Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Derek Falvey is Likely to Stay, But Twins' Code of Silence Leaves Future of Front Office Unclear


    Jamie Cameron

    There's been a little-noticed but noteworthy silence, since the end of last season, about the contract statuses of the Minnesota Twins' top front-office executives. What should fans make of it?

    Image courtesy of © Kim Klement Neitzel-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The Twins are struggling. In the last week, they’ve lost three games in which their win probability was 85% or higher at some point. The team seems to be running into a confluence of challenges at the worst possible time. Carlos Correa and Byron Buxton remain sidelined, with the trio of Correa, Buxton, and Royce Lewis having only played 17 games together all season. The back half of the rotation is comprised of three rookies. The bullpen looks thin and exposed, with Brock Stewart’s season-ending injury leaving the Twins short of high-leverage arms and Jhoan Durán proving, shockingly, to be human. Despite all that, the resilient Twins are still roughly 86% likely to make the playoffs, and 23% likely to win the AL Central, per FanGraphs. Impressive fortitude, indeed.

    Amid that state of affairs, especially given that they're coming off an AL Central championship and a very important playoff breakthrough, it's peculiar that we have no official news of an extension with either of their top baseball executives, Derek Falvey and Thad Levine.

    It’s possible that the Twins have engaged Falvey and Levine in contract talks already. In May 2023, Ken Rosenthal reported that the organization ‘quietly’ extended Rocco Baldelli until at least the end of the 2025 season. Regardless of which Pohlad is running the show, the Twins organization has typically been one that prizes consistency and continuity, if we’re to judge by the tenures of previous managers and front office staff.

    Furthermore, as best Twins Daily has been able to discern in discussions with several sources around and within the team, Falvey is happy with his situation in Minnesota, and the Pohlads are happy with the way Falvey and Levine have done their jobs of late.

    Asked for an official comment, the Twins declined.

    "A few years back as a matter of policy, we decided not to comment on contract specifics during the season for any of our staff, including Rocco, the coaching staff, or our executive leadership," said a spokesperson.

    That jibes with the lack of an announcement from the team when Baldelli signed his aforementioned extension, and it leaves wide open the possibility that Falvey and Levine have already agreed to deals to stick around beyond 2024. By all indications, both executives would be welcomed back, and a significant change in leadership is unlikely.

    If that's how it plays out, we should regard it as very good news. Since 2019, the Twins have won the AL Central in three out of five seasons. They’re on track to make the playoffs for the fourth time in six seasons. In 2023, they broke a playoff drought of over 20 years by sweeping the Wild Card series against the Toronto Blue Jays, before eventually crashing out to the Houston Astros. All you can do is get there as close to every year as possible. The last five years on the field have been good for the Twins.

    In Falvey’s initial remarks on taking the job in Minnesota, he stated a desire to build a team that could win sustainably. For a mid-market team like the Twins, that means drafting and development. Things could hardly be going better in that arena. Entering the season, the Twins had three consensus top-100 prospects (Walker Jenkins, Brooks Lee, Emmanuel Rodriguez). Lee and Jenkins were high draft picks; they began their professional careers with the top prospect label. This season, the organization has added three more premium dudes: David Festa (13th round), Zebby Matthews (8th round), and Luke Keaschall (2nd round) all now appear on top-100 prospect lists. None of them were ranked entering 2024.

    This speaks to the systems and structures the Twins have built around player development. The organization knows what it does well, whether that’s improving swing decisions or adding velocity to a fastball. Increasingly, the developmental leaps taken by drafted prospects are becoming more pronounced. It’s not difficult to imagine a future in 2025 wherein the likes of Kaelen Culpepper or Charlee Soto enter top-100 consideration. At various points this season, the Twins have used four homegrown starting pitchers in their rotation (Ober, Varland, Festa, Matthews).

