Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Letting Free-Agent Pitchers Walk Was All Part of the Twins' Plan


    Sherry Cerny

    The Minnesota Twins had some of the best pitching in MLB this past season. The pitching core carried the team throughout the season, and managed to keep the team around .500 even when the bats weren’t showing up. Now, they need a new core.

    Image courtesy of © David Richard-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    This past week, the club lost two of its most valuable assets on the pitching staff, Sonny Gray and Kenta Maeda. Both pitchers had impressive seasons, considering Maeda was returning after an 18-month recovery from Tommy John surgery in 2021. The club has suffered so long without good pitching, so why would the front office allow such difficult departures? Because it was a part of the plan all along.

    There have been articles and rumors about the Twins wanting to cut a large chunk of their payroll, and even with keeping Max Kepler and Jorge Polanco, the Twin's front office right now has an $88-million dollar payroll, a far cry from the 2023 $154-million Opening Day figure.

    The front office was well aware that three things would happen: They were going to lose Gray and Maeda, they would need more pitching, and they would need to trade some pieces to obtain new arms. Enter the club options of Polanco and Kepler.

    The Twins first picked up the options for Polanco ($10 million) and Kepler ($10.5 million), two of the Twins' cornerstone players and a fan-favorite duo. Kepler and Polanco have been a part of the Twins organization for 14 seasons, both signing as international free agents from Germany and the Dominican Republic, respectively. They were roommates in spring training for the 2010 season, forming what has proved to be an unbreakable bond. Naturally, when their options were picked up, fans were relieved and excited, but that’s not the end of the story. 

    Polanco and Kepler are huge trade pieces for the Twins. Both players had their ups and downs in 2023. There are reasons why each is an imperfect fit for the 2024 team, but they each have considerable trade value.

    Kepler played the entire season, starting slowly in the first half, then finding his stride after the All-Star break. He had his best season since 2019, with 24 homers and a .260/.332/.484 line. Kepler hit in the second half of the season like he knew his job was in jeopardy and he’s still one of the best defensive right fielders in the league, but is it enough?

    Unlike the potential in the infield, the Twins don’t have much immediate help coming in the way of outfielders. With Trevor Larnach being the other option for right field, trading away Kepler would be difficult to justify. The best option would be to bring in someone who would become a full-time outfielder for years to come and be ready to release Kepler after the 2024 season.   

    The infield has some of the best players, and while Polanco is a fantastic, versatile player and a switch-hitter, the club has a lot of young talent that stepped up for the consistently injured veterans--and there is still more at Triple-A St. Paul. Brooks Lee and Austin Martin, both of whom have been improving and showing why they should get their shot in 2024, are knocking on the door.

    Polanco only played 80 games in the 2023 season due to a long and strenuous battle with injury, but when he was in the game, he produced at the plate and was able to cover second base and the hot corner. Polanco has another club option for 2025, worth $12.5 million with a $750,000 buyout. So, what’s out there that would allow the Twins to get value for Polanco and not to miss Kepler after his deal is up? 

    Only a few pieces are needed to boost the Twins to where they are looking to be, and they don’t have to go far to find that talent. The Brewers have a lot of talent in their farm system, and some that have seen MLB time and who helped them reach the postseason in 2023. A small-market team with a surfeit of both relief pitchers and outfielders, they make perfect suitors. Based on the Twins’ need to replace so many high-quality innings, someone like Bryse Wilson, a rubber-armed long reliever, would be an excellent acquisition. 

    Wilson, a righty who will turn 26 years old this month, has been in the league since 2018, having been drafted in 2016 by the Braves. He spent his formative years in Atlanta before being traded to Pittsburgh, who flipped him to Milwaukee last winter for a minimal return. Last season, Wilson pitched 76 2/3 innings, with six wins and no losses. One of his best games was a 10-6 win over the Padres late in August, in which he worked four scoreless innings of emergency long relief and struck out four, allowing only three baserunners. Wilson ended his season with some of the best numbers of his career: a 2.58 ERA, a1.10 WHIP, a 4.17 FIP. He’ll make around $1.5 million in his first trip through arbitration in 2024, but he’s a decent bargain at that price.

    Wilson needn’t be the centerpiece of a trade, though. Joey Wiemer, a loose cannon at the plate and in the outfield, still has a lot of potential and could be a huge acquisition. Weimer is a really strong hitter, but he struggled a lot throughout the season. Looking at his numbers, his best month at the plate was in June (.233/.337/.512) and that gives a small glimpse into what kind of player he is. Even with the poor numbers in July and August, Wiemer crushed it against lefties (.267/.298/.517) through the whole season, which is a huge asset to the lineup. He also has outstanding defensive metrics, with five total Defensive Runs Saved in 1,026 innings as a rookie, showing that he has room to grow offensively and defensively with plenty of years left to play.  

