Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Opinion: Twins TV Hits a Grand Slam with All Analyst Broadcast

    Baseball is fun. Baseball broadcasting should be fun too, and with the introduction of the All-Analyst Broadcast in 2025 and running it back in 2026 has been a tremendous change of pace for Twins fans.

    Seth Stohs
    Image courtesy of © Brad Rempel-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The beauty of the baseball season is that it is a long season, that it is a marathon and not a sprint. After 162 games, the best teams separate themselves from the others. 

    The difficulty of the baseball season for players and for fans is that it is a long season. Players have to figure out a routine and that could certainly get monotonous. It's the same for most fans, even die-hard fans. The routine of watching most of the 162 games can get a little stale, especially if you are a fan of a team that isn't very good. It can also be true of great team. 

    So sometimes teams and players need to mix up. Days off, completely away from the field are important. Taking batting practice in the batting cage instead of on the field. Taking the second bus from the hotel instead of the first bus to the ballpark. Maybe something as simple as wearing your pants to your knees. 

    Likewise, for fans, we need to find different ways of watching. Maybe on your big living room TV. Maybe on a laptop grilling or sitting near a campfire. Maybe it's listening on the radio on a Saturday afternoon with a fishing pole in your hand on the pontoon. 

    Maybe it's as simple as hearing different voices. Twins fans are really lucky. Dick Bremer and his iconic voice was welcomed into our homes calling Twins fans for 40 seasons. This coming weekend, he will be welcomed with open arms as one of the most deserving members of the Minnesota Twins Hall of Fame. 

    Cory Provus was the radio voice for the Twins for a dozen years. He has now been in the TV booth for a few seasons. Enjoying the All-Analyst Broadcast is not in any way a knock on Provus. I think most know just how good he is behind the microphone. He does probably 150 Twins games each year. He's fantastic calling college football and college basketball in the offseason. He also has a young family. I'm sure an extra series off here and there is a great thing. We all want a quality work-life balance, right?  

    Early in his career, Bremer teamed with Tommy John, Jim Kaat and Harmon Killebrew. For a long time, Bremer worked mostly with Bert Blyleven. That was fun early on and when the "Circle Me Bert" became a thing. If we're being honest, the Blyleven experience is why many of us started watching the game on mute. Sure, you occasionally missed Blyleven expanding the English dictionary, even getting himself suspended. What we learned from that is that on TV you can see what's happening. You don't need to have the play detailed to the same level as is needed on the radio. 

    When Blyleven retired from the booth, the Twins decided to go with analyst-by-committee. Remember how much we enjoyed Tom Kelly's takes and stories the first time that he was in the booth. Roy Smalley had been around for a while. Justin Morneau came on board in 2019. The Twins tried out the likes of Torii Hunter (which made us all a bit nervous to hear what he might say). Glen Perkins got more and more time. LaTroy Hawkins was on for a few years before joining the coaching staff this year. Trevor Plouffe and Denard Span have been added in the last couple of years. 

    I always thought that mixing up his in-booth partners brought out the best in Bremer. He seemed rejuvenated by the opportunity to work with more players. Few know the game of baseball and the history of the Minnesota Twins than Bremer, but he let his analyst be the "star" of the broadcast. He set them up for success. He asked questions that he likely knew the answers to, but he knew that the audience wanted to hear the opinions of the former players. 

    Last year, the Twins tried something new. Because of the popularity of the former players involved in the broadcasts, they put together an All-Analyst broadcast. Instead of the traditional play-by-play announcer and an analyst. the broadcast was solely called by the analysts.   

    In 2025, Morneau, Perkins and Plouffe were in the booth. Pablo Lopez joined the broadcast and impressed us all. The three former players were teammates with the Twins from 2010-2013

    The Twins and Twins.tv brought back the All-Analyst broadcast. This year's class added another former teammate, Denard Span. It is clear that the four players have strong and lasting relationships. Those teams weren't always good, but the players were close and remain close. 

