Ranking 2026 Twins Top Prospects By Best Hit Tool

[Cody Christie]

Image courtesy of Rob Thompson, St. Paul Saints

As prospect season ramps up, outlets across baseball are refreshing top-100 rankings for 2026, and for the local nine, the news is relatively good. Despite several Minnesota prospects battling minor injuries this spring, the system's overall talent remains impressive.

Using the traditional 20-to-80 scouting scale (where 50 represents major-league average), several Twins prospects stand out for their pure hitting ability. To qualify for this list, each player appears on MLB Pipeline’s Top 30 Twins prospects.

Hit Tool Standouts
Honorable mentions include Marek Houston, Billy Amick, and Bruin Agbayani, each of whom has shown promising bat-to-ball skills with a 50-grade hit tool, but just missed the cut. Houston has a lot to prove with his hit tool this season after being Minnesota’s first-round pick in 2025. Amick has been floating around on top Twins prospect lists, but hasn’t put all his tools together. Agbayani might be a new name to Twins fans, as he was Minnesota’s sixth-round pick in 2025 from high school in Hawaii—but, like fellow 2025 draftee Quentin Young, he has big-league bloodlines and a high ceiling. That said, here are the top five hit tools in the Twins system.

5. C Khadim Diaw: 50-grade hit tool
Diaw’s development has been interrupted more than once, but his ability to hit has shown up whenever he’s been healthy. He produced at a high level in college (.348 average, .985 OPS) and carried that same approach into pro ball. Even in limited action, he has consistently found ways to get on base (.422 OBP) and control at bats (11.8 BB%).

His game is not built around power, instead prioritizing contact and a polished approach early in counts. Diaw demonstrates a mature understanding of the strike zone, rarely expanding unnecessarily and effectively limiting swing-and-miss (17.8 K%). The challenge for him moving forward is simply staying on the field long enough to let that skill play out over a full season.

4. SS Kaelen Culpepper: 55-grade hit tool
Culpepper has translated his college approach (.314 BA) well into professional baseball (.294 BA in 2025). He maintains consistent contact and shows the ability to use all fields, helping him avoid prolonged slumps. His bat speed allows him to handle velocity, and he does damage when pitchers challenge him in the zone, with a .585 slugging average on contact (SLGCON).

There is still some refinement needed. Offspeed pitches can give him trouble, particularly when he expands the zone. However, if he tightens that area of his game and lifts the ball more frequently, there could be another level to unlock offensively.

3. OF Hendry Mendez: 55-grade hit tool
Few hitters in the system demonstrate Mendez’s feel for the strike zone. He has built a reputation for controlling at-bats, often walking (13.6 BB%) as much as he strikes out (13.2 K%). That kind of balance is rare, and points to a hitter who understands exactly what he's trying to do at the plate.

The next step in his evolution is adding impact. Mendez has historically put the ball on the ground too often, limiting his extra-base production. In 2025, he slashed .299/.399/.439, with 31 extra-base hits in 118 games. Encouragingly, there were signs last season that he is beginning to elevate more and tap into his strength without sacrificing his elite contact ability. His SLGCON rose from .468 in 2024 to .522 last year.

2. OF Gabriel Gonzalez: 55-grade hit tool
Gonzalez rebounded in a big way last season, climbing multiple levels to Triple-A and forcing his way into the organization’s long-term plans. His calling card has always been his natural ability to put the bat on the ball, and that skill remained intact even during tougher stretches. In 123 games last season, he hit .329/.395/.513 with 38 doubles and 15 home runs.

What stood out most in his recent performance was the added balance. He cut down on strikeouts (14.5 K%), showed a bit more patience (8.7 BB%), and paired his contact ability with sneaky pop. He will likely always be an aggressive hitter, but if he continues to refine his pitch selection, there is everyday upside here.

