Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
Image courtesy of © Jerome Miron-Imagn Images

The Twins' offense has looked noticeably different over the past month, and it isn't just because the runs have started to come in bunches.

Even after striking out 14 times on Wednesday night, Minnesota has become one of the best contact-hitting teams in baseball during June. Entering play on Saturday, the Twins have struck out just 154 times this month, the second-fewest in Major League Baseball, trailing only the Arizona Diamondbacks (144). That's a dramatic shift from where they stood earlier in the season.

Back in May, Minnesota's lineup was one of baseball's most swing-and-miss-heavy groups, tying for the fourth-most strikeouts in the majors with 252. During March and April, they ranked tied for ninth with 279 strikeouts. The change hasn't happened by accident. Whether it's a philosophical adjustment, better swing decisions, or simply healthier hitters settling into their seasons, the Twins have made putting the ball in play a clear priority.

For a lineup that has often lived and died by the home run over the past several years, becoming more difficult to strike out adds another dimension. It creates more pressure on opposing defenses, leads to longer innings, and gives Minnesota more opportunities to capitalize on mistakes.

Brooks Lee Has Become One of Baseball's Toughest Outs

No player better represents Minnesota's offensive evolution than Brooks Lee. The former first-round pick has always been praised for his advanced hit tool, but this season, he's turning those scouting reports into elite major league production.

Among all American League hitters in June, Lee owns the league's lowest strikeout percentage at just 8.7%. Looking across all of baseball among players with at least 70 plate appearances this month, only four hitters have struck out less frequently: Luis Arraez (4.5%), Jung Hoo Lee (5.9%), Nico Hoerner (6.8%), and Otto Lopez (8.6%). That's elite company.

Perhaps even more impressive is that Lee isn't simply putting the ball in play. He's doing damage when he makes contact. Only two qualified hitters in baseball have hit at least 14 home runs while maintaining a strikeout rate below 16 percent this season: Juan Soto, who has 17 home runs with a 13.1% strikeout rate, and Brooks Lee, who has 14 home runs while striking out just 15.4% of the time.

That combination is incredibly rare in today's game. Modern baseball has largely accepted higher strikeout totals as the cost of generating power. Lee is proving that the two skills don't have to be mutually exclusive. He's consistently finding the barrel (28.6 Squared-Up%) without sacrificing contact, allowing him to impact games in multiple ways.

It's also a testament to the hitter many evaluators believed the Twins were drafting when they selected him eighth overall in 2022. Lee has always shown exceptional bat-to-ball ability throughout his amateur and minor league career. The power has continued to develop, making him an increasingly complete offensive player. If this version of Brooks Lee is here to stay, Minnesota may have found one of the most complete young hitters in the American League.

The Contact Improvement Extends Throughout the Lineup

Lee may be leading the way, but he certainly isn't alone. Among qualified Twins hitters in June, Luke Keaschall ranks 18th in baseball with a 16.0% strikeout rate, while Kody Clemens sits 22nd at 17.0%. Minnesota has also received excellent contact production from several players who haven't accumulated enough plate appearances to qualify.

Ryan Kreidler owns an outstanding 6.3% strikeout rate this month, Trevor Larnach has cut his strikeouts to just 13.0%, and Victor Caratini has posted a solid 15.4% mark. That type of production throughout the lineup changes the complexion of an offense.

Rather than relying on one or two hitters to carry the attack, Minnesota is forcing opposing pitchers to work through nearly every at-bat. More balls are being put in play. More runners are reaching base. More innings are being extended. Even on nights like Wednesday, when the strikeout totals spike, the overall trend remains encouraging.

A Sustainable Formula

The Twins don't need to become a team that completely eliminates strikeouts. That's simply unrealistic in today's game. What they have done is find a healthier balance.

Power will always be an important part of Minnesota's identity, but combining that power with improved contact gives the offense a much higher floor. The lineup no longer has to wait exclusively for the three-run homer. It can manufacture offense through competitive at-bats, consistent contact, and pressure on opposing defenses.

No player embodies that balance better than Lee. His ability to pair elite contact skills with legitimate power has placed him among some of baseball's best hitters statistically. More importantly, his approach appears to be shaping the team's offensive identity.

If Minnesota continues making this much contact over the season's second half, the Twins won't just be harder to strike out—they'll be much harder to beat.

Can the Twins continue their improved approach at the plate? Leave a comment and start the discussion.

 


View full article

Posted

While it's fun to watch Lee be successful at the plate, I don't see any realistic sustainability of even an average MLB hitter based on his approach. Baez through 2025 ASG = .275/.310/.442 wRC+ 108, wOBA .325, xwOBA .291 and then the wheels came off. Obviously a totally different hitter, but that's how regression works.

