Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins 2023 Position Analysis: Left Field


    Nick Nelson

    The Twins acquired Joey Gallo during the offseason, in part, because his defensive versatility could provide some much-needed depth with upside in a variety of injury scenarios.

    If everyone is healthy (ha!) Gallo is slated to be the regular in left field, where he presents a boom-or-bust proposition.

    Image courtesy of Nathan Ray Seebeck and Jeffrey Becker, USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    Projected Starter: Joey Gallo
    Likely Backup: Nick Gordon
    Depth: Michael A. Taylor, Trevor Larnach, Gilberto Celestino
    Prospects: Emmanuel Rodriguez, Yasser Mercedes, Misael Urbina

    THE GOOD
    In many ways, Gallo presents the ideal corner outfield specimen. He's surprisingly fast for his build, bringing the range of a low-end center fielder to left or right (not unlike Max Kepler). He's got an absolute cannon arm, the mere threat of which helps to limit the opposing run game.

    Most years, he also brings all the slugging prowess you could ask for in a corner bat. In 2021, Gallo launched 38 homers and led the league in walks on the way to an OPS that was 21% above average – despite batting just .199 and also leading the league in strikeouts.

    That's always been Gallo's game: boom or bust, personified. His ability to bring plenty of boom made him a fairly consistent asset over a five-year span from 2017 through 2021, notching two All-Star appearances and averaging more than 3 fWAR per season. Gallo is a big, strong dude with a ferocious swing. His exit velocities and hard-hit rates consistently rank near the highest percentiles. 

    With this signing, the Twins are clearly hoping to add a game-breaking factor to their offense that was amiss last year when Byron Buxton wasn't on the field. 

     

    Even if he's the primary starter in left field, as planned in a best-case scenario, Gallo still figures to spend time at other outfield positions and at first base. This will open up LF at-bats against right-handers for Gordon and Larnach, who both probably profile best at this position. Against left-handers, Taylor brings an elite glove and capable bat.

    Kyle Garlick is also around, and he's a nice depth piece to have on hand for platooning purposes. Don't sleep on Austin Martin to emerge as an option here at some point if he can get healthy.

    THE BAD
    Minnesota's depth at the outfield corners is tough to knock. The front office added Gallo on top of what was already a strength. He brings real upside to the lineup if he's consistently playing in left alongside the likes of Buxton, Alex Kirilloff, and others. 

    A more likely scenario has the defensively flexible Gallo frequently backfilling at other positions, which would allow the Twins to showcase their multitude of quality options in left field. Gordon, Larnach, and Taylor would be clear starters on a lot of teams.

    So, what's not to like? The concern here, I suppose, is the specter of Minnesota sticking with Gallo too long in the event he simply doesn't have it anymore. His 2022 season points toward such a probability; he batted .160 with a 79 OPS+ and 40% K-rate. 

    The slugger struggled both before and after a midseason trade from Yankees to Dodgers. He was barely a replacement-level player.

     

    Gallo and the Twins are both banking on a rebound, which is why the two sides agreed to a one-year, $11 million contract. His contract and MLB track record will rightfully earn him some length of leash, and it can be difficult to gauge how much slumping is TOO much for a guy who batted .199 during an All-Star season two years ago.

    He's still under 30, entering a refreshing change of scenery in Minnesota, and good players have bounced back from worse. At the same time, for boom-or-bust types like Gallo, starting to fall behind major-league pitchers – even a little bit – is anathema. The appeal of waiting out those extended "bust" periods starts to fade quickly when the "booms" are too far and few between. (Just ask Miguel Sanó, still looking for a job at the same age as Gallo.)

    There's hope that cutting down his K's slightly and benefiting from the shift could get Gallo's batting average back up into an acceptable range (by his standard). But without an obvious injury to blame for last year's drop-off, and with teams already exploring ways to try and stifle him under the new rules, it's not the most favorable of bets.

     

    THE BOTTOM LINE
    Gordon can play several defensive positions. Left field might be the only one where he's truly an asset. It's also where Larnach's glove profiles best. So long as Kepler remains entrenched in right field, these two – along with Matt Wallner, and a handful of defensively ambiguous prospects nearing readiness – must look to left field as one of their best paths to MLB playing time. (Sans DH, which we'll break down soon.)

    The Gallo acquisition throws another barrier in the way for this group. But given the uncertainties surrounding most of these players and prospects, it's not a bad gamble. "Too much depth" is a problem the Twins, and any team, would love to have. 

