Tibs Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) Callis said McKay turned down an offer the Twins made him. I forgot how to link tweets here Edited June 12, 2017 by Tibs Respy 1
King Provisional Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Is the MLB.com stream stuttering for anyone else? TwinsfaninCali and Kwak 2
Darius Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) With our pitching the way it is, the idea that this team would take a position player at 1:1 ticks me off. I have wanted Greene for long time and that hasn't changed!I don't think you can use the #1 pick base upon need. You take the player with the best chance of being a superstar. I'll be ticked if they use the #1 overall pick on a guy that's projected to be a #3 starter. Draft for talent and upside, and take the pocketbook out of mothballs and use it for once on a SP in the short-term. Edited June 12, 2017 by Darius Dozier's Glorious Hair, AZTwin and Tibs 3
dgwills Provisional Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 A toolsy high-school position player is hardly a risk-averse pick. McKay as a pitcher would be "safer."Taking that child molester at 1-1 would be a risk too. Risk isn't necessarily good. d-mac 1
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 So Twins offered McKay something in line with #4 pick?
Carneal&Gordon Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 I trust Falvine with Royce Lewis and look forward to 35 and 37.
dgwills Provisional Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Is the MLB.com stream stuttering for anyone else? Open TD and the draft in separate browsers.
drivlikejehu Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Taking that child molester at 1-1 would be a risk too. Risk isn't necessarily good. All picks are "risky" in various ways, I was refuting the claim that Lewis is a "risk-averse" selection. That's just not the case. Whether it's a good pick is a completely separate issue.
mikecgrimes Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 I think 10% of the people at Target field care
jimmer Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 my excitement for the draft is gone. magiklair, Vanimal46 and markos 3
sftwinsfan Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 This is sickening, toolsy hs SS, has massive bust written all over it. Have seen nothing about him remotely worthy of #1 consideration. To take a massive gamble on athleticism may as well just take Green or Gore. Just to have money for later slots-look at the history of picks 30-40, not much talent there, most years 1-2 players pan out. Compare this to the top 10, your key players are in the top 10 and you shouldn't mess around.
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Lewis. There you go. Well, I don't get it, but whatever.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Gad, five minutes in and I'm already disappointed.
mikecgrimes Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Love the pick me and 3 other people clapped lots of confused looks drjim and Hosken Bombo Disco 2
Pardon My Dinger Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Well, I said I'd act a fool. I'm a man of my word. Look out, cars on my block. Y'all about to get flipped. Vanimal46 1
Darius Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Lol, for crying out loud. They actually left Hunter Greene on the table. We'll look back on this amazement (in a bad way).
Brock Beauchamp Site Manager Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 This pick makes me wonder if Falvey is taking the Cubs approach of "avoid pitchers". Not sure a mid-market team can play that game but whatever, we'll all know in a few years. I don't get riled up about the draft because when you get right down to it, none of us know jack crap about these players. Bob Sacamento, howieramone2, Respy and 7 others 10
mikecgrimes Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Sets up to take great pitching at 35 and 37 where failure is tolerable. Once again falvey makes the smarter option
mikecgrimes Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Sets up to take great pitching at 35 and 37 where failure is tolerable. Once again falvey makes the smarter option
70charger Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Really not a fan of this at first overall. Like at all. But I think it behooves me to wait and see what happens at 35 & 37.
drjim Provisional Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 Sets up to take great pitching at 35 and 37 where failure is tolerable. Once again falvey makes the smarter optionI agree. Digging into Lewis I like him more. A lot depends on how they follow this up. Dozier's Glorious Hair and nicksaviking 2
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 I don't hate Lewis on a personal level. He seems like a great pick but I don't see why we'd take a HS guy in this draft. And I doubt he'd take a huge discount as a Boras guy. So why do we pass on guys who might be able to help the current core? d-mac, markos and glunn 3
Darius Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 (edited) Look at all of the s-eating grins in the Reds war room. Edited June 12, 2017 by Darius twins_89 and Pardon My Dinger 2
jud6312 Verified Member Posted June 12, 2017 Posted June 12, 2017 So, does this set them up to take great pitching at 35 and 37? Not sure if we're clear on that. Comrade Bork 1
Billy Amick Wichita Wind Surge - AA 1B/3B Despite hitting just .194, the 23-year-old ranks fourth in the Texas League in Home Runs (17) and sixth in RBI (50). Explore Billy Amick News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now