Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Twins Trade Candidate Breakdown: Chris Paddack


    Nick Nelson

    He's among the players most likely to be shopped around this offseason as the Twins front office seeks to clear payroll. 

    Can they actually move him? Which teams might be interested? What could Minnesota realistically get back? Let's explore these questions.

    Image courtesy of © Matt Krohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    What's Up with Chris Paddack
    He finished the season on the injured list, although it sounds like he was on the verge of being able to return and might have tried to do so in the playoffs if the Twins didn't collapse and miss out. Alas, he didn't appear at all in the second half, finishing with fewer than 90 innings thrown in yet another campaign plagued by arm problems.

    He's entering the final year of a contract extension signed in January of 2023, set to earn $7.5 million at age 29 in 2025. Over the course of three seasons in Minnesota, he has pitched to 4.82 ERA over 116 innings, including 4.99 in 17 starts this year. 

    The Case for Trading Chris Paddack
    It's pretty straightforward and self-explanatory. Coming off a fourth consecutive injury-shortened season, Paddack is a major question mark going forward. His salary stands out as a big sticking point for Twins leadership as they desperately seek to shed payroll in search of flexibility to add, or merely to meet their budgeted number.

    He's a talented pitcher with upside, and we've seen him flash it at times as a Twin. But having Paddack around feels like a luxury, especially with young starters like David Festa and Zebby Matthews already breaking through to the majors. Although $7.5 million isn't some huge sum in the grand scheme, there's little doubt the front office would love to redirect that money toward the bullpen, bench or first base. It's no surprise Paddack was recently listed by MLB Trade Rumors among top 35 trade candidates of the 2024-25 offseason.

    The trickier part of this discussion is building a case to trade for Paddack from another team's perspective. His track record makes it almost impossible to trust his in his health, or really even his performance when available. Then again, it sounds like he was cleared for a relatively normal offseason program, and he is a respected arm talent with a high ceiling when he's right. Paddack is still under 30, and his contract (1 year, $7.5M) could be attractive for an upside-seeking team relative to free agency options.

    Bobby Nightengale Jr. wrote in the Star Tribune last week that "league sources expect some interest in Twins starter Chris Paddack."

    Comparable Trades of the Past
    One of the reasons it's tough to envision Paddack's trade market and theorize a return is that there just aren't many precedents that come to mind. Actually one of the best comps might be ... Chris Paddack, who was acquired by the Twins in 2022 under similar circumstances: His previous season had been cut short by an elbow injury, but Minnesota bet on him rebounding and tapping into that ever-tantalizing upside. 

    In that case, I think it's fair to say his arm health was more openly in doubt. Already the survivor of one Tommy John surgery, he had suffered a UCL sprain in 2021 with the Padres, receiving a stem cell injection after the season in hopes of healing the injury without a second reconstruction. The Twins knew the risk when they signed up, and indeed, Paddack made it through only five starts before needing to go under the knife once again.

    Despite the looming health uncertainty, Paddack did have other more appealing qualities at that time: he was three years younger, with multiple years of inexpensive team control remaining. The trade cost to acquire him is a little hard to directly assess because Paddack was shipped alongside buy-low reliever Emilio Pagan in exchange for Brent Rooker and one year of a legitimately high-caliber bullpen arm in Taylor Rogers

    Another comparable player traded for in recent Twins history, I suppose, is Anthony DeSclafani. Very similar story here: pitcher with some level of proven upside, coming off elbow injury that he attempted to rehab, acquired by the Twins as part of a complicated and creative trade package. The same motivation that compelled them to target DeSclafani in that deal -- adding a veteran starter for the back of the rotation on a cheap-ish one-year deal -- would be the same one stirring interest in Paddack.

    It seems fair to say that if Minnesota can find a way to move Paddack, the deal will take shape in a similar fashion to those examples, with multiple players and maybe even multiple teams involved.

    Potential Trade Partners
    If there's a general sense of confidence in his health, Paddack could draw interest from a wide range of teams, especially in the midst of pervasive reduction in spending across the league (which I expect). For all his risk, the right-hander could be attractive on a one-year commitment compared to the treacherous free agent market. Here are a few team names that stand out in my mind as likely suitors for Paddack. 

    New York Mets
    They have some holes to fill in the rotation with Sean Manaea and Luis Severino heading into free agency. Head exec David Stearns has been open about the need to add in the rotation. "We have to have multiple starters. We understand that," he told The Record. "We went into last offseason with the same need, and I think we'll be able to do it."