    Should Gallo rebound in left field while guys like Buxton, Kirilloff, and Kepler stay healthy and productive enough to keep him from being needed frequently elsewhere, they may find themselves with that happy problem. What a thought.

    Nothing wrong with dreaming big, so long as you're responsibly planning real-world contingencies. The Twins have plenty in left field. And as we'll see in then coming days, they have them across the outfield.

    Catch Up On Our Position Preview Series:

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Both Gallo and Kepler are having nice springs so far and they also have been going up against starters at least the first time through the order.  Granted it is spring where the variable level of competition, small sample sizes and stats render most trends meaningless.  Still it is nice to see both players making contact and having good numbers which beats the alternative of struggling in spring training.

    It is interesting how much both players have been in the lineup as it looks like with the swing changes they made they want to get them as much "real world" at bats as possible.  Right now Kepler has been the best at making contact between the two as he has only K'd 2 times in 23 PA.  Gallo an OK 6k's in 22 attempts which is acceptable but it would be nice if he made more contact.

    SSS is so small things can change drastically with one HR but still I am encouraged by what both have done this spring so far. Hopefully both have career years this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Comparatively speaking, Gallo's a skinny Sano, but he can play defense. I'd still rather have Gordon and/or Larnach in left. I'm not a fan of bringing in crusty old veterans and keeping the kids down on the farm. There ain't no future in the past.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Gallo’s worth a shot now that he’s on the roster….can’t reverse time. It sure seems Kiriloff is out through most of April at this point. Assuming v. RH pitching that Gallo is at 1B & Gordon is in LF. He probably sits most games v. LH pitching.

    Best case in my mind, if Kiriloff comes back, is Gallo gets spread around ………Kepler in RF 115 games ……Gallo 40 games in RF. Gordon 80 games in LF …….Gallo 40 games in LF. With 50 games at 1B assuming Kiriloff is relatively fragile. Larnach 40 games in LF………depending upon the health of Kiriloff - we may carry Garlick at some point & he bats against LH pitching & plays left.

    Gordon plays 40 games in CF v. RH pitching……Taylor plays 40 games in CF v. LH pitching …….Buxton at DH v. LH pitching & plays 80 games in CF.

    VS. RH starter Gallo in LF - Gordon in CF - Kepler in RF ………40 games, while Buxton rests or DH’s.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Dave The Dastardly said:

    Comparatively speaking, Gallo's a skinny Sano, but he can play defense. I'd still rather have Gordon and/or Larnach in left. I'm not a fan of bringing in crusty old veterans and keeping the kids down on the farm. There ain't no future in the past.

    No disagreeing with you on bringing in Gallo(age 29), but he is 704 days older than Gordon and just over 3 years older than Larnach. So I am not sure Crusty old veteran is accurate,

    It isn't like they brought a 32 year old Farmer, 35 year old Solano, 31 year old Garlick or 32 year old Taylor in for left field.

    Gallo is actually younger than Kepler. The brought in a 29 year old two time all star and two time gold glove winner and hopefully will be on a short leash.  Again I am not a fan of the signing, but I would be way more disappointed if they gave Larnach or Gordon the job straight away.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Karbo said:

    Concerned about Gallo's hitting. I hope working with a new hitting coach can help him.

    I was too, Karbo. I was very concerned about this new batting coach. When he 1st came on board with all his HR hitting team. I was afraid that with the moonshot mania from the organization nothing had changed especially with Sano, Sanchez and Jeffers slumps. 

    But after reading an article in the Athletic on Popkin, I've changed my tune. Popkin doesn't push a certain HR approach but he tries to customize a swing that helps each  hitter to barrel up on the ball. So I'm blaming Sano for his under production and I have more hope that Gallo & Kepler will hit this season.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also think Taylor will get his share of time in LF against LHPs if they want Buxton in CF.

    2 yrs ago I suggested that they should bring Buxton up to play a kind of "rover" to keep him away from the wall, While having Kepler & Broxton manning the OF. I still think that could work with a combination of Taylor, Gallo & Kepler would be able to cover the OF while Buxton is at rover.

