recording 125 saves and a 3.40 ERA across his first 402 2/3 innings.

His performance in 2017 made him particularly appealing. Reed began the season with the Mets before being traded to Boston at the deadline. Across both clubs, he posted a 2.84 ERA in 76 innings, striking out 76 batters while issuing only 15 walks. He also converted 19 of his 21 save opportunities with New York.

Reed had been remarkably durable, too. He appeared in 157 games between 2016 and 2017, leading the major leagues in appearances over that span. His ability to handle a heavy workload was an important part of his appeal to a Minnesota team looking to improve its relief corps.

The Twins had already signed veteran closer Fernando Rodney and left-handed reliever Zach Duke that offseason, but Reed represented the most significant commitment of the three. Minnesota envisioned him working in a high-leverage setup role ahead of Rodney while providing another option to close games if necessary.

The team had a clear reason to prioritize the bullpen. Minnesota relievers ranked 20th in the majors with a 4.40 ERA in 2017 and weren’t any better in terms of FIP (4.50, 23rd) or xFIP (4.49, 22nd).

On paper, the signing made sense. Reed was still relatively young, had an extensive track record of success, and offered the kind of strikeout ability the Twins needed. The organization was not paying for a brief breakout from an unproven pitcher. It was investing in someone who had been effective and durable for several seasons.

A Disappointing First Season in Minnesota

Reed's first year with the Twins quickly became a disappointment. He opened the 2018 season looking like the reliever Minnesota had hoped to acquire. Through his first 20 appearances, he recorded a 2.42 ERA, suggesting he could become a dependable option in the late innings.

The results deteriorated from there. Over his next 21 appearances, Reed posted a 7.71 ERA. His fastball velocity declined, opposing hitters made more consistent contact, and he struggled to put away batters at the rate he had in previous seasons.

The Twins placed Reed on the injured list in July because of right triceps tightness. He returned later that month, but the time away did not restore his earlier effectiveness. He continued to struggle, and his role became less important as the season progressed. 

Reed finished the year with a 4.50 ERA across 55 appearances and 56 innings. He posted an 18.2 K%, a significant drop from the 29.9 K% he recorded in 76 innings the previous season. Those numbers represented a difficult return on the Twins' investment. Minnesota had paid for a reliable late-inning arm, but Reed became a pitcher the club could not consistently trust in important situations.

The contract still had another year remaining, however, giving the organization an opportunity to see whether he could rebound.

Year Two Never Got Off the Ground

Reed's second season in Minnesota was even more disappointing because he never returned to the major-league club. A left thumb sprain delayed his start to the 2019 season, and he began the year on the injured list. He eventually went to Triple-A Rochester on a rehabilitation assignment in May, but his outings did not provide much reason for optimism.

In five minor-league appearances, Reed allowed 13 hits, eight runs, and four home runs in just five innings. The Twins designated him for assignment on May 16 and released him five days later. He never appeared in a major-league game again.  Minnesota had guaranteed $16.75 million with the expectation that Reed would help anchor its bullpen for two seasons. Instead, the club received a disappointing first year and no major-league production in the second.

Buyer Beware: Relievers Can Burn Bright and Fade Away

Reed's experience illustrates one of the biggest challenges of spending money on relief pitching. A reliever can look like an exceptionally safe investment right up until the moment his performance changes.

Bullpen pitchers often work in shorter bursts than starters, but their workloads can be demanding. They may be asked to pitch on consecutive days, handle high-leverage situations, and perform with little margin for error. A small decline in velocity or command can quickly turn a dependable arm into a liability.

Reed had demonstrated both effectiveness and durability before signing with Minnesota. His 2017 season was particularly strong, and his recent history suggested he could handle a substantial workload. Yet those qualities did not protect the Twins from a sudden decline.

The lesson is not that teams should never sign relievers to multi-year contracts. Bullpens are essential to postseason success, and clubs sometimes need to spend money to acquire pitchers capable of handling the most important innings. A reliable closer or setup man can be worth a substantial investment when everything goes according to plan.

The challenge is determining how much security a team should provide at a position with so much uncertainty. Guaranteed years can become expensive quickly when a pitcher loses velocity, struggles with command, or suffers an injury. A deal that looks reasonable when signed can become a burden before it reaches its second season.

For the Twins, Reed's contract helps explain the organization's long-standing preference for shorter commitments to free-agent relievers. It also shows why a player's recent statistics and workload cannot be the only factors in evaluating a potential signing.

The Takeaway for Minnesota

Reed's time with the Twins is a reminder that even an established reliever can become an expensive disappointment. Minnesota made a logical investment in January 2018, targeting a pitcher with a strong résumé who seemed capable of addressing a clear roster weakness. The results never matched the expectations.

That experience should not prevent the Twins from pursuing significant bullpen upgrades. Building a competitive relief corps requires a willingness to take calculated risks, particularly when a team needs dependable options in the late innings.

However, Reed's contract demonstrates why those risks require careful consideration. A two-year commitment can provide stability when a pitcher maintains his effectiveness, but it can also leave a team paying for production that disappears almost immediately.

As the Twins look to construct their next competitive roster, the goal should be to invest in the bullpen without assuming that past performance guarantees future results. Reed arrived as one of the most accomplished relievers the franchise had ever signed. His departure offered a lasting reminder that, with bullpen arms, even the most promising investment can burn bright and fade away.

Should the Twins sign another reliever to a multi-year deal this offseason? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

Do you approve of the job Derek Shelton is doing as Twins manager?

Do you approve of the job Derek Shelton is doing as Twins manager?

• Do you approve of the job Derek Shelton is doing as Twins manager? Required
  

  
• Save

See All Twins Polls >

Are you interested in Twins history? Then check out the Minnesota Twins Players Project, a community-driven project to discover and collect great information on every player to wear a Twins uniform!