Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Twins 2024 Position Analysis: Left Field


    Nick Nelson

    Matt Wallner was built to be a right fielder, with the kind of defensive skill set that scouts dream on at the position (namely his scale-topping arm strength). For now, though, right field remains occupied by longtime tenant Max Kepler, so Wallner and his boom-or-bust offensive profile are staying in left. 

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement Neitzel-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Left field has hosted some of the great power-hitting performances in modern Twins history – from Jacque Jones to Josh Willingham to Eddie Rosario. Last year a rookie entered the fold capable of mashing with the best of these storied sluggers. But Matt Wallner has plenty to prove entering his first full season, and the long-term plan in left field isn't totally clear with the 26-year-old presumably shifting to right after this year.

    Here's a rundown of Wallner's outlook as primary left fielder, and what's behind him on the depth chart, now and going forward.

    TWINS LEFT FIELDERS AT A GLANCE

    Starter: Matt Wallner
    Backup: Manuel Margot
    Depth: Willi Castro, Alex Kirilloff, Trevor Larnach
    Prospects: Emmanuel Rodriguez, Gabriel Gonzalez, Austin Martin

    Twins fWAR Ranking Last Year: 14th out of 30
    Twins fWAR Projection This Year: 19th out of 30

    THE GOOD
    Wallner isn't competing for a starting job this spring – left field belongs to him. That's how convincing his showing in 76 games as a rookie for the Twins was. The Forest Lake native launched 14 homers and posted a 139 OPS+ in 214 plate appearances, flashing the core attributes of a prototypical power bat. He ranked third on the Twins in average exit velocity, third in launch angle, and second in barrel rate.

    The slugging was impressive, but mostly expected. What really made Wallner's debut exciting was the well-rounded nature of his play. He drew walks at a strong 11% clip. He found enough hits outside of the homers to produce a respectable .249 batting average. He played solid defense, despite mostly being used at a position that he rarely played while coming through the system. (In the minors, 258 of Wallner's 281 defensive starts came in right field.) 

    This isn't a one-trick pony. Wallner is a ballplayer. But to be sure, pure raw power is the main attraction here. It's the trait that got him drafted in the first round (in 2019), earned him Minor League Player of the Year honors (in 2022) and holds his ticket to potential stardom in the big leagues. Wallner has the kind of power where – when he connects – everyone in the park knows it's gone at that moment. The clip below exemplifies this well: 

     

    It will be exciting to see what Wallner can do in a full season. His underlying metrics weren't good just by Twins standards last year – they were elite by the league's standards. His 18.8% barrel rate would've ranked third in the majors if qualified, behind only Aaron Judge and Shohei Ohtani. His average exit velocity was the same as Mike Trout's. As long as he keeps regression at bay, Wallner is going to be a lethal force against right-handed pitching, and possibly the cleanup hitter.

    Against lefties, it's best to keep him shielded. Wallner batted .119 against southpaws last year. The addition of Margot forms a natural platoon partnership in left, and heading into the season, that's probably the tentative plan. Margot doesn't have much power, especially in comparison to Wallner, but he's a career .281 hitter against LHP with a .341 on-base percentage, and a superior defender in left. 

    Margot will be a great backup to Wallner so long as he's not needed in center. That's a fairly big caveat. In all likelihood, we'll see a lot of Castro here, probably a fair amount of Martin, and maybe a bit of Kirilloff if Carlos Santana is stationed at first. Larnach will be stuck in Triple-A waiting for an opportunity, which is unfortunate for him but convenient for the Twins. I still believe in his bat.

    THE BAD
    I mentioned earlier that Wallner was among the team leaders in exit velocity, launch angle and barrel rate. You know who led the Twins in each of those categories? Joey Gallo. Point being: hitting the ball hard doesn't mean much if you're getting beaten in a vast majority of your at-bats. That didn't happen to Wallner in his limited rookie sample, but it's clearly the concern going forward as the league adjusts.