    I don’t think the front office is above criticism. There have been poor free-agent signings, trades that didn’t work out (Tyler Mahle, Jorge López), and underwhelming trade deadline returns (2023, 2024). That’s not exclusive to this front office, though, and to me, it’s clear that they have gotten more of the big decisions and tests right than wrong. Whether it’s the Pablo López trade, re-signing Carlos Correa, or extending Byron Buxton, the front office has usually nailed the big moments.

    Too often, organizational weaknesses are foisted on the front office. Whether it’s broadcast access or diminishing payroll, let’s not conflate the front office with ownership just because they are the mouthpiece of the organization.

    That brings us back around to the real question about retaining Falvey and Levine, which seems to be less about whether the Twins would want them than about whether they would want to stay. To reiterate, we have some reason to believe the answer to both questions is yes, but we must take note of the lack of an announcement of extensions for either last fall. That wouldn't have violated their convenient organizational policy, after all. It also would have forestalled a lot of potential speculation and uncertainty, including and especially for fans--who already must contend with a lack of clarity about the team's commitment to winning (in the form of spending on payroll) and about the future of access to the team via TV broadcasts.

    It does seem safe to assume that, as of the start of spring training, both Falvey and Levine were de facto impending free agents. Even if both, or just Falvey, have reupped since, the diminished transparency here--the twin extensions the two signed after 2019 were made public in short order--invites some unease that feels unnecessary, except as a means of preserving a policy they instituted both silently and voluntarily.

    On balance, it’s clear that the Twins should extend Falvey and Levine immediately--if not sooner, as is actually possible in this case. They’ve restored consistent competitiveness to the Twin Cities, and spearheaded the development of a top-five farm system in baseball. There’s a young, exciting core in place who, despite the miserliness of the ownership group, gives the team a chance to win sustainably for the next half-decade. A bit more clarity about the situation would probably do more good than harm, but while the team remains mum, it sounds like both sides are interested in keeping the Falvey Pipeline flowing for years to come.


    What is your assessment of the Twins front office pair of Derek Falvey and Thad Levine? Should they be extended? What stand out as the successes and challenges of their tenure in Minnesota?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Riley Quick

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, RHP
    In his second professional outing, Quick went three innings. He gave up no runs and no hits. He walked three and had five strikeouts.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    The decision not to discuss these things is nicely timed with the loss of a couple EVPs in marketing and communications (and revenue) along with some downright silly public comments.  They are much better off saying less, at least until they can get the new public relations staff in place. 

    I would not be surprised if they were both already locked up for a while.

    To illustrate where I think Falveys open market value is I think about what teams would be interested in his services.

    I don't say this lightly-Derek Falvey is the guy that would finally make the Yankees move on from Brian Cashman.

    I can't reiterate enough how much I dislike thinking of Falvey and Levine as a package deal just because they were hired in the same year. They are different people with different jobs. If one of them is good at their job and the other is not, it shouldn't be a 'both stay' or 'both go' scenario. Frankly, I like the architecture of the organization more than I did during the prior regime. Forward thinking, analytical and willing to change course year-to-year.

    The free agent singings and in-season trades couldn't be worse. Presuming player acquisition is still the purview of the GM, I think there's a solid case to retain Falvey and replace Levine.

    Though, honestly, if a team willing to spend money to win championships is offering Falvey a job, I don't know how he doesn't jump at it.

    I agree that the Twins should try to extend both Falvey and Levine. My question is, why would they stay if they get other options? I recall reading that Levine was in consideration for a job in Boston. He didn't get it, but it would have been hard to blame him for leaving a financially struggling organization for one willing to open the pocketbook to field a more competitive team. I suspect both are willing to stay but only until they get a better offer.

    I think the unfortunately likely result here will be that both stay with the Twins but remain open to other offers. They will both eventually get offers to move to an organization more willing to spend and are likely to take those offers. By the way, I think the same is likely for Baldelli, who despite the incessant trolling on this site is a very good MLB manager who could get another job in a week if the Twins let him go. I live in LA and the Dodgers or Angels would grab him in a nano second if he was available. The Twins Front Office will then become like the Twins team itself; an organization that finds young talent, grooms it to success, and then loses it to other organizations that are willing to actually pay for talent.