Brooks Lee's performance looks a lot like Javy Baez's hot 2025 start. It's just a matter of time before Lee's results tank. 

image.png.388316a801f2f8a97d25f1be80fd6a56.png

image.png.ef7d1ab550041d7b67f93b3de418c6fa.png

Posted

Lee is doing better, no question. The home runs are a pleasant surprise but contact comes in lots of different forms (see Miranda, Jose). My late father would say “ Brooks doesn’t get his pitch to hit often enough”. Meaning he still swings at the pitchers pitch too much. With his good contact skills that results in weak contact. But I feel like he has improved in this area and hopefully continues to improve. 

Posted

I haven’t studied the numbers but Lee looks fine at 3B, and his plate appearances look a lot more consistent these days. It’s interesting how these things work; a lot of ink was spilled (I’m an analog kinda guy) early this season about how Lee at SS was killing us, but now he’s in rarified air as far as American League 3B. And I didn’t have Lewis on my bingo card as the possible answer at 1B. With Keaschall maybe looking passable in RF, and Kreidler keeping SS warm (and Gray hopefully demoted soon), suddenly I’m not losing sleep over our infield defense. 

Posted

Hold up..Hold up! As of May, Lee was better off as a utility player...We need some consistency around this place...Jeez...Next, I suppose you're going to tell me those tomato plants I planted last weekend aren't going to be suppling me with ripe tomatoes for my 4th of July cook out....

Please read Stu's satire warning.

Posted

Lee has been a pretty consistent .750 OPS hitter month to month.  Seems like he should be able to keep that up if he stays healthy.  I love that he is hitting more home runs but if he is only going to walk at a 5% clip it would be nice to see a higher batting average or higher Slugging as his OBP percentage is low.  

There's room for improvement, but hitting the ball is an important skill if you are going to be a good hitter and he appears to have that.  Now he needs to find better pitches to barrel or take his walk. We'll see how he does going forward.

Posted
1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

While it's fun to watch Lee be successful at the plate, I don't see any realistic sustainability of even an average MLB hitter based on his approach. Baez through 2025 ASG = .275/.310/.442 wRC+ 108, wOBA .325, xwOBA .291 and then the wheels came off. Obviously a totally different hitter, but that's how regression works.

Brooks Lee's performance looks a lot like Javy Baez's hot 2025 start. It's just a matter of time before Lee's results tank. 

image.png.388316a801f2f8a97d25f1be80fd6a56.png

image.png.ef7d1ab550041d7b67f93b3de418c6fa.png

Agreed, it’s a bummer to see so many twins writers paying minimal attention to more advanced metrics.

I’ll never stop shaking my head at the Mike Trout comps that originated from baseball writers for Luke Keaschall last year 

Posted
54 minutes ago, MMBoys93 said:

Agreed, it’s a bummer to see so many twins writers paying minimal attention to more advanced metrics.

I’ll never stop shaking my head at the Mike Trout comps that originated from baseball writers for Luke Keaschall last year 

I don't recall Keaschall ever being compared to Trout, but Trout comparisons in general are insane. Trout produced more than 4x Buxton's career value through age 29.

Aside from that, Lee is absolutely "better" than he was at the plate, but he's still not looking like somebody who will be even average. He's also "better" as a 3B than he was as a SS, but he's not going to be a good 3rd baseman. He's not rangey and his arm is very weak. 

Lee's also been a TD golden child for a long time. Not until this year did fans stop the endless excuse making, but still, writing glowing articles about him feed the need of people to live in their bubble. That's what people want to hear and TD is a fan entertainment site.

Posted
2 hours ago, bean5302 said:

While it's fun to watch Lee be successful at the plate, I don't see any realistic sustainability of even an average MLB hitter based on his approach. Baez through 2025 ASG = .275/.310/.442 wRC+ 108, wOBA .325, xwOBA .291 and then the wheels came off. Obviously a totally different hitter, but that's how regression works.

I agree there is some regression coming, I think he will outperform the xwOBA, even if he doesn't match the current wOBA.  Looking at the spray chart, he gets a bunch of pulled HRs, and Statcast doesn't like these. Lee has 5 HRs with a xwOBA below .300.  These are all his balls in play between 25 and 40 degrees.  xwOBA of .335, actual of .618.  The posterchild for this is Isaac Parades, who over 2500 PAs has a wOBA of .336 and an xwOBA of .309.

image.png.e77869cb90cf47fb23ed010d8dbbde86.png

Lee is also 25.  It shouldn't be expected that he is at his peak skill-level.