    His playoff performance gave a glimpse of Wallner's downside, as opposing pitchers were able to bear down and neutralize his threat, holding him hitless in eight at-bats. He's going to have spells where he slumps badly and strikes out a ton. It's the nature of the beast for his player profile. Minimizing and mitigating those rough patches will hold the key to his sustained impact. 

    Wallner managed to keep his strikeouts relatively in check as a rookie. His 31.5% K-rate would've led the majors in 2003 but ranked fifth on the Twins in 2023; in other words, it's not really an extreme whiff profile in today's game. If he remains in that range, one can feel fairly confident in the 26-year-old's continued offensive success. 

    Regardless of what happens with Wallner this season, the future in left field feels uncertain thereafter. With Max Kepler expected to depart as a free agent, the door will be open for Wallner to move back to his natural position, leaving left field unspoken for. Unless Larnach can find a way to re-establish himself this year, it's anyone's guess who might be next in line.

    Right now, the next best hope internally looks like Emmanuel Rodriguez, who we have ranked as the No. 3 prospect in the system. He's currently a center fielder but generally viewed as a future corner guy, and Rodriguez could be knocking on the door of the majors by year's end. Like with Wallner, his ability to make consistent contact will be make-or-break. Gabriel Gonzalez, the centerpiece of the Jorge Polanco trade, could also be a factor here in the years to come. But in all likelihood both players are multiple seasons away from being impact big-leaguers. They need to show they can handle the high minors before they enter the conversation to become next in a lineage of slugging Twins left fielders.

    THE BOTTOM LINE
    Keeping Kepler on the roster for one final go means the Twins have a bit of an overabundance of corner outfielders, in the short term. And so Wallner goes to left, Castro stays on the bench, and Larnach remains in Triple-A as an insurance policy, while Rodriguez and Gonzalez are free to develop in the minors unrushed. These are all good things, as far as the team is concerned – layers of depth to protect against injury or extreme regression. Larnach in particular is a luxury, a 27-year-old former first-rounder who has mashed in the minors and performed decently in the majors. 

    Even with Nick Gordon – who led the team in left field starts two years ago – shipped out, the Twins have plenty of current and future depth, with the addition of Margot rounding things out nicely. It will be very interesting to see how this position takes shape for Minnesota in the years ahead, because the likelihood of Wallner remaining here past 2024 feels very low.

    Catch up on the rest of our position-by-position preview series:

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    My hope is that he can bring his swing under control, mash homers but strike out less.  I do not care how far over the fence the ball flies - it is still one run.  I just love to have a local guy on the team doing well like Hrbek did all those years.  

    Excellent article.  While I understand that players with the hitting profile of Matt Wallner are prone to more strikeouts and thus more regression, there isn't anything specific that makes me think that he is any more likely than anyone else to regress.  Even though there is are a lot of Wallner doubters on TD, I'm hoping and thinking that Wallner can hold down a corner spot for years to come, whether that be left- or right-field.  There are enough guys around that we can figure out the future when it appears. 

    I'd love the Twins to get off the HR bandwagon & teach their players how to hit & not strike out. Then Wallner will really shine w/o regression. I have lot of faith that Martin will shine once he's called up. Castro had a great ST last year, (but would have been passed over if not for injuries) and is still doing well as a switch hitter he'll be valuable.

    7 minutes ago, Doctor Gast said:

    I'd love the Twins to get off the HR bandwagon & teach their players how to hit & not strike out. Then Wallner will really shine w/o regression. I have lot of faith that Martin will shine once he's called up. Castro had a great ST last year, (but would have been passed over if not for injuries) and is still doing well as a switch hitter he'll be valuable.

    Since everyone can't get enough of "advanced statistics," how about a Watchability Index rewarding plays that are fun to watch? High grades for triples, doubles, stolen bases, balls that challenge a defender to make a catch or throw, and, of course, at bats that tie the game or take the lead? Walk-off homeruns get lots of points, but so do walk-off singles and game-saving defensive plays.

    I am fairly confident 8 at bats means nothing.....

