Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Recommended Posts

Posted
26 minutes ago, mikelink45 said:

Trades require a second team - the article I am looking for is - who do other teams want from the Twins.

as we saw last year, if you make someone available, someone will take them.  Worst case scenario, attach him to Jeffers.  Even as well as he is playing he does you little good if he's in the way of Rodriguez, Jenkins, Fedko, Gonzalez, Mendez, maybe even Rhoden and (gulp) Sabato.

Posted
12 hours ago, Czelgert said:

I’ll be the voice of dissent here.  Larnach is one of the more professional hitters this team has, which is why he’s often elevated to the 1 hole.  His upside is limited, but this organization sorely needs professional players to provide stability and model behaviors for its younger players.  I’d argue the lack of solid veterans is one of the reasons for so many prospect flameouts at the big league level.  Buxton is nice, but he can’t carry the whole load.  This team has turned into a revolving door and develops very little as result.  
 

Larnach is likely worth a contract of $8Mish a year.  Big whoop.  His trade value can’t be much higher than a couple of C level prospects when judged against what the Twins acquired last year for players like Varland.  Trading him for that kind of haul isn’t worth the squeeze.  

His presence will keep those younger players in St. Paul or on the bench.  He's a former 1st round draft pick out of college who has been in the big leagues for six years and never hit 20 home runs or driven in more than 60 runs.  I would say he's NOT the model I'd want for younger players.

Posted
22 hours ago, karcherd said:

Until there is someone ready to replace him, why do you trade Larnach other than for the sake of trading him.  And what will you get for him a player from A ball.   What value does he really have.  Same with Clemens and Bell, they have no value around the league.  Yes they have had hot streaks but have also had really cold streaks, you don't think the rest of the league sees this.  There was only one Falvey who would get fooled by a hot streak and he isn't in the league as a decision maker currently.

There is some value there for all of the players mentioned, but not enough to really change the trajectory of this or next season IMHO. There is certainly a replacement waiting in AAA for Larnach--Alan Roden--who is a better runner and fielder and would profile to be Trev's equal (at least) with the bat. 

I hesitate to use the word "logjam", but Wallner, Mendez, Rodriguez, Jenkins and Roden is a lot of corner outfielder with all but Gonzalez hitting left handed. 

Posted
22 hours ago, Patzky said:

Without the firesale you'd be looking at a SP rotation of.. Joe, Prielipp, Paredes, Zebby, maybe Rojas at this point. Not sure about your assessment.

Rojas is an asset received in “the fire sale”. …… Where was Louie at age 23? He was in the minors trying to develop a 2nd pitch. He’s 28 now and until his age 27 season, he had some pretty rough years.

I’m not sure about the assessment either!

As of this a.m., Abel is having elbow surgery (ouch!). However, many here are clamoring for Roden (remember, Fedko tore up ASA as well) & Rojas certainly has enough talent to be very valuable as he matures……Varland pieces from last July. Does Taj Bradley count or is he not included in the assessment above because he’s had success?

Morris would probably be the 5th starter if Rojas didn’t come over in trade.

Never thought I’d miss Bailey Ober & David Festa soooo much!

Posted

Keep inexpensive 29 year olds that have finally reached their potential ……. probable .260 BA - .350 OBP - .410 Slug ……. and trade some “prospects” that other teams can hope to develop ……. for players that CAN play.

Larnach was where Jenkins - Rodriguez - Roden are ……. he was highly touted out of Oregon! He’s paying off now and people want to trade him so one of the 3 guys that are repeatedly hurt can come up & shine …… oh yea, MAYBE shine or fail? …….nobody here has a crystal ball on how Roden & Rodriguez or Mendez will play, if healthy, at MLB level! …… organization shouldn’t trade a known performer for AAA unknowns “just to see what they can do”. They keep the known and develop the “maybe’s” parallel, until they know.

Fedko & Martin ……. even Clemens are all players that could/should be displaced by young talent in OF……before Larnach.

IMO, with Bell gone, Larnach is the obvious DH for ‘27 v. RH pitching……occasionally in OF if he fits strategically.

Posted
16 minutes ago, JD-TWINS said:

Rojas is an asset received in “the fire sale”. …… Where was Louie at age 23? He was in the minors trying to develop a 2nd pitch. He’s 28 now and until his age 27 season, he had some pretty rough years.

I’m not sure about the assessment either!

