Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
34 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

Raya is what, 23? They'll keep him starting. IMO 

You are probably right, but he hasn't shown the durability to last a season as a starter...yet.  And his numbers haven't been great this year at AAA 1-8 6.42 ERA.  Although he has had several good starts recently.

Posted
1 minute ago, Chembry said:

You are probably right, but he hasn't shown the durability to last a season as a starter...yet.  And his numbers haven't been great this year at AAA 1-8 6.42 ERA.  Although he has had several good starts recently.

You and I might agree.....

Posted
3 hours ago, rdehring said:

Interesting article, Cody, and great analysis

After all the deadline moves, I was thinking about starters for 2026.  The Twins currently have a staff headed by three frontline starters, Lopez, Ryan and Ober.  Next are three starters who all have starting experience beginning last year, SWR, Festa and Matthews.  Add three top arms from deadline moves Abel, Bradley and Rojas who all are close.  That gives the Twins nine potential starters in 2026.

I would like to throw one more name into the mix, Mike Canterino.  The Twins signed him to a two-year minor league contract which gives him time to rehab this year and return to the mound in 2026.  Unlikely he would be available out of spring training, but he sure could become an option by say next year's trade deadline.  His days of starting are likely behind him, but when pitching he was special and could be another strong candidate for a late inning role.

That's good. Most teams will use 9 starters to get through a season.

Canterino is a name, but not someone I ever expect to see pitching in the major leagues. He hasn't thrown a competitive inning in three seasons. The track record of pitchers rehabbing after shoulder surgery is poor. If Canterino pitches in AAA it will be a minor miracle.

Posted
3 hours ago, Chembry said:

Not true.  Edwin Diaz signed a 5-year $102M deal in 2022.  Josh Hader $19M/year.  Tanner Scott 18M/year. Raisel Iglesias $14.5M/year, Ryan Pressley $15M/year...I could go on

High end closers, which we have a few potential candidates, will get paid once they hit unrestricted free agency.

And five might get paid as much as a #3 starter.  The few names you dropped are more comparable to the $35M to $40M a year pitchers.  Or put another way - playing at half salary.

Posted
4 hours ago, NYCTK said:

I think this is over stating how difficult it is to "develop" decent bullpen arms. The fact that they'd added about one a season is more so on the construction of the bullpen previously, with less experimentation needed with the veterans in those roles already. 

Don't expect this to remain true, but technically this bullpen has performed better than the one with all those guys that were traded away. 

I don’t think so.  If it were that easy, then Alcala, Moran, Henriquez, et al would be pitching out of the bullpen for the Twins right now.  IMHO the Twins will be pretty fortunate to “create” one solid high-leverage relief arm per year.  Add in a little bit of luck and it still takes a long time.  In many ways, this is my biggest gripe with the bullpen tear down.  I was fine trading two, or maybe even three if you get bowled over with an offer, but taking away every high leverage arm at the same time seems foolish to me.  There is now no foundation from which to build.  

Posted

One thing I think that could be interesting is possibly trading one of these young arms to the White Sox for one of their young catchers. They have Teel and Quero, with Korey Lee in AAA (albeit much less value). Maybe the Sox would be interesting in adding a young pitcher with similar team control instead of holding onto multiple young catchers and trying to split reps. If possible, I'd try to trade SWR (5 years of control) and a mid-level prospect for Edgar Quero (6 years of control). I'm sure the Sox would value some guys over others in our system, but I think it would be wise to find a way to maximize the value of our abundance of young arms and add to a position of long-term need.

Posted
5 hours ago, terrydactyls said:

In my non-humble 😉 opinion, until high-profile relievers start getting paid like a starter, it will be difficult to convince people to change.  Look at someone like Morris.  He's looking down the road at a possible salary of $10M-$12M a year in a couple years if he remains a starter.  Or he could switch to relief and look forward to $5M-$6M a year.  Hard for them to look look forward to playing for half the salary when your value to the team hasn't significantly changed.