    It is completely entertaining to hear them share stories about their playing years, but it's also fun to hear them analyze the game from their experiences. 

    Luke Keaschall made his first start in center field on Wednesday night. He had played some center field in Cedar Rapids in 2013 before his Tommy John surgery. Just recently, he has moved from second base to the outfield. Denard Span talked about how he played center field only in the minor leagues, but when he was called up, he had to play right field. He discussed the differences between the three outfield spots. 

    They also discussed Span's "walk off grand slam!" 

    Trevor Plouffe discussed the challenges he had coming up as a shortstop, getting some time at second and third base, and then being thrown into the corner outfield spots. He talked about the difficulty and differences between the infield and the outfield.  On Tuesday, the highlighted a trip he made to the A's bullpen and got a good laugh about it. 

    Pablo Lopez spent an inning with the broadcasters on Tuesday night. They talked about his "success" as a hitter in the National League earlier in his career. They also talked about him taking 14 Twins players with less than one year of service time to a tailor who made custom suits for each. He talked about Martin Prado being the guy who paid it forward to him. 

    Wednesday night's game began with Morneau and Perkins in the booth while Trevor Plouffe sat by the foul pole in left field, and Denard Span sat by the foul pole in right field. In the first inning, Span reached toward a ball that Kody Clemens knocked off the top of the wall, maybe 10 feet from him. Later, he "jumped" for a long foul ball over his head. His broadcast teammates laughed and mocked him in the way only teammates can.   

    Meanwhile in left field, Trevor Plouffe told the TV audience that he had his wallet, and it had a few $20 bills in it. He said that he would give a $20 to those that came up to him and mentioned it to him. It didn't take long for a line to come up to him, get a $20 and take a picture and shake his hand. In fact, at one point he ran out of money.   

    Soon after, Twins owner Tom Pohlad and Dustin Morse showed up in left field. Pohlad handed Plouffe some more $20s and they made fans of several more people.

    Then they went over to see Denard Span in right field, and Pohlad gave him some money to hand out to fans as well. 

    I think that the experience "humanized" Tom Pohlad to some Twins fans who, to this point, have only read quotes or heard negative things about the family. Pohlad appeared to be having a great time talking to the broadcasters, chatting with the fans, and being present. It is exactly the kind of thing that he needs to do to simply start the process of gaining fan confidence. (Yes, proving it by spending more and pushing payroll back to the 2023 and 2024 levels would also have a huge impact.)   

    Asked if they wanted to hand out some money from the broadcast booth, Morneau and Perkins both said that they'd rather have a hot dog. The next half-inning, there was Tom Pohlad, placing a huge hot dog in front of them. That's when Span and Plouffe rejoined Perkins and Morneau in the booth. 

    Of course, it's always fun when we get to see the Twins win, especially against an AL Central foe. But both games have been really good baseball games. The Twins won 3-1 on Tuesday night. And Alan Roden played hero in the Twins walk-off win on Wednesday night. 

    The Twins and Guardians will play one more game this series. We get to enjoy one more game with the four analysts working together. What topics will they cover today? What stories will they share? Will there be any surprises, such as additional former players joining them, or unique angles, or stories we haven't heard before? And could we be so bold as to ask for another Twins win?


    What are your thoughts on the All-Analyst Broadcast? Is it something you would like to see more of? Is it brilliant, or is it crazy? Is it perfect as is, one series each season, to help us all with the long season? Share your thoughts below. I'm sure the Twins would love to hear what you think? The people behind Twins TV would love to hear it as well. Whether you love it or hate it, let them know. 

    Another question for discussion? Are there other former Twins players that you would like to see in the TV booth? 

      


    View our top trade candidates list, up to nearly 70 names and updated regularly!

    View Trade Candidates

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Vahn Lackey

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, C
    The Twins top pick in this month's MLB Draft, Lackey made his pro debut on Thursday, catching and batting third for the Mussels. He was 0-for-1, was hit by a pitch and two walks. Also stole a base.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Loved it, but as others have said wouldn't be good to do more than 3-4 series a year.  Might also make sense to change one of the four on repeat performances.  Would love seeing Cuddyer, Hunter, Smalley or even Nicki Punto.

