Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

He'd be #2 for me because he hasn't stepped foot on a pro field yet. But he's certainly in the conversation for #1 with Jenkins. It's those 2 and then everyone else.

I have to agree here. At the end of the day, Lackey will probably be two levels below Jenkins when he debuts even though Jenkins only a few months older.  Hard to justify leapfrogging him without proving it to some degree.  In fact, I could probably be convinced that he's currently closer to Culpepper than Jenkins, at least until he confirms some of the hype

Posted
6 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

I keep hearing Realmuto and Posey as comps for Lackey. The best comp for Jenkins is Kyle Tucker. Tucker is a multiple time All Star but the catchers are the best at their position in their generation.

Culpepper doesn’t have the upside of either.

Glad the Twins have all of them.

Well you also have Adley Rutschman who at the time was rated higher than Lackey.  He started off at a hall of fame level his first 2 years then has fallen off since.  He has a slight shot.  The biggest difference I see is Rutschman stats were in the Pac 12 while Lackey was in the SEC.  Rutschman rated 65 slightly higher on power -  much lower on run (30 vs 50 for Lackey) and a fielding of 65 vs 55 for Lackey.   Most think with Lackeys athleticism the defense will improve.   Adley is sporting a career .250/.327/.436 slash line.   For a 60 hit tool the batting average is low and he has shown no where near the power that he was anticipated to have.   Even still he is a 16 plus WAR in the last 5 years he just didn't reach his potential.    

Then you have Posey who was an absolute stud.  Posey is the closest comp I can find at the college level. 

 Henry Davis even though drafted #1 was a significantly worse prospect - lower in every category other than arm compared to Lackey.  His batting average has been horrible at the MLB level.  If I have any concern its that the hit tools haven't matched up close to production for Rutschman or Davis.   

As to Jenkins - I would say the ceiling is a more powerful Tucker.   He can provide good defense while providing great contact with power.  I really think he will fill out more and 30+ home runs per a year is what we will see from him.  So far though injuries and performance wise the power hasn't quite shown up yet.  

Posted
1 hour ago, jmlease1 said:

I tend to rate production over projection with prospects, but you can't ignore the tools Lackey brings to the table or discount the college production he's brought to the table just because it's college. #9 is absurdly low for the 3rd overall pick in the draft and a player guaranteed to be a consensus top 50 prospect in all of baseball.

Considering all of E-Rod's injury challenges, I would have trouble ranking Lackey lower than 3rd on the Twins list. I'd probably drop him in at #2 right now, but there's a case for #1. I still think it's Jenkins, who has risen very fast through the minor leagues, hit every mark along the way, and is very close to graduating to MLB with all those tools intact. But not outrageous at all for someone to pick Lackey. (I'd argue a little bit on putting Culpepper ahead of him, but K-Pep has done everything asked of him and if he were healthy he'd probably be starting at SS for the MLB club, so it's hardly crazy to pick him to stay at #2)

It's a fun question and a good problem to have: which of our elite prospects should be ranked highest! :P

Rating him 9 and letting him establish himself and work up the list is not a put down - being in the top 2 right away is not an insult - top ten is a compliment.  As noted in the story, we have had some high draft picks that failed.  Let's make sure he meets the press clippings. 

Posted

#2, and it's not close.  Once we see him, it might be different (vs 3+), but until there's plenty of evidence otherwise, he's nowhere close to Jenkins.  I'm not saying he couldn't get there, but Jenkins is so far above the rest of the system, both because he's so good and because the system's so bad.

I wouldn't blink to put Lackey in that wide gap, and I'm not as big a Lackey fan as most everybody else (yet).

Posted
12 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

Easily top ten after they sign Lackey. Possibly higher if they sign the HS pitcher. And that's largely from depth. 

BR has Twins at #4.

Top 10 Prospects

1. OF Walker Jenkins (Tier 1)
2. C Vahn Lackey (Tier 1)
3. SS Kaelen Culpepper (Tier 2)
4. OF Emmanuel Rodríguez (Tier 3)
5. RHP Riley Quick (Tier 3)
6. C Eduardo Tait (Tier 4)
7. LHP Kendry Rojas (Tier 4)
8. SS Marek Houston (Tier 4)
9. LHP Dasan Hill
10. OF Hendry Mendez

 

Prospect Spotlight: RHP Riley Quick

With a durable 6'6", 255-pound frame and a standout fastball-slider combination, Quick has quickly emerged as the top pitcher in the Twins farm system after going No. 36 overall in the 2025 draft. He has a 3.47 ERA and 74 strikeouts in 49.1 innings between Single-A and High-A, and he is still building toward his ceiling after a college career that was interrupted by Tommy John surgery.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25454559-updated-mlb-farm-system-rankings-after-2026-mlb-draft

 

Posted

IMO you can't consider putting Lacky ahead of Jenkins until he's at least proven something in the minors. Jenkins was considered to be a 1-1 type player that was drafted in arguably the best draft class in a decade+. He's also proven himself at every level while being well below the league average age at each stop.