I think that's true to some extent, but if you are a pitcher 24 or older I'd be more interested in getting my service time started than holding out to be a starter.  You need to get through three non- arb years and then three more arb years before you can make the big, big bucks.  I'd do whatever I can to get my service time started.  There would always be a chance you could go back to starting if good enough out of the pen. We've seen more guys able to do that recently.  

Posted
1 hour ago, terrydactyls said:

And five might get paid as much as a #3 starter.  The few names you dropped are more comparable to the $35M to $40M a year pitchers.  Or put another way - playing at half salary.

I agree with you that starters are more valuable that relievers.  However, your argument is #4 or #5 starters get paid more than relievers.  I agree with that to an extent.  I am saying if a fringe starter, especially one that is competing with 5-6 others for one spot in the rotation, may be better off switching to a bullpen role if they have the chance to be a very good high leverage reliever.  If that is the case, they will get paid as well, if not more, than a #4 or #5 starter.

Here is the data.  These depth charts were taken directly from ESPN.com and the salaries from Sportrac.  As you can see, on average a #4 or #5 starter is mostly pre arbitration guys.  However, the ones that are post arbitration make similar money as average relievers.  There are guys whose salaries are inflated due to history of being a #1 or #2 starter (Aaron Nola, Chris Bassit, Jose Berrios, etc...) 