    After reading the other comments while I was drafting my incredibly verbose post above, I tend to agree that Falvey is the guy to keep more than Levine. I do question whether they have been signed to a long-term deal. I don't think that's because the Twins don't want them long-term; I think it's because they are unsure about staying.

    Why the skepticism? You have two guys that took a moribund organization and turned it into a forward thinking, modern team that has a chance to compete -all in a period of about five years with limited resources. Now imagine if you took that same skill set and combined it with more resources like they have in at least 10 to 12 organizations. If I'm Falvey or Levine, I would think twice about signing an extension of more than two years in Minnesota because I've then shut the door on better opportunities. Let's not kid ourselves; there are at least 10 to 12 better opportunities out there and may be more.

    I do think the off-season is going to be interesting in the Front Office because I think both men will really wonder if this is the place they want to be. There is still no clarity about broadcast rights and there is clarity that ownership will not spend additional sums on payroll until the revenue stream is guaranteed. These guys are bankers, not start up founders or real estate developers; they are not entrepreneurial and they don't build on spec. I would expect both Falvey and Levine to at least be willing to explore other opportunities. I know that I would.

    I would think that Levine would be the tougher one to keep right now, because as much as he might like it here the pull to be the top dog will be strong and he's likely to have suitors in the offseason. realistically the only reason for Falvey to want to leave is if a team with significantly more resources comes a-callin', and even then it might not actually be a better job. While the Pohlads don't spend to the levels fans would want and arguably should expect...from a front office perspective they also don't get down in the weeds and much about with the baseball operation.

    The current front office regime has overall done a good job. there have been some misses, both on the draft & development side (cavaco & sabato, for example) and on the free agent/trade side (Mahle, Gallo). but there have been some real highs there too (Royce, Wallner, Ober, SWR, Jeffers, Miranda on the draft/dev side and Cruz, Ryan, Pablo, Gray, Correa, Duran on the FA/trade side). And the farm system looks far stronger from top to bottom than when they started, which is impressive considering how many guys have graduated.

    I have concerns about their ability to manage sunk costs and whether they take too many injury risks, but the former is problem for all but the richest franchises I think and the latter might just be the peril of being a smaller market team and a risk you have to accept. Their creativity in finding lesser known college pitchers that they can develop is really quite impressive.

    they haven't won big in the playoffs, which is a debit that can't be ignored. YMMV on how much of that is on them vs ownership, or them vs the vagaries of a small sample size playoff. Otherwise the balance sheer is pretty strongly in favor of extensions, because the only other argument you hear is related to data-driven decision-making that some people DGAF about and want a change in manager and style of play (more bunting, steals, hitting for average over power, less platooning, starters throwing 120 pitches, etc) that simply isn't going to happen with this regime.

    2 hours ago, nicksaviking said:

    Presuming player acquisition is still the purview of the GM, I think there's a solid case to retain Falvey and replace Levine.

    Personally, I would have those two reversed. But that’s a matter of taste, a Coke, Pepsi thing. 

    I listen to interviews, and I love Levine’s candor and detest Falvey’s shallow dismissiveness about everything. (Beat writers sound the same way.) “The Twins are great, everything is incredible, we got this.” Maybe Joe Pohald eats that **** up. Maybe Falvey shows a different side in private. If Levine is the one ultimately calling the shots on things like the Mahle trade or Gallo signing or pulling the trigger on other bigger dollar signings, well then Levine should get the pink slip. Either way, we will all be cheering together like last year i hope when the playoffs roll around. Baseball is too much fun in October. 