Posted

Lee is doing exactly what he was projected to do.  He's a below average starter in the major league, in general.  I didn't quite know whether that was 25th %ile or 47th %ile.  He's just fine if your other two infielders are above average.  Somewhere there's a comment from 2 or 3 years ago that spells that out. :-)

Nobody liked that comment at the time.

Posted
5 hours ago, DataNerd said:

I agree there is some regression coming, I think he will outperform the xwOBA, even if he doesn't match the current wOBA.  Looking at the spray chart, he gets a bunch of pulled HRs, and Statcast doesn't like these. Lee has 5 HRs with a xwOBA below .300.  These are all his balls in play between 25 and 40 degrees.  xwOBA of .335, actual of .618.  The posterchild for this is Isaac Parades, who over 2500 PAs has a wOBA of .336 and an xwOBA of .309.

image.png.e77869cb90cf47fb23ed010d8dbbde86.png

Lee is also 25.  It shouldn't be expected that he is at his peak skill-level.

25 is pretty dang close to peak. xwOBA doesn't dislike pulled home runs, it doesn't grade favorably when the home runs clear the fence by barely enough. Lee's been jusssssssttt eeking over fences this year. A lot of those home runs wouldn't be home runs at many parks.

Aside from that, Brooks Lee has been pretty much in line with wOBA vs xwOBA during his career. I'm not seeing the data to suggest he's going to beat the expected metrics.

Posted
4 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

Our site wrote off Lee in many early posts and comments.  I am so glad we had patience.  The answer to who will be the next core might include Lee. 

Patience is the key with those who are good hitters, they usually adapt & come around. Some have a lot of patience with those who aren't & not enough with those who are.

Posted

He’s improving. He’s just at 1000 PA, and 25, if you’re going to figure some things out and be a good hitter, this is when if often happens.

But elite?? Such an overused clickbait word. 106 OPS+, K% at 15. He’s having a good month. Nothing is remotely elite yet. But yes, encouraging. Specifically, the power part of it. Seems realistic that he can get to the point that the power shows up even a bit more than it has this year.

Posted

My main thought on Lee is that he's starting to develop into a slightly above average power based hitter, but he's doing so at a level that would play really well at short but only plays OK at a bat first spot like third. It's like how we had Kepler as a glove first RF who'd put up right around 100 OPS+/wRC+ numbers, and it was fine enough, but left you wanting a bit more from a bat first spot. He played about a season's worth of short with -9 OAA before he got the hook. Those numbers are bad, and his speed indicates there's probably not any more range in the tank, but I would've preferred to at least see the rest of the season's worth of time to confirm it. It's similar to how I feel about Keaschall at 2B, he played 1000 bad innings of 2B, but his bat just doesn't play in cOF and it's organizationally crowded, so he needs to stick at 2B to have a future and unlike Lee he seems to have athleticism.

Posted
18 hours ago, bean5302 said:

Aside from that, Lee is absolutely "better" than he was at the plate, but he's still not looking like somebody who will be even average. He's also "better" as a 3B than he was as a SS, but he's not going to be a good 3rd baseman. He's not rangey and his arm is very weak. 

Is "rangey" even a word?  Regardless, I strongly disagree.  I played 3B for many years and I was most definitely not "rangey" and I had a mediocre arm.  I compensated for those shortcomings by playing closer to home plate.  I was also playing goalie at the same time and I had above average reflexes which I honed on the racquetball court by standing close to the front wall, hitting the ball as hard as I could, and fielding it with my glove.  (And, yes, I did look stupid wearing a baseball glove on a racquetball court.)  My 3B philosophy was to play "a step and a dive" from the foul line.  And, if you know anything about cutting down angles (a goalie, remember), by playing more shallow, I could compensate for my lack of range.  A good SS also helps immeasurably.

Posted
10 hours ago, Connor Gould said:

My main thought on Lee is that he's starting to develop into a slightly above average power based hitter, but he's doing so at a level that would play really well at short but only plays OK at a bat first spot like third. It's like how we had Kepler as a glove first RF who'd put up right around 100 OPS+/wRC+ numbers, and it was fine enough, but left you wanting a bit more from a bat first spot. He played about a season's worth of short with -9 OAA before he got the hook. Those numbers are bad, and his speed indicates there's probably not any more range in the tank, but I would've preferred to at least see the rest of the season's worth of time to confirm it. It's similar to how I feel about Keaschall at 2B, he played 1000 bad innings of 2B, but his bat just doesn't play in cOF and it's organizationally crowded, so he needs to stick at 2B to have a future and unlike Lee he seems to have athleticism.

Why do positions on the field have to be decided by batting profile?  Brian Dozier should have been a right fielder, I guess.  Hey, Kansas City, move Bobby Witt, Jr. away from SS.  I would rather see players at positions at which they provide the best defense.  

