Report: Twins Could Still Pursue Long-Term Deal With Ryan Jeffers

[Cody Christie]

The Minnesota Twins have some important decisions to make behind the plate this offseason. Ryan Jeffers is coming off another productive season, but the organization allowed him to reach free agency without agreeing to a long-term extension. That decision doesn't necessarily mean his time in Minnesota is over.

According to Dan Hayes of The Athletic, the Twins could still explore bringing Jeffers back on a multiyear contract. Hayes offered some insight into Minnesota's thinking, writing, “Even though the club didn’t re-sign Jeffers ahead of free agency, don’t be surprised if the Twins pursue him while he explores his options.”

That possibility makes sense for a team looking to improve its roster without creating another significant hole.

Jeffers Remains an Important Part of the Catching Market

Minnesota made Jeffers one of eight players across Major League Baseball to receive a qualifying offer this offseason. The offer is a one-year contract worth $23.15 million, giving Jeffers a decision to make before the November 17 deadline.

If he accepts, Jeffers would return to Minnesota on a lucrative one-year deal. However, he is expected to decline the offer and explore his options on the open market. If he signs with another team, the Twins would receive draft-pick compensation.

Jeffers enters free agency as the top available catcher in a relatively thin market. Teams looking for an established option behind the plate won't have many alternatives with his combination of experience and offensive production. That could create a competitive market for his services, even if the qualifying offer makes his free agency more complicated.

Many national outlets recently projected several possible contract outcomes for Jeffers. Those estimates ranged from a three-year contract worth $45 million to a four-year agreement totaling $75 million. The difference between those projections is significant, and Minnesota will need to determine how much it values keeping its veteran catcher.

A Potential Fit With Caratini and Lackey

The Twins already have some pieces in place behind the plate. Victor Caratini provides an experienced option, and Minnesota could pair him with another established catcher rather than relying on an inexperienced player to handle a significant workload.

Re-signing Jeffers would give the Twins a familiar option who understands the pitching staff and has already established himself within the organization. He wouldn't need an adjustment period with a new coaching staff or teammates. That familiarity can be valuable, especially for a pitching staff looking to establish consistency.

There is also a longer-term consideration involving Vahn Lackey, Minnesota's first-round selection in the 2026 MLB Draft. Lackey represents another potential catching option for the organization down the road, but he isn't someone the Twins should need to rush through the minor leagues. A multiyear agreement with Jeffers could provide stability while Lackey continues developing. Minnesota could maintain a productive catching tandem now without forcing its top young catching prospect into the majors before he is ready.

The financial side will ultimately determine whether a reunion makes sense. The Twins have indicated they need to be more competitive with their payroll, but that doesn't mean they will spend without considering long-term value. A three-year agreement might be easier to justify than committing to four seasons at the higher end of the market.

Hayes' reporting suggests Minnesota hasn't completely closed the door on Jeffers. The two sides didn't reach an agreement before free agency, but negotiations can continue as the market develops. The Twins have a clear need behind the plate, and Jeffers is arguably the most straightforward solution. If his asking price remains within a reasonable range, Minnesota could still find a way to bring him back.

View full rumor

[Exiled in Illinois]

A three year deal for 45M makes sense to me.  Could even add some incentives to get the deal done if needed. A longer contract seems like too much risk, especially since there's reason to be optomistic about our catching pipeline.

Signing him to such a deal would also go a long way to showing they are serious about trying to compete,  improving the attitude of the fan base (at least for this fan).

[IndianaTwin]

4 minutes ago, Exiled in Illinois said:

A three year deal for 45M makes sense to me.  Could even add some incentives to get the deal done if needed. A longer contract seems like too much risk, especially since there's reason to be optomistic about our catching pipeline.

Signing him to such a deal would also go a long way to showing they are serious about trying to compete,  improving the attitude of the fan base (at least for this fan).

I don’t think 3/$45M will come close to getting it done. No matter what we think he’s worth or not worth, there will be at least one team willing to offer a) a fourth year; b) more than $15M AAV; c) or both. 

[Exiled in Illinois]

14 minutes ago, IndianaTwin said:

I don’t think 3/$45M will come close to getting it done. No matter what we think he’s worth or not worth, there will be at least one team willing to offer a) a fourth year; b) more than $15M AAV; c) or both. 

You may be right, but maybe add 5M in incentives?  Even if ultimately rejected, seems like a legit offer telling me the Twins aren't just playing lip service to increasing payroll and competing.  If he rejects the offer, move on and use the money to go after someone else that helps the team get to and compete well in the post season.

 

 

[DJL44]

They’re already in for 1/$23M. Adding 3/$36M to that doesn’t seem crazy.

[Andy MacPhail]

Jeffers knows our pitchers, I'm willing to give him 4yrs. if that was a factor. Because Lackey would take a while to take over the primary catching role. But for us to sign Jeffers, his market would have to totally crater under Boras. Him being the top catching FA, I don't see that happening.

[Andy MacPhail]

1 hour ago, DJL44 said:

They’re already in for 1/$23M. Adding 3/$36M to that doesn’t seem crazy.

I'm thinking the Twins offering him the QO, in hopes he'd decline it, not him accepting it. Offhand, I don't recall any Boras client ever accepting one,

[RpR]

2 hours ago, Exiled in Illinois said:

A three year deal for 45M makes sense to me.  Could even add some incentives to get the deal done if needed. A longer contract seems like too much risk, especially since there's reason to be optomistic about our catching pipeline.

