Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Lessons Learned From the 2022 Trade Deadline


    Matt Braun

    Or, when the ecstasy of the deal wears off, what are you left with?

    Image courtesy of Brent Skeen-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Typically, analyzing deals less than a year after they occur is bad process. Players often make massive, gigantic strides in their game, and performance fluctuates—lagging before suddenly clicking, perhaps. But the outcomes of two of the trades are already mostly apparent, allowing us to play anthropologist and unearth what happened on August 2nd, 2022.

    But first: the historical context. It’s always easy to admonish trades long after the fact, but with some exceptions (hello, Pirates and Chris Archer), every trade makes sense at the time. Front office executives aren’t fools; they may be desperate to varying degrees, but the heat of the moment will always justify whatever eventual poor trade they make.

    And so we must travel back in time a little to where the Twins were at the trade deadline. 

    Sitting six games above .500—comfortable, perhaps not cozy—Minnesota could easily command the AL Central crown over yet another tepid division. Things weren’t perfect, but they were good, and sometimes that’s all one can get in baseball. Still, the duel swear words “Dylan Bundy” and “Chris Archer” (there he is again!) made up 40% of the starting rotation, and Emilio Pagán was Emilio Pagán-ing, leaving the Twins hungry for upgrades to the pitching staff. 

    Traded by the Baltimore Orioles with cash to the Minnesota Twins for Juan Nunez (minors), Cade Povich (minors), Juan Rojas (minors), and Yennier Cano.

    The Jorge López deal was the first to break that day. I was still sleeping when news hit Twitter—I’m on the West Coast; not lazy, mind you—so waking up to a sudden All-Star influx of closing ability was more pungent and invigorating than the first cup of coffee. The deal hurt, given that Cade Povich was a tremendous talent laying waste to minor-league hitters, but that’s the price the devil extracts when you don’t plan your bullpen well. And López would be worth it, right?

    This was a blatant breaking of a very serious rule the A’s have known about for decades: closers are built, not bought. High-octane relievers are alluring, but like a sports car purchased to flaunt opulence, they can break easily. López’s ERA has jumped almost two runs since his half-season of elite play in Baltimore, while Yennier Cano currently leads MLB in reliever fWAR. That’s the kind of swindle that appears in documentaries with Very Smart people wondering how the hell a team could get duped that badly. For your health, don’t look up Povich’s peripherals at AA this year.

    Traded by the Cincinnati Reds to the Minnesota Twins for Christian Encarnacion-Strand (minors), Steve Hajjar (minors), and Spencer Steer.

    The monkey’s paw curled once more before the day ended, and suddenly the common troubles of a talented and underperforming starter became Minnesota’s problem to figure out. 

    They didn’t. Or, rather, they never got the chance to: Tyler Mahle’s Twins career lasted 42 innings (less than Gabriel Moya’s), and he will likely spend 2024 on a different team—one fine with eating a few months of Tommy John recovery in the hopes that he can be an effective pitcher in the nebulous sometime future. 

    As tragic as this deal was as well, it had to be done, sort of. 

    The value of a competent starter has never been higher than now; the vast dearth of arms capable of eating five, six innings with any consistency has created a market of desperation where teams are taking risks on players in the hopes that the low odds of them breaking out turn favorable. They have to; there’s no other choice. It’s why Minnesota stirred up all the hoopla over acquiring Chris Paddack; it’s why Toronto sends Yusei Kikuchi out to the mound every handful of days. The Twins were burned—obviously—but so were the Yankees when they signed Carlos Rodón and traded for Frankie Montas. And I think if you ask any team with a similar situation, they would say that they remain fine with the chance they took.

    Ironically, the depth Minnesota sought to avoid and protect now appears to be the answer in front of their face: Bailey Ober and Louie Varland are solid rotation fixtures.

    So let this be the lesson: risks are good and necessary, but the Twins may best avoid future disasters if they choose to trust themselves. They’ve proven excellent off-season identifiers of pitching talent, but their nervous in-season trade decisions have almost always bitten themselves, save for one awesome Sergio Romo addition. Hopefully, they realize this before it’s too late this season.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    At this year's deadline we shouldn't need to go after a starting pitcher  and give up a bundle  ...

    We gave up a bundle for Lopez last deadline , DONT EVER DO  THAT AGAIN ...