SP1 SP1 Salary SP2  SP2 Salary SP3  SP3 Salary SP4  SP4 Salary SP5  SP5 Salary
Kyle Bradish IL60 2,350,000 Zach Eflin IL15 18,000,000 Dean Kremer 2,950,000 Trevor Rogers 2,600,000 Tomoyuki Sugano 13,000,000
Garrett Crochet 3,800,000 Brayan Bello 2,500,000 Lucas Giolito 19,000,000 Dustin May 2,135,000 Walker Buehler 21,050,000
Max Fried 22,000,000 Carlos Rodon 27,000,000 Luis Gil 804,125 Will Warren 767,600 Ryan Yarbrough IL15 2,000,000
Ryan Pepiot 774,600 Shane Baz 1,450,000 Drew Rasmussen 2,250,000 Adrian Houser 1,375,000 Joe Boyle 760,000
Kevin Gausman 23,000,000 Shane Bieber IL60 3,172,017 Max Scherzer 15,500,000 Jose Berrios 19,000,000 Chris Bassitt 22,000,000
Aaron Civale 4,602,151 Shane Smith 760,000 Martin Perez IL60 3,500,000 Sean Burke 760,350 Davis Martin 765,450
Tanner Bibee 5,000,000 Gavin Williams 780,300 Logan Allen 777,200 Slade Cecconi 765,000 Joey Cantillo 762,800
Tarik Skubal 10,150,000 Jack Flaherty 25,000,000 Casey Mize 2,340,000 Chris Paddack 7,500,000 Charlie Morton 15,000,000
Cole Ragans IL60 1,250,000 Seth Lugo 15,000,000 Michael Wacha 18,000,000 Michael Lorenzen IL15 5,500,000 Noah Cameron 760,000
Pablo lopez 21,500,000 Joe Ryan 3,000,000 Bailey Ober 3,550,000 Zebby Matthews 760,000 David Festa 760,000
Jeffrey Springs 10,500,000 Luis Severino IL15 20,000,000 Jacob Lopez 760,000 J.T. Ginn 760,000 Jack Perkins 760,000
Hunter Brown 870,000 Framber Valdez 18,000,000 Spencer Arrighetti 794,200 Cristian Javier 10,400,000 Luis Garcia IL60 1,875,000
Yusei Kikuchi 21,225,000 Jose Soriano 790,000 Tyler Anderson DD 13,000,000 Kyle Hendricks 2,500,000 Victor Mederos 760,000
Luis Castillo 22,750,000 George Kirby 4,300,000 Logan Gilbert 7,625,000 Bryan Woo 783,300 Bryce Miller IL15 800,000
Nathan Eovaldi 30,100,000 Jacob deGrom 40,100,000 Merrill Kelly 7,000,000 Tyler Mahle IL60 16,500,000 Jack Leiter 2,050,000
Spencer Strider 4,000,000 Chris Sale IL60 22,000,000 Bryce Elder 800,000 Joey Wentz 775,000 Hurston Waldrep 760,000
Eury Perez 769,500 Ryan Weathers IL60 779,100 Sandy Alcantara 17,300,000 Edward Cabrera 1,950,000 Cal Quantrill 3,500,000
Kodai Senga 14,000,000 Sean Manaea 20,212,526 David Peterson 4,625,000 Clay Holmes 13,000,000 Tylor Megill IL60 1,975,000
Zack Wheeler 42,000,000 Ranger Suarez 8,800,000 Jesus Luzardo 6,626,000 Cristopher Sanchez 2,050,000 Aaron Nola IL60 24,571,428
MacKenzie Gore 2,890,000 Mitchell Parker 767,200 Jake Irvin 774,600 Brad Lord 760,000 Cade Cavalli 760,200
Shota Imanaga 13,000,000 Matthew Boyd 10,000,000 Jameson Taillon IL15 18,000,000 Cade Horton 760,000 Michael Soroka IL15 9,000,000
Hunter Greene IL15 6,000,000 Nick Lodolo IL15 1,975,000 Andrew Abbott 770,000 Zack Littell 5,720,000 Brady Singer 8,750,000
Freddy Peralta 8,100,000 Brandon Woodruff 5,000,000 Jose Quintana 2,000,000 Quinn Priester 760,000 Jacob Misiorowski IL15 760,000
Paul Skenes 875,000 Mitch Keller 15,411,500 Mike Burrows 760,000 Andrew Heaney 5,250,000 Braxton Ashcraft 760,000
Sonny Gray 25,000,000 Matthew Liberatore 775,800 Andre Pallante 2,100,100 Miles Mikolas 17,666,667 Michael McGreevy 760,000
Zac Gallen 13,500,000 Eduardo Rodriguez 20,000,000 Ryne Nelson 825,000 Brandon Pfaadt 799,400 Anthony DeSclafani 2,000,000
Kyle Freeland 16,000,000 German Marquez IL15 10,000,000 Austin Gomber 6,350,000 Antonio Senzatela IL15 12,000,000 Bradley Blalock 762,000
Yoshinobu Yamamoto 10,000,000 Shohei Ohtani 28,216,944 Tyler Glasnow 32,500,000 Blake Snell 28,436,867 Clayton Kershaw 7,500,000
Michael King 4,000,000 Nick Pivetta 2,500,000 Dylan Cease 13,750,000 Yu Darvish 21,000,000 Nestor Cortes 7,600,000
Logan Webb 12,000,000 Robbie Ray 25,000,000 Justin Verlander 15,000,000 Landen Roupp IL15 765,000 Kai-Wei Teng 760,000
Average 11,733,542   11,709,680   7,334,374   6,126,639   5,110,729
Posted
44 minutes ago, Dman said:

I think that's true to some extent, but if you are a pitcher 24 or older I'd be more interested in getting my service time started than holding out to be a starter.  You need to get through three non- arb years and then three more arb years before you can make the big, big bucks.  I'd do whatever I can to get my service time started.  There would always be a chance you could go back to starting if good enough out of the pen. We've seen more guys able to do that recently.  

That was my argument "to" Jax all along. Get in the majors, start making money early.......

Posted
1 hour ago, Rod Carews Birthday said:

I don’t think so.  If it were that easy, then Alcala, Moran, Henriquez, et al would be pitching out of the bullpen for the Twins right now.  IMHO the Twins will be pretty fortunate to “create” one solid high-leverage relief arm per year.  Add in a little bit of luck and it still takes a long time.  In many ways, this is my biggest gripe with the bullpen tear down.  I was fine trading two, or maybe even three if you get bowled over with an offer, but taking away every high leverage arm at the same time seems foolish to me.  There is now no foundation from which to build.  

Henriquez and Moran are evidence in my favor. Both were fine bullpen arms despite never being real prospects. 