    The Brewers’ surplus of young outfielders may be the blessing the Twins seek. With Kepler being a free agent next year, being 31 years old, and the unknown of Buxton, contributing to the overall inconsistency of the outfield, a player like Weimer could solve many problems for the team. Over at Brewer Fanatic, writer Ryan Pollak even made the case Thursday afternoon that Wiemer will become trade bait.

    One pipe dream would be to acquire Corbin Burnes in a trade for Polanco. There is still uncertainty as to whether the Brewers are looking to trade Burnes, but based on the information out there, it would take at least $250 million for the Brewers to retain him in free agency after 2024. He’ll make in excess of $15 million via arbitration in 2024, an onerous amount for the Brewers at their expected payroll level The Twins could “rent” him for a year, but the Brewers know what he’s worth, and the package for Burnes would likely include a lot more than Polanco, such as the Twins’ 2024 competitive-balance draft pick or prospects. The front office has been known to shock the fan base in the offseason, so they could shock us again, but it’s more than likely that the Twins would rather hold onto the prospects and trade for controllable assets that would provide long-term solutions, like Wilson and Wiemer. 

    With so many things up in the air, it’s really hard to say which way the Twins front office will go, but one thing for sure is to use Polanco and/or Kepler as trade pieces at some point to get the pitching that they need. It’s all part of the plan.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I was very intrigued by your title, Sherry & liked your ideas. Wilson & Wiemer would be good additions to our club, but would MIL be open to trade them? Burns IMO is out of our range as far prospects & salary for one year & IMO we couldn't extend him. With Courio breaking into MLB this year, will they want to trade their best CFer in '23? maybe. Brewers had a pretty good BP even after they traded Hader, would they be interested in trading Wilson? maybe. It depends if they like what we have to offer. MIL might want to  recieve a SP, IDK if we have a SP we can offer? IMO they could use a 3B man would they be interested Farmer? IMO they could use a upgrade at 2B, would they be interested in Polanco? IMO there's a lot of questions. 

    Last season Gray, Maeda and Pagan cost the Twins close to 21 million.  Next season they would cost over 47 million.    We can get an Ohtani with that kind of money. But I think that is why the Twins have decided to move on.  

    2 hours ago, rv78 said:

    No, I said, they should have tried extending him for 1 more season. Not 4 or 3 or even 2. Maybe they did and he didn't accept. Do you know if they did or not?

    As @ashbury notes, they essentially did this by making a Qualifying Offer.

    Gray knew he had a multi year deal in front of him. I don’t know what the number is, but I’m guessing a one-year extension had to be at least $30M to get him to even consider taking that in favor of the multi year deal he was going to get.

    4 hours ago, PatG said:

    About Gray, as well as he pitched, the Twins lost about as many games as they won with him on the mound.

    Is it possible to replace Gray and Maeda with D Keuchel, Mahle, Dobson?? Urias from Dodgers?

     

    Severe lack of run support in the 8 losses.

    4 hours ago, Blyleven2011 said:

    Crazy how Kepler is now a fan favorite  again after 2 1/2 years of everyone wanting to trade him 

    Kepler remained a favorite to casual fans.  TD is about the only place where there seemed to be a significant desire that he be shown the door.  

    28 minutes ago, MMMordabito said:

    Kepler remained a favorite to casual fans.  TD is about the only place where there seemed to be a significant desire that he be shown the door.  

    TD is also the only place that would expect a significant return for a trade of Kepler. A replacement in free agency better than Kepler would cost significantly more, Larnach hasn’t shown he can hit major league pitching. That would leave one of the infielders learning how to play outfield. That would likely lead to a weaker outfield defense on a team that tends to have more than average balls heading to the outfield. Perhaps the casual fan is smarter than expected. 

    4 hours ago, rv78 said:

    No, I said, they should have tried extending him for 1 more season. Not 4 or 3 or even 2. Maybe they did and he didn't accept. Do you know if they did or not?

    He wasn't going to do another extension, he did that when traded to the Reds. The first thing he mentioned in his interview with Do Hyoung Park was that he was dead set at getting to free agency for the fist time.

    https://www.mlb.com/news/sonny-gray-on-possible-future-with-twins-before-hitting-free-agency

    “But going into Spring Training this year, [my family] wanted to become a free agent. We wanted to experience that. We wanted to see what it's like. I know how good I am. We want to bet on ourselves, essentially, and I know that I have a whole lot left to give to the baseball world.”