    If the FO  does trade at the deadline,  they need to trade for bullpen arms and be smarter than everyone in the room for once  ... 

    They have been alittle better as sellers than buyers ...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, Blyleven2011 said:

    At this year's deadline we shouldn't need to go after a starting pitcher  and give up a bundle  ...

    We gave up a bundle for Lopez last deadline , DONT EVER DO  THAT AGAIN ...

    If the FO  does trade at the deadline,  they need to trade for bullpen arms and be smarter than everyone in the room for once  ... 

    They have been alittle better as sellers than buyers ...

    Ryan and Gray say hi....

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    EVERY trade involves uncertainty and frequently one team "wins" the trade and another "loses" the trade based on the statistics that the players accrue.  However, that simplistic analysis doesn't take into account the specific contribution made to the mix by a particular player in a particular situation at a particular point in time.  It is impossible for the Twins or any other team to wind up on top of the trade every time, or even really most times.  I think both the trades in the article fall into this category.  Yes, Mahle got hurt and therefore didn't produce, but injuries are the great wildcard. 

    Trade deadline deals are especially fraught with difficulty.  Either a contender, desperate to remain a contender, overpays for a player that they think will put them over the top.  OR a team with a pending free agent sells a player too cheaply because the market just isn't there in the right way (i.e. you have a third baseman and none of the teams in contention need one).

    At the end of the day, the best trades are the ones in which both teams realize value, or at least the value that they sought.  That way, both teams live to trade again another day and we can see good healthy player movement from team to team. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The best deadline deals for buyers are usually for mediocre veterans, often underperforming relievers. Prices are too high to acquire top talent in July. Aim low and give up little. The best deal the Twins made last summer was Fulmer for Gipson-Long.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    What I learned was having a deep minor league system allows you to go get players you need. The Twins are having a tough time with the 40 man imagine having to figure it out with the some the guys they traded away.

    Good point. Add three or four more infielders to the forty man right now ... Without depleting the pitching.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    30 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    The Twins are having a tough time with the 40 man imagine having to figure it out with the some the guys they traded away.

    It's not that trades are made that's the problem - it's HOW trades are made. When you give up massive value and get negative value in return, that's likely the result of haste and panic. If 40 man roster space is an issue, DFA veterans with no real upside or future (Kepler, Pagan) and let top talent develop for high-end return. Mahle had a history of injury, and Lopez had no history of success. These trades absolutely should be regretted.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Within the context of a vacuum, the trades mid season last year were fine unto themselves. You build a solid team, you win, you're in contention, a couple guys get hurt or simply don't perform as hoped/expected...you make some trades to try and push yourself over the tip and give yourself a legitimate shot come the postseason.

    Now, more guys get hurt, including one of the guys you trade for, you are just DONE. Doesn't mean trying wasn't the right thing to do.

    To my immediate memory, the 2022 deadline moves were the biggest in about 15 or more years, if not longer, or ever. A solid, experienced ML starter and recent All Star bullpen arm. My issue with the moves is not the moves themselves, but rather, that either or both had to be made at all. 

    FA is absolutely not a cure all for anyone. But it's a tool to be used. And I didn't feel that particular tool was used well pre-2022 by the Twins. Now, injuries and some poor performers were part of the equation as well. But if they had been a little smarter, had pushed payroll just a little more, they might have "guessed" better and not had to make the moves they made. Or smaller moves in place of them.

    I think this year the entire team was put together very well, despite some results here and there that haven't turned out. Different topic, different day. And honestly, with Stewart and DeLeon looking like help for the pen, Moran rounding in to form, still a few arms in AAA and one on the IL that might still help, I'm not convinced just yet they will need to trade for bullpen help. But if they had taken a shot on a FA arm and guessed right, they probably wouldn't have to think bullpen trade at all. 

    So we can always learn, adapt, and hopefully get smarter in the future. And reavrview 20/20 is always accurate. But the trades last year were not bad moves at the time.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Ryan and Gray say hi....

     

    2 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    And Duran say's how are you today!

    Gray wasn't a deadline deal. Zack Littell, Tyler Watson, Jorge Alcala, Devin Smeltzer, and Sam Dyson wave hello in addition to the disaster last year. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    Gray wasn't a deadline deal. Zack Littell, Tyler Watson, Jorge Alcala, Devin Smeltzer, and Sam Dyson wave hello in addition to the disaster last year. 