    New York does have a pretty solid starting pitching corps in place, so they could potentially afford to take a gamble on Paddack, hoping to catch lightning in a bottle and bolster their championship hopes. Under owner Steve Cohen, the Mets are in sort of a sweet-spot for this kind of trade because they won't overly scrutinize a salary like Paddack's, but might also be looking to avoid huge financial commitments after leading MLB in payroll this year.

    Texas Rangers
    Like the Mets, Texas is a free-spending team with World Series aspirations. They also seem like a heck of a natural fit for Paddack, a Texas native known for arriving at the ballpark in his cowboy attire. The Rangers have a strong track record of taking fliers on starting pitchers whose stock is down and striking gold; Lance Lynn and Mike Minor are among the examples. They're also the team that signed Tyler Mahle to a two-year contract coming off Tommy John surgery with the Twins, although the returns haven't been so good there up to this point.

    Like the Mets, Texas is facing significant veteran losses in the rotation, with Max Scherzer, Nathan Eovaldi and Andrew Heaney becoming free agents. They could be looking to load up on arms.

    Tampa Bay Rays
    I don't have any specific reasons for including the Rays, other than that they are an unpredictable team with whom the Twins have done business in the past. Unlike the Rangers and Mets, they are far from big spenders, but they could be interested in acquiring a contract like Paddack's if they believe he's healthy and they like his underlying metrics.

    Tampa has a solid stable of young starters, but could be keen to add a veteran with frontline talent on top of it. I also think the Rays (or other teams) could be interested in Paddack as a multi-inning weapon out of the bullpen.

    Baltimore Orioles
    Corbin Burnes has finally reached free agency and is in search of a mega deal. Assuming they don't bring him back, he will leave a massive void in their rotation, and the O's will be on the hunt for quality arms to supplement their overflowing young offense. 

    One name that stands out to me here as a possible return is Ryan O'Hearn, a strong lefty bat and first baseman making an equal $7.5 million in his final year under contract. Formerly a nondescript player for the Royals, O'Hearn blossomed in Baltimore over the past two seasons under now-Twins hitting coach Matt Borschulte, posting a 122 OPS+ in both, but his poor defense keeps his value in check. 

    Conclusions
    When it comes to trading Paddack, there is definitely a will, but is there a way? The plausibility will be dictated by several factors: his arm prognosis, the temperature of the free-agent market, and the spending inclinations of major-league teams. If the Twins are able to move Paddack and his salary, expect the deal to be significantly more complex than a standard one-for-one swap.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Riley Quick

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, RHP
    In his second professional outing, Quick went three innings. He gave up no runs and no hits. He walked three and had five strikeouts.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Heck, why not trade me???

    I have MLB value that is about equal to Paddack...

     

    Just because Minny decided to pay him exorbitant amounts to "recover" DOES NOT mean anyone else thinks he is worth anything beyond a non-guaranteed MiLB contract with a spring training invite.

    No team is going to trade for paddack  straight away , he would have to be packaged with other players ( see desclafini trade for Polanco , we wanted bullpen help and got topa and prospects  , and we also  got desclafini ,  and Seattle and giant's paid down his injuty plague salary ) , if another team wants to trade for 1 of our 40 man roster  players  , they would have to take paddack in the same deal , if we have to send money to the trading team , I say we keep paddack for the bullpen or as depth to fill an injury  ...

    Great job Nick. Paddack is the type of fat that we need to cut. Paddack does have value & still has upside but not as much that this FO thinks. They signed Paddack to an extension, to hopefully have something to show for the wasted time, talent & money spent on him. Mets were interested in him (but backed out because they knew his arm was ready to fall off) before the Twins picked him up & invested in him. Paddack can be easily replaced & is the best place to start cutting fat. A small prospect can be added to even out the small negative trade value, that can be involved in a different trade.

    IMO HOU could also be a trade partner, HOU needs some help in the backend of their rotation, HOU could also be a home town team & the farther fences could aid in Paddack's fly balls. IMO he wouldn't be that hard to move with no negative effects to the team & we cut salary w/o trading someone which would be harder to replace.