    I wouldn't be surprised because of the salary crunch that both sides would see that they no longer fit together. If NYY decided to move on from Cashman, IMO Flavey would be happy to have all that cash to play with, instead of being restricted. Twins on the other hand would need someone who can swing a deal. Falvey has produced a pitching pipeline here in MN & he has been very lucky in '19 by picking up Cruz (through Skoop) together with the juiced ball that favored the Twins. Picking up Maeda that produced the perfect storm during covid in '20. Having Lopez & Correa dropped in their laps in '23. In the draft, getting a 1st overall pick in his 1st year, then winning the lottery in '22 & '23 by gaining 8th (Lee) & 5th (Jenkins) overall. As far as signing Buxton they seemed to drag their feet with the assumption that he didn't want to sign. Through the encouragement of the Pohlads they pursued talks & low & behold Buxton wanted to sign & indeed signed an owner-friendly contract,

    3 hours ago, LA VIkes Fan said:

    After reading the other comments while I was drafting my incredibly verbose post above, I tend to agree that Falvey is the guy to keep more than Levine. I do question whether they have been signed to a long-term deal. I don't think that's because the Twins don't want them long-term; I think it's because they are unsure about staying.

    Why the skepticism? You have two guys that took a moribund organization and turned it into a forward thinking, modern team that has a chance to compete -all in a period of about five years with limited resources. Now imagine if you took that same skill set and combined it with more resources like they have in at least 10 to 12 organizations. If I'm Falvey or Levine, I would think twice about signing an extension of more than two years in Minnesota because I've then shut the door on better opportunities. Let's not kid ourselves; there are at least 10 to 12 better opportunities out there and may be more.

    I do think the off-season is going to be interesting in the Front Office because I think both men will really wonder if this is the place they want to be. There is still no clarity about broadcast rights and there is clarity that ownership will not spend additional sums on payroll until the revenue stream is guaranteed. These guys are bankers, not start up founders or real estate developers; they are not entrepreneurial and they don't build on spec. I would expect both Falvey and Levine to at least be willing to explore other opportunities. I know that I would.

    I agree with most everything …..the one angle that is assumed to not exist or isn’t considered at all, is the difficulty there is in getting to a top 5 minor league system. There is good fortune involved as well on some level. If the two guys are comfortable financially, they might opt for pride and commitment to what they have put in place……continuing to build upon what they have started. Maybe naive to think that? Maybe not.

    1 hour ago, Hosken Bombo Disco said:

    Personally, I would have those two reversed. But that’s a matter of taste, a Coke, Pepsi thing. 

    I listen to interviews, and I love Levine’s candor and detest Falvey’s shallow dismissiveness about everything. (Beat writers sound the same way.) “The Twins are great, everything is incredible, we got this.” Maybe Joe Pohald eats that **** up. Maybe Falvey shows a different side in private. If Levine is the one ultimately calling the shots on things like the Mahle trade or Gallo signing or pulling the trigger on other bigger dollar signings, well then Levine should get the pink slip. Either way, we will all be cheering together like last year i hope when the playoffs roll around. Baseball is too much fun in October. 

    I'm a cynic until this team wins another World Series, so I kind of like Falvey's 'say everything, but really say nothing' approach. Don't share trade secrets. But as a fan, I get the plea for honesty and transparency. 

    On the other hand, whoever is pushing to sign and trade for back end starters, replacement-level-at-their-peak veterans and whatever the heck is going on with non-organizational relievers, that person can take a hike.

    Not sure which guy does what, but listening to Falvey just makes me want to whack him over the head with the nearest baseball bat. I can't stand the "speak volumes, but say absolutely nothing" routine. Rocco is pretty good at it too. If some other team wants Falvey, Levine, or Rocco...go for it. 

    21 minutes ago, CRF said:

    Not sure which guy does what, but listening to Falvey just makes me want to whack him over the head with the nearest baseball bat. I can't stand the "speak volumes, but say absolutely nothing" routine. Rocco is pretty good at it too. If some other team wants Falvey, Levine, or Rocco...go for it. 