Posted

Not enough is written about clutch hitting. The Twins have great clutch hitting in general. Pat Tabler's career numbers don't jump off the page, but would you rather see him up with the bases packed than Byron Buxton? We have a bevy of clutch hitters now whose numbers don't wow you, but make the hits when they are needed. Ironically, the Buck Truck gets stuck in neutral while guys like Larnach, Lee, and Kreidler put the pedal to the metal when the ducks are on the pond.

Posted
18 hours ago, bean5302 said:

I

Lee's also been a TD golden child for a long time. Not until this year did fans stop the endless excuse making, but still, writing glowing articles about him feed the need of people to live in their bubble. That's what people want to hear and TD is a fan entertainment site.

I agree, he was a golden child for TD.  Perhaps it was justified though... back in 2024 he was highly ranked in MLB Pipeline, ESPN, and various other prospect sites.  I think hope for Brooks Lee was justified given that pedigree and his high draft slot.  Most of us had never seen him play, other than a few highlight reels.

I agree generally though that TD writers/readers pin some hopes on many less highly thought of prospects, often later round draft picks.  Names like Balzazovic, McCusker, Helmen, and Keirsey come to mind.  None of those received the national press that Brooks Lee got, and needless to say none of them worked out in their brief chances in MLB.

The Twins are, by any objective measure, an unsuccessful franchise this century.  Most of us were born into fandom by geography.  When the present is bad, people tend to hope for the future or else dwell on the past... but Kirby and Hrbek aren't coming back.

Posted
2 hours ago, Road trip said:

I agree, he was a golden child for TD.  Perhaps it was justified though... back in 2024 he was highly ranked in MLB Pipeline, ESPN, and various other prospect sites.  I think hope for Brooks Lee was justified given that pedigree and his high draft slot.  Most of us had never seen him play, other than a few highlight reels.

I agree generally though that TD writers/readers pin some hopes on many less highly thought of prospects, often later round draft picks.  Names like Balzazovic, McCusker, Helmen, and Keirsey come to mind.  None of those received the national press that Brooks Lee got, and needless to say none of them worked out in their brief chances in MLB.

The Twins are, by any objective measure, an unsuccessful franchise this century.  Most of us were born into fandom by geography.  When the present is bad, people tend to hope for the future or else dwell on the past... but Kirby and Hrbek aren't coming back.

First off, Brooks Lee has been a success. He's made MLB and even if he moves into a slot of a utility infielder until he starts getting a little expensive, he provides a solid floor. TD opened with an omg omg omg omg omg omg Brooks Lee fell alllllll the way to the Twins at #8! Lee was potentially a first overall pick!!! type of message. Except Lee wasn't a potential number 1. He was drafted right about where he was expected to go according to mock draft sources, but the TD hype machine was working so hard smoke was coming out. Fans bought in, and that's where a lot of this comes from IMHO. 

This century? I mean, I guess. By the raw numerical odds, a team can only win the World Series once every 30 years and make it once every 15. The Twins were pretty exciting to watch for a 5 year period between 2006-2010. I believe the 2006 team would likely have won the World Series if not for injuries to Brad Radke and Francisco Liriano.

A lot of fans were pretty excited at the start of the Falvey era as well, but the 2020s? Rough by any account.

Posted
2 hours ago, Senior Softball Guy said:

Not enough is written about clutch hitting. The Twins have great clutch hitting in general. Pat Tabler's career numbers don't jump off the page, but would you rather see him up with the bases packed than Byron Buxton? We have a bevy of clutch hitters now whose numbers don't wow you, but make the hits when they are needed. Ironically, the Buck Truck gets stuck in neutral while guys like Larnach, Lee, and Kreidler put the pedal to the metal when the ducks are on the pond.

I should check, but isn't Lee on track for a 100 rbi season?

I stopped following baseball for decades. After retirement came back to following Twins online.(to cheap to pay the cable/streaming prices).

Was dazzled by stats I hadn't heard of. After 5 years or so of this I have come back to what I felt was true in 1970.

The two most important stats to rate a player's offensive value are RBIs and Runs Scored.(one can adjust that homemade stat by subtracting HRs from runs scored)

The name of the game for half of each inning is to score runs.

Lee does that.

If Royce would quit chasing low and low and outside sweepers and other breaking balls he would too.

 

 

Posted
On 6/29/2026 at 1:55 PM, MMBoys93 said:

I’ll never stop shaking my head at the Mike Trout comps that originated from baseball writers for Luke Keaschall last year 

I defy you to find one that wasn't being sarcastic or simply talking about his early stats.  No one was remotely saying he could be Trout-like.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...