    22 hours ago, Eris said:

    The plan was to develop a pitching pipeline.  Given the cost of acquiring pitching (both via trade and free agency) seems that the original plan is still the way to go. 
     

     

    I think we as fans expected to build a 'pitching pipeline' but with hindsight, I don't believe that was the plan at all. Cleveland, with Falvey there, traded for just about all of their starters when they were still controllable. Which is pretty much exactly what the Twins have done since.

    I wouldn't have previously agreed with that tactic, but it has merit. Pitchers, particularly young ones, are the least predictable players to judge. Trading for them when they are ready or near ready for MLB action is a much safer bet to produce.

    As such, I'd do that again this year.

    6 hours ago, RpR said:

    For 31 years the Twins were also ran or worse; last year they finally go to the post season and won.

    The question is does the Front Office want to keep the paying fans happy and in the stands or are they willing to put out more crap-shoot meh teams and hope the attendance does not suffer too badly.

    Letting top pitching go, it almost points to the latter.🤔

    Bly.2011

    Not every one wanted to dump Kepler, only some very vocal ones.🤔

    I have loved Kepler defense and have always said he has been one of the best right fielders in Twins history  , Oliva was quite good too , cuddyer , Puckett and hunter in between  Oliva and kepler were good but not as good as my two favorite right fielders  ...

    Kepler hitting is why they wanted him dfa'd or traded , he's not a lead off hitter or in the 4th slot in the batting order but has been placed there in the past , place him sixth and he responds better with less pressure  ...

    Seems like a good idea to let a Cy Young Award finalist walk because you think you might be able trade some negligible trade value for a worse starting pitcher.

    What could go wrong there?

    “The plan.”  That makes it sound like they had a choice, or think they can di better than a Cy Young finalist for $25 million.  In reality, they won’t pay the money.  There is no “plan.”  

    2 hours ago, MMMordabito said:

    Kepler remained a favorite to casual fans.  TD is about the only place where there seemed to be a significant desire that he be shown the door.  

    I was just quoting a line of the OP ,,, 

    Kepler's defense was never in question  but his hitting just wasn't productive  ,,, 

    2019 was a career year for Kepler  and 2020 started well  , but batting 1st or 4th in the lineup,  he just didn't belong there , he's more productive in the 6th slot in the batting order with less pressure  ....

    Kepler has been one of the Twins  best rightfielders since Tony  O ...

    Some good ones in between , but Tony O  and kepler were / are the elite right fielders the twins have ever had  and are two of my favorite right fielders in our history ...

    They MIGHT trade one but they won't trade both.  Too much chance of Larnach being Larnach, Kiriloff being injured and Julien being Miranda.  IF all of those things don't happen maybe both are gone by the deadline but they were expected to be gone by the deadline this past year to and that would have been a mistake.

    Here is another thought son the subject.  Paddack is likely to replace and pitch better than Maeda in 100-120 innings next year.  Put Varland in the pen and as an emergency starter and he pitches 70-90 innings of under 3.00 ERA and you now have about 180 innings of the 288 innings of Maeda and Gray already replaced internally.  We just need to replace another 100-120 innings at an ERA of just over 3.00 and we likely come out ahead and at a much lower cost.  Paddack 2.535 million and Varland under 750 k and ? Vs 47 million for the three mentioned earlier.  Surely we can replace this last innings at a reasonable price.

    "Don't get me wrong, I have no problem trading players from an area of depth for areas of need but sometimes and this time in particular the FO needed to change their way of thinking and doing business. Picking up options on 2 players that you have replacements for and letting 2 pitchers walk away that you don't have replacements for maybe was the plan but that is not a good plan. Contracts to players like Buxton, Correa and Gallo are huge over-pays and 2023 proved that. The more I see what this FO does the more I question their plan."

    It is the way to go when the purse strings are controlled by a Pohlad.  That family has a priority of winning on the PROFIT line of the Income Statement; irrespective of what happens on the playing field.  Already saddled with two burdensome contracts for players with (so far) value that doesn't approach their contract values, the business philosophy was totally obvious.  Twenty million for 1 year of two players with tradable value OR $75 million for 3 years of a pitcher who will be 37 yo at the end of the contract and $24 million for 2 years of a pitcher who will be 38 YO at the end of the contract PLUS $16 million for 2 years of an up and down Relief Pitcher who will be 35 YO at the end of that contract.  So, the BOTTOM LINE is:

    TWENTY MILLION OR ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN MILLION.  Remember Team is owned by the Pohlads  OBVIOUS RESULT !!

