Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Reusse makes case for Danny Santana at shortstop


Seth Stohs

Recommended Posts

Posted

http://www.startribune.com/twins-shouldn-t-disregard-danny-santana-the-shortstop/414561533/

 

Patrick Reusse wrote an article making a case for Danny Santana to compete for the shortstop job. He isn't pretending that it is a great option, but while Santana and Molitor contend that he's more valuable to the team if he's able to play six positions, Reusse things the 26-year-old could still develop. 

 

 

 

The theory here is the Twins might be better off throwing Santana into the shortstop competition — with Jorge Polanco, Escobar and Ehire Adrianza — rather than have him chasing fly balls this spring.

Polanco is the projected starter, but in the middle of last season, he was playing second base in Rochester and was projected as a non-shortstop for the big leagues. Escobar had a poor season in 2016, and Adrianza’s history suggests he is Florimon II.

The gifts that once foresaw Santana as an everyday shortstop are still there. Did his nervous, failed attempt to seize the position at the start of 2015 end any thought of that?

 

 

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

"Nervous, failed attempt" pretty much describes his career at shortstop. He was an E machine in the minors. I think we're past the point of giving Santana the benefit of doubt based on his athleticism, right? 

Posted

There is no loss or foul moving on from Santana. He did show some dynamics a few years ago and that was probably a mirage. Who knows, but we have to focus our attention on the other question marks.

 

Wasted time is wasted time. Let's move on.

Posted

Well, you got me to click on something with Reusse's name. That doesn't happen often.

 

This is just filler because he has to start filing stories again before Spring Training. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

Posted

 

"Nervous, failed attempt" pretty much describes his career at shortstop. He was an E machine in the minors. I think we're past the point of giving Santana the benefit of doubt based on his athleticism, right? 

 

And now we're two years removed from his remarkable rookie season... I'm ready to move on. I can understand if Molitor isn't though.

Posted

This post demands some of those great Simpson's cartoons + captions from those with more talent in that area than myself.... (one of my favorite threads of all time on TD!)

 

Posted

 

 

This post demands some of those great Simpson's cartoons + captions from those with more talent in that area than myself.... (one of my favorite threads of all time on TD!)

An entire montage!!!!!!!!!!!!

giphy.gif

Posted

 

That this article could be written is in itself an indictment of the SS situation.

Ruesse has always been a pot-stirrer.  That there are so few comments is  an indictment of Ruesse's ability to still stir a pot

Posted

Reusse has long been a believer in Danny Santana. Tough to let that go, I think.

 

I disagree. We have three other options that are better than Santana, who hasn't been able to hit since that rookie year.

Posted

Like Danny Santana, our other SS candidates -- Escobar, Polanco, and the new guy Ehire Adrianza -- are all out of options.

 

Honestly, the Twins should probably cut two of those guys this spring, but failing that, the roster pretty much demands them to cut one and deploy another in the outfield. Hard to see a way you can avoid Santana in one of those outcomes.

 

Also, if Santana cleared waivers, he couldn't refuse an outright assignment to AAA and thus would remain in the Twins org this season, unlike Adrianza who has the right to elect free agency under such conditions since he was previously outrighted by the Giants.

 

I guess Escobar could also be a candidate to clear waivers and be outrighted, due to his $2.15 mil salary -- I'll call this the "Tommy Milone Principle" -- with over 3 years service time, Escobar would have the right to refuse the assignment and elect free agency, but he would then forfeit his salary -- players need 5 years service time before they have the right to refuse the assignment and force the team to release them, thus keeping their salary.  Escobar will reach 5 years service time around May 14th this year, so perhaps we will see an attempt to waive/outright him before then if he doesn't start strong.

Posted

 

Like Danny Santana, our other SS candidates -- Escobar, Polanco, and the new guy Ehire Adrianza -- are all out of options.

 

Let me try to put this nicely:

Danny Santana is a "SS candidate" only in Reusse's (and maybe his own) head.

Posted

 

Let me try to put this nicely:

Danny Santana is a "SS candidate" only in Reusse's (and maybe his own) head.

I get that! I basically meant, guys who can play SS who are on the 40-man roster (not including recent addition Vlelma).

 

FWIW, Santana is still listed as an outfielder on the 40-man roster at MLB.com. I think that's pretty accurate at this point, and his best path to the 40-man roster.

Posted

I understand the sentiment, after all, if you thought Polanco lost magical development time because he was playing second base from April-June last year, than they same theory might hold true to Santana.  The problem, I think, is that Santana wasn't really seen as much more than a UI type player with speed.  That's not a bad thing, UI are needed and positional versatility only improves that.  I think the bigger concern with Santana is that he hasn't shown much ability to play strong defense at any position or to hit with limited playing time.  My guess is that if he had steady playing time his offensive numbers would be a bit better than they've been the last two years - maybe he could produce a 85-90 OPS+ if it all broke right - but his defense has been pretty shabby.  I'd rather take a chance with Polanco and Escobar at short and see if we can find a UI that fits a bit better.

 

But I'd also like to be proven wrong and see Santana return to his rookie glory.

Posted

Unlike most other poster's here, I agree with the thought.  Santana is a good player and I think he would benefit with knowing where is he is playing everyday.  The Twins for some reason always seem to do this with players, they only give the player a short time to show their stuff.  Santana had a great rookie year and has shows glimpses (although small ones) of an offensive skill set.  He went from SS to CF and has been all over.  The only time he have the SS job he did poorly, I agree on that however, nothing can be hurt by giving him an other shot.  Polonco's D is worse then Santana and Poloncos range is horrific.  I love Escobar, but as the bench INF guy playing three times a week.  GO DANNY!

Posted

Wait, what?

 

No. This is a ridiculous idea.

 

Polanco has the same question marks as Santana, except is younger and has a better track record. They're both out of options.

 

IMO, Polanco is a pretty ****ty option at short. I'm not going to scour the earth to find an even ****tier option in the name of "competition".

Posted

 

The only other topics that draw more ire from TD is Trevor May in the pen and Mauer batting 3rd.

I believe you are forgetting the release of Joe Benson.

Posted

 

The only other topics that draw more ire from TD is Trevor May in the pen and Mauer batting 3rd.

 

Nope.  Sano's weight is the #1 topic

Posted

I think criticism is too easy.  What I most wonder about is whether this is a column that leads us back to the article posted in TD about the mishandling of Polanco by the Twins.  Did we do the best job with the talents and potential of Santana?  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...