As of this a.m., Abel is having elbow surgery (ouch!). However, many here are clamoring for Roden (remember, Fedko tore up ASA as well) & Rojas certainly has enough talent to be very valuable as he matures……Varland pieces from last July. Does Taj Bradley count or is he not included in the assessment above because he’s had success?

Morris would probably be the 5th starter if Rojas didn’t come over in trade.

Never thought I’d miss Bailey Ober & David Festa soooo much!

Ober 'should' be back this summer. Festa.. man I don't know if he is just going to Kirill Off and away. If Abel can come back in, say September.. does it even make sense to do that, or let him continue to heal? That's a long time to be away. And will 2027 even happen in March or May or at all? If we start in May Abel and Pablo should be a go. 

Posted
23 hours ago, Sampson5 said:

Honestly I'd be crazy not to trade him to create a spot for one of the outfielders at some point here you want wallner and one of the others up here easy way to do it is trading larnach I've always assumed fedko was a placeholder until roden or a prospect was ready and with how well larnach is playing you could actually get a solid return hope he continues to thrive until the deadline to maximize his value 

WHY would anyone want to see Matt Wallner up???

Why is giving someone else a chance more important than trying to win or playing guys that DO get the job done?

What’s “a solid return” that will create more WAR over next 2-3 years than a platooned Larnach? In ‘27 he should be penciled in as a 15-20 time starter in OF and 100 games at DH. That’s 120 starts v. RH pitching (70-75% of pitchers).

There’s no downside. There’s no “blocking others”. Keeping a known bat makes sense.

Posted
On 6/24/2026 at 8:50 AM, Mike Sixel said:

Taj?

Yes, trade Larnach. It's 100 percent what Milwaukee and Tampa would do. 

I would trade Larnach also but I don’t think it has been the Brewers model. I don’t see Brewer trades (checked back to 2021) of position players in their last few years of service time.

The Rays traded Arozarena and received two prospects two years ago. Brody Hopkins was a 45+ at the time and has been in a few recent top 100. He is struggling with command this year in his first shot in AAA. They recently moved him to the bullpen. Aiden Smith was a 40 in A ball at the time. He is currently struggling in high A. Arozarena had a much longer track record of success going into that trade at age 29 but maybe the Twins can get something for that will eventually help. I wouldn’t trade him for much less than the Rays received for Arozarena. 

 

 

Posted
On 6/24/2026 at 10:23 AM, MMBoys93 said:

Because you get trade value for Clemens at the deadline. With Culpepper on the IL he’s not coming up anytime soon. They’ll need someone to replace Clemens who can play the infield with Kreidler starting every day. It’s not cause I want Arcia, but in the infield there’s no other option. They need a backup who can play SS, Gray is obviously not that and the ship has sailed on Lee getting any time there 

Clemens stays...............Culpepper can wait until Sept or 2027.  Gray will be just fine

Posted
1 hour ago, JD-TWINS said:

WHY would anyone want to see Matt Wallner up???

Why is giving someone else a chance more important than trying to win or playing guys that DO get the job done?

What’s “a solid return” that will create more WAR over next 2-3 years than a platooned Larnach? In ‘27 he should be penciled in as a 15-20 time starter in OF and 100 games at DH. That’s 120 starts v. RH pitching (70-75% of pitchers).

There’s no downside. There’s no “blocking others”. Keeping a known bat makes sense.

There is no reason this team should hang on to expensive veteran role players to try to eke out 78 wins instead of finishing with 75 wins. There is no AL Central 3rd place pennant to hang in the rafters.

If you want to acquire a free agent as good as Larnach this offseason it will cost about the same as he is expected to cost in arbitration.

Posted
On 6/24/2026 at 9:39 AM, LA Vikes Fan said:

You all make valid points, but I think you’re missing an important part of the analysis – what do we get in return and how does this go down in the clubhouse. We have a number of players that we hope will want to stay with the Twins long-term. We can’t make trades that show we are giving up on the season again and expect these guys to want to stick around when they get the chance to leave. We cannot trade Larnach for prospects or frankly anybody that doesn’t immediately join the major league roster and make a contribution. If we do, the clubhouse is going to see it as a vote of no confidence and it’s likely we will collapse again. Nobody wants to be on that team long-term.

So while I get the arguments for trading Larnach and think they have some validity, I only do it if we can get quality major league help back. The perfect trade, of course, would be Larnach for a quality relief pitcher with closing experience, even if we have to throw in a mid-level prospect to make that happen. Bottom line, unless we’re getting a guy who is immediately on the 26 man roster and either playing regularly or making a real contribution in the bullpen, I say you wait till the off-season to trade him.