    11 hours ago, PatG said:

    About Gray, as well as he pitched, the Twins lost about as many games as they won with him on the mound.

    In 2023, the Twins averaged 4.6 runs a game while Pablo Lopez was on the mound. They averaged 4.7 for Joe Ryan.  For Sonny Gray? 3.3 runs.   Imagine that much difference in ERA - you think that might affect how often a good pitcher will get a 'W'?

    After the starter departed the game, the Twins averaged .9 additional runs in Pablo's games, .7 runs for Joe.  In Sonny's games they averaged .4 more runs. So not only were they less likely to support him during his start, but they were less likely to come back to take a lead.

    There needs to be some context when looking at game results for a pitcher.  There's wide variation in what goes on that's out of his hands, unless his name is Shohei and he picks up a bat..

    https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/MIN/2023-pitching.shtml#all_players_starter_pitching

    5 hours ago, old nurse said:

    TD is also the only place that would expect a significant return for a trade of Kepler. A replacement in free agency better than Kepler would cost significantly more, Larnach hasn’t shown he can hit major league pitching. That would leave one of the infielders learning how to play outfield. That would likely lead to a weaker outfield defense on a team that tends to have more than average balls heading to the outfield. Perhaps the casual fan is smarter than expected. 

    Or you bring up a minor leaguer like they did with celestino and wreck them. 

    Jacksson very succinctly defined what life for a Twins fan under Pohlad ownership is like.  When we had the Mauer, Morneau, Santana years we had a team with 2 MVP's and a multi time Cy Young Award winner.  Yet we never made "the big move" to get the team over the hump to go to a World Series and possibly win it.  

    In 1987 they made no such move and still won it.  But they were lucky Vince Coleman was hurt and missed the World Series.  In 1991 they made two key off season acquisitions, Jack Morris and Chili Davis and both came through.  The Pohlad's have never made a trade deadline deal of any great magnitude.  Never a pitcher to be the one-two punch to Santana.  Never the high profile RH hitter to hit between Mauer and Morneau.   

    And if you think of it, The Twins have only ever been run by two families...the Griffith's and the Pohlad's.  Even with Killebrew, Carew and Oliva and Jim Perry (two MVP's and a CY Young winner and a HOF RF) the Twins just couldn't get past the mighty Baltimore Orioles in 1969 & 1970.  The Orioles won 109 games in 1969 and 108 in 1970 (and they "slumped" to 101 in 1971 but still had FOUR 20-game winners).  The Orioles were just better than the Twins, but Calvin never made a big trade for an expensive star in 1969 or 1970 at the deadline.  Off-season 1970 we acquired Luis Tiant and Stan Williams from the Guardians, but Luis was coming off arm problems and wasn't quite healthy yet and we gave up on him too soon.  He ended up with the Red Sox and had a lot of good pitching left in that arm.

    Now, Twins fans see a team with potentially a really good future, coming off a division championship.  In some respects, I don't mind that they let Gray and Maeda walk.  Maeda is on fumes and the Tigers paid him more than I would have, and Gray, while spectacular in a Bert Blyleven sort of way last season will not come close to what he did for the Twins in any of his upcoming 3 years with the Cardinals.  In my opinion, we cut bait at the right time. 

    The problem going forward is what the plan is to fill those holes while dealing with a self imposed cut in payroll?  I maintain that there are trades and signings to be made that not only could enable the Twins to defend their division crown in 2024 and beyond, but also contend for a World Series.  What precisely those moves could be is what we all love to debate day after day here on TD.

    Money is great.  It helps a sports team absorb some of the personnel decisions that go bad.  The Dodgers and Yankees among a few others have that luxury.  Teams like the Twins, Cleveland, Milwaukee or the Reds give themselves very thin margins.  Could the Twins allow themselves a little bit more of a margin compared to the teams I just mentioned?  Absolutely!!  But the wealthy Pohlad's by choice do not.   

    One team that to me appears to have tremendous potential and is on the verge of being a dominant power for several years is Seattle.  They have a bona fide superstar in Julio Rodriguez.  Twins fans "hope" that Lewis or Jenkins (or both) could be that guy.  The Mariners are flush with pitching, some established, most of it young and controllable.  As thirsty as virtually every other team in MLB is for pitching, the Mariners are a lemonade stand in the middle of the desert.  And they have both the reigning N.L. Cy Young Award winner (Blake Snell) and the hottest pitching prospect since Ohtani (Yoshi Yamamoto) clamoring to sign with them (provided the dollars are commensurate with the market).  Even Shohei Ohtani has mentioned he'd be interested in playing for them.  They are NOT the Dodgers or Yankees.  How much money can Seattle afford to shell out?  They're suddenly the prettiest girl in school and prom is just around the corner.

