Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Trea Turner to Phillies


Vanimal46

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, nicksaviking said:

11 years??? That's going to throw a monkey wrench into things.

My thoughts exactly.

Posted

Trea Turner? He's that young guy, so eleven years won't... wait, what, he turns 30 next June? Geez, I feel old.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Brock Beauchamp said:

Honestly, I don't see why MLB teams should care. 10 or 11 years, doesn't matter.

I'd 100% rather go 11 for a lower annual number, then just release him the last year and have dead money.....

Twins could have drafted him and not Gordon....sigh.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

I'd 100% rather go 11 for a lower annual number, then just release him the last year and have dead money.....

Twins could have drafted him and not Gordon....sigh.

I'd tell you to chill out because nobody likes the hindsight game, but I do remember you banging the drum for Turner so you get a pass!

Man, that draft seems like only yesterday, and now Turner is 30-years-old.

Posted

CC is licking his chops. The money train will be pulling into the station. Unfortunately, I don't think it's gonna be in Mpls. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, puckstopper1 said:

You think Correa is loving that contract....

Maybe, maybe not. The AAV is much less than what folks were predicting for Turner.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

Behold! The first look of Trea Turner in a Phillies jersey. 

 

That's cool that Stott had fun with that, considering Stott's job is the one that Turner's signing most threatens.

Posted
48 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

I'd 100% rather go 11 for a lower annual number, then just release him the last year and have dead money.....

Twins could have drafted him and not Gordon....sigh.

Agree - in 10 years $27MM will be worth about $12-15 and revenues and budgets will be way hire. Write it off if need be.

Posted
57 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

I'd 100% rather go 11 for a lower annual number, then just release him the last year and have dead money.

I also would rather have a player for 11 years instead of 10 given the same money. This is basically a "Buy 9 years, get 2 free" contract.

Community Moderator
Posted

11 years? Wow. That’s a lot for a SS who will turn 30 next year.

On another note, if this at all influences the market for Correa, our chances of resigning him are ****ed.

Posted
Just now, cHawk said:

11 years? Wow. That’s a lot for a SS who will turn 30 next year.

On another note, if this at all influences the market for Correa, our chances of resigning him are ****ed.

That was my original thought, but Turner's AAV is over 6M per year less than MLBTR predicted. Depending on what both the Twins and Correa want, it actually might help.

Posted

will be nice to see if the particulars are shared.  Higher dollars to start with scale going lower over time.  Might not be a bad thing for Twins with Correa, really depends on high we want annual to start with, thus limiting how we spend any other dollars for others.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...