    Reading the Strib this morning, the manager is sold on Roden being a very good hitter.  Could not be happier for that young man last night after what he has been thru the last 12 months.  Have a feeling he is going to be a very good player for the Twins.  Hopefully, for a long time.

    I am old.  And I liked the format.  Once a year, I fly back to Minnesota and spend a couple days with high school and college teammates (hockey) from over 60 years ago and it is a blast reliving (or being reminded of) amusing things that happened back in the days of playing goalie without a mask).  Having not played baseball beyond high school, I would like to hear about the difficulty of moving from the infield to the outfield,  RF to LF, or SS to 3B.  I've never done it so a professional's view is appreciated.  I do agree with some that a little more current situation broadcasting would be nice, but almost everything you need to know is on the screen at all times.

    I’m an old timer that grew up listening to Twins on the radio with Halsey Hall, Ray Scott, and Herb Carneal. They were great broadcasters that also brought baseball stories to the game to entertain listeners. Baseball stories and legends are one of the reasons I fell in love with the game and the Twins. My Grandfather used to listen and join in with his memories of past players.
    Think of some of the colorful past announcers like Harry Carey, Joe Garigiola, Joe Morgan, and Bob Costas that added stories into the broadcast. Great entertainment. 
    Today’s broadcasts, especially Twins broadcasts, lack that element. It’s pretty sterile watching games today with all the stats and analysis. These guys reminded us that baseball is fun, even funny and that there are colorful personalities playing and associated with baseball. Loved it, let’s have more “color” and humor in the broadcasts in the future please.

    If you're watching the game, I'm unclear on why you would have to go to the app or radio to find out what happened regardless of who was saying what, unless you've truly never watched a baseball game and didn't know how the game is played (shoutout to those TwinsDaily.com fans from Burkina Faso). I understand those who may not care for this kind of commentary, and I totally understand that it's not going to be everybody's cup of tea, but some of the hyperbole here is silly. 

    As others have said, I think it's a fun change of pace, but it's better as an occasional novelty. At some point I just want to watch the game and not listen to a bunch of people talk over each other.  

    I do like the fact that the Twins have multiple analysts throughout the season. I like getting the different perspectives and fresh stories.

    I suspect the play by play vs. analyst broadcasts would appeal to different demographics. In the day and age we have, there are a lot of folks who enjoy the "react" videos which go off topic, etc. There are also going to be a lot of purists who want the full play-by-play, pitch-by-pitch details where it just feels comforting and "right."

    Hey, was that Tom Pohlad showing up with more 20s for Plouffe and Span to give out fans who are actually in attendance? Same guy then showing up in the booth with a large hot dog? It's almost like this guy understands he is running an entertainment company and is trying to connect with the customer. Since when did that become a thing for the family? A guy who actually cares running the team? Who knew? That must've been an imposter in a Tom Pohlad costume.

    Seriously, really smart, savvy move. Gotta give the guy credit for that. Little things like that can start to change the narrative about the team and about ownership. Good for him.

    I'm torn on this one. 

    I'll always applaud trying new things and I certainly wouldn't call this any sort of failure. It was fun and novel. I think day 2 worked better for a couple reasons.

    a) Having 1 day under your belt helps
    b) It wasn't all 4 of them in the booth the whole time. 4 in the booth was too many.

    It's interesting, I think this is a better format for some of these guys and a worse format for others. I think this was better for Plouffe and Morneau. For Plouffe it was his natural environment. For Morneau, I think he's a very thoughtful guy with good stories and analysis, but my biggest knock on him is that his stories become novels and his analysis drones on. This format doesn't allow that and I think that was good for Morneau

    For Perkins, I think he's really good ay being the 2nd guy in a 2-man booth. That's his sweet spot. Of these 4 he's the best with Provus (IMO) but also of these 4, he'd probably be the first guy I'd pull out of this 4-man booth.