    I am also fairly confident this guy can play, and while he's very unlikely to reproduce last year's numbers (would have been the 2nd best LFer in the game over a full season), he's also, imo, very unlikely to be below average for the year. I think he's a legit player for this team for years to come.

    My hope for Wallner is he can continue to hit righties close to what he did last year and he improves enough against lefties that he is playable.

    I don't usually give spring training much worry, but it would be nice to start seeing better at bats from him, otherwise it might be better to give Larnach another shot to see if he can stay hot and healthy.

    54 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    would have been the 2nd best LFer in the game over a full season), he's also, imo, very unlikely to be below average for the year.

    Is this really true? If you double his at bats against righties and triple his at bats against lefties. (That would have given him about 40 less plate appearances than Correa for example) that would have put him close to a .200/.325/.440 (very rough math except average. (28 doubles, 30 homers, 64 BB,  175 K's) Sill very good, but he was terrible against lefties last year and at some point they would have had to stop playing him.

    2 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

    My hope is that he can bring his swing under control, mash homers but strike out less.  I do not care how far over the fence the ball flies - it is still one run.  I just love to have a local guy on the team doing well like Hrbek did all those years.  

    What part of his swing isn't under control in your opinion? Wallner stands close to the plate and the type of swing he has isn't going to be successful at generating hard contact on inside edge pitches so he's going to be vulnerable to those if the pitcher can hit their spots.

    I do think there's some work Wallner might be able to do on pitches down in the zone. He doesn't hit them as well, and he sees a lot of pitches down and away or in. He seems to have inside pitches pretty well handled, but down and away is his biggest K weakness. Up and away/outside edge is an area he can probably swing more and do more damage, but he gets a lot of his walks there already.

    Overall, Wallner's o-swing rate is already better than MLB average so I'm not sure I expect there's a lot of room for him to make big strides.

    The ridiculous power means he will get more attention and game-planning from opposing pitchers. Still, his K% is not starting from a super horrible level…31+%l. Gallo’s (for reference) was in the high 30’s at the same age, despite more mlb experience.

    I am optimistic on the bat. A one-step-back, then two-steps-forward type of progression wouldn’t surprise.

    "His 31.5% K-rate would've led the majors in 2003 but ranked fifth on the Twins in 2023; in other words, it's not really an extreme whiff profile in today's game."

    Wallner's 2023 whiff rate ranked fifth on a team that set records for whiffs.  The 2023 Twins were extraordinarily bad as a team at controlling the strike zone.  Wallner's 2023 whiff rate was (along with four other Twins) an extreme whiff profile by any common sense objective analysis.  

    That said, I view Wallner as able to make adjustments because he's done that in the minors.  I expect Wallner to strike out less, walk more and increase his OPS over 2023.  If LF is the Twins' weak spot, then 2024 will be a fun year.

    Margot is a fine 4th OF.

    But if you're listing him as a starter/platoon, your team does not have an "overabundance" of corner OF.

    I hope that Wallner can figure out LHP and his K rate, and that Larnach improves. But there isn't much starter-level depth after that. Castro and Margot are meant to be backups.

    After reading your article, Nick, and the comments gotta ask myself how far out in right field am I with my belief that he is going to begin the season in AAA?

    I haven't been convinced he is going to make it long term with the Twins.  Just don't know how much of that is seeing him try to play right field in his first few games.  Just can't get that out of my brain when his name comes up.  Yes, I know his results last season were good and he did play better D as the season went on.  

    Hopefully, he proves me wrong and becomes a long-time fixture for the Twins.  I do believe, however, that he is going to have to establish himself this year because those two young kids will be coming on hard next year.

    25 minutes ago, roger said:

    After reading your article, Nick, and the comments gotta ask myself how far out in right field am I with my belief that he is going to begin the season in AAA?

    I haven't been convinced he is going to make it long term with the Twins.  Just don't know how much of that is seeing him try to play right field in his first few games.  Just can't get that out of my brain when his name comes up.  Yes, I know his results last season were good and he did play better D as the season went on.  