1. OF Walker Jenkins: 60-grade hit tool
Jenkins sits at the top of this list for a reason. When healthy, he looks every bit like a middle-of-the-order hitter with both average and power upside. His left-handed swing is smooth and repeatable, allowing him to consistently square up pitches and drive the ball with authority. Last season, he slashed .286/.399/.451, with 29 extra-base hits in 84 games. There will likely be comparisons to Joe Mauer’s swing (whether fairly or unfairly) throughout his career.

Despite missing time early in his career, Jenkins has advanced quickly and already reached the upper levels of the minors at a young age. He combines strong plate discipline (13.5 BB%) with the ability to impact the baseball, a rare blend that gives him one of the highest offensive ceilings in the system.

Minnesota’s farm system continues to lean on polished hitters who bring a mix of contact ability and developing power. While injuries have slowed a few of these players at different points, the underlying tools remain strong across the board.

The encouraging part for the Twins is the variety within this group. From high-contact table setters to potential middle-of-the-order bats, there is a blend of skill sets that could complement each other at the big league level. If even a couple of these hitters reach their ceilings, the organization will be in a strong position to sustain offensive production for years to come.

---

Do you agree with the rankings above? Who has the best hit tool that isn’t on this list? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

View full article

[FlyingFinn]

Not Tait? Isn't he highly rated because of his hitting?

[WarPath1211]

1 hour ago, FlyingFinn said:

Not Tait? Isn't he highly rated because of his hitting?

With Tait, it's the power that stands out, not the contact ability/hit tool. Tait was putting up above average major league level exit velocities in A ball last year as an 18-year-old, but his hit tool and plate discipline will be highly scrutinized as he rises through the minors.

[arby58]

Any list that puts Houston's hit tool ahead of Emma's is immediately suspect.

[jmlease1]

59 minutes ago, arby58 said:

Any list that puts Houston's hit tool ahead of Emma's is immediately suspect.

If Houston's hit tool is an honorable mention then either our system is utterly bereft of quality hitters or we need to change how we rank & evaluate them. Because right now, even excusing him from needing any power production, he needs a lot of work. He looked totally overmatched in his brief stint at High A and his total production in the minors doesn't scream top hit tool.

[mikelink45]

Actually I'm disappointed if 60 is the highest and we only have one at that ranking.  

[Bodie]

35 minutes ago, mikelink45 said:

Actually I'm disappointed if 60 is the highest and we only have one at that ranking.  

Especially considering Jenkins was rated as a number 1 pick largely due to his bat. 

60 sounds low, but how much of his glowing prospect status has been lost due to injury?  Originally a "can't miss" prospect, his path to a "never was" is perfectly clear to see if he can't stay healthy.  And with the Twins' history, it feels increasingly likely every year.

Here's to Jenkins hitting the road running about May 1 and putting his injuries behind him!!!

[tarheeltwinsfan]

4 hours ago, FlyingFinn said:

Not Tait? Isn't he highly rated because of his hitting?

Not yet, but he is only 19. He will be an amazing player for the Twins soon. He has a nice, fan friendly attitude. I discovered that at spring training this year when we had a conversation and he gave me a baseball that he and Dasan Hill had been throwing.

[tarheeltwinsfan]

1 hour ago, jmlease1 said:

If Houston's hit tool is an honorable mention then either our system is utterly bereft of quality hitters or we need to change how we rank & evaluate them. Because right now, even excusing him from needing any power production, he needs a lot of work. He looked totally overmatched in his brief stint at High A and his total production in the minors doesn't scream top hit tool.

But Houston's fielding is a thing of beauty at the key position. He knows what he has to do He is smart. I bet he will improve his hitting this year.

[tarheeltwinsfan]

2 hours ago, arby58 said:

Any list that puts Houston's hit tool ahead of Emma's is immediately suspect.

 

2 hours ago, arby58 said:

Any list that puts Houston's hit tool ahead of Emma's is immediately suspect.

Emma's power may be rated the highest of any Twins prospect. But not his  hit tool. He strikes out too much and chases pitches out of the strike zone.  Emma will be a good major league player soon due to his impressive power and fielding skills. 

