Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 13, 2017 Author Posted December 13, 2017 Brian1:39 Which teams do you view as leading the way in terms of data driven pitching analytics? Where might you rank the mariners in that list?Eno Sarris1:40 I think the Mariners do a lot there, look at some of their fringe acquisitions like Moll. Extreme high spin and low spin waiver pickups. I think very highly of the Cubs pitching analytics group, they're obviously doing their best to supplement offensive core with smart pitching pickups. The Rays were formidable with Kalk so maybe the Twins will pick it up.
70charger Verified Member Posted December 13, 2017 Posted December 13, 2017 Why do posters use other people's real names? It's not confusing, it's just weird to read along and see questions from Falvey and Jon Bon Jovi.On the other hand, “Ohtani Kitaen” is brilliant.
big dog Verified Member Posted December 13, 2017 Posted December 13, 2017 On the other hand, “Ohtani Kitaen” is brilliant.Chuck Finley is going to need a trigger warning if he's lurking on this thread.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 13, 2017 Author Posted December 13, 2017 Hannah Hochevar1:58 I like both, but do you prefer Smyly or Pineda for TJ return?Eno Sarris1:58 Smyly had a crappier, longer injury history going in, so I guess that's an argument for Pineda. But Pineda had labrum surgery way back when, so I'll take Smyly.
USAFChief Twins Daily Contributor Posted December 13, 2017 Posted December 13, 2017 On the other hand, “Ohtani Kitaen” is brilliant.concur. ×1000
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 18, 2017 Author Posted December 18, 2017 Spider12:52 What is the Twins next move? Darvish? Cobb? Another reliever?Travis Sawchik12:52 Darvish would like nice, sure ... But I could see a Tier 2 FA starter landing there https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/travis-sawchik-fangraphs-chat-43/
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 19, 2017 Author Posted December 19, 2017 https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/eric-longenhagen-prospects-chat-12-19/ Jordan from Dakota12:04 Have you seen much of the Twins Akil Baddoo? Everything about him screams big time riser in 2018.Eric A Longenhagen12:05 Big physical tools, not the most graceful ballplayer but it's working so far. I've been a fan for a while and would argue he's already broken out. dusty12:08 How do you rank the upsides of the Twins prospect shortstops ( Lewis, Gordon, and Wander Javier) Thanks . Eric A Longenhagen12:08 Lewis, but I don't think he stays at short tom12:35 brusdar graterol thoughts?Eric A Longenhagen12:37 Special arm. 97-100 in short bursts, 93-98 during starts without much movement, average cutter/slider in the upper-80s. Generates the velo pretty easily, an impressive physical specimen and athlete. Has had a surgery already.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted December 19, 2017 Posted December 19, 2017 I like that Longenhagen will answer questions about these lower level prospects. Klaw usually only talks about the known ones but Longenhagen seems to be pretty well versed on these guys.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 19, 2017 Author Posted December 19, 2017 I like that Longenhagen will answer questions about these lower level prospects. Klaw usually only talks about the known ones but Longenhagen seems to be pretty well versed on these guys. Kiley is back with Fangraphs. Eric is not leaving....so there will be even more prospect coverage there.
drjim Provisional Member Posted December 19, 2017 Posted December 19, 2017 I like that Longenhagen will answer questions about these lower level prospects. Klaw usually only talks about the known ones but Longenhagen seems to be pretty well versed on these guys. How can KLaw have the capacity to answer questions like that when he is owning people on political/science questions? And to be fair KLaw does cover and answer questions from all aspects of baseball, while Longenhagen is strictly prospects. I'm not sure KLaw even knows a whole lot on prospects that aren't in the top 100 range.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 19, 2017 Author Posted December 19, 2017 Michael (no, not me.....)3:36 Twins management continue to say they are pursuing Darvish. How realistic is it to think that he would sign with them? Steve Adams3:37 They have the money, the need and an abnormal lack of competition for top starters. I wrote about how it's a good fit at length six weeks ago, and I think most of that argument still holds (maybe even more so now that we know the Royals are for sure going for a rebuild):https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/11/twins-brewers-enter-offseason-i... https://www.jotcast.com/chat/chat-with-mlbtrs-steve-adams-12-19-17-2850.html CoryM3:43 Do you have a favorite team or do you look at things more neutral now?Steve Adams3:45 I still follow and cheer for the Twins. I get why some journalists say they give up their fandom, so to speak, when they get into the industry. But I'm hardly in a traditional media position, and I don't really think pulling for a certain team has ever influenced me to write anything one way or the other. If the Twins do something I find to be stupid, I don't have much of an issue saying it makes little sense to me. I treat them like I would any other club and don't place extra focus on Minnesota while working for MLBTR or anything. Marcus3:45 If arrieta does not get resigned by Chicago , where do you think he realistically goes? Same goes for Wade davis. Thanks! Steve Adams3:47 Twins or Brewers make sense as alternate landing spots for Arrieta to me. Phillies if they want to keep getting aggressive.Davis... Rockies, Cardinals, Twins, Dodgers (at a certain price point), Phils all make varying degrees of sense. Red Sox if they miss out on JDM and pivot to strengthen the pitching staff rather than bolster the lineup. Speculative, but I can see it.
