Justin Upton Time?

Anaheim is pretty laid back here so i doubt a change of scenery will do too much.  maybe just a different place. I do think i prefer Upton to our in house options right now.  at least on a platoon basis with Arreaz.

Arraez's defensive numbers in LF are about the same and his bat is definitely better.  I'd be in no hustle to sign Upton.

Angels weren't even considering him in OF more of a 1B/ DH type, just what we need to continue to hoard these type and his hitting is pretty bad. Absolutely No Thanks! 

Our present OF depth is pretty thin especially CF although I love Gordon's hustle and Celestino's glove. I'd still like to see Celestino have more ABs in AAA and I'm not sure if Larnach's bat is ready and his glove is not great. Kiriloff is down heaven forbid if Buxton or even Kepler would go down even for a short time.

I've been advocating for 3 years for  quality depth in CF while yet having some respectability on the corners. I'd like to see a MLB ready CF who can hit LHP. I know some are tired of my harping but I'll continue to do so until something is done or Celestino is completely ready (which I hope is soon).

Quote

can't we believe the same thing about Upton getting out from the terrible contract

What's terrible about that contract for Justin Upton? He was getting paid $28M this season. I'd say that was an awesome contract situation for him.

Is he better than adding Kyle Garlick to the roster? Probably not.

I see no space for Upton.  He hits lefties fine still at this point in career, but negative against righties, and in the field.  So the only positive you get is the few times he would play against left handed pitchers for the maybe 2 to 3 at bats he gets that game.  Why would you use up a valuable roster spot on a guy with very limited times he would be better than a replacement player? 

12 minutes ago, DocBauer said:

I can only assume they were going to drop someone no matter what for Upton/Garlick and promoted Rodriguez for a day or two as an extra arm before also being dropped.

I think this is the case. Nobody is grabbing Rodriguez on waivers so he's a safe add/drop.

It’s worth taking a shot at. Upton will be cheap and the Twins could use another Outfielder for depth. Use Upton as a lefty platoon with Trevor Larnach/Max Kepler and a DH option for the time being. If he doesn’t perform, oh well. DFA him and move on

In my opinion, there is nothing Upton does better than Garlick. Garlick stepped in in CF when Buxton was hurt and while it wasn't great, it wasn't terrible either. Garlick is slightly above average playing corner OF, and demolishes lefties. Upton is below average everywhere, and while I know he is a bench player at this point, I still would prefer that we pass on him. On a different note, Garlick would've been nice to have up for this Dodgers to see if he could crack Heaney or Kersh.

HARD PASS!!

I'm down on Upton. Just doesn't look like he can hit much any longer, can't play in the OF worth a damn...why give a roster spot to him? Seems more likely a fit for a National League team looking for a platoon bat to DH and maybe backup a little at 1B. Doesn't look like a bounce-back candidate to me: Sanchez is a different case: younger, was becoming the poster boy for failure in NYC, better positional flexibility.

Upton doesn't look any better than Garlick to me. 

21 hours ago, USAFChief said:

 

The better question is why this FO didn't try to address this question previously. 

 

Agreed. The Front Office (and many Twins fans it seems) appeared to be operating under the foregone conclusion that Alex Kirilloff was a set-it-and-forget-it part of the OF this year. Remember when the Twins gave up Eddie Rosario the FO convinced themselves and many fans that AK was just going to pick up the slack? Ridiculous.

And going into 2022 did nobody ask themselves "Hmmm, I wonder if maybe a 2nd year player who hasn't played in 9 months, coming off a chronic injury might not be that good and/or reliable?"

I'd frankly take Garlick over Upton right now, but the Twins are going to have to address this problem rather than try and fix it with bubble gum and duct tape. Larnach isn't the answer, he's looking at a Chris Parmalee ceiling at this point in his career. His window seems to have passed.

2 minutes ago, bighat said:

Larnach isn't the answer, he's looking at a Chris Parmalee ceiling at this point in his career. His window seems to have passed.

This is going to be a fun quote to dig out 5 years from now for somebody.