AZTwin Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 They got a bag of balls (21 year old catcher still in Rookie ball). They also had to give up the 74th overall pick and cash. Hope it’s not a lot of cash
bluechipper Provisional Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 The article on MLBTR said about half of the $13.2M will be paid by the Padres for the final year of the deal. It's too bad they have to give up the pick, but hopefully that money will be spent elsewhere next year.
AZTwin Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Author Posted May 27, 2018 So Twins are paying all of this year and half of next year? Ouch. Thought the 74th pick would be worth more
VATwinsFan Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 But the catcher they got (Villalobos) may be the second coming of Gimenez--he's also pitched in a game.
Brandon Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 I think that is a fair trade. We got filler and 6.6 million. With all the other money comming off the books next year, should be a fun offseason. Comming off booksMauer 23 millionDozier 9 millionEscobar 5.5 millionLynn 12 millionDuke 2 millionHughes 6.6 millionGrossman 2 million (non tender candidate) Thats 49.1 million and i dont know ig Gibson is a FA this offseason or next, and Morrisons option as well but i bet they pick that up if he keeps hitting the way he has in May vs April.
Brandon Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 Also Buxton and Polanco are making strong cases for a low arbitration raise when they qualify for arbitration...
AZTwin Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Author Posted May 27, 2018 I think that is a fair trade. We got filler and 6.6 million. With all the other money comming off the books next year, should be a fun offseason. Comming off booksMauer 23 millionDozier 9 millionEscobar 5.5 millionLynn 12 millionDuke 2 millionHughes 6.6 millionGrossman 2 million (non tender candidate) Thats 49.1 million and i dont know ig Gibson is a FA this offseason or next, and Morrisons option as well but i bet they pick that up if he keeps hitting the way he has in May vs April.Do you think they pick up Santana at $14M? I don’t think it’s worth it. We will have: BerriosRomeroOdorizziGibson PinedaGonsalvesPlenty of minor league depth
RatherBeGolfing Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 Do you think they pick up Santana at $14M? I don’t think it’s worth it. No way. They probably aren’t going to pick up Erv even at a reduced price.
AZTwin Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Author Posted May 27, 2018 I think that is a fair trade. We got filler and 6.6 million. With all the other money comming off the books next year, should be a fun offseason. Comming off booksMauer 23 millionDozier 9 millionEscobar 5.5 millionLynn 12 millionDuke 2 millionHughes 6.6 millionGrossman 2 million (non tender candidate) Thats 49.1 million and i dont know ig Gibson is a FA this offseason or next, and Morrisons option as well but i bet they pick that up if he keeps hitting the way he has in May vs April.My math off or isn’t that 59M
AZTwin Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Author Posted May 27, 2018 No way. They probably aren’t going to pick up Erv even at a reduced price.Right. So that’s another $14M off the books
jorgenswest Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 There have been 53 pick 74s. The Twins picked 74 in the very first draft and chose Graig Nettles. Great choice. Best 74 ever. David Cone is another great pick at 74. Unfortunately for the drafting teams, they never saw the fruits trading the two away for what turned out to be little return. One other notable pick 74 with over 20 career WAR is Jim Clancy. Two active pick 74s passed 10 WAR in Tyler Chatwood and John Jay. The other 48 are unremarkable but the Twins can hope on Akil Baddoo. Would you trade Baddoo for 6 million and a catcher? There better be some hope in the catcher.
AlwaysinModeration Verified Member Posted May 27, 2018 Posted May 27, 2018 This is a great move. Hughes might be better in Petco, but really the point is getting him off the books and not needing to worry about using him, either rotation or bullpen. It’s amazing they got anything, and doing so by only giving him one start was prudent too.
Doomtints Verified Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 This is a great move. Hughes might be better in Petco It's interesting you say this because the thought when he came to the Twins was he would do better at Target Field. And he did do better, at least until body parts started falling off. Zombiefication is a bad sign for any baseball player. If he pitches well in the pen for the Padres, look for him to be in a Tigers uniform next year.
ashbury Verified Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 Something for nothing. Good job. Draft picks are nothing?
olivia11 Verified Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 I feel very neutral about this, but I think it makes sense for the following reasons. 1) many have reported that this year's draft is much weaker than last year's2) the twins had a lot less money to play with (especially after Lynn signing), so it wasn't super likely they could've drafted a high upside guy at pick 74 (like Enlow or Baddoo) 3) the twins effectively acquired two extra picks from the 2017 draft in Jacob Pearson and David Bañuelos, which helps to balance everything out Plus, $6.6 million in next year's free agent market could get them a solid contributor to the 2019 team
Richie the Rally Goat Community Moderator Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 Draft picks are nothing?not nothing, but no more or less certain than Villalobos
ashbury Verified Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 not nothing, but no more or less certain than VillalobosI wasn't talking about certainty, but I expect a draft pick in the top 100 is worth more than this particular catcher.