    I could see a team dealing for Paddack; at that salary, he makes sense as a 5th starter who you could maybe skip on occasion to try and keep him healthy, and he's also shown that he can be impactful in the bullpen, so he'd still have value in the postseason for a contender. There's some risk because of his arm injuries, but at the same time it's a 1-year deal and the money ain't exactly high. I wouldn't want him in a rotation with a lot of question marks, because he's not someone you can really count on. He's a question mark of his own. But there's still talent there, and there's also a more than reasonable option to slide him to the bullpen if it's not working as a starter or someone else emerges as a better option. No team is going to look at him as a top 3 in their rotation, but as a 5th starter? We've seen a lot worse pitchers get more money to be the 5th guy.

    Is he going to bring a significant return? Probably not a big one, but doesn't mean the Twins shouldn't be shopping him. If they can use him to get the veteran RH bat they need and match salaries? That would be a help. Sadly, the self-imposed payroll limits are so measly that even a straight salary dump for a C-prospect isn't the worst idea if it means they can add a Carlos Santana type that their ownership wouldn't otherwise allow.

    Moving Paddack makes a lot of sense, really. I'm comfortable with Festa starting the season as the #5, and even with that move we still have prospect depth in AA/AAA that are ready to step up in Matthews, Lewis, Raya, Adams, Nowlin, and Morris...even Randy Dobnak is lurking around for one more shot if needed. It doesn't blow a hole in the team and could allow them to fill one.

    Quote

    He's a talented pitcher with upside

    What makes people think this? I'm quite serious when I ask. 

    Lets ignore the 6 year veteran's innings. Here are his actual results on the mound in ERA.
    2019 - 3.33 <-- young pitcher with upside! This guy could be great!
    2020 - 4.73 <--- promising young pitcher got hurt, but it happens
    2021 - 5.07 <--- it's just a small sample size!
    2022 - 4.03 <--- okay so there might be a ceiling here.
    2023 - 5.40 <--- huh, I thought he was better than this
    2024 - 4.99 <--- oh, this is who he is.

    He's a back end rotation arm with no upside. Kyle Gibson-esque, but without the durability. BaseballTradeValues has Paddack as -1.9 in trade value.

    In my offseason plan, I have the Twins eating $3.0MM and trading him to the Orioles to be a part of their early season rotation depth in exchange for the Twins getting back a depth reliever with upside.

     

    Twins trade candidate breakdown, Chris Paddack.  Shouldn’t that be breaks down? Levine traded for or signed a lot of players that broke down. He is gone. The only way Paddack is gone is by either the Twins can identify another team that doesn’t consider injury history or it is the trade deadline and Paddack has pitched reasonably well. 

    Every year teams start the season with pitchers worse than Paddack in the rotation. Pretty much any pitcher worth starting is worth paying $7.5M. Paddack has very little trade value but there are plenty of other players in MLB with very little trade value who would fit the Twins roster better. Several of those players make less money than Paddack.

    Leody Tavares is also on that top 35 players to get traded list. He's an extra outfielder for the Rangers but a great fit for the Twins at $4.5M. The Rangers are desperate for starting pitching after losing most of their rotation. Tyrone Taylor of the Mets would be a good fit in the same way.

    There are other teams with a relief pitcher getting paid $3-4M who might want to upgrade that spot to a starter making $7.5M.

    If we can trade Paddack, maybe we can get the lefty reliever we really need in a one for one swap. The other scenario would be trading him for some minor league prospect as basically a salary dump. If they go this route, the money saved needs to go towards a first baseman or pitching help.

    12 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    Every year teams start the season with pitchers worse than Paddack in the rotation. Pretty much any pitcher worth starting is worth paying $7.5M. Paddack has very little trade value but there are plenty of other players in MLB with very little trade value who would fit the Twins roster better. Several of those players make less money than Paddack.

    Leody Tavares is also on that top 35 players to get traded list. He's an extra outfielder for the Rangers but a great fit for the Twins at $4.5M. The Rangers are desperate for starting pitching after losing most of their rotation. Tyrone Taylor of the Mets would be a good fit in the same way.

    There are other teams with a relief pitcher getting paid $3-4M who might want to upgrade that spot to a starter making $7.5M.

    The Rangers have Jacob deGrom, Tyler Mahle, Jon Gray, Cody Bradford and Kumar Rocker so I wouldn't think they'd be desperate. 

    Tyrone Taylor is a better fit since he's cheaper and a league average-ish bat despite entering his a31 season. I didn't think the Mets would be interested in keeping Paddack in a rotation spot or using him as a reliever. The Mets aren't bargain bin shoppers, and I couldn't find an starter the Twins could part with where the Mets would legitimately be interested, and where the Twins would actually get something we needed back in my offseason plan. I was trying to figure out a way to fit Tyrone Taylor into the Twins' plans, and I wanted Brandon Sproat for high end potential. Just couldn't make it work with the other needs, depth and stability.

