Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • You are currently reading exclusive Twins Daily Caretaker content.

    Ranking the Twins' 10 Most Valuable Trade Candidates


    Nick Nelson

    If the Twins are thinking ambitiously about trade targets this offseason, these are the types of players they'll need to consider parting with.

    Twins Video

    Here in the month of November, Twins Daily is providing offseason preview coverage with a phased thematic approach. Last week we took a deep dive on free agency possibilities; this week we're shining the spotlight inward with a focus on players currently in the Twins organization and how they might factor into the team's plans.

    Along with articles on the site that will explore this focus from every angle, we're also releasing a new section of the 2024 Offseason Handbook for TD Caretakers, which includes Seth's breakdown of organizational depth at every position, and a story from me ranking the 10 players in Twins organization who best blend tradeability with trade value.

    If you use the coupon code 2024HANDBOOK at checkout, all Caretaker packages are 25% off!

    You can read an excerpt from that story here, or become a Caretaker to access the whole thing! (If you are a Caretaker, you can scroll to the bottom of this page to download the full PDF for the chapter.)


    The Twins front office has not been shy about swinging big trades and giving up high-profile talent in the process. In the past we've seen them trade top pitching prospects Brusdar Graterol and Chase Petty to acquire frontline starters, and more recently, they gave up cherished team fixture Luis Arraez in the Pablo Lopez swap.

    These moves involved some painful losses, but they were also responsible for shaping the league-leading 2023 rotation. As the Twins endeavor to fill key gaps left in their starting pitching corps this offseason, history tells us there's a good chance they'll turn to the trade market.

    The other factor at play: Minnesota has a lot of players in the mix who look like plausible trade candidates. To their credit, the front office has built up some redundancies, or at least reasonable depth, to make certain quality players less essential to the future. 

    The Twins have productive veterans they could be motivated to deal, as well as elite prospects they could use to aim exceptionally high in their hunt for controllable frontline pitching. 

    Here's my take on 10 players who could realistically be traded this offseason, in order of how much value they might bring back by my estimation. 

    I didn't include players who have no-trade clauses (Correa, Buxton) or players who I simply could not imagine being traded (Jeffers, MLB starting pitchers). I also didn't include players who are candidates to be traded, but have mostly neutral value because of their salaries (Farmer, Vazquez).

    1. Brooks Lee, 3B

    Lee is not the Twins' top prospect, according to TD's rankings, but I do think he is their most valuable and viable trade chip. He's a truly elite prospect in the game – 18th overall in the season-ending MLB Pipeline rankings – and he is pretty clearly major-league ready or very close. Turning 23 next spring, Lee will be a cheap, controllable regular for years to come. He's established a solid floor while still offering an All-Star level ceiling. This blend of qualities makes him highly appealing to a wide range of rebuilding and contending teams. 

    Placing Lee at the center of a trade package would put the Twins in the conversation for almost any hypothetical high-end pitcher on the market. And while losing him obviously would not be fun, we already find ourselves talking about how to make room for him in a crowded Twins infield next year.

    2. Emmanuel Rodriguez, OF

    Rodriguez is not quite the same caliber of prospect as Walker Jenkins (below), in absolute terms. However, I do think he has a special sort of intrigue that could make him alluring to front offices enamored by his rare skill set.

    To be clear, E-Rod's game is not without known flaws. He has a lot of swing-and-miss in his plate approach, with a 30% K-rate in three minor-league seasons helping contribute to a .242 batting average. He's also had some injury issues. But the corresponding strengths really jump out at you. He's a speedy, lefty-swinging center fielder whose power is uncommon and whose patience is almost unheard of. The 20-year-old has an absurd 21.3% career walk rate in the minors. While constantly facing more advanced competition, he has gotten on base more than 41% of the time.

    After leading the High-A Midwest League in OPS and finishing second in wOBA, Rodriguez is flying high, ready to tackle Double-A. His relative proximity to the majors adds to his value from a trade acquisition standpoint. 

    3. Walker Jenkins, OF

    If the Twins were to make their newly drafted top prospect available in trades, they could get a haul. And technically, that is an option on the table. An MLB rule change in 2015 made it so teams can trade draft picks in the same year they were selected, which was previously prohibited. Jenkins was a consensus top-five talent in a loaded draft, and followed up with an emphatic pro debut that puts him in the discussion as a top 10 global prospect.

    Still, it seems really unlikely the Twins would shop him already. And even if they did, any club drawn to his immense upside would also have to grapple with an added level of uncertainty compared to Lee and Rodriguez. Jenkins has played 26 total pro games and is likely multiple years away from the majors, even in a favorable scenario.

    Then again, when you're talking about the #16 prospect in baseball (per MLB Pipeline), you're talking about gargantuan trade capital.

    MORE FROM TWINS DAILY
    — Latest Twins coverage from our writers
    — Recent Twins discussion in our forums
    — Follow Twins Daily via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a Twins Daily Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    Julien is at least 6th on this list. Certainly ahead of Kepler and Polanco. I'd argue that Miranda, Larnach, Jax and Kirilloff would all slot higher in value as well despite struggles. Years of control is a multipler.

