twinssouth Provisional Member Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 Keith and I, like so often times are before are on the right side of history yet again! As the great Mac Davis said in one of his songs from the past; Oh Lord it's hard to be humble, When you're perfect in so many ways I look in the mirror, I get better looking each day
twinssouth Provisional Member Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I always thought that was one of many of those head scratching trades of TR's
jud6312 Verified Member Posted May 18, 2017 Posted May 18, 2017 Another slow night at the office: 2-3 (HR), 3RBI, 1 r, 1 BB For those of you playing along at home: .326 BA.464 OBP.616 SLG1.080 OPS 7 HR19 RBI6 SB22 BBs
jimmer Verified Member Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 So when filtering LF with 100 or more PA, 34 names came up. Aaron Hicks leads in wRC+ with a 183, Rosario is 26th with an 89. Of course Hicks plays everywhere in the OF and he will show up on the same filter for CF, but still. Almost 100 point difference in weighted runs created plus.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 19, 2017 Author Posted May 19, 2017 So when filtering LF with 100 or more PA, 34 names came up. Aaron Hicks leads in wRC+ with a 183, Rosario is 26th with an 89. Of course Hicks plays everywhere in the OF and he will show up on the same filter for CF, but still. Almost 100 point difference in weighted runs created plus.This is what bugs me the most, I for a couple years have been saying Rosario is the one who should have been shopped, and the crazy thing is: he would have maybe brought back a much better package then Hicks anyways! (Due to early success) Ugh.
The Wise One Verified Member Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 This is what bugs me the most, I for a couple years have been saying Rosario is the one who should have been shopped, and the crazy thing is: he would have maybe brought back a much better package then Hicks anyways! (Due to early success) Ugh.Prove that Rosario would have brought more back in trade. Rosario was only on one ranking service as a top 100 prospect. So what lightly regarded outfield prospect with one season of mlb ball that could be considered his ceiling brought back a young player of note in the analytic era? Maybe he would have is not a reality but baseless conjecture.
The Wise One Verified Member Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Keith and I, like so often times are before are on the right side of history yet again!I can not remember the times you were correct before.
Mr. Brooks Verified Member Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Prove that Rosario would have brought more back in trade. Rosario was only on one ranking service as a top 100 prospect. So what lightly regarded outfield prospect with one season of mlb ball that could be considered his ceiling brought back a young player of note in the analytic era? Maybe he would have is not a reality but baseless conjecture.He said "maybe", which clearly frames it as opinion. We really can't state an opinion now on a fan message board without objective proof?
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 20, 2017 Author Posted May 20, 2017 Prove that Rosario would have brought more back in trade. Rosario was only on one ranking service as a top 100 prospect. So what lightly regarded outfield prospect with one season of mlb ball that could be considered his ceiling brought back a young player of note in the analytic era? Maybe he would have is not a reality but baseless conjecture.It's not really baseless, Rosario had shown more success at the major league level then Hicks (who was traded at his rock bottom value imo) Rosario would be a damn fine CF for many teams, he doesn't hit enough to be a good corner Of, but CF? I think he would be above average overall, which is why at the time I feel like he could have gotten a beturn return then JR Murphy It's not so much about his prospect rating, those go out the door once a guy closes in on 1000 major league at bats in my opinion.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 20, 2017 Author Posted May 20, 2017 I can not remember the times you were correct before.You can read about them in my upcoming book
howieramone2 Verified Member Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 It's not really baseless, Rosario had shown more success at the major league level then Hicks (who was traded at his rock bottom value imo) Rosario would be a damn fine CF for many teams, he doesn't hit enough to be a good corner Of, but CF? I think he would be above average overall, which is why at the time I feel like he could have gotten a beturn return then JR MurphyIt's not so much about his prospect rating, those go out the door once a guy closes in on 1000 major league at bats in my opinion.No, after a terrible 2016, his value fell further.
ashbury Verified Member Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 I can not remember the times you were correct before.Moderator's note: There is no value to this kind of response. Since the target of your response already replied, I'm just going to leave it alone, except to point out that the long version of the site's Comment Policy covers this situation exactly from both angles:"It's much easier to be accidentally disrespectful to other members (or unnamed groups of members) when you make it be *about* them." "A corollary is to be wary of making it be about yourself."Let's keep it respectful.
Jham Verified Member Posted May 21, 2017 Posted May 21, 2017 http://www.pinstripealley.com/2017/5/19/15660960/yankees-aaron-hicks-judge-analysis-swing-heat-maps
The Wise One Verified Member Posted May 21, 2017 Posted May 21, 2017 It's not really baseless, Rosario had shown more success at the major league level then Hicks (who was traded at his rock bottom value imo) Rosario would be a damn fine CF for many teams, he doesn't hit enough to be a good corner Of, but CF? I think he would be above average overall, which is why at the time I feel like he could have gotten a beturn return then JR Murphy It's not so much about his prospect rating, those go out the door once a guy closes in on 1000 major league at bats in my opinion. Hicks had value in trade for his ceiling and still being young enough to reach it. Hot stretches to confirm the ceiling might be obtainable. Rosario performed at a level in the major leagues in 2015 far above a level his AA performance or his short AAA career would project. In an analytic age after the 2015 season the Twins would be the likely the only team to overvalue Rosario. A .310 woba is not anything to lure other teams for a hitter in CF.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 24, 2017 Author Posted May 24, 2017 Another day. Another home run and great work in the field by our Boy Hicks.
jokin Old-Timey Member Posted May 24, 2017 Posted May 24, 2017 Awww..this is cute! Is this a yearly tradition now? Cuz I remember this from last year too and Hicks ended with a .617 OPS and 65 OPS+. Over/under on him topping 70 this year? I take the under. Are all of you naysayers still sticking with the Under? (because I would like a piece of that action). Aaron Hicks OPS+ (May 23): 168
Tuba Verified Member Posted May 25, 2017 Posted May 25, 2017 Ellsbury headed to concussion DL which opens up CF for Hicks. Last 10 games though not so good for him, hitting just .166. Season average has now dipped below .300 and OPS is once again below 1.000.