    For Span... he's got the least experience of all of these guys (by far), so I think he's still figuring out what kind of broadcaster he will be. I thought he did a fine job, but getting this specific type of experience isn't going to allow him to hone his craft. 

    At the end of the day, my biggest complaint is that they completely lost track of the game at several key points. I don't mind you wandering away to talk about Hacky Sack or Lord of the Rings if you can bring it back to the game when you need to.

    Yesterday there was a point where they didn't know Cleveland has made a pitching change. Not great. Then in the 8th inning when Cleveland was walking our entire lineup, one of them was like "oh... man.... we just tied it up." I don't need them locked in for 9 innings but I need them more locked in than they were. The Manning cast works as "not very locked in to the game" because if you're someone that wants a traditional broadcast, you can just flip over the ESPN's main feed and also, when things get amped up in the game, they DO lock in.

    So, as a one-series thing? Sure. Fun concept. But I'd make a few tweaks.

    4 minutes ago, amjgt said:

    The Manning cast works as "not very locked in to the game" because if you're someone that wants a traditional broadcast, you can just flip over the ESPN's main feed and also, when things get amped up in the game, they DO lock in.

    In regards to the Manningcast, it's a case study for when a novelty item stretches themselves too far. Their ratings have been declining consistently since their debut in 2021. They were the pioneers of the surge in alternative broadcasts, but over time, people will still gravitate towards the traditional broadcast no matter the sport. 

    56 minutes ago, Natron said:

    If you're watching the game, I'm unclear on why you would have to go to the app or radio to find out what happened regardless of who was saying what, unless you've truly never watched a baseball game and didn't know how the game is played (shoutout to those TwinsDaily.com fans from Burkina Faso). I understand those who may not care for this kind of commentary, and I totally understand that it's not going to be everybody's cup of tea, but some of the hyperbole here is silly. 

    A lot of times, the game is on in the background for me. I’ll be making dinner or looking at something on my iPad. It’s nice to be able to hear what’s going on rather than anecdotes or goofy stories. 

    2 hours ago, strumdatjag said:

    The split-screen during the game got annoying.   Show the game.   We don’t have to see the “analysts”.    
    Many times, the yapping lingered long after an important play.  “By the way, a minute ago blankety-blank happened…”. 
    I like this better during Spring Training games.   The banter about the good old days and interaction with fans works better when the game on the screen matters less.  
    The Tom Pohlad bits last night actually worked somewhat.  I would have liked the group asking him whether the Twins will be buyers or sellers at the deadline.

    for a change, I didn’t mind it.  But let’s have no more than 4 games a season of this. 

    This is good feedback... about 'seeing the analysts" all the time. That's certainly fair. We've heard plenty of each of their voices that we know who is talking. 

    And it wouldn't matter who asked Pohlad that question... he's not (and shouldn't) answer it. 

    I agree with those who say that it has to be somewhat limited. So far, they've limited it to one series per season.  However, if things go ugly again after the trade deadline, then maybe a second series because we'll need to be entertained. 

    3 minutes ago, Seth Stohs said:

    This is good feedback... about 'seeing the analysts" all the time. That's certainly fair. We've heard plenty of each of their voices that we know who is talking. 

    And it wouldn't matter who asked Pohlad that question... he's not (and shouldn't) answer it. 

    I agree with those who say that it has to be somewhat limited. So far, they've limited it to one series per season.  However, if things go ugly again after the trade deadline, then maybe a second series because we'll need to be entertained. 

    My biggest problem with the split screen was that it meant the strikezone box went away. I'm sure that's a solvable problem, but I'd like them to attempt to solve it :)

    2 hours ago, Jim H said:

    I turned it over to the Cleveland broadcast. I like to know what is going on in the game I am watching, not what happened in the clubhouse 15 years ago.