[Cris E]

1 hour ago, mikelink45 said:

Actually I'm disappointed if 60 is the highest and we only have one at that ranking.  

Well good news for you then, because the highest score is 80. Hurray? 

[DarrenPS]

Guys hit tool is more about making contact consistently, which is why Tait & ERod aren't as high as other guys on the list. They have more swing and miss in their game, even if the power is better and the results are better. This was not an article about their total offensive profile

[DocBauer]

This is about HIT tool, not pure OPS. 

I just can't/won't comment on Agbayani or Young. I mean, COME ON, we're talking about 18yo kids just drafted who barely held a bat in a game after being drafted. 

As to the rest, why would anyone be down on Houston? He was great at A, and then didn't look so good at A+ in his rookie debut. Didn't K-Pepper do the EXACT same thing the previous year? There are debates about Houston's power...despite not being a small guy...but he has a history of contact and zone recognition indicating he might be a solid hitter. 

Amick has suddenly lost his power, but has suddenly been a solid hitter and OB% batter. If he can find a way to combine the 2 approaches, he just might jump up the prospect rankings.

But back to the top 5:

DIAW: He might be the most athletically talented catcher since Mauer. The kid can play some CF for you if needed. But he needs to be healthy and stick behind the plate. When healthy, he's shown actually HIT ability.  He runs well. There's at least some pop/power potential. If he's healthy in 2026, watch his status rise. He MIGHT be catching in Minnesota sooner than you realize.

CULPEPPER: I really don't think we have to discuss him much. Great athlete, way more potential than I realized when drafted. He's up with the Twins in 2026 at SS, or utility early, before taking over SS. Even that might be temporary based on Houston's development. But Culpepper will be starting somewhere in the Twins INF.

MENDEZ: I think it's great the Twins are moving him to 1B. I think it's even better if they commit to it. I have zero objection to him playing a little OF for versatility, but reports are he's just not a good OF. He's shown the ability to HIT. And not everyone can do that. And he seems to have at least some power. But you can't succeed at the ML level with the number of ground balls he hits. ML INF will gobble them up. He just needs to take natural power, contact, and a solid swing and elevate his bat to ball and he has a real future.  He actually reminds me a lot of Arraez with more power. That's a good thing! But I need to see more power and LIFT of hits before I buy in.

GONZALEZ: The kid can HIT. He's got power and a good arm. Whether he can ever be a starting OF or not depends on his defense, as well as the talent around him. As impressive as Rodriguez was in ST, Gonzalez was right behind him in looking good. And while ST stats don't matter in a SSS, he looked good and had a great 2025. It's crazy to realize he reached AAA as a 22yo, only a little younger than Jenkins. There might be more HR power in the the future, but he had a 2025 season that surprised me he didn't jump back in to top 100 prospect rankings considering age and production. His bat may be ready soon. Same as Rodriguez.

JENKINS: Not sure there is anything more to say. Just stay healthy. The BAT is there. The power will come naturally. I still keep thinking a "Mauer" bat with more power. 

[Chembry]

1 hour ago, DocBauer said:

This is about HIT tool, not pure OPS. 

I just can't/won't comment on Agbayani or Young. I mean, COME ON, we're talking about 18yo kids just drafted who barely held a bat in a game after being drafted. 

As to the rest, why would anyone be down on Houston? He was great at A, and then didn't look so good at A+ in his rookie debut. Didn't K-Pepper do the EXACT same thing the previous year? There are debates about Houston's power...despite not being a small guy...but he has a history of contact and zone recognition indicating he might be a solid hitter. 

Yes, Culpepper struggled at A+ the year before.  I am sure both Houston and Culpepper struggled with endurance which played a significant role in their struggles toward the end of the year after playing a full college season, then jumping into professional baseball.  Yes, Houston has a history of contact and zone recognition.   Even with his struggles at A+, his K rate was low and contact rate was good. Hope he takes the same step forward that Culpepper did.