The bullpen in 2027 will be completely fine, and arguably better than 2025. 

Posted

Patience, patience, patience

The biggest mistake is to give up on a young starter before they have really shown what they can become. Frank Viola is a good example. Going into 1984, his 3rd year in the bigs, he had a career record of 11-25, with an ERA over 5.50, a WHIP of 1.55, and was giving up 1.5 HR’s per 9.  It may have made sense to push him to the pen after that kind of a start to his career. However; 1984 turned things around and started an amazing run of 250 inning seasons and an eventual Cy Young as a starter.

It was mentioned that all of the relievers traded had started out as starters, but failed. That is essentially true for all relievers. The main difference is the level of failure, and when it occurs. If they transition in AA or AAA, we tend to think of them as always being relievers. It is those that break into the majors as starters that we have this discussion over. That’s where the comparison of the 5 gets interesting. It looks like Stewart and Coulombe both started with the Dodgers, bounced around a bit, (Stewart was even out of pro ball for a stretch) and then were resurrected by the Twins.

Jax and Varland both were developed by the Twins and struggled as starters. They had seen enough of starter Jax in one season and transitioned him full time to the pen in his second year, sort of as a last ditch effort. Varland was a starter for parts of three years (2022, 23,  and 24) in the majors, showing flashes of success.  Short stints in the pen showed potential of a high-end reliever, but it seemed that Varland wanted to continue starting. 2025 was the first year Varland was strictly a reliever.

Duran is the exception. He never started a game in the majors. He was transitioned to the pen in his final minor league season and has been there since.

Each of the 5 took a different path.  That will probably be the case with the next wave as well.  The group of young starters laid out in the article (Festa, SWR, Matthews, Bradley) are a ways into the progression. Abel, Adams, Morris, Ohl, Raya, Prielipp, and probably a few I have missed are just getting started. Decisions will be made based on performance.

As has been pointed out by a number of commenters, you don’t really need a playoff caliber BP if you don’t have a team that can get to the playoffs. If by chance, the offense comes together quicker and there looks like playoff potential next year, a quicker decision may need to be made. A few of the above names will likely start 2026 in the pen, but the majority will be starting at either St Paul or Minneapolis.

It is fun to anticipate and predict how this may play out over the next few years, but until the decisions need to be made, just relax and enjoy the process,

Posted
7 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

They'd have to decide to stop having them start. Then where's the depth? No chance they move Matthews off starting. Or Preilipp. This also assumes they didn't deal anyone. 

100% agree.  These two guys have the potential to be top of the rotation starters.  It makes zero sense to move them to a BP role until they have proven they are not mid-rotation or better starters.  Good example is Jax.  I remember you being on that one as it unfolded.

Posted

Probably be the same way they built the last one. Throw in a couple failed starters. Add in a few young arms that play in1-2 inning stints. Sign a few failed guys off the scrap heap of MLB FA pitching. Throw it all at the wall and see what sticks. 

Posted
3 hours ago, NYCTK said:

Henriquez and Moran are evidence in my favor. Both were fine bullpen arms despite never being real prospects. 

The bullpen in 2027 will be completely fine, and arguably better than 2025. 

I'm willing to hope you are correct.  I'm just not willing to hold my breath.  

The 2026 bullpen will likely be a trainwreck.

Posted

I don't recall Festa having any serious injury until this year. While it sounds more like shoulder fatigue of some sort rather than something major, it does beg the question if he would be better in the pen moving forward. Similar to the reason Duran was moved.

There has been some concern regarding CJ Culpepper maintaining his velocity. Like Jax, he has a number of pitches he throws. Perhaps he also stays healthier and throws harder in the pen?

