Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

We are talking about the same Ervin Santana here right? The 33yo career average starting pitcher who's due 27M/2YR?  Twins fans are talking like this guy is a Cy Young candidate

'He is compared to 90% of the guys the Twins have run out there the last 5 years' is probably the underlying thought there. That said, I was hoping the Twins would shop him at least one notch more aggressively than 'have to be blown away by an offer'

Posted

There are going to be a variety of headlines on this one....

 

Twins acquire...

 

Twins trade....

 

Twins swap.... 

 

Angels acquire....

 

Angels swap....

Posted

We get a decent MLB starter for Nolasco and a former pitching prospect who needs a change of scenery.  I am starting to Antony deserves a chance to stay.

Posted (edited)

I like that Santiago's career FIP is almost 1 run higher than his career ERA.

 

To paraphrase Rob Antony, "santiago is a 10-4 guy, but I think he could be a 4-10 guy."

Edited by notoriousgod71
Posted

So, we gave up Meyer to get rid of Nolasco AND we sent money to the Angels to pay for his lousy contract AND we got a guy back who is a FA next year?  I don't think this is a good deal for us.

Posted

 

Why? Nolasco was bad here, and Meyer is the disappearing man.....and they got a guy that might start for them while we wait for the AA phenoms to get here......what difference does the money make?

Note that I said, "less impressive", not necessarily bad.

Posted

 

I'm not so sure 2017 is the Twins option. I know that has been talked about on here, but I've seen absolutely no evidence of it anywhere else. 

According to Cots contracts he has a $6M option for 2017. It vests if he reaches 485 plate appearances. To me that indicates the Twins have the option of picking it up, unless he reaches 485 PAs, in which case they HAVE to pick it up. 

 

Posted

 

Jeremy speculates the Twins are sending the difference in their remaining 2016 salaries, which would be $2.4 mil.  Not a big deal.

 

Weird trade!  Some points for creativity. :)

And $4M next year it sounds like.

Posted

 

So, we gave up Meyer to get rid of Nolasco AND we sent money to the Angels to pay for his lousy contract AND we got a guy back who is a FA next year?  I don't think this is a good deal for us.

 

Not a free agent next year. Sounds like he has another year of arbitration remaining. Should bring a little more stability to the rotation while waiting on pitching prospects to come up next year.

Posted

 

Not a free agent next year. Sounds like he has another year of arbitration remaining. Should bring a little more stability to the rotation while waiting on pitching prospects to come up next year.

Got it.  OK, sounds like we are paying the rest of this year and 4 mil next year.  Hmmm.  Well, I guess we need a lefty in the rotation since I don't see Milone in the rotation next year.

Posted

I am happy to get Nolasco out of here.  Now if Nolasco becomes a better than average starter and Meyer reaches his potential, then we know there is something really wrong with the Twins organizations and how they develop pitching and coach pitching. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...