Lacky has amazing tools and could very well be the best prospect, but until he proves himself in at least one milb level I can't put him above Jenkins. The real debate starts at #2 vs Culpepper.

Posted
4 hours ago, DJL44 said:

Highest drafted catchers in this century 

Joe Mauer (#1 2001)

Henry Davis (#1 2021). 

Mike Zunino (No. 3 overall, 2012)

Vahn Lackey (No. 3 overall, 2026)

Buster Posey (No. 5 overall, 2008)

Matt Wieters (No. 5 overall, 2007)

Adley went 1:1 in 2019

Posted
2 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

Rating him 9 and letting him establish himself and work up the list is not a put down - being in the top 2 right away is not an insult - top ten is a compliment.  As noted in the story, we have had some high draft picks that failed.  Let's make sure he meets the press clippings. 

We probably shouldn’t rank prospects until they have played 10 years in the majors

Posted
5 hours ago, DJL44 said:

Highest drafted catchers in this century 

Joe Mauer (#1 2001)

Henry Davis (#1 2021). 

Mike Zunino (No. 3 overall, 2012)

Vahn Lackey (No. 3 overall, 2026)

Buster Posey (No. 5 overall, 2008)

Matt Wieters (No. 5 overall, 2007)

1st Ballot HoF
Bust
17 fWAR career with a couple All Star caliber seasons
Lackey
Probable HoF'er
16 fWAR career with a couple All Star caliber seasons

Pretty solid list

Posted
5 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

1st Ballot HoF
Bust
17 fWAR career with a couple All Star caliber seasons
Lackey
Probable HoF'er
16 fWAR career with a couple All Star caliber seasons

Pretty solid list

Plus Rutschman who is already at 17 WAR with 3 all star game appearances. 


Pencil in 20 WAR and a couple all star games. Earl Battey is a reasonable projection.

Posted

He looks like a great pick. But I want to wait and see how his transition into pro ball goes, likely low  A at Fort Myers. In the meantime I would slot him number 4 until he proves it. 

Posted
2 hours ago, DJL44 said:

We probably shouldn’t rank prospects until they have played 10 years in the majors

I consider this to be from Randball Just for Fun.  I cannot take seriously anything that is so overstated.  Come back to Earth.  

Posted
2 hours ago, DJL44 said:

Plus Rutschman who is already at 17 WAR with 3 all star game appearances. 


Pencil in 20 WAR and a couple all star games. Earl Battey is a reasonable projection.

I was a big Earl Battey fan. But I am hoping Lackey is has a higher offensive ceiling than Earl, with more projectable power and much more speed ( I remember when the slug footed Battey was thrown out at first base on a single to right). But Battey was an excellent defensive catcher. During the 1962 season, Battey set a remarkable Major League record by picking off 13 baserunners in a single year! And he caught over 40% of base stealers too, which is elite. By contrast, HOF Iván "Pudge" Rodríguez holds the Major League Baseball record for the most career pickoffs by a catcher, recording 88 throughout his 21-season career average 4 per year. But MLB didn’t start tracking this statistic during Battey’s playing career, so it might be higher than 88.

Posted
17 hours ago, Mike Sixel said:

Easily top ten after they sign Lackey. Possibly higher if they sign the HS pitcher. And that's largely from depth. 

If you down voted this, have you actually looked at the rankings? Because I have. 

Posted
5 hours ago, mikelink45 said:

Rating him 9 and letting him establish himself and work up the list is not a put down - being in the top 2 right away is not an insult - top ten is a compliment.  As noted in the story, we have had some high draft picks that failed.  Let's make sure he meets the press clippings. 

Hahaha. 

Posted

One thing I wonder about is Lackey, Tinney, Tait and Jimenez should all be in A or A+ to start next season. That's a lot of talent needing ABs. Maybe a little 1B/DH/Catching? I should point out Jimenez is one of my heavily rooting for guys from last season's sell off and draft. Fan Graphs has Tinney and Tait rated very similarly when it comes to tools. Which surprised me a bit, of course, Tait is a year and 1/2 younger though. Lackey was their #1 prospect in this draft.