    They speak volumes.  Just have to listen carefully.

    I don't think we will have success outside of the regular season with Falvey in charge, I assume Levine is in lockstep with him or he would have left by now.  Their philosophy is to play the odds over 162 games and yes you will have some success by doing that, but in a short series in the playoffs you need to have the better players and we don't because we platoon everyone and worry about matchups,  And they set the roster to support this.  They have modernized the front office but have done so at the expense of traditional scouting, you need both.  I don't think they have developed hitters, we will see if some start to come thru.  They try to change players to fit their mold rather than tweaking their existing swing to be more productive.  

    I think blaming the Pohlads is to easy, yes I wish they hadn't cut payroll but Falvey chose to use his limited resources on Farmer, Margot and Santana.  And they are all short side platoon players even if they are playing Santana every day even though he can't hit RH pitching above league replacement.  It's not like they have Miami's payroll and they did sign two long term contracts.

    1 hour ago, nicksaviking said:

    so I kind of like Falvey's 'say everything, but really say nothing' approach. Don't share trade secrets

    That is absolutely valid and fair. I was probably a little harsh. 

    These articles on the front office and the comments commending Falvey always surprise me. I don't have any complaints because I don't specifically have any knowledge about who does what in the Twins organization. I just follow the play on the field and the minor leagues. The comments on the games include a ton of complaints. One would think that the type of play on the field is a reflection of the FO.

    12 hours ago, Hosken Bombo Disco said:

    Personally, I would have those two reversed. But that’s a matter of taste, a Coke, Pepsi thing. 

    I listen to interviews, and I love Levine’s candor and detest Falvey’s shallow dismissiveness about everything. (Beat writers sound the same way.) “The Twins are great, everything is incredible, we got this.” Maybe Joe Pohald eats that **** up. Maybe Falvey shows a different side in private. If Levine is the one ultimately calling the shots on things like the Mahle trade or Gallo signing or pulling the trigger on other bigger dollar signings, well then Levine should get the pink slip. Either way, we will all be cheering together like last year i hope when the playoffs roll around. Baseball is too much fun in October. 

    I'm the same way. The few times I've heard Levine give interviews I really like what he says. And the next day the Twins do the opposite. So IMO Levine has zero pull. 

    15 hours ago, LA VIkes Fan said:

    I agree that the Twins should try to extend both Falvey and Levine. My question is, why would they stay if they get other options? I recall reading that Levine was in consideration for a job in Boston. He didn't get it, but it would have been hard to blame him for leaving a financially struggling organization for one willing to open the pocketbook to field a more competitive team. I suspect both are willing to stay but only until they get a better offer.

    I think the unfortunately likely result here will be that both stay with the Twins but remain open to other offers. They will both eventually get offers to move to an organization more willing to spend and are likely to take those offers. By the way, I think the same is likely for Baldelli, who despite the incessant trolling on this site is a very good MLB manager who could get another job in a week if the Twins let him go. I live in LA and the Dodgers or Angels would grab him in a nano second if he was available. The Twins Front Office will then become like the Twins team itself; an organization that finds young talent, grooms it to success, and then loses it to other organizations that are willing to actually pay for talent.

    I'm not a Baldelli hater but if the Dodgers would like to trade their GM & manager for ours, I'd be all in.

    29 minutes ago, Doctor Gast said:

    I'm not a Baldelli hater but if the Dodgers would like to trade their GM & manager for ours, I'd be all in.