    The Twins have traded away very few players of value at the deadline so what would you expect from trading Garcia and Dozier  who was not much of a player when they traded him.  They got tremendous value for Cruz and Escobar.  They did not do well on Pressley and the Berrios trade is yet to be determined but does not look great.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It wasn’t just the trade deadline that was problematic for the FO. The trade for Paddock and Pagán is was necessitated the trade deadline deals. The Twins were buyers when they should have been sellers. Finishing 14 games behind the Guardians and 8 games out of the wild card was not a little miss by the FO. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Ryan and Gray say hi....

    I guess I should have phrased it differently  ...

    The FO has not made that many trades at the deadline that had an immediate impact  , yes we got Ryan,  Duran  and others but those were selling season  and last year we were buyers at deadline  and other deadline years that our acquisition didn't pan out to good  , Romo might be the best that performed at the twilight of his career  ...

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Major League Ready said:

    The Twins have traded away very few players of value at the deadline so what would you expect from trading Garcia and Dozier  who was not much of a player when they traded him.  They got tremendous value for Cruz and Escobar.  They did not do well on Pressley and the Berrios traded is yet to be determined but does not look great.

    Sure, Dozier's value had cratered by the time he was moved, but he did have actual value that the team opted not to cash in on. 

    Garcia and Kintzler were certainly more valuable in the moment. Ditto for Pressly. Dyson was a bust. Mahle was/is a bust on an even larger scale. Does anybody feel good about Jorge Lopez right now? Yeah, Ryan and Duran are clear W's, no doubt, but they've swung and missed their fare share as well. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The idea was sound they just picked the wrong trade targets. If the FO had any ability to draft and develop pitching they wouldn’t have had to do those deals. That’s where the real problem lies. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Linus said:

    The idea was sound they just picked the wrong trade targets. 

    There are multiple avenues to do trades. Acquiring expiring contracts at the deadline vs acquiring pitchers that are not on expiring contracts  and therefore pay a higher price in terms of prospects. If the FO makes a good trade  the team is helped for the next seasons and a bad trade is more painful.  Trading for pitchers on expiring contracts would be a lower risk strategy. 
     

    The Twins were not the only team that made deadline acquisitions for pitchers that didn’t work out. The Yankees trade for Frankie Montas and subsequent unloading of Jordan Montgomery were also trades that did not work out for the Yankees. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If I were the GM, I'd have a steadfast rule: never, ever, under any circumstance whatsoever, be a buyer at the trade deadline, and I'd ALWAYS be a seller if possible. The FO did a bit better this season at adding bodies to plug into the BP, guys like Brock Stewart. I'd never trade assets for RP's like Pagan and Lopez, but I WOULD look to trade MLB guys like Kepler for minor league prospects like Ryan, Alcala, and Duran whenever possible. Some will work out and some will not. But it seems like the odds favor sellers big time. In short, my philosophy/strategy would be to live with your off-season decisions, regardless of the standings, and trade MLB surplus for minor league prospects every chance you get to leverage another team's desperation, hopefully getting an overpay.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Trading for damaged goods (Mahle, Paddock are just a couple of examples) at any time is questionable, yet that does not sway this FO. Trading for a flash in the pan Jorge Lopez does not concern this FO. Every team takes risks, most of them not at the level that this FO does. I agree with Linus about the idea being good but the targets being wrong. Don't justify their mistakes by saying the Yankees made them too. Both are still mistakes. Part of the "cost" that they gave up in top prospects for these guys was due to the fact that they had two years of control. That made them more expensive. Neither Mahle or Lopez helped down the stretch last season and neither one is going to or is making a difference this year either. Then look at what they traded away and how those players are doing this year. So, it's easy to see that the FO swung and missed on both occasions. Kinda like the offense this year, they fit right in.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One thing to keep in mind is the trades of 2022 were for players with 1 1/2 seasons of control. Which is a big part of why the traded players cost is so steep.

    Mahle's injuries are the chance you take when trading for a decent starter. 95% (guessing) of starters probably have some sort of injury history.

    Lopez was an all-star and not a rental. You don't get that type of player for nothing.

    I believe these are the type of trades buyers usually don't win a few seasons later. Like the Cruz trade in 2021. Teams and fans should grimace at the cost and hope their team goes on a run like the Phillies last season.