Doomtints Verified Member Posted December 20, 2017 Posted December 20, 2017 I'm not sure KLaw even knows a whole lot on prospects that aren't in the top 100 range. KLaw is figuring out the hard way that the more he makes projections, the more wrong he is, and people are starting to see it and realize he's not a great resource for prospect ratings. I like his profiles on minor league players but his projections/ratings on those players are worthless. He has no first-hand knowledge, but he's as good of a "Second hand" source as one can get. He has value, but the value is just not what some people think it is.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2017 Author Posted December 20, 2017 KLaw is figuring out the hard way that the more he makes projections, the more wrong he is, and people are starting to see it and realize he's not a great resource for prospect ratings. I like his profiles on minor league players but his projections/ratings on those players are worthless. He has no first-hand knowledge, but he's as good of a "Second hand" source as one can get. He has value, but the value is just not what some people think it is.This is such a bad take it is ridiculous. He's always admitted the work is hard, and he'll get a lot wrong .
Doomtints Verified Member Posted December 20, 2017 Posted December 20, 2017 This is such a bad take it is ridiculous. He's always admitted the work is hard, and he'll get a lot wrong . Any grad student will tell you that you use second hand sources at your own peril. KLaw is what he is, the glossy magazine talent of the baseball prospect business. He's good to get a survey-level overview, he's a bad source for details.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2017 Posted December 20, 2017 Any grad student will tell you that you use second hand sources at your own peril. KLaw is what he is, the glossy magazine talent of the baseball prospect business. He's good to get a survey-level overview, he's a bad source for details. I mostly agree with this. I think some guys are much better at seeing a player and breaking down what they saw than Klaw. Klaw is a good writer and has multiple sources that he trusts to be accurate. So we've seen Klaw be right about someone like Eddie Rosario before many others. But if Longenhagen and Klaw were sitting at a game and watching Nick Gordon I'd trust Longenhagen's daily write up a lot more than Klaw's write up.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 20, 2017 Author Posted December 20, 2017 Any grad student will tell you that you use second hand sources at your own peril. KLaw is what he is, the glossy magazine talent of the baseball prospect business. He's good to get a survey-level overview, he's a bad source for details. a: he actually goes to games, but that wasn't hte point I was responding to.... b: this is:KLaw is figuring out the hard way that the more he makes projections, the more wrong he is you seriously think he's just figuring this out? You think this bothers him at all, relative to how hard it is?
bird Verified Member Posted December 20, 2017 Posted December 20, 2017 Any grad student will tell you that you use second hand sources at your own peril. KLaw is what he is, the glossy magazine talent of the baseball prospect business. He's good to get a survey-level overview, he's a bad source for details. A bit harsh perhaps? I don't think KLAW holds himself out to be more expert or knowledgable than he is, and why not appreciate that about him? And also appreciate that his second-hand sources are a collection of professional talent evaluators and developers that probably have spent considerable time with the prospect. The prospect evaluators you appear to trust are seeing prospects once or twice, if that. I'm not so sure I'm going to place much more stock in their observations than I might in an aggregation of many more observations, in theory at least, that KLAW passes along to us.