I don't know WHO gets moved or WHEN. But to say nobody WANTS to be made a reliever is somewhat inaccurate. Ask Jax if he'd prefer to be retired now, or chasing his dream as a 30yo in AAA or having a $2M + salary and growing, service time, and fulfilling his ML dream. Every kid wants to imagine he's a future Cy Young winner and will sign $30M contracts. But it only works out that way for limited number.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, DocBauer said:

I don't know WHO gets moved or WHEN. But to say nobody WANTS to be made a reliever is somewhat inaccurate. Ask Jax if he'd prefer to be retired now, or chasing his dream as a 30yo in AAA or having a $2M + salary and growing, service time, and fulfilling his ML dream. Every kid wants to imagine he's a future Cy Young winner and will sign $30M contracts. But it only works out that way for limited number.

 

I think this is the real answer.  Everybody wants the big bucks and they are all hyper-competitive.  But, there comes a point when most of them realize that the best path forward might be the bullpen.  Reality sets in for everyone eventually.  

Posted

I'm not ready to give up on Zebby as a starter. Dude has been solid as of late. Who knows, there are similarities to Varland and maybe he will turn out the same way. But I love how they handled Varland, they gave him a legitimate opportunity before moving him to the pen.

Twins Daily Contributor
Posted
10 hours ago, jorgenswest said:

 The Twins have added the structured routine of a 3-4 inning/3 days rest pitcher this year in the minors. Pitchers don’t need the routine of a reliever to pitch in relief in the majors.

And for the life of me I can't come up with one single solitary reason this makes any sense. 

What the hell are they preparing them for? There's no such role

 

Posted
10 hours ago, Danchat said:

I don't think they move any of the grouping of Matthews/SWR/Festa to the pen and probably not Prielipp. Raya's likely destination is the pen but they're probably going to keep trying him as a starter because of the upside. But when it comes to the borderline arms like Adams, Ohl, and Lewis they should be tested out as one inning relievers... I don't buy that the multi-inning approach is going to work long-term for them.

 

Prielipp is 24 and has thrown less than 100 career innings combined between college and the minors. Given that, it's really hard for me to see him being an MLB starter, especially with the newfound depth in the upper levels of the system.

Posted

Good article. Rebuilding the Twins bullpen looks like a daunting task, but not something that will necessarily take two years. I don't see us signing any "top" free agents or making trades, so basically we will need to find some in-house arms that were being used as starters (Prielipp, Raya, Lewis, etc.) that may not be able to crack our starting rotation for a few years, if ever. And then we need to find some castoff arms that could be useful like we found in the past with pitchers such as Brock Stewart, Coloumbe, Megill, Littell, and Wisler. Not all-stars, but the arms are out there. Obviously, we are going to need to be creative, but I think this re-build can happen quicker than some think.

Posted
13 hours ago, Elliot said:

Each of the 5 took a different path.  That will probably be the case with the next wave as well.

Viola - 22 , Stewart - 24, Jax - 26, Coulombe - 24, Varland - 24, Duran - 24 

Viola is the only one that ended up a starter and was very good one by the time these others were even making the majors, And most of the other guys you mentioned are already 24 or older. Only Abel, Bradley, SWR debuted earlier than age 24.

The odds say all of these guys end up in the pen, we can only hope 1 or 2 become decent reliable starters.

 

"Duran is the exception. He never started a game in the majors. He was transitioned to the pen in his final minor league season and has been there since."

Duran pitched in 84 games in the minors and started 80 (and two of the four games he didn't start were rehab in 2024) So not sure if one game in relief in St. Paul in 21 counts as transitioned in the pen his final minor league season. 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, USAFChief said:

And for the life of me I can't come up with one single solitary reason this makes any sense. 

What the hell are they preparing them for? There's no such role

 

This is my recall of the Sunday morning radio show with Jeremy Zoll. I don’t think the purpose was to develop a pitcher for that role in the majors. I think the purpose is to have a role in the minors structured to get more innings as well as having routine time in between outings to work. The routine of a reliever does not allow that routine.

My takeaway…

I don’t think they have developed anyone who was strictly a reliever in the minors to a successful major league reliever. Jovani Moran is the closest but he was signed in the prior administration. Maybe they think giving 10 or so more pitchers in the organization a regular routine that allows work in between adds to the chances someone will make it through.