    One last thing, one of the posts mentioned FA spending before the 2022 season. I agree 100% that some of these trades could have been avoided if the FO would have invested more in roster in the offseason.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @rv78I did not make my comments clear enough. I think acquiring pitchers with multiple years of control at the trade deadline is higher risk strategy and the Yankees acquisition of Montas is another example of risks associated with this strategy. Like the Twins they hurt their playoff prospects last year and this year by making a trade that didn’t work out. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, bird said:

    If I were the GM, I'd have a steadfast rule: never, ever, under any circumstance whatsoever, be a buyer at the trade deadline, and I'd ALWAYS be a seller if possible. The FO did a bit better this season at adding bodies to plug into the BP, guys like Brock Stewart. I'd never trade assets for RP's like Pagan and Lopez, but I WOULD look to trade MLB guys like Kepler for minor league prospects like Ryan, Alcala, and Duran whenever possible. Some will work out and some will not. But it seems like the odds favor sellers big time. In short, my philosophy/strategy would be to live with your off-season decisions, regardless of the standings, and trade MLB surplus for minor league prospects every chance you get to leverage another team's desperation, hopefully getting an overpay.

    I have examined how the top producing players were acquired for almost every playoff team in the past 15 years.  Trading for prospects or MLB players that have not yet become established is overwhelming more important than trading for established players, especially for teams that are not top 10 in revenue.  I would agree with your approach in general but I definitely would not make it a steadfast rule.

    Taking advantage of selling like the Tampa, Oakland, Cleveland, and more recently Baltimore, can create a very deep pool of prospects.  The Twins were very deep in good but not great prospects.  They would have lost some players they wanted to keep had they not traded away several prospects.  There are times when that pool of assets can and should be used to bolster the current roster.  
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, Cano is putting up insane numbers in Baltimore, and maybe he will sustain that, but who saw it coming?  I mean he always had stuff, but he could not find the strike zone consistently.  Now, he is not walking anyone.  Until this year, he walked about as many as he struck out.  This year he is not walking anyone.  I am not saying he will revert back, he may not, but who would have expected him from going career average of like 8 walks per 9 to 0.6.  Clearly Baltimore found something, just as they did when they moved Lopez into the pen, but will it be for a career or will league adjust? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Our front office has made some trades that certainly did not work out, but it appears the signing of Correa was their worst move. Just do not understand why our front office decided to sign him when 2 other teams decided, after medical reports, to not sign him. I do think Rocco wanted Correa, but that should not have been a good reason to sign him. Those 2 teams now are happy they did not sign Correa and the Twins have him for 6 more years batting in the 3 spot with a .200 average. Everyday this looks worse and worse. As a Twin's fan I can only hope Correa starts hitting, but he looks lost at the plate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just read about a former Twin hitting almost .400 so far this year. I wonder what the Twins record would be if he was still a Twin and the .500 pitcher we got was not on the team. Hitters that can hit .400 are very hard to find, but pitchers with a .500 record are everywhere. When the trade was made our front office said it was a win-win trade. It was really a win for the other team and the Twins were the loser.  After looking at this trade and the signing of Correa it is hard to have much faith in our front office.  Trading a good everyday player for a player that plays every 5 days just doesn't make sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, John Belinski said:

    I just read about a former Twin hitting almost .400 so far this year. I wonder what the Twins record would be if he was still a Twin and the .500 pitcher we got was not on the team. Hitters that can hit .400 are very hard to find, but pitchers with a .500 record are everywhere. When the trade was made our front office said it was a win-win trade. It was really a win for the other team and the Twins were the loser.  After looking at this trade and the signing of Correa it is hard to have much faith in our front office.  Trading a good everyday player for a player that plays every 5 days just doesn't make sense.

    I tend to agree about Correa, but disagree about the everyday player being traded for a good pitcher not making sense. Sometimes it does make sense. However, in this case I think people were overappraising Lopez and underestimating Arraez, I definitely agree with that. We see the front office do a move, and we want the move to work out, obviously, and we try to make sense of it, so we call Lopez a borderline ace, we call Salas a top prospect, and we call Arraez a huge risk with bad knees not likely to continue hitting, and we say we are selling high on him, even though I don’t think most people really believed that. 

    In general terms, trading a middle infielder for a starting pitcher can be a good thing to do, if the right players are involved.

    but anyway.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...