Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

1.  It was my understanding there'd be no math, but since there is

 

2. Pretty sure that's not how that works.

You are incorrect on 1. Math was, is, and ever shall be, world without end, amen.

You are correct on 2. OBP increases with a base on balls. Slugging percentage is unchanged with a base on balls. Hence, OPS increases with a base on balls.

Posted

I've never heard of Neuse. I noticed the Twins have a minor league CF with the same last name. Since that name is pretty rare, I wonder if the two players are related.

Posted

   Wes Johnson..................whenever there's a 'kerfluee' on the mound.  He has logged some serious mileage that last couple of years.

Twins Daily Contributor
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nine of twelve said:

You are incorrect on 1. Math was, is, and ever shall be, world without end, amen.

You are correct on 2. OBP increases with a base on balls. Slugging percentage is unchanged with a base on balls. Hence, OPS increases with a base on balls.

Not necessarily...

 

What if your OBP was already 1.000?

Posted
3 minutes ago, MadHits said:

Nice play Celestino?

(Buxton bias)  Byron get's off to a quicker start and his speed allows him a basket catch, without having to face plant himself.  Runner hold us and doesn't score on the possible  SF.

Posted
1 minute ago, RickOShea said:

(Buxton bias)  Byron get's off to a quicker start and his speed allows him a basket catch, without having to face plant himself.  Runner hold us and doesn't score on the SF.

IDK bout that

Posted
1 minute ago, MadHits said:

IDK bout that

I agree.  That's why I identified comment with (Buxton Bias).

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...