    Hopefully, he proves me wrong and becomes a long-time fixture for the Twins.  I do believe, however, that he is going to have to establish himself this year because those two young kids will be coming on hard next year.

    I think there's basically a 0% chance he starts in AAA. I don't think there's a lot of guys who've OPS'd .877 with a 139 OPS+ in 76 games and 254 plate appearances before being a regular starter in a playoff lineup who turn around and get optioned down to AAA before the next season even starts.

    51 minutes ago, roger said:

    After reading your article, Nick, and the comments gotta ask myself how far out in right field am I with my belief that he is going to begin the season in AAA?

    I haven't been convinced he is going to make it long term with the Twins.  Just don't know how much of that is seeing him try to play right field in his first few games.  Just can't get that out of my brain when his name comes up.  Yes, I know his results last season were good and he did play better D as the season went on.  

    Hopefully, he proves me wrong and becomes a long-time fixture for the Twins.  I do believe, however, that he is going to have to establish himself this year because those two young kids will be coming on hard next year.

    I think you're very far out in right field, left field, any field if you think Wallner's going to start the season in AAA. The Twins value MLB results more than spring training showings (justifiably) and Wallner was very good last season. he's not a great OF, but he's not awful either and his biggest asset as a defender (the elite arm) doesn't showcase as much value once guys stop running on him. To put Wallner in context, though: he's played about half as many games as Larnach and accumulated the same amount of bWAR. The power is legit, he's not afraid to get hit if a pitcher tries to go inside on him, and he doesn't start chasing when he's struggling to make contact. A pitcher grooving one on a 3-1 count is flirting with disaster.

    If Kepler weren't still here, he'd already be making the transition back to RF, where he'll do better once he's gotten used to the vagaries of the MLB RF. I think it's likely that happens next season with one of the young guys trying to seize LF (Martin's range plays well there, E-Rod can certainly handle it, and if Rosario's hit his way into pushing for a MLB job he'll do fine there too) Margot & Castro should fill in fine handling the tougher lefties; we might even see Farmer get a little run out there if needed.

    LF looks pretty solid going into the year.

    1 hour ago, roger said:

    After reading your article, Nick, and the comments gotta ask myself how far out in right field am I with my belief that he is going to begin the season in AAA?

    I haven't been convinced he is going to make it long term with the Twins.  Just don't know how much of that is seeing him try to play right field in his first few games.  Just can't get that out of my brain when his name comes up.  Yes, I know his results last season were good and he did play better D as the season went on.  

    Hopefully, he proves me wrong and becomes a long-time fixture for the Twins.  I do believe, however, that he is going to have to establish himself this year because those two young kids will be coming on hard next year.

    I wouldn't be shocked. I would be mildly surprised.

    But I'm reading into how much they protected him from LHP last year. It felt excessive, which means they don't trust him yet, imho. But it would take Larnach knocking the cover off the ball for it to happen.

    3 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

    I am fairly confident 8 at bats means nothing.....

    I am also fairly confident this guy can play, and while he's very unlikely to reproduce last year's numbers (would have been the 2nd best LFer in the game over a full season), he's also, imo, very unlikely to be below average for the year. I think he's a legit player for this team for years to come.

    If we're talking about 28 other teams taking notice of that Houston series and whether Wallner can make adjustments I wouldn't consider those 8 ABs to be meaningless. 

    I've watched Wallner enough to see he has a pretty good eye, that's why he walks so much. I've seen him shorten up his swing and make adjustments and still drive the ball. And I've followed him throughout his milb career and monitored his numbers, and he constantly improved month to month at every level to he advanced to. But that's an eye test, not numbers.

    12 games, 43 PA at Cedar Rapids in 2019 is the only time he's been under .800 for an OPS  and it was .794. And it was for 2 weeks. 

    His 4 year career MILB quad slash line: .274 AVG/ .361 OB%/ .511 SLG%/ .898 OPS.

    As I posted in a different OP regarding Wallner, take all 4 of those numbers and cut them by 30 points. Even 40 if you want. That's still a hell of a powerful and productive ballplayer. 