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 I feel very neutral about this, but I think it makes sense for the following reasons. 1) many have reported that this year's draft is much weaker than last year's2) the twins had a lot less money to play with (especially after Lynn signing), so it wasn't super likely they could've drafted a high upside guy at pick 74 (like Enlow or Baddoo) 3) the twins effectively acquired two extra picks from the 2017 draft in Jacob Pearson and David Bañuelos, which helps to balance everything out Plus, $6.6 million in next year's free agent market could get them a solid contributor to the 2019 teamLynn's signing has nothing to do with the draft pool money. The other stuff I concur and hope they use the ~$7 million towards a real difference maker. Lord knows they have a lot of money coming off the books.
Mr. Brooks Verified Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 Lynn's signing has nothing to do with the draft pool money. The other stuff I concur and hope they use the ~$7 million towards a real difference maker. Lord knows they have a lot of money coming off the books.I thought they had to forfeit a pick for signing Lynn?
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 I thought they had to forfeit a pick for signing Lynn?Ahh, bingo! I was thinking about the draft budget... Not the draft pick lost to acquire Lynn.
Mr. Brooks Verified Member Posted May 29, 2018 Posted May 29, 2018 Ahh, bingo! I was thinking about the draft budget... Not the draft pick lost to acquire Lynn.But doesn't forfeiting that pick also mean forfeiting that assigned portion of bonus pool?
old nurse Verified Member Posted May 30, 2018 Posted May 30, 2018 There have been 53 pick 74s.The Twins picked 74 in the very first draft and chose Graig Nettles. Great choice. Best 74 ever. David Cone is another great pick at 74. Unfortunately for the drafting teams, they never saw the fruits trading the two away for what turned out to be little return.One other notable pick 74 with over 20 career WAR is Jim Clancy.Two active pick 74s passed 10 WAR in Tyler Chatwood and John Jay.The other 48 are unremarkable but the Twins can hope on Akil Baddoo.Would you trade Baddoo for 6 million and a catcher? There better be some hope in the catcher.Cederoth was the 79th pick, After 2 years they would have made that trade in a heartbeat. Ryan Edes near that position. . Stuart Turner went for 100K,
mlhouse Verified Member Posted May 30, 2018 Posted May 30, 2018 Not a bad deal for dumping $7 million in payroll. If another team offered to sell the 74th pick for $7 million do you think you would do it?
olivia11 Verified Member Posted May 30, 2018 Posted May 30, 2018 Ahh, bingo! I was thinking about the draft budget... Not the draft pick lost to acquire Lynn. They also forfeit the money allotted to the pick they forfeited for signing Lynn. Meaning signing Lynn meant less money to play around with and potentially allot to other picks.
Doctor Wu Verified Member Posted May 30, 2018 Posted May 30, 2018 I'm still shocked that we got anything atall for Hughes, A shame that we also had to give up that draft pick. Yeah, it was not a high one, but a pick is still a pick, and sometimes those lower ones are keepers. But I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. Good luck to Phil on the Left Coast!
Vanimal46 Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2018 Posted May 30, 2018 They also forfeit the money allotted to the pick they forfeited for signing Lynn. Meaning signing Lynn meant less money to play around with and potentially allot to other picks.Yeah you're right. I forgot about all of that.
jun Verified Member Posted May 31, 2018 Posted May 31, 2018 I think Escobar is going to stay next season since he is still considered inexpensive.
gunnarthor Old-Timey Member Posted May 31, 2018 Posted May 31, 2018 I think Escobar is going to stay next season since he is still affordable.I think he'll be gone and our payroll will decrease significantly.
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS On Saturday, Houston went 3-for-5 and scored two runs. After a short slump, he is now back over .290 on the season. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.