Jenkins, Lackey then Culpepper. We're talkin 1.000, 1.001 and 1.002. Tough problem to have...

Posted
1 hour ago, weitz41 said:

One thing I wonder about is Lackey, Tinney, Tait and Jimenez should all be in A or A+ to start next season. That's a lot of talent needing ABs. Maybe a little 1B/DH/Catching? I should point out Jimenez is one of my heavily rooting for guys from last season's sell off and draft. Fan Graphs has Tinney and Tait rated very similarly when it comes to tools. Which surprised me a bit, of course, Tait is a year and 1/2 younger though. Lackey was their #1 prospect in this draft.

Jenkins, Lackey then Culpepper. We're talkin 1.000, 1.001 and 1.002. Tough problem to have...

Maybe they can piggyback catchers….

Posted
On 7/14/2026 at 7:36 AM, TopGunn#22 said:

Culpepper is probably going to end up at 2B or 3B with Marek Houston owning SS in the not too distant future.  For that reason alone, I put Lackey ahead of him.  For me, it comes down to Lackey vs Jenkins.  And I have to put Lackey #1.  Jenkins may start out in CF (like KC will at SS) but he most likely will end up in RF sooner or later (probably sooner, but dependent on who actually takes over in CF once Buxton shifts to LF).  

Lackey is going to stay at Catcher and has Gold Glove potential.  Plus, and I write this hoping I'm not JINXING anybody...Lackey starts with a clean slate from an injury standpoint.  Jenkins, Culpepper and E-Rod have ALL been slowed by the injury bug.  If Lackey plays to his ability, AND STAYS HEALTHY, he should be on a pretty fast track to the big league roster.

Once Jeffers is traded, and with Caratini under contract through 2027, the timeline for Lackey and Tait comes into play.  They could both be up sometime in 2028.  Jenkins and Culpepper will soon be Minnesota Twins.  Once that happens, maybe in 3-4 weeks, Vahn Lackey becomes #1.   

First the twins need to sign him,  once signed get him in high A pro ball  , AA and AAA in 2027  , promote fast , college player shouldn't take long with the tools  everyone is hyping on ...

I'm sorry to say but with the imminent strike or MLB lock out  for 2027 , Jenkins and Culpepper are not going to be added to 40 man roster or promoted in 2026 , if they do that these 2 players will sit during the strike and they need to keep honing their talent in the minors until the strike has ended and then promote them to the major leagues ...

Lackey with his tools and a fast riser should make his debut in 2028 along with Houston  ...

Because Lackey is a catcher and come through the system fast , elite  catchers are hard to come by , they are or should be in control of the entire field when on the field ...

If he signs I would rank him #1  ...

Posted

Updated top 10 from Kiley McDaniel at ESPN this morning. 

Link: https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/47684227/2026-top-10-prospect-rankings-all-30-mlb-teams-kiley-mcdaniel#min

Minnesota Twins

Top 10 prospects

Player
Previous
Trending
1. Walker Jenkins, CF
1
 
2. Vahn Lackey, C
2026 Draft
gn-arrow.png
3. Kaelen Culpepper, SS
3
 
4. Emmanuel Rodriguez, CF
4
 
5. Marek Houston, SS
7
gn-arrow.png
6. Riley Quick, RHP
8
gn-arrow.png
7. Kendry Rojas, LHP
NR
gn-arrow.png
8. Eduardo Tait, C
5
rd-arrow.png
9. Dasan Hill, LHP
6
rd-arrow.png
10. Hendry Mendez, LF
9
rd-arrow.png

One thing to know: Lots of near misses on this list, including RHP Charlee Soto, RF Gabriel Gonzalez, C Carson Tinney (2026 second-rounder), RHP Ethan Wachsmann (third round), RHP Brett Renfrow (second round), C Khadim Diaw, and RHP Ryan Gallagher.

Posted
17 hours ago, Blyleven2011 said:

First the twins need to sign him,  once signed get him in high A pro ball  , AA and AAA in 2027  , promote fast , college player shouldn't take long with the tools  everyone is hyping on ...

I'm sorry to say but with the imminent strike for 2027 , Jenkins and Culpepper are not going to be added to 40 man roster or promoted in 2026 , if they do that these 2 players will sit during the strike and they need to keep honing their talent in the minors until the strike has ended and then promote them to the major leagues ...

Lackey with his tools and a fast riser should make his debut in 2028 along with Houston  ...

Because Lackey is a catcher and come through the system fast , elite  catchers are hard to come by , they are or should be in control of the entire field when on the field ...

If he signs I would rank him #1  ...

Lockout. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...