[Doctor Wu]

7 hours ago, DocBauer said:

I think it's great the Twins are moving him to 1B. I think it's even better if they commit to it.

I didn't realize that the Twins were doing that with Mendez, but I second the motion! We need a permanent solution at first base instead of this revolving door of free agents we get every season. But ... the big question will be: how well can he handle the position defensively? 

[Doctor Wu]

7 hours ago, DocBauer said:

DIAW: He might be the most athletically talented catcher since Mauer. The kid can play some CF for you if needed. But he needs to be healthy and stick behind the plate. When healthy, he's shown actually HIT ability.  He runs well. There's at least some pop/power potential. If he's healthy in 2026, watch his status rise. He MIGHT be catching in Minnesota sooner than you realize.

I wonder who will arrive first: Diaw or Tait? Both appear like they might rise quickly through the system and be ready to contribute within the next two years. Do both players stick as catchers?

[roger]

Please Lord, let at least two of this group remain healthy and reach their ceilings.

[mikelink45]

15 hours ago, Cris E said:

Well good news for you then, because the highest score is 80. Hurray? 

I know that but the rave reviews I've read on here would seem to make he and Emma and Gonzalez to be more in the 70 range than 60

[NYCTK]

1 hour ago, mikelink45 said:

I know that but the rave reviews I've read on here would seem to make he and Emma and Gonzalez to be more in the 70 range than 60

Don't look to biased fans for your talent evaluation. Don't even look to Twins commentators, like Provus or...whomever is radio play-by-play. This is how a lot of fans get too high of expectations for players coming up.

The only player that's deserved that level of hype the last decade has been Royce Lewis. And the only one currently worthy of that sort of hype is Walker Jenkins. 

[Senior Softball Guy]

17 hours ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

But Houston's fielding is a thing of beauty at the key position. He knows what he has to do He is smart. I bet he will improve his hitting this year.

Greg Gagne was a big part of our championship teams without a big offensive profile. Houston has only to hit as well as Gagne.....not a high bar.....IMHO

[strumdatjag]

17 hours ago, Cris E said:

Well good news for you then, because the highest score is 80. Hurray? 

Bingo - Unless the band Spinal Tap starts to influence the ratings, then the top score will be 81.   Or would that be 85? Are these always in 5 point increments? 

[LA Vikes Fan]

18 hours ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

 

Emma's power may be rated the highest of any Twins prospect. But not his  hit tool. He strikes out too much and chases pitches out of the strike zone.  Emma will be a good major league player soon due to his impressive power and fielding skills. 

Agreed, but Emma is unlikely to ever be a well rounded hitter. He'll be a guy who walks a lot, hits 25 plus HRs, fields well, but has an average or below average batting average and a 30% SO rate. Something like a .240/.350/.475 line. That would be great to have in the lineup but It's a guy who hits in 4-6 hole, not a guy who hits 2 or 3.    

[DataNerd]

5 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

I know that but the rave reviews I've read on here would seem to make he and Emma and Gonzalez to be more in the 70 range than 60

When people do grades, they are often considered to be 1 standard deviation per 10, so saying that a guy is a 70 would be saying they are projected to be in the top 5% of all MLB hitters.  It's too hard to project guys to be at that level when they have never faced MLB pitching and are still 7 years away from their prime.  MLBPipeline has 1 70 hit grade and 2 65s. belonging to the #2, #5. and #9 prospects in baseball

[chpettit19]

15 hours ago, DocBauer said:

As to the rest, why would anyone be down on Houston? He was great at A, and then didn't look so good at A+ in his rookie debut. Didn't K-Pepper do the EXACT same thing the previous year? There are debates about Houston's power...despite not being a small guy...but he has a history of contact and zone recognition indicating he might be a solid hitter. 

 

13 hours ago, Chembry said:

Yes, Culpepper struggled at A+ the year before.  I am sure both Houston and Culpepper struggled with endurance which played a significant role in their struggles toward the end of the year after playing a full college season, then jumping into professional baseball.  Yes, Houston has a history of contact and zone recognition.   Even with his struggles at A+, his K rate was low and contact rate was good. Hope he takes the same step forward that Culpepper did.