    Was excited when the Twins acquired Paddock.  Continue to believe that he can become a very good starter.  Unfortunately, he hasn't been able to stay on the field.

    Will other teams be interested?  Interesting question which we will have to wait to be answered.  If he is moved, I see one of two returns.  The most likely may be for a mid-level prospect which would give the Twins $7.5M of salary relief.  The other trade would see the Twins getting something of value in return.  Could that be a lefty bullpen arm or first baseman?  Maybe. Or perhaps a good prospect close to big league ready for one of those two holes in their roster.  

    For me the latter option would be best.  But we are all going to have to wait for an answer.  Will that answer actually come, or will Paddock be the Twins #4 or #5 starter on opening day?  I guess the worst-case scenario would be trading him for a mid-level prospect, then watching him start the All-Star game for the National League while our guy is pitching in Wichita!  The way things have gone for the Twins of late, this may be the most likely scenario.  

    I will agree that it's debatable how much value Paddack has.  Yet teams are ALWAYS looking at pitching and catching lightening in a bottle.  To me, a win would just be getting a team to take Paddack and clear the $7.5 million.  But if a marginal prospect or a player with some talent came back, even better.

    The Mets are an interesting fit.  They may be looking for a small $7.5 million arm to fill out the back end if they plan on offering mega-bucks to Juan Soto.  Maybe even the Dodgers for the same reason.  Baltimore is an interesting fit.  Either Ryan O'Hearn or Ryan Mountcastle fits the 1B need for the Twins.  O'Hearn could platoon with Miranda.  Mountcastle would replace Miranda.  Mountcastle was nominated for a Gold Glove at 1B this season so he would provide the defense we'd need.

    If we had to attach a prospect to Paddack to get either Mountcastle or O'Hearn I'd do it in a heartbeat.  We have a gaping hole at 1B.  Even a lateral move salary-wise that fills that hole with a productive major league hitter is acceptable to me.  The Orioles have a TON of young prospects breaking through and that makes Mountcastle and O'Hearn expendable as they try to find spots for guys like Westburg, Cowser, Jackson Holiday. Ramon Urias and Heston Kjerstad.     

    1 hour ago, jmlease1 said:

    I could see a team dealing for Paddack; at that salary, he makes sense as a 5th starter who you could maybe skip on occasion to try and keep him healthy, and he's also shown that he can be impactful in the bullpen, so he'd still have value in the postseason for a contender. There's some risk because of his arm injuries, but at the same time it's a 1-year deal and the money ain't exactly high. I wouldn't want him in a rotation with a lot of question marks, because he's not someone you can really count on. He's a question mark of his own. But there's still talent there, and there's also a more than reasonable option to slide him to the bullpen if it's not working as a starter or someone else emerges as a better option. No team is going to look at him as a top 3 in their rotation, but as a 5th starter? We've seen a lot worse pitchers get more money to be the 5th guy.

    Is he going to bring a significant return? Probably not a big one, but doesn't mean the Twins shouldn't be shopping him. If they can use him to get the veteran RH bat they need and match salaries? That would be a help. Sadly, the self-imposed payroll limits are so measly that even a straight salary dump for a C-prospect isn't the worst idea if it means they can add a Carlos Santana type that their ownership wouldn't otherwise allow.

    Moving Paddack makes a lot of sense, really. I'm comfortable with Festa starting the season as the #5, and even with that move we still have prospect depth in AA/AAA that are ready to step up in Matthews, Lewis, Raya, Adams, Nowlin, and Morris...even Randy Dobnak is lurking around for one more shot if needed. It doesn't blow a hole in the team and could allow them to fill one.

    I was with you until you mentioned Dobnak!  

    22 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    The Rangers have Jacob deGrom, Tyler Mahle, Jon Gray, Cody Bradford and Kumar Rocker so I wouldn't think they'd be desperate. 

    Tyrone Taylor is a better fit since he's cheaper and a league average-ish bat despite entering his a31 season. I didn't think the Mets would be interested in keeping Paddack in a rotation spot or using him as a reliever. The Mets aren't bargain bin shoppers, and I couldn't find an starter the Twins could part with where the Mets would legitimately be interested, and where the Twins would actually get something we needed back in my offseason plan. I was trying to figure out a way to fit Tyrone Taylor into the Twins' plans, and I wanted Brandon Sproat for high end potential. Just couldn't make it work with the other needs, depth and stability.

    deGrom and Mahle aren't exactly the pictures of pitching health. I wouldn't predict a Paddack to Texas trade, but naming deGrom and Mahle as reasons for a team to not being looking for arms is awfully bold. Banking on Jacob deGrom to make more than 15 starts in a season is like banking on Byron Buxton to play more than 80 games.