    Worth noting that spending a boatload more money than the Twins for the last 30 years has netted the Dodgers ONE title.  Go back 40 years and the two teams are even at two.  Just sayin

    It is fair to say that the Twins have been mildly successful since Falvine and Rocco have arrived. Unfortunately their shortcomings and mistakes have really kept the Twins from being even better. Additions like Gallo, have been horrendous and replacement level signings like Margot, Santana, Jay Jackson, to name a few don't make the team better, which should be the goal each and every season regardless of payroll. If you have limited resources you shouldn't squander them on multiple replacement level players but instead add 1 or 2 higher quality players where you need them. To me, it seems that they don't have what it takes to take the team to the next level. Not making the right moves at the trade deadline for instance, when you are having a good season show that. I'll be surprised if the Twins make the playoffs this year and IF they do, they will be lucky to win a series. The lack of adding quality pitching this year at the deadline will once again prove disastrous as they rely on the AAA arms to carry them the rest of the season. Seems we see this almost every year with this regime as their history of signing broken or washed up pitchers (Shoemaker, Happ, Archer, Keuchel, Pagan, JoeSmith, Floro, Colome, Pineda, Paddack, Mahle, DeSclafani) far outweigh the number of good pitchers they bring in. Their level of success, or should I say, lack of it, against the better teams, is the real indicator of how good the trio of Falvey, Levine and Rocco are.

    This is a great look at it Jamie. Thank you first of all.

    I do think the organization as a whole is in a strong place at the moment. Lots of prospects, strong depth everywhere, and a winning team (even with the last 10 games or so.)

    I do hope Falvey stays for a long time. I can see GM changing, and possibly promoting someone from within. That can certainly happen. I'm curious if the direction of the offseason will change based on whoever is in that seat, be it Levine or someone else? They do have a LOT of prospects that they both could rely on for the major league roster, and/or trade to add some help. 

     

    It's been strange to me how little I've seen about Falvey and Levine's contracts with respect to the lack of front office activity this past winter and in July. They're both going to courted this fall if they haven't been extended. They've appeared to be relatively checked out. But it's less noticeable since they've had such significant contributions from past investments. 

    I have a hard time believing a team with

    1. Ownership laser-focused on the balance sheet handcuffing how you do your job.
    2. No TV deal in sight. 

    while the farm system they've built is blossoming is a situation where either of them can be happy. Maybe they don't want to start over and/or maybe their families don't want to move, but there's a price that can overcome those concerns. 

    As much as people complain about their shortcomings (I've got my gripes too) they've been net-successful here, They are going to be very marketable this fall. I'm actually going to be surprised if they stay. That's a bummer. 

    There are things that I'd like to see them do differently. 

    Yet I am 100% behind them. Hope they get comfortable in the land of 10,000 Lakes. 

    Ultimately I will judge the front office on development because that's the only way success can be sustained.  

     

     

    I agree with others that it's really hard to judge who does what. My feel for it is that Falvey, Levine, and Rocco are the triangle of power. They're all involved in every roster decision more or less. Each guy has the primary responsibility in certain areas, but they all collaborate to make the final decisions. They aren't bringing anyone in until they've talked with Rocco about how they'd be used, or with Falvey about how they fit into the budget (I don't actually know if he runs the budget), etc.

    It's hard for me to know if I should want them replaced or not. I'm happy with the state of the system, as they seem to have figured out the development side nicely which is huge. But I think their platooning, pinch hitting, rostering corner, short-side platoon bats strategies are awful. I think they're too slow to move on from under performing vets in the name of depth. I don't think negative WAR players are depth, they're just bad players you don't want to move. They show a real lack of in-season adjustment ability. They have their 162-game strategy and they are very reluctant to move off any part of it.

    I want championships so I tend to lean towards moving on from one or all of them to take a shot at getting somebody who may be better suited to bring a title to the Twin Cities. But I'm not blind to the fact that this current regime is actually pretty good and there's a lot of room below them on the possible results chart. If there's an individual in charge of the system and what they've been doing the last few years in development I'd like that person to stay and continue running that. If it's a separate person in charge of roster construction and strategy I'd like that person replaced. It's just hard to know which heads to call for because I don't know that there's truly any distinction between the 3. I think they're likely all in pretty close lock-step on most things.