     

    I absolutely loved the broadcasts! The stories and good-natured ribbing was fun to hear. There was also a lot of insight as to what they thought the pitcher would throw, the batters thought process, base stealing, hit and run etc... As for not knowing what was going on in the game all you had to do was watch your television screen. Baseball isn't that difficult to understand. 

    2 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    My eyes can tell me what's happening in the game. It's why I watch the games. To see what's happening. I don't need an announcer to tell me the ball is in the air to left field.

    That only works if they aren’t cutting away from the game feed to show video of the announcers. That happened way too many times yesterday. If they do a split screen it becomes unwatchable on a small screen like a laptop or mobile phone.

    16 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    That only works if they aren’t cutting away from the game feed to show video of the announcers. That happened way too many times yesterday. If they do a split screen it becomes unwatchable on a small screen like a laptop or mobile phone.

    That's totally fair. I by no means think it's a perfect broadcast, but I turn the volume on normal games off because I have no interest in the play-by-play. I don't know why they feel they need to show the guys sitting in the booth or in outfield corners. Brings nothing to the broadcast. But I'd far prefer hearing players having a back and forth on strategy and telling clubhouse stories, etc. than have a play-by-play guy telling me what my eyes already are.

    Didn't love it...didn't hate it...wouldn't mind it every once in a while. I certainly wouldn't want a whole season of it...I think I'd go bonkers. A bit too much goofing around for my personal tastes, but a few series every year to give Provus a little vaca would be fine. I'm really watching the game anyway, not particularly paying a whole lot of attention to what the improv foursome was doing. I thought the handing out $20's was kind of ridiculous. If Tommie-Boy wants to give away money, then spend it on FA's, not fans wanting more beer money. Does anyone know...will the fab 4 be doing the Halo series too? 

    3 minutes ago, CRF said:

    Didn't love it...didn't hate it...wouldn't mind it every once in a while. I certainly wouldn't want a whole season of it...I think I'd go bonkers. A bit too much goofing around for my personal tastes, but a few series every year to give Provus a little vaca would be fine. I'm really watching the game anyway, not particularly paying a whole lot of attention to what the improv foursome was doing. I thought the handing out $20's was kind of ridiculous. If Tommie-Boy wants to give away money, then spend it on FA's, not fans wanting more beer money. Does anyone know...will the fab 4 be doing the Halo series too? 

    I'm almost positive that it was just for this Cleveland series. I'm pretty sure they said that.

    10 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    That's totally fair. I by no means think it's a perfect broadcast, but I turn the volume on normal games off because I have no interest in the play-by-play. I don't know why they feel they need to show the guys sitting in the booth or in outfield corners. Brings nothing to the broadcast. But I'd far prefer hearing players having a back and forth on strategy and telling clubhouse stories, etc. than have a play-by-play guy telling me what my eyes already are.

    Like someone else mentioned, I am not able to keep my eyes glued to the screen for every second. The play by play helps me know when to play fetch with the dog and when to pay attention to the screen. I suppose I could turn on the radio, but it is completely out of sync with the video feed.

    21 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    That's totally fair. I by no means think it's a perfect broadcast, but I turn the volume on normal games off because I have no interest in the play-by-play. I don't know why they feel they need to show the guys sitting in the booth or in outfield corners. Brings nothing to the broadcast. But I'd far prefer hearing players having a back and forth on strategy and telling clubhouse stories, etc. than have a play-by-play guy telling me what my eyes already are.

    I'm going to partially disagree with you here. 

    I also mute the broadcast sometimes. Like you said, I'm watching. My ears don't need to tell me what my eyes are seeing. I'm not generally muting it because I don't like the play by play. It's usually because the color guy is annoying me or they are doing some other silly thing like Audra talking to a fan.

    BUT

    There are times I don't mute the broadcast. Like when Molitor is on. I could listen to him all day. I don't know what it is. When he's talking, I'm locked in and listening. Perkins gets closer to this than the other color guys, but still not on the Molitor level. The other side of the spectrum is Morneau. Awesome Twin. Great dude. But when he's talking it might as well be the Peanuts teacher talking. My brain completely tunes it out and it just become noise. 