    He's off to a good start with his 2022-2023 seasons. I can't wait to watch more. Does his early success and milb numbers offer proof he's going to be good? Absolutely not. But when you have a talented athlete who puts up big numbers everywhere he goes, wouldn't you want that as a starting point??

    He's actually pretty fast and runs well, he's just a big guy who takes a second to get going. He's got that cannon of an arm. He's  barely played LF, but he looked like he was getting more and more confident there last year. In 2025 he's probably in his more familiar RF, where his arm plays even better, and where he'll actually have a little less ground to cover. Defensively, the only real issue I've seen is some bad recognition and some bad routes here and there. He works on those things and gets better, he can be average defensively, and above average with the arm factored in.

    As far as LF in 2025, that will take care of itself. But, FWIW, I'm betting it might be Martin as the primary, and he'd help cover CF for Buxton. Castro will play LF, and Larnach might yet turn out as a corner OF/DH for us. But that's a whole year away yet.

    My impression is that even among third party analysts, lots of people are expecting massive regression from Wallner. 

    But he's got points in his favor -

    - his Statcast data is excellent. He got a little lucky perhaps on batting average but unlucky on slugging, overall his expected results near exactly matched the actuals

    - along the same lines, this guy is a serious athlete. 100th percentile arm, 67th % speed, and plus plus power

    - he wasn't particularly vulnerable to off speed or breaking pitches

    - his weakness against LHP is probably overstated. In his breakout 2022 milb season, he crushed lefties, and his zone data doesn't look bad for countering them. He's of course much weaker than against RHP, like all left handed hitters

    5 hours ago, KirbyDome89 said:

    If we're talking about 28 other teams taking notice of that Houston series and whether Wallner can make adjustments I wouldn't consider those 8 ABs to be meaningless. 

    Counting those 8 games, his strike out percentage as I write this is 48 percent.

    As I write this, Wallner and Joey Gallo have identical batting averages in Spring Training

    At that, Arraez was 1  for 16,  but in his last 9 at bats has had 7 hits so time will tell, but Spring Training is meaningless only to those who are not there.

    8 hours ago, Shaitan said:

    I wouldn't be shocked. I would be mildly surprised.

    But I'm reading into how much they protected him from LHP last year. It felt excessive, which means they don't trust him yet, imho. But it would take Larnach knocking the cover off the ball for it to happen.

    Article last week in the Athletic about the TWINS and the history of their good left handed hitters and how they were sharply skewed one way with results by weighing OPS. The results were v. RH & LH pitchers.

    Only Carew had an OPS over .800 facing left handed pitching.

    Koskie was around .770………Oliva was .690 ……Mauer was .760 I believe & Morneau slightly less. Hrbek wasn’t too bad from memory. They had another half dozen guys and nobody was what people would consider good v. LH pitching.

    That said, it’s not some terrible thing for Wallner or Julien to struggle v. LH pitching. Playing them & expecting them regularly v. lefties to “work it out” doesn’t make sense. This assumes the team has alternative RH batters.

    The amount of RH pitchers throughout life as a player gets the RH hitters more used to seeing pitching from the right side. LH hitters don’t see too many lefties growing up & very few are proficient hitting them.

    Being worried about guys sticking in the Show because they are struggling v LH pitching is worrying about something that likely isn’t changing any time soon.

    "His 31.5% K-rate would've led the majors in 2003 but ranked fifth on the Twins in 2023; in other words, it's not really an extreme whiff profile in today's game."

    I don't care how many MLB players strike out over 30% of the time, it will always be an extreme whiff profile. All it means is that there are more players with an extreme whiff profile. It doesn't make it less extreme because more players can't hit the ball as often anymore.

    To me, Wallner made big strides on defense, making himself far from a one-trick pony. As shaky as he looked in '22 and his first handful of games last year, he looked the part of a major league outfielder in the second half of his season. Wallner will always strike out a lot, but if he can manage to hit balls hard in the zone and refuse to chase, he'll be fine. 