Cleveland, Tampa, and Milwaukee would not hesitate for 10 seconds to trade Larnach.   Those organizations don't manage their assets to produce perennial mediocrity.   

Posted

It all really depends on whether the front office wants to pursue making the playoffs this season. The negatives are well documented--bad defense and poor bullpen--and it is unknown if ownership will spend more money. I suspect the team will flounder enough to justify selling. I keep seeing a club ready to fall into the abyss and then extricating themselves. I wonder how many down cycles ownership will see before they see no hope.

It is admirable to believe in the players they have. They've played hard on the whole and have stayed in the race despite a number of injuries and disappointments. They've been helped by the mediocrity of the American League where a .500 record could be a ticket to the playoffs.

My opinion is that the weaknesses are too much. What is best is to cash in Larnach, Jeffers and Ryan, and perhaps veterans like Bell.

Verified Member
Posted
3 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

Cleveland, Tampa, and Milwaukee would not hesitate for 10 seconds to trade Larnach.   Those organizations don't manage their assets to produce perennial mediocrity.   

Then why does Cleveland have 4 player batting below the Mendoza line?

image.png.e799fa6980774ec26c1e665b823950e7.png

Posted
34 minutes ago, RpR said:

Then why does Cleveland have 4 player batting below the Mendoza line?

image.png.e799fa6980774ec26c1e665b823950e7.png

Pretty sure you know the definition of pinch runner in that box score? 

Verified Member
Posted
Just now, Vanimal46 said:

Pretty sure you know the definition of pinch runner in that box score? 

They are still on the team, not traded, or are you saying trade Larnach for a pinch-runner?

Posted
50 minutes ago, stringer bell said:

It all really depends on whether the front office wants to pursue making the playoffs this season. The negatives are well documented--bad defense and poor bullpen--and it is unknown if ownership will spend more money. I suspect the team will flounder enough to justify selling. I keep seeing a club ready to fall into the abyss and then extricating themselves. I wonder how many down cycles ownership will see before they see no hope.

It is admirable to believe in the players they have. They've played hard on the whole and have stayed in the race despite a number of injuries and disappointments. They've been helped by the mediocrity of the American League where a .500 record could be a ticket to the playoffs.

My opinion is that the weaknesses are too much. What is best is to cash in Larnach, Jeffers and Ryan, and perhaps veterans like Bell.

April 22nd was the last time the Twins were .500 with a 12-12 record. The day before was the last time the Twins were above .500. They haven’t stayed in any race beyond the fantasy of being an optimistic fan. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, RpR said:

They are still on the team, not traded, or are you saying trade Larnach for a pinch-runner?

They just might be on the team because Jose Ramirez, 24 year old Angel Martinez, and 24 year old Chase DeLaughter are on the IL… All batting above the Mendoza line.

Can you ever post in good faith? 

Posted
9 hours ago, RpR said:

Then why does Cleveland have 4 player batting below the Mendoza line?

image.png.e799fa6980774ec26c1e665b823950e7.png

I made a statement about success over the past 20 years and your response is anecdotal evidence from one game.  Cleveland has had eight 90 win seasons in the past 20 years.  Tampa has nine.  The Twins have 3.  I am not sure if you are unaware of the roster management / trading practices of these teams or simply ignore how they operate because you don't like the implications.   Either way, I just don't think we should ignore how successful teams operate.  I especially don't believe we should follow practices that are basically the opposite of what has made these teams successful.

Verified Member
Posted
13 hours ago, Vanimal46 said:

They just might be on the team because Jose Ramirez, 24 year old Angel Martinez, and 24 year old Chase DeLaughter are on the IL… All batting above the Mendoza line.

Can you ever post in good faith? 

They might-- hmmm, well, that is just another version of -- IF.

YOU are the one who made an absolute statement about other teams, back it up with facts.

Verified Member
Posted
4 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

I made a statement about success over the past 20 years and your response is anecdotal evidence from one game.  Cleveland has had eight 90 win seasons in the past 20 years.  Tampa has nine.  The Twins have 3.  I am not sure if you are unaware of the roster management / trading practices of these teams or simply ignore how they operate because you don't like the implications.   Either way, I just don't think we should ignore how successful teams operate.  I especially don't believe we should follow practices that are basically the opposite of what has made these teams successful.

Unless you are in Cleveland's business workings, giving an absolute statement of what they will or will not do is as real or accurate as fantasy baseball.

You have your opinions, fine,  but do not present it as fact.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...