This administration is going to develop pitchers for the bullpen from a starter’s role in the minors. I might argue with that but I don’t think they are preparing pitchers for a new role in the majors. I do see Adams and Ohl in that bullpen day role now so I could be wrong. I am hoping it is a function of three starters on IL and one starter traded.

Posted

Easy!! Fire the fools in the office and dugout. You don't trade arms that you have years of control. They had a couple of years to develop replacements,but blew up the one thing this team had.

We all saw what happens when you have no BP the last two nights in NYC. They went there with the Yankees not playing well and are getting smoked.

Posted
20 hours ago, Chembry said:

Here is my opinion:

Every team needs 8 relievers... most of the fringe starters are fighting for the #4 or #5 spot in the rotation and could very well spend the vast majority of their time in AAA.  Given nobody is traded in the offseason, we have Lopez, Ryan, Ober, Matthews, Festa, SWR, Bradley, and Abel that have MLB experience.  Then we have Raya and Morris at AAA, Prelipp at AA.  Again if no trades/injuries occur, our top 4 is more than likely set at Lopez, Ryan, Ober, and Matthews.  That leaves the other 6 (7 if you want to include Prelipp) fighting for the #5 spot.  I am not sure it would take that much convincing to move 1-2 into the high leverage bullpen situations, especially if they have the chance to be very good.      

I would argue that we have several potential starters that may very well fit the mold of high leverage relievers: Festa, SWR for example... Maybe Raya, Morris, Prelipp (depending on durability,)  

This assumption does not seem likely given what happened at the deadline.  To trade away Duran/Jax/Varland /Stewart and then try to replace 4 very good RPs by converting SPs would be unprecedented malpractice. 

Posted

It’s a big decision to move a pitcher to the bullpen. They have to be sure that starting is not viable going forward, so some track record of that is needed. I disagree with one poster who suggested Matthews in the bullpen. Zebby has had several very successful starts and some clunkers too. But he is tough when he is on, so I see no reason to move him to the bullpen yet. 
 

Speaking of the bullpen, it is now littered with waiver projects in Tonkin Hatch, Ramirez, Kriske, Davis, Misiewicz, Urena, Duarte, McCaughan. Most of these guys I never heard of, and obviously the FO prefers scrap heap pitchers to starting the arbitration clock on some AAA guys who could use some experience in the big leagues. It’s pretty disappointing to see 35 year old journeymen pitchers on this rebuilding team, instead of building for next year and beyond. Can’t wait for a change in ownership, front office, and manager too. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

Sure let's save on service time to let them go through their growing pains next April and May and be out of the race by June.

They were out of the 2026 race when they traded Duran/Jax/Varland/Steward and Correa.  The lack of production from Larnach / Lee and Lewis also contributed.   Getting a couple prospects that are not ready for MBL 7 or 8 starts is going to have very little impact on them being in our out of the race in 2026.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Major League Ready said:

This assumption does not seem likely given what happened at the deadline.  To trade away Duran/Jax/Varland /Stewart and then try to replace 4 very good RPs by converting SPs would be unprecedented malpractice. 

LOL!  Did you read anything else in that post or anything else I posted?

I never said saying they are going to replace all of our previous relief pitchers with starters...I stated many times that given no trades/injuries our top 4 in the rotation are more than likely Lopez, Ryan, Ober, Matthews.  That leaves the other 6 potential candidates fighting for 1 rotation spot.  

Then I said it wouldn't take much convincing to convert 1 or maybe 2 of those starters to a bullpen role... never once did I mention converting them all to RP roles

Posted
23 hours ago, Bigfork Twins Guy said:

Then why are we not bringing up these guys NOW and getting them pen experience in the last 2 months of THIS season?  I get some may not be on there 40-man, but some are.  This season is lost at this point anyways so lets let these BP vets with high ERA's go and bring up some actual RP prospects so we can start building next year's pen now instead of waiting until next season.

$$$ - loss of player control one year sooner is my assumption, along with guys not being ready in Club’s eyes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...