    The Twins have to weigh the "cost" of moving Paddack vs the potential benefit of keeping him.

    Regardless of the comments here, Paddack does have value.  As an SP5 or possible BP guy, there is enough there for teams to take a chance him.  Maybe not $7.5m worth of chance, but a chance. Paddack's salary is currently sunk money.  The Twins would "lose" any trade here as some level of prospect would need to be moved to offset the salary.  The questions here are:

    1) Do the Twins see Paddack as a potential member of their pitching staff (either SP or RP) next season?
    2) If not, what are they willing to give up to move his salary?

    Can’t imagine that anyone has interest in Paddack as a starter. His numbers and his health combine to huge risk & minimal upside. No real way to get anything positive back for him in trade other than $$ relief.

    That said, if he only has 75 good innings in his arm per season, put him in the bullpen where he can be aggressive with his approach but inning protected by only throwing 3 innings per week. His stuff plays well over 3-6 guys faced per outing. He isn’t a terribly high cost and he could help elevate the Pen to a weapon for the Team.

    Alcala - Henriquez - Varland - Sands - PADDACK - Topa - Stewart - Jax - Duran - Moran - Headrick - Funderburk …….. this group of 12 isn’t perfect individually but there are almost certainly 8 guys that combine to be very effective from September through October.

    I wonder if the Twins could trade Paddack and Dobnak in a packaged deal.  Include a prospect if need be and free up 11 million.  
     

    Paddack was highly effective in 3 out of every 4 starts last year.  I think 2 in particular really skewed his numbers up last year from the High 3.00s / low 4.00s ERA he was pitching from otherwise.  Dobnak is costly for what he is but the return would be of 0 consequence to the acquiring team.  
     

    I like Nick’s trade idea with the Orioles

    I am ok with packaging him with Vazquez or Julien or Miranda maybe Castro.  I think we should keep him but whatever.  This is the big transaction of the offseason hopefully because anything bigger will result in something that really disappoints the fan base I think.🤔 

    2 hours ago, DJL44 said:

    They got 126 innings out of these three pitchers combined in 2024. There are rumors they are looking to trade Gray.

    Hard to get innings out of guys who were just successfully returning from TJ (deGrom and Mahle) and rookies before their call up. Context matters.

    52 minutes ago, Brandon said:

    I wonder if the Twins could trade Paddack and Dobnak in a packaged deal.  Include a prospect if need be and free up 11 million.  
     

    Paddack was highly effective in 3 out of every 4 starts last year.  I think 2 in particular really skewed his numbers up last year from the High 3.00s / low 4.00s ERA he was pitching from otherwise.  Dobnak is costly for what he is but the return would be of 0 consequence to the acquiring team.  
     

    I like Nick’s trade idea with the Orioles

    I am ok with packaging him with Vazquez or Julien or Miranda maybe Castro.  I think we should keep him but whatever.  This is the big transaction of the offseason hopefully because anything bigger will result in something that really disappoints the fan base I think.🤔 

    If they're going to struggle moving Paddack, moving Dobnak as well will be a huge effort. Both have negative value.

    Don't see a offer for him until teams see him pitch in ST. You can't expect a team to take his contract without seeing if he can take a mound and show something. This situation is and has been a problem with Falvey trying to build pitching with tired,weak arm and shoulder pitchers. They saw it with the BP as well,just look at Stewart who couldn't even get out of ST. They need to do better at drafting and develop pitching like Cleveland does.

    20 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    Hard to get innings out of guys who were just successfully returning from TJ (deGrom and Mahle) and rookies before their call up. Context matters.

    Jacob deGrom has made 35 total starts since the 2021 season began. He made 3 starts last year. 6 the year before. And 11 the year before that. You know this. Pointing to Jacob deGrom as a reason a team wouldn't be looking for pitching is nonsense. He hasn't thrown even half a season's worth of starts in 4 years. Hasn't thrown 100 innings in over 5 years (2020 not being his fault, obviously). It's just flat out hard to get innings out of deGrom.

    And Jon Gray wasn't a rookie so not sure what context that has to do with the 3 pitchers named.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...