Squirrel Community Moderator Posted December 20, 2017 Posted December 20, 2017 I'm interceding here before this discussion on KLaw gets too far in. This thread is for posting Fangraphs links, news, discussion related to the Twins. Or other national articles/discussion related to the Twins. If you want to have an in depth discussion on anything that gets brought here, start a thread on it. As for a discussion on KLaw, let's not go there here. Start a discussion about him ... who he is and what he has to say about baseball and how he goes about it ... that would be a great discussion to have ... in the 'Other Baseball' forum. With none of this generic "KLaw hates the Twins" 'stuff.'
snepp Verified Member Posted December 24, 2017 Posted December 24, 2017 This is pretty cool. Twins Prospect Tom Hackimer on Being a Pitching Nerd https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/twins-prospect-tom-hackimer-on-being-a-pitching-nerd/
ashbury Verified Member Posted December 24, 2017 Posted December 24, 2017 This is pretty cool. Twins Prospect Tom Hackimer on Being a Pitching Nerd https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/twins-prospect-tom-hackimer-on-being-a-pitching-nerd/"Tom Hackimer loves Driveline, uses a Motus Sleeve..." I looked these up and they sound like terrible video games. I'll stick with Out Of The Park, thank you.
prouster Verified Member Posted January 5, 2018 Posted January 5, 2018 Twins ZiPS projections were posted the other day: https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/2018-zips-projections-minnesota-twins/. Some interesting numbers, especially for the starting rotation. And I think Buxton will outperform his projected WAR total.
biggentleben Verified Member Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 KLaw is figuring out the hard way that the more he makes projections, the more wrong he is, and people are starting to see it and realize he's not a great resource for prospect ratings. I like his profiles on minor league players but his projections/ratings on those players are worthless. He has no first-hand knowledge, but he's as good of a "Second hand" source as one can get. He has value, but the value is just not what some people think it is. This is pretty much the opposite of reality. Law does the work of scouting the guys himself. He does source some guys in and out of the game, but his eye always will beat out another's opinion in a debate on a guy. He attends a TON of baseball throughout the year, amateur and minor league. He's been very open that he's not seen guys in the past when asked about them, and because he's tasked with doing so much other stuff for ESPN, he really cannot just focus on the prospect coverage the way his protege Longenhagens can for Fangraphs, which was a big pull for Eric to leave ESPN.
biggentleben Verified Member Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 This is pretty cool. Twins Prospect Tom Hackimer on Being a Pitching Nerd https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/twins-prospect-tom-hackimer-on-being-a-pitching-nerd/ I did a long talk with Michael and Kyle at Driveline last summer, and they specifically mentioned Tom in that discussion. The interview was one of my more fun things I've put together, and I think Michael gave me 12 iterations before I finally published!
Thrylos Old-Timey Member Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 Twins ZiPS projections were posted the other day: https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/2018-zips-projections-minnesota-twins/. Some interesting numbers, especially for the starting rotation. And I think Buxton will outperform his projected WAR total. Got to love Dozier's projected plate appearances
prouster Verified Member Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 Got to love Dozier's projected plate appearances Ha, I didn't even notice that. It's...ironic, isn't it?
BrianTrottier Verified Member Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 Twins ZiPS projections were posted the other day: https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/2018-zips-projections-minnesota-twins/. Some interesting numbers, especially for the starting rotation. And I think Buxton will outperform his projected WAR total. I predict that Byung Ho Park will underperform his projected outputs.
Whammy Verified Member Posted January 6, 2018 Posted January 6, 2018 Miguel Sano with 2 triples and 1 SB I wonder how often players end up with more triples than SB.... and what the largest differential ever is.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted January 11, 2018 Author Posted January 11, 2018 Matt12:34 Anything pointing to a Kepler breakout this year? Eno Sarris12:35 Not really. He doesn't hit the ball that hard, and his homers are all pulled straight down the line. He's 24, so I guess age says the arrow is pointing up.
jimmer Verified Member Posted January 11, 2018 Posted January 11, 2018 Dave Cameron is leaving Fangraphs to '...begin a new adventure,helping build out a Research and Development department for the San Diego Padres.'
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS On Saturday, Houston went 3-for-5 and scored two runs. After a short slump, he is now back over .290 on the season. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.