    I really can't comprehend the hate for Wallner here. There's nothing in his profile from last year suggesting he won't be a great to elite bat moving forward.

    Almost the entire team sucked at the plate against the Astros in the playoffs. Basically, the entire team was overwhelmed by the atmosphere and they were collectively swinging at junk. Only Lewis & Correa actually forced the Astros pitchers to throw strikes at all if my recollection serves me well. Wallner wasn't some exception. Not sure why the sky isn't falling from the 5-10 PA other Twins players got?

    22 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    What part of his swing isn't under control in your opinion? Wallner stands close to the plate and the type of swing he has isn't going to be successful at generating hard contact on inside edge pitches so he's going to be vulnerable to those if the pitcher can hit their spots.

    I do think there's some work Wallner might be able to do on pitches down in the zone. He doesn't hit them as well, and he sees a lot of pitches down and away or in. He seems to have inside pitches pretty well handled, but down and away is his biggest K weakness. Up and away/outside edge is an area he can probably swing more and do more damage, but he gets a lot of his walks there already.

    Overall, Wallner's o-swing rate is already better than MLB average so I'm not sure I expect there's a lot of room for him to make big strides.

    I think you answered the question you asked me.  Total coverage of the plate is possible and I would love to see him move his game up.  I think he could be a star.

    14 hours ago, JD-TWINS said:

    Article last week in the Athletic about the TWINS and the history of their good left handed hitters and how they were sharply skewed one way with results by weighing OPS. The results were v. RH & LH pitchers.

    Only Carew had an OPS over .800 facing left handed pitching.

    Koskie was around .770………Oliva was .690 ……Mauer was .760 I believe & Morneau slightly less. Hrbek wasn’t too bad from memory. They had another half dozen guys and nobody was what people would consider good v. LH pitching.

    That said, it’s not some terrible thing for Wallner or Julien to struggle v. LH pitching. Playing them & expecting them regularly v. lefties to “work it out” doesn’t make sense. This assumes the team has alternative RH batters.

    The amount of RH pitchers throughout life as a player gets the RH hitters more used to seeing pitching from the right side. LH hitters don’t see too many lefties growing up & very few are proficient hitting them.

    Being worried about guys sticking in the Show because they are struggling v LH pitching is worrying about something that likely isn’t changing any time soon.

    I named two reasons he could be demoted. This is one, though I don't think it's relevant to compare him to a bunch of hall of famers or ring of honor members. You forgot to mention his .481 OPS. There's a difference between being slightly worse against LHP and being futile against it.

    That said, I'm not "worried" he can't hit LHP. But I am saying it makes him a flawed player who will get more AB if he improves in that category. 

    Of course he won't be demoted for one single statistic though. It would be a combination of factors, including his K rate, if they feel he needs everyday AB, his ability to adjust to MLB pitching, etc. Nobody is guaranteed a roster spot, especially if they have options. Even some of the best players ride the shuttle their first few years as they figure it out. And Wallner still has a lot to figure out.

    6 hours ago, bean5302 said:

    I really can't comprehend the hate for Wallner here. There's nothing in his profile from last year suggesting he won't be a great to elite bat moving forward.

    Almost the entire team sucked at the plate against the Astros in the playoffs. Basically, the entire team was overwhelmed by the atmosphere and they were collectively swinging at junk. Only Lewis & Correa actually forced the Astros pitchers to throw strikes at all if my recollection serves me well. Wallner wasn't some exception. Not sure why the sky isn't falling from the 5-10 PA other Twins players got?

    I'm not seeing any actual "hate," in this thread, more so concern for the floor and whether or not Wallner makes adjustments if necessary. We're talking about a guy with 300 career PAs, suggesting anything seems premature. 

    The Twins sat him against a right handed starter in a deciding game. In that sense he was an exception. If we're going to exclude guys who are viewed as everyday players is there a fair comparison left? Kirilloff? He's received plenty of ****.  Taylor, Solano, Castro, Polanco, or Kepler? They're some combination of gone, going, or part time. Julien hit. I guess there's Jeffers at C if that's the route you want to go. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...