Culpepper struggled, but not like Houston. Houston was atrocious. Culpepper put up an 85 wRC+ in his brief A+ stint after being drafted. Houston was a 34. And it felt worse than that in the handful of games I watched. He barely passed the "Cavaco test" for me. None of this dooms him by any means. He appears to be a hard worker and he can absolutely improve and impress in his first full season. But Culpepper and Houston's struggles were not the same. Culpepper looked like he wore down, Houston was flat out overmatched. 

[jmlease1]

22 hours ago, tarheeltwinsfan said:

But Houston's fielding is a thing of beauty at the key position. He knows what he has to do He is smart. I bet he will improve his hitting this year.

Because being a wonderful defender means his hitting will improve?

Look, I hope everyone is right and he becomes at least an acceptable hitter, but the early returns should make people nervous. His defense made him worth taking a flier on, and it's possible that will be enough to get him up to MLB. As a mid-first round pick...why not? Maybe the struggles in Cedar Rapids was just long season challenges. Maybe it was the stress of having to move...again. Maybe it was just small sample size.

But maybe he's not a good hitter once you give him a wooden bat and take him out of the Wake Forest bandbox. I hope I'm wrong. I'd love nothing better than for him to hit .280-.300, take some walks and pop a few doubles if/when someone hangs a breaking ball or grooves a fastball.

Notably, Greg Gagne never hit below .270 in A-ball, was in AA at 20, and hit quite well for a SS in those days for 2 seasons at AAA before installing himself at SS in the Twin Cities.

[DataNerd]

7 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

 

Culpepper struggled, but not like Houston. Houston was atrocious. Culpepper put up an 85 wRC+ in his brief A+ stint after being drafted. Houston was a 34. And it felt worse than that in the handful of games I watched. He barely passed the "Cavaco test" for me. None of this dooms him by any means. He appears to be a hard worker and he can absolutely improve and impress in his first full season. But Culpepper and Houston's struggles were not the same. Culpepper looked like he wore down, Houston was flat out overmatched. 

Cavaco never had a K% below 30%, and he was at 38% in rookie ball after he was drafted.  Houston was 19% between Low-High A (and was lower at High A).  He had a .488 BABIP in A, then a .162 in A+ in about the same sample size each.  

With Houston, the concerns on the bat are that he doesn't get to much power, but the hit tool was fine.

[dxpavelka]

On 3/24/2026 at 1:46 PM, arby58 said:

Any list that puts Houston's hit tool ahead of Emma's is immediately suspect.

same thought crossed my mind.  

[chpettit19]

9 hours ago, DataNerd said:

Cavaco never had a K% below 30%, and he was at 38% in rookie ball after he was drafted.  Houston was 19% between Low-High A (and was lower at High A).  He had a .488 BABIP in A, then a .162 in A+ in about the same sample size each.  

With Houston, the concerns on the bat are that he doesn't get to much power, but the hit tool was fine.

Did you watch him play any of those games or do you just have numbers? I'm aware of the numbers. I also watched him play. There are very real concerns over Houston's ability to hit enough to get to the majors. Noah Miller has never had outrageous K numbers and he's a premier fielding SS, too, but there's very real questions about him being able to hit enough to play in the majors. 

That .162 BABIP isn't automatically bad luck. He was not having good ABs or putting good swings on the ball. He absolutely can improve, and maybe he will from the jump this year. But he was overwhelmed by A+ pitching last year.

His offense was questioned before the draft and after the draft by many scouts. And not just the power side. The hope for him at this point is probably to be Taylor Walls. Who, by the way, had a 14.8% K rate in A ball at 21. And 15.6% K rate in A+ ball. Just looking at K rate doesn't actually tell you that much. Shoot, Eduardo Tait isn't on this list because of questions with his hit tool and he had a 19% K rate at A ball as an 18-year-old.