    As much as I'm curious to see what the Twins will do, I can't wait to see what the Mariners decide to do.  

    I can't believe I'm saying this, but in some ways it must be excruciating to be a Mariners fan right now.  SO MUCH POTENTIAL !!  But how to maximize it?

    Of course their plan was to let them walk, but it does not imply that their plans also include going after an upgrade in pitching. It could simply be a money dump. I'm skeptical that it is not that to be honest. I hope that my inclination is wrong, but I don't see clues pointing towards landing an upgrade at this point.

    9 minutes ago, Aerodeliria said:

    Of course their plan was to let them walk, but it does not imply that their plans also include going after an upgrade in pitching. It could simply be a money dump. I'm skeptical that it is not that to be honest. I hope that my inclination is wrong, but I don't see clues pointing towards landing an upgrade at this point.

    Getting it right ... Hitting on the upgrade ...

    Something needs to be addressed on pitching and they can't use payroll as an excuse ... 

    The fans aren't accepting that while 2023  had the pitching that took them to the playoffs ...

    22 hours ago, Fatbat said:

    @tony&rodney I agree that Paddock has a higher ceiling than Maeda which is why they let him walk butI would have offered him the QO to get either the extra draft pic and extra signing $$$or the stability of less player turnover.  The FO chose the cheap option by letting him walk for nothing safe budget saving. 

    The Twins signed Chris Paddack to a three year contract after he was injured, which was shortly after he arrived via trade.

    I believe I stated that Paddack is being counted on next season to provide 100-120 innings if everything goes perfectly. I do not believe Paddack has a higher ceiling than Kenta Maeda. Paddack has more velocity on his fastball, but it is quite a stretch to see Paddack having a career as effective as the one achieved by Kenta Maeda. To be clear, Chris Paddack can still have a fine career and I hope he blows by any and all markers already achieved by Maeda. This is, however, a hope for the future.

    16 hours ago, Jacksson said:

    "Don't get me wrong, I have no problem trading players from an area of depth for areas of need but sometimes and this time in particular the FO needed to change their way of thinking and doing business. Picking up options on 2 players that you have replacements for and letting 2 pitchers walk away that you don't have replacements for maybe was the plan but that is not a good plan. Contracts to players like Buxton, Correa and Gallo are huge over-pays and 2023 proved that. The more I see what this FO does the more I question their plan."

    It is the way to go when the purse strings are controlled by a Pohlad.  That family has a priority of winning on the PROFIT line of the Income Statement; irrespective of what happens on the playing field.  Already saddled with two burdensome contracts for players with (so far) value that doesn't approach their contract values, the business philosophy was totally obvious.  Twenty million for 1 year of two players with tradable value OR $75 million for 3 years of a pitcher who will be 37 yo at the end of the contract and $24 million for 2 years of a pitcher who will be 38 YO at the end of the contract PLUS $16 million for 2 years of an up and down Relief Pitcher who will be 35 YO at the end of that contract.  So, the BOTTOM LINE is:

    TWENTY MILLION OR ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN MILLION.  Remember Team is owned by the Pohlads  OBVIOUS RESULT !!

    Always sad to read the comments of someone obviously too young to remember the state of the Twins BEFORE the Pohland's bought it.

    7 hours ago, old nurse said:

    Hard to wreck something that was never there 

    When a player is brought up with limited high minors experience, fails and then never does put it together, there is no way to know if the handling of said player caused the outcome. 

    4 hours ago, wabene said:

    When a player is brought up with limited high minors experience, fails and then never does put it together, there is no way to know if the handling of said player caused the outcome. 

    Your argument could be made for any minor league player. The outcome would be supported by data as to what his ceiling would be. A ground ball hitter with no power. Adequate fielding but not spectacular. That is what he is and the Twins did not wreck that as far as further development, he would need to have a pretty big uptick to be viable as anything but a defensive replacement. 

    50 minutes ago, old nurse said:

    Your argument could be made for any minor league player. The outcome would be supported by data as to what his ceiling would be. A ground ball hitter with no power. Adequate fielding but not spectacular. That is what he is and the Twins did not wreck that as far as further development, he would need to have a pretty big uptick to be viable as anything but a defensive replacement. 

    A hard look at Cele's minor league career statistics confirms that you are correct, 👍




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...