    I know my ideas are out of the box and you think I'm crazy (they sure did 2yrs. ago). But they are using this concept in trying to circumvent the shift ban. This concept could be adapted for each player & probably won't work on everybody. But IMO to be more dynamic you have to think outside the box. I believe we have the defense to do it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    54 minutes ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    No disagreeing with you on bringing in Gallo(age 29), but he is 704 days older than Gordon and just over 3 years older than Larnach. So I am not sure Crusty old veteran is accurate,

    It isn't like they brought a 32 year old Farmer, 35 year old Solano, 31 year old Garlick or 32 year old Taylor in for left field.

    Gallo is actually younger than Kepler. The brought in a 29 year old two time all star and two time gold glove winner and hopefully will be on a short leash.  Again I am not a fan of the signing, but I would be way more disappointed if they gave Larnach or Gordon the job straight away.

    Very interesting point, and I will admit, I completely missed this fact. For some reason Gallo has always seemed older to me in my head, maybe because Kepler signed with the twins so very very young.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not a real fan of Gallo, but if he can somehow hit .225 or so, with 35 hr's, 90 ribbys, and 80 bb's...he'd be worth the flyer we took on him. Probably too much to ask for him to hit his weight. He'd win comeback player of the year. I suppose then he'd be looking for a big multi year contract either with us or someone else. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, CRF said:

    I'm not a real fan of Gallo, but if he can somehow hit .225 or so, with 35 hr's, 90 ribbys, and 80 bb's...he'd be worth the flyer we took on him. Probably too much to ask for him to hit his weight. He'd win comeback player of the year. I suppose then he'd be looking for a big multi year contract either with us or someone else. 

    I'd guess that makes him an All Star with 4+ WAR....yes, he'd definitely be worth the flyer! I'd guess he is more like 2.5-3 fWAR, and still worth it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Dave The Dastardly said:

    Comparatively speaking, Gallo's a skinny Sano, but he can play defense. I'd still rather have Gordon and/or Larnach in left. I'm not a fan of bringing in crusty old veterans and keeping the kids down on the farm. There ain't no future in the past.

    29 years old is a crusty veteran?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    28 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I'd guess that makes him an All Star with 4+ WAR....yes, he'd definitely be worth the flyer! I'd guess he is more like 2.5-3 fWAR, and still worth it.

    Hoping he can approach these numbers to max his trade value.  I can't see a scenario where he would be here next year, if he's raking he will be too expensive and if not he'll get flipped for BPA.  Best case is Larnach/Taylor play well enough to make him expendable. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, CRF said:

    I'm not a real fan of Gallo, but if he can somehow hit .225 or so, with 35 hr's, 90 ribbys, and 80 bb's...he'd be worth the flyer we took on him. Probably too much to ask for him to hit his weight. He'd win comeback player of the year. I suppose then he'd be looking for a big multi year contract either with us or someone else. 

    Looking to prove himself to obtain that multi-year contract is the best part of this signing.  He's highly motivated.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would have liked the Gallo signing a lot better had he been the #4 outfielder. As a starter though, the floor is just so low with him, and I don't think the ceiling is all that high unless we think the league can revert back to 2019. If he doesn't get that power back, teams are going to stop walking him; we saw a big decrease in BB% last year already. Offensively he's starting to look an awful lot like Chris Davis at the end of his run. I hope he turns it around, but if he doesn't find a groove early, they have to pull the plug and turn to the young players.

    But he's getting paid well and his agent is new friend-of-the-family Scott Boras, so it seems unlikely that he'd get released regardless of his play.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, Doctor Gast said:

    I was too, Karbo. I was very concerned about this new batting coach. When he 1st came on board with all his HR hitting team. I was afraid that with the moonshot mania from the organization nothing had changed especially with Sano, Sanchez and Jeffers slumps. 

    But after reading an article in the Athletic on Popkin, I've changed my tune. Popkin doesn't push a certain HR approach but he tries to customize a swing that helps each  hitter to barrel up on the ball. So I'm blaming Sano for his under production and I have more hope that Gallo & Kepler will hit this season.

    Agreed - that article got me a lot more optimistic about Gallo after how Popkin worked with C4 last year.  If he plays lights out and goes elsewhere next year so be it - I'll take one dynamite year out of him!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Jocko87 said:

    Hoping he can approach these numbers to max his trade value.  I can't see a scenario where he would be here next year, if he's raking he will be too expensive and if not he'll get flipped for BPA.  Best case is Larnach/Taylor play well enough to make him expendable. 