Signing him to such a deal would also go a long way to showing they are serious about trying to compete,  improving the attitude of the fan base (at least for this fan).

Signing him to a long term contract would also show the the lacking Twins defense care little about stopping run-at-will.

Sign him and see what shows up in 2027.

[Cory Engelhardt]

Jeffers as the primary in 2027, and Jeffers at minimum as a co-catcher in 2028, then as backup catcher/1b/dh in 2029 and 2030 works just fine. And assuming his bat doesn't drop off a ton (he makes a lot of contact) this would work.

[Coach]

Sign Jeffers, trade Caratini (reducing the investment in the catcher position), keep Jackson and promote Lackey as soon as possible to get on the job training.  Wynegar handled it, so can Lackey.
 

[twinstalker]

Pay him more than the Twins can afford long-term, and they might get him.  I highly doubt he'd be worth anything close to that.  23 million for one year is likely the only hope, and if he would accept that, he'd probably accept 4/$64, both scenarios stemming from a poor market.  Doubt that occurs.  Twins don't want him for four years, please no.

[SE23]

$23 Million for a year of Jeffers is just absolute folly for this team. $64 Million for 4 years of poor defense and barely above average offense is unthinkable. That money could be used in so many more productive ways -- one of which is to open a window and throw the money into the wind.

[arby58]

8 hours ago, Andy MacPhail said:

I'm thinking the Twins offering him the QO, in hopes he'd decline it, not him accepting it. Offhand, I don't recall any Boras client ever accepting one,

Hyun-Jin Ryu and Matt Wieters.

[HerbieFan]

On 11/8/2026 at 10:50 AM, DJL44 said:

They’re already in for 1/$23M. Adding 3/$36M to that doesn’t seem crazy.

Precisely

[DataNerd]

The Twins get a pick between Round 1 and Comp A (around 30) if he gets $50M and will get around pick 75 if he doesn't.  Wouldn't be surprised to see them bid at around 3/48 and then be happy to let him walk for more and get the better pick.  The expected value between 30 and 75 would be a little above 1.5 WAR, enough to matter.

[Western SD Fan]

We need to go under the assumption the QO rules still survive the CBA negotiations since the players want this to go away.  The highest I would go would be 3/$50M.  At 50M, the Twins get a Comp A pick and the QO play worked as intended.  If Jeffers accepts the QO, then the Twins get certainty for an overpay, which is still ok since it gives time for Lackey to come up to the majors.

Let's tamp down the rush to bring up Lackey though.  Let us look at the best two catchers in the last generation (sans Salvador Perez since he was an international signee).  Joe Mauer was drafted in the 2001 draft and made his ML debut in April 2004 from HS.  Buster Posey was drafted in 2008 from Florida State and made his debut as a September callup in 2009.  Posey did not become a mainstay in the lineup until May 2010.  At the earliest, since Lackey was a collegiate player, you're expecting him to go the Posey route and come up in September 2027 as a late season callup and make his permanent debut sometime in early 2028.  If Lackey goes the Mauer route, you're not expecting him until April 2029.  We still need to fill in the gap for, at minimum, one to two years.  Either way, you're asking your draft pick to follow in the path of one HOF and one likely HOF.  Not a big ask at all.

If I'm structuring a contract for Jeffers, I would offer the 3/$50 as previously stated but front-load it with maybe a buyout offer for the third year.  The AAV would go, per year, as $23M as with the QO since we are technically already committed to it, 13.5M, 13.5M with a $2M buyout for the third year.  If the Twins do this, then trade Caratini to free up some cash and sign a lower-budget catcher that is more of a defensive wizard.  I'm not sure if Jeffers would bite on a contract like that, but it solves a lot of options and could be a win-win (on paper) regardless of the outcome of the FA negotiations.

1.  We re-sign a guy we know and trust.

2.  Contract becomes more team friendly if Lackey really does race through the minors as everyone expects while not putting the pressure on Lackey to perform to get up here.  

3.  If Jeffers signs somewhere else, Twins get a Comp A draft pick.

Edited 21 hours ago by Western SD Fan
added italicized statement

[90stwinskid]

On 11/8/2026 at 12:32 PM, Cory Engelhardt said:

Jeffers as the primary in 2027, and Jeffers at minimum as a co-catcher in 2028, then as backup catcher/1b/dh in 2029 and 2030 works just fine. And assuming his bat doesn't drop off a ton (he makes a lot of contact) this would work.

I have a hard time believing that his bat would deteriorate that much, but we'll see one way or another. 

 

I like the potential of him moving to 1b/dh at some point after Lackey gets called up. 4 yrs at 20 mil AAV doesn't feel like that much of an overpay to me under those circumstances, not to mention his familiarity with the pitching staff. And this year's FA class seems pretty weak overall.

[Twins_Fan_in_NJ]

On 11/8/2026 at 10:51 AM, Exiled in Illinois said:

A three year deal for 45M makes sense to me.  Could even add some incentives to get the deal done if needed. A longer contract seems like too much risk, especially since there's reason to be optomistic about our catching pipeline.

Signing him to such a deal would also go a long way to showing they are serious about trying to compete,  improving the attitude of the fan base (at least for this fan).

 

This.

3 years for Jeffers makes a ton of sense and would love to see the Twins bring him back. Unfortunately, I think the Yankees will go to 4 years with more money. They're desperate right now.

[tony&rodney]

1 hour ago, Twins_Fan_in_NJ said:

3 years for Jeffers makes a ton of sense

Nice pun.