    So, the fact that we are muting the broadcast, to me, doesn't say that we don't need broadcasters because I have eyes.... it means we need more consistently good broadcasters. And specifically here, I'm talking about the color analyst position. I think Provus does a perfectly good job as the PBP guy

    8 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    Like someone else mentioned, I am not able to keep my eyes glued to the screen for every second. The play by play helps me know when to play fetch with the dog and when to pay attention to the screen. I suppose I could turn on the radio, but it is completely out of sync with the video feed.

    And that's totally fine. That's how you ingest the game. I'm not saying everyone should watch or listen to the game the same way. What I enjoy isn't going to be what everyone else enjoys. The comment you originally responded to was more about the other poster's claim that this take was just Seth being the always positive guy (which does tend to be and I've certainly not enjoyed all of his takes because of it). It was about how you can enjoy certain things that I find annoying and I can enjoy things you find annoying. Seth's take isn't "koolaid" just because the other poster doesn't like this broadcast. Because many of us do. And many of us dislike the normal one that that other poster presumably prefers.

    We're all allowed to enjoy different parts of the game or broadcast. I get very little enjoyment out of the announcers on any sporting event. I would far prefer to listen to 2 or 3 players breaking down and discussing the strategies being implemented, what they'd do differently, why they'd do it differently, why the team did it how they did it, what the preparation is like beforehand, what day to day life as an athlete is like, all the behind-the-scenes stuff. I appreciate when the singular player in the booth gives their thoughts on things, but I want back and forth. I want multiple players. The debate on 3-0 red light vs green light was great. I want that all game long. Doesn't mean that's what everyone wants or that others shouldn't find the typical broadcast enjoyable or useful. It's just not my cup of tea.

    14 minutes ago, amjgt said:

    I'm going to partially disagree with you here. 

    I also mute the broadcast sometimes. Like you said, I'm watching. My ears don't need to tell me what my eyes are seeing. I'm not generally muting it because I don't like the play by play. It's usually because the color guy is annoying me or they are doing some other silly thing like Audra talking to a fan.

    BUT

    There are times I don't mute the broadcast. Like when Molitor is on. I could listen to him all day. I don't know what it is. When he's talking, I'm locked in and listening. Perkins gets closer to this than the other color guys, but still not on the Molitor level. The other side of the spectrum is Morneau. Awesome Twin. Great dude. But when he's talking it might as well be the Peanuts teacher talking. My brain completely tunes it out and it just become noise. 

    So, the fact that we are muting the broadcast, to me, doesn't say that we don't need broadcasters because I have eyes.... it means we need more consistently good broadcasters. And specifically here, I'm talking about the color analyst position. I think Provus does a perfectly good job as the PBP guy

    Totally fine that those are the reasons you mute the broadcast. They aren't the reason I do. I simply don't enjoy the typical play-by-play/color guy broadcast. When I watch games I am sitting and watching. I far more prefer 2 or 3 players in the booth so they can discuss the different sides of strategies. I keep going back to the 3-0 red light debate they had late in the game yesterday. I really enjoyed it. I want that all the time. I don't have any need for Provus. 

    That's nothing against Provus. When I've listened, he's done a perfectly fine job. I'm just not interested in hearing what I'm watching. I want the talk about how Span was a red light guy and Morneau wasn't. I wish they'd gone deeper at the end of it when Morneau was talking about how they had different jobs as well. Span was more typically a guy expected to get on in front of someone like Justin. They had 2 different thought processes. I love that stuff. And I have no need for play-by-play. That is why I specifically mute the broadcast.

    It's a good thing in moderation. I hope they don't get too high on their own supply and start rolling this out more than once or twice a season, but it is a fun change of pace during the season.

    I think the real star of the show is Perkins; I always love hearing him whether as part of this or the regular TV or radio broadcasts. A mix of "fun" and good analysis.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...