    1 hour ago, rv78 said:

    It is fair to say that the Twins have been mildly successful since Falvine and Rocco have arrived. Unfortunately their shortcomings and mistakes have really kept the Twins from being even better. Additions like Gallo, have been horrendous and replacement level signings like Margot, Santana, Jay Jackson, to name a few don't make the team better, which should be the goal each and every season regardless of payroll. 

    Santana is a replacement level signing? he's sitting at 2.1 bWAR right now with a 109 OPS+, despite the horrifically slow start. Instead of getting hit by the aging stick, he's been basically the same player as last season and getting paid $1M less. That's neither replacement level nor horrendous, and without him we'd be flailing at 1B this year.

    Need to be accurate about this stuff when evaluating the FO.

    Margot, Jackson, Gallo? Sure. But they were right about Santana. (I was wrong)

    33 minutes ago, jmlease1 said:

    Santana is a replacement level signing? he's sitting at 2.1 bWAR right now with a 109 OPS+, despite the horrifically slow start. Instead of getting hit by the aging stick, he's been basically the same player as last season and getting paid $1M less. That's neither replacement level nor horrendous, and without him we'd be flailing at 1B this year.

    Need to be accurate about this stuff when evaluating the FO.

    Margot, Jackson, Gallo? Sure. But they were right about Santana. (I was wrong)

    Yes Santana has been a decent pickup but he should not be leading the team in AB's.  He has had one month where he is above league average in OPS.  He needs to playing only against LH pitching and used as a defensive replacement.  Kirilloff was outperforming him in April and currently Miranda is having AB's taken away because Santana is being deployed everyday at 1B.  So no we would not be flailing at 1B without him, but I believe his contributions are being overvalued.  Everyone overlooks some of the plays he has missed at first, you have to take those into account along with the plays he has made.

    2 hours ago, rv78 said:

     Their level of success, or should I say, lack of it, against the better teams, is the real indicator of how good the trio of Falvey, Levine and Rocco are.

    I've stated many times starting with the owners ( pohlads)  , there main objectives are to have a team capable of winning during the season  and draw fans  , they don't care about  a true contender for the playoffs and they proved it this year with a reduced payroll  ...

    It's just a business with them and not a passion  to bring à championship to the fans and anyone the believes differently  is naive  ...

    Twins are a poorly run team by the trio on collaboration  ( the plan of falvey , Levine and Rocco  ) , they do take way to long to move on from a player because they see something that they think is great and then hope for a miracle that player will figure it out  ...

    The twins are a poorly run team at promoting there product because they needed to cut costs ,  you have to spend money to make money  , cutting twin̈so fest to one day and the twins caravan to just Minnesota  and not the 5 states area has lost alot of revenue for the team ...

    Last but not least , the article on falvey and Levine  ...

    I too am not a fan of how falvey  goes about his interviews and can't be straight forward about the team , I wouldn't expect him to come out and say things about trade talks but there are other concern the fans have and would like to be in the know  ...

    Plus if you ever noticed ( especially in 2021 and 2022 ) falvey  was never in front of the camera giving interviews when team was losing big   , it was left to Levine to address the media ... 

    I'll leave with this , falvey  , Levine  , Rocco and ownership don't care 1 iota about the fans thoughts , just the business side of it of how they are running the team that they believe is the right way  ...

    If they would add some old school strategies to the game , I wouldn't be as harsh in my statements  ....

     

    1 hour ago, dxpavelka said:

    Worth noting that spending a boatload more money than the Twins for the last 30 years has netted the Dodgers ONE title.  Go back 40 years and the two teams are even at two.  Just sayin

    There seems to be a phenomenon that I love. Teams that think they can win a World Series by spending boatloads of money, seem to backfire. NYY spends more money than anybody & for many years they haven't come close to the World Series. NYM decided to do that with Cohan in '23. They had a great team & a great manager (Buck Showalter) but didn't make the playoffs. LAD FO seems to do everything right & spends a lot of money which supports that phenomenon. Hope that holds true this year also.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...