Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, KirbyDome89 said:

0 quality starts in 9 chances. His ERA is north of 8 in his last six starts and it's because he's giving up tons of hard contact. It's been more down than up recently. The relationship always had an expiration date. 

Quality starts are hard to come by with a manager who is notorious for a quick hook regardless of how guys are pitching.

Ryan 4/8
Paddack 0/5
Ober 1/7
Gray 2/7
Winder 2/3
Smeltzer 1/5
Archer 0/11
Gonzalez 0/1
Sands 0/2
The entire Twins pitching staff has a combined 10 quality starts in 58 games.

Besides that, "quality start" isn't even a good metric the way it's designed because a 3ER 6 inning performance is much worse than a 5 inning 2 earned run performance in regard to the likelihood a game is won or lost. Bundy has 4 starts of 5.0+ innings and less than 2 earned runs allowed.

Bundy has 3 truly bad games in 9 starts this year. He has 3 games with an xFIP over 5.00 as well.

I'm still not a huge fan of Bundy, but intentionally cherry picking a (bad) stat for which almost nobody in MLB would deliver good results is disingenuous. 

Posted

I think if Bundy has 4 innings and 2 ER or 5 innings and 3 ER against the Yankees, I would consider his night a success.   

Posted
6 hours ago, bean5302 said:

Quality starts are hard to come by with a manager who is notorious for a quick hook regardless of how guys are pitching.

Ryan 4/8
Paddack 0/5
Ober 1/7
Gray 2/7
Winder 2/3
Smeltzer 1/5
Archer 0/11
Gonzalez 0/1
Sands 0/2
The entire Twins pitching staff has a combined 10 quality starts in 58 games.

Besides that, "quality start" isn't even a good metric the way it's designed because a 3ER 6 inning performance is much worse than a 5 inning 2 earned run performance in regard to the likelihood a game is won or lost. Bundy has 4 starts of 5.0+ innings and less than 2 earned runs allowed.

Bundy has 3 truly bad games in 9 starts this year. He has 3 games with an xFIP over 5.00 as well.

I'm still not a huge fan of Bundy, but intentionally cherry picking a (bad) stat for which almost nobody in MLB would deliver good results is disingenuous. 

Is it? Is giving the Twins bullpen an extra inning of work "much worse," than 6 innings of 3 runs or less from your SP? 

The runs he has given up his last 6 (now 7) starts? The number of barrels he's catching or his hard hit percentage you seemed to gloss over? 3/4 of the 5 IP with fewer than 2 ER starts came in his first three games, which conveniently sidesteps my point about him being terrible lately, but yeah, I'm the one cherry picking....

Posted
8 hours ago, Hheimer said:

Could he be effective in the bullpen? 

 

I considered that when they signed him. They basically gave him Colome's 2021 allocation in the 2022 budget. But at this point I just don't know. In theory, when you transition to the pen you start throwing harder and narrow your repertoire down to 2, maybe 3 pitches. There's usually a heavy reliance on one off-speed pitch to pair off that (harder) fastball. Bundy's issue is that all his pitches are sub-par. So what becomes the focal point pitch? 

image.png.b953ec5e1814df388b2477cb11075e45.png

Posted

Can Bundy make himself a trade chip (and can Ober and the rest come back).

Bundy and his $5 million are safe. His tenure will last with the Twins as long as there is a place for him. If the rotation fills and he is the odd man out, would he pitch in the bullpen?

Do the Twins just let him walk?

Got until the end of July to make a hard decision.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Rosterman said:

Can Bundy make himself a trade chip (and can Ober and the rest come back).

Bundy and his $5 million are safe. His tenure will last with the Twins as long as there is a place for him. If the rotation fills and he is the odd man out, would he pitch in the bullpen?

Do the Twins just let him walk?

Got until the end of July to make a hard decision.

I’d say odds are very low he’s a trade chip in July but anything is possible. No one ever thought the Cardinals would give up a serviceable reliever in John Gant for JA Happ last year. 

Posted
41 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

I’d say odds are very low he’s a trade chip in July but anything is possible. No one ever thought the Cardinals would give up a serviceable reliever in John Gant for JA Happ last year. 

And we still have Evan Sisk, who is pushing for a mid-season promotion to St. Paul.

Posted
58 minutes ago, Rosterman said:

And we still have Evan Sisk, who is pushing for a mid-season promotion to St. Paul.

I don't know what's taking them so long, TBH.  He's 25 years old, no reason to wait.  I realize they have a lot of arms at AAA to sort through, but you don't let mature prospects get blocked while you do that.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...