Otto von Ballpark Old-Timey Member Posted May 25, 2017 Posted May 25, 2017 Last 10 games though not so good for him, hitting just .166. Season average has now dipped below .300 and OPS is once again below 1.000. Still has a .742 OPS in the last 10 games, though. 2 HR, 8 BB, and a .342 OBP in that stretch, but only a .158 BABIP.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 25, 2017 Author Posted May 25, 2017 Last 10 games though not so good for him, hitting just .166. Season average has now dipped below .300 and OPS is once again below 1.000. lol this is some SSS, also yes, his OPS is below 1.000....but by exactly one point: .291/.426/.573/.999
GCTF Verified Member Posted May 25, 2017 Posted May 25, 2017 lol this is some SSS, also yes, his OPS is below 1.000....but by exactly one point: .291/.426/.573/.999Looks like he'll be heading into the HOF as a Yankee, Thanks, Turry.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted May 29, 2017 Author Posted May 29, 2017 Aaron hicks Update:.291/.429/.555 .983 OPS 8 HR 21 RBI 7 SB 1.8 bWAR 1.8 fWAR
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted May 30, 2017 Posted May 30, 2017 Aaron hicks Update:.291/.429/.555 .983 OPS 8 HR 21 RBI 7 SB 1.8 bWAR 1.8 fWAR so if he's replacement level the rest of the way, he puts up around 2 WAR more than Rosario. Sigh. I never loved Hicks, and I had no issue with the trade. It wasn't working here, and they needed a catcher. I never loved JRM, but it seemed like two guys that would be ok backups were traded for each other.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted June 2, 2017 Author Posted June 2, 2017 Hicks with a solid night:4 for 5, 3 doubles, 2 runs and 6 RBIAverage back up to .317 OPS back up to 1.016I know even as recently as last week folks were like "lol lucky start, hes gonna revert to what he was etc etc" It's time for even those folks to Admit, Hicks is legit. His OPS trails Sano only by 12 points. He would look pretttttty pretttttty prreeeetttttyyy good hitting #2 in this lineup right now.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted June 2, 2017 Posted June 2, 2017 Hicks with a solid night:4 for 5, 3 doubles, 2 runs and 6 RBIAverage back up to .317 OPS back up to 1.016I know even as recently as last week folks were like "lol lucky start, hes gonna revert to what he was etc etc" It's time for even those folks to Admit, Hicks is legit. His OPS trails Sano only by 12 points. He would look pretttttty pretttttty prreeeetttttyyy good hitting #2 in this lineup right now. Those are mostly the same people that said the Cubs and Astros weren't ahead of the Twins in their rebuild....as recently as this spring....
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted June 3, 2017 Author Posted June 3, 2017 2-4 Double and a single. 1.024 ops
notoriousgod71 Verified Member Posted June 4, 2017 Posted June 4, 2017 The criminal part of this is that Terry traded three starting CF in a two year span and got out of it one borderline acceptable season from Trevor May and a bunch of trash.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2017 Author Posted June 4, 2017 1-3 I think hicks has gotten hits in 27 of his last 32 games. On base in 30 of those.
DaveW Old-Timey Member Posted June 4, 2017 Author Posted June 4, 2017 The criminal part of this is that Terry traded three starting CF in a two year span and got out of it one borderline acceptable season from Trevor May and a bunch of trash.Yup! Unreal. I don't really mind the Revere (especially) or Span trades because both netted a couple high upside SP But hicks, man that bothered me then and now. You don't give up a CF like that for a dude who is known to be a backup C at best.
The Wise One Verified Member Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 The criminal part of this is that Terry traded three starting CF in a two year span and got out of it one borderline acceptable season from Trevor May and a bunch of trash.Revere started games in CF, but I would not call him a starting centerfielder. The Twins netted more for him in trade than any other team would have. The Span trade was like plunking down a month's salary for this week's powerball. Ryan thought he had a play for a jackpot. Good for him.Hick took over a year away from the Twins to be good. A little PTSD? Wrong hitting coach. Ryan did not recognize that. Look how much better everyone but Dozier is doing away from Bruno. For a .500 ops hitter the Twins got a good return. Ooopisie.
Platoon Verified Member Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Those are mostly the same people that said the Cubs and Astros weren't ahead of the Twins in their rebuild....as recently as this spring.... But we are even with the Astros (first place) and ahead of the Cubbies! . Our rebuilds are all on the same path, and level.
Vahn Lackey Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+ C It took him 14 games to hit his first professional home run with Fort Myers. Tonight, Lackey hit his first MWL homer in his second Kernels at-bat. Explore Vahn Lackey News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.