    I highly doubt light hitting and UFA next year Michael Taylor makes anybody expendable except himself. But it would amazing if Larnach, Wallner, and/or Lewis does.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    No disagreeing with you on bringing in Gallo(age 29), but he is 704 days older than Gordon and just over 3 years older than Larnach. So I am not sure Crusty old veteran is accurate,

    It isn't like they brought a 32 year old Farmer, 35 year old Solano, 31 year old Garlick or 32 year old Taylor in for left field.

    Gallo is actually younger than Kepler. The brought in a 29 year old two time all star and two time gold glove winner and hopefully will be on a short leash.  Again I am not a fan of the signing, but I would be way more disappointed if they gave Larnach or Gordon the job straight away.

    Thanks for the correction on the age difference. Just seems like Gallo's been around much longer. My initial intent was to use "reclamation project" instead of crusty old veteran, but my wife announced her fresh cinnamon bread had just come out of the oven and I went into brain freeze, hurriedly pounded something out on the keyboard and raced off to the kitchen. Nothing like fresh cinnamon bread straight from the oven.

    My wife says I'm her reclamation project. She's been at it for 40 years.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just being honest. I hated the Gallo signing when initially announced. I didn't see the need, and he was coming off such a nightmare 2022, and has never really "hit". And when I stepped back and took a long look I began to have a new mind set.

    Quality defender with a great arm. Tremendous power and usually has about equal splits when batting. And despite the poor BA, he's usually been around. 350-ish for his OB. Despite the high K rate and low BA, a healthy Gallo performing to his "normal" standard is a good ballplayer.

    He's worth the $11M shot.

    I would PREFER Larnach to be healthy this year and just grab a starting job and take over for Gallo or Kepler. And that might still happen. But while cautious, I've done almost a 180 in regard to my initial thoughts on Gallo. It's a good 1yr shot, especially with a couple question marks in the OF still.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    34 minutes ago, DocBauer said:

    Just being honest. I hated the Gallo signing when initially announced. I didn't see the need, and he was coming off such a nightmare 2022, and has never really "hit". And when I stepped back and took a long look I began to have a new mind set.

    Quality defender with a great arm. Tremendous power and usually has about equal splits when batting. And despite the poor BA, he's usually been around. 350-ish for his OB. Despite the high K rate and low BA, a healthy Gallo performing to his "normal" standard is a good ballplayer.

    He's worth the $11M shot.

    I would PREFER Larnach to be healthy this year and just grab a starting job and take over for Gallo or Kepler. And that might still happen. But while cautious, I've done almost a 180 in regard to my initial thoughts on Gallo. It's a good 1yr shot, especially with a couple question marks in the OF still.

    Let's hope Larnach pulls an "Arraez".

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    33 minutes ago, DocBauer said:

    Just being honest. I hated the Gallo signing when initially announced. I didn't see the need, and he was coming off such a nightmare 2022, and has never really "hit". And when I stepped back and took a long look I began to have a new mind set.

    Quality defender with a great arm. Tremendous power and usually has about equal splits when batting. And despite the poor BA, he's usually been around. 350-ish for his OB. Despite the high K rate and low BA, a healthy Gallo performing to his "normal" standard is a good ballplayer.

    He's worth the $11M shot.

    I would PREFER Larnach to be healthy this year and just grab a starting job and take over for Gallo or Kepler. And that might still happen. But while cautious, I've done almost a 180 in regard to my initial thoughts on Gallo. It's a good 1yr shot, especially with a couple question marks in the OF still.

    Thank you for the honesty Doc.  Considering how there were SO many people arguing against this signing, those voices have gone eerily quiet.

    I was for this signing since the beginning for the exact reasons we are seeing now: offensive potential, positional flexibility, great defense.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 hours ago, TwinsDr2021 said:

    I highly doubt light hitting and UFA next year Michael Taylor makes anybody expendable except himself. But it would amazing if Larnach, Wallner, and/or Lewis does.

    I used Taylor specifically because he is almost guaranteed to be around all year for defense and pinch running.  He will get a ton of run especially before Lewis comes back. But yes, many options help make Gallo a very valuable asset around the deadline. I could easily see getting a return similar to what Nelson Cruz got.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 3/14/2023 at 1:50 PM, Jocko87 said:

    Hoping he can approach these numbers to max his trade value.  I can't see a scenario where he would be here next year, if he's raking he will be too expensive and if not he'll get flipped for BPA.  Best case is Larnach/Taylor play well enough to make him expendable. 

    The trade deadline should make things interesting this year.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...