    Kepler and Polanco are stuck in the limbo zone of too good and too cheap. They can't bring enough value to be traded and their production is too good to be backfilled easily. They both break camp with the Twins.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This is a solid list and the Twins need to give trades some serious consideration, both for on the field reasons and for 40 man logjam reasons down the road.  I would likely include Eduard Julien on the list as well. 

    My first thought is that one of Lee, Julien, and Polanco will be traded -- especially if the team isn't sure that Byron Buxton won't be clogging up the DH spot.  These three guys seem destined for the same spot in the field and all have pretty serious trade value, from prospect hype to young controllability to veteran presence.  Who gets traded depends on who the target is and what the situation is for the other team. A team in win now mode takes Polanco, but a team trying to build a core takes Julien or Lee. IF we trade for a young-ish controllable starter, one of these guys is the headliner on the trade.

    My second thought is that Duran probably isn't this high on the list. Make no mistake, he's an awesome relief pitcher. For the most part, however, guys who are "just" a relief pitcher don't tend to be headliners in a trade.  I'm also not sure that the league is that sold on Wallner.  He could be really good, but he doesn't look like as much of a sure thing as Royce Lewis or Eduard Julien.

    I don't think the Twins trade Festa or Raya either. They've worked pretty hard to try to develop some pitching in the system and these guys both look like they could be solid MLB starters down the road.

    With the consternation over the budget for 2024, it would seem that trading is definitely on the table for the offseason.  I for one am completely a fan of trades - especially ones that can be win-win situations like the Arraez/Lopez trade. Let's sit back and hopefully watch something happen. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting list.  Like Jocko87, I would put Julien on the list somewhere in the top 6 or 7 (I am curious why you left him out, Nick), and I think Jenkins would bring back more than Rodriguez.  I think Jenkins is being viewed by a lot of baseball gurus as someone who could be a top 5 prospect in all of baseball by the end of the summer.  Kepler is an interesting case.  The question trade partners may have is whether he will be the player he was last summer, or more like the guy from the previous couple of years.  Still, his defense would be a positive.  Kirilloff simply has too many health issues to be on the list.  Raya is interesting as he has pitched a total of only 127 innings in two years.  I think he is one real strong minor league season with 90-100 innings away from being in top 10.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Who/what are we trading for? Prospects?

    Nobody is trading a decent pitcher for anyone we would part with - unless multiple guys from us.

    Real trade pieces & why:

    Polanco - lack of availability & cost relative to internal options

    Rodriguez - Jenkins is right behind him

    Julien - defense lacking?

    Wallner - lots of K’s?

    None of the pitchers named above are going anywhere.

    Sands - Moran - Headrick - Balazovic are all guys we could pair with a couple bats to do something positive. We NEED to clear 40 man space.

    Polanco - Miranda - Larnach - Gordon - Rodriguez 

    The Milwaukee staff has 4-5 guys to consider a trade for with varying control. Relief studs & impact starters. Williams in our Pen & Varland back to rotation seems feasible.

    Polanco - Larnach - Moran for Devin Williams? Better package for 1 year of Corbin Burnes? I don’t see any non-contender taking on Polanco’s salary.

    How about Polanco - Sands - Miranda & maybe Gordon for another Miami arm? Luzardo & the rookie are untouchable but there may be more there? They are down Alcantara to surgery so they may be too thin? They still need offense & Sands may help ease some depth issues?

    Milwaukee seems to be the best partner but we’ll have to overpay with controllable potential. They have worthwhile pitching!

    Rodriguez - Polanco - Miranda - Moran - Gordon for Burnes & Williams………..couple potential cheap bats that have upside after injury’s in ‘23. A big time power prospect! A solid guy to plug existing hole at 2B. An upside pitcher to work with maybe………….. Sands/Moran/Rodriguez/Miranda/Gordon if they don’t want the Polanco cost?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Add me to the chorus of 'why not Julien' from a trade chip perspective. On the plus side of value, he had a nice rookie year at the MLB level, so he jumps some of the players where it is conjecture as to whether they can hit MLB pitching. He also does well in the OBP area, and there is some pop to his bat. Plus, he's controllable. The downside is defense - and the Twins' log jam of players who might conceivably play 2B, which is still his natural position. That said, for a team looking for offense at that position, he should be plenty interesting as a trade chip. I would slot him at 6 as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Polanco, if they like, Winder - Moran - Sands - Rodriguez - Miranda - Larnach………..6 potential solid contributors and 5 under team control…….,couple former top prospects & a new power bat with potential!!

    Three arms to help fill the void left in the trade. Jorge Polanco…….they may use in an additional trade? Opens some slots on our 40 man as well. 

    For:

    Corbin Burnes & Devin Williams.

    They want to rebuild & shed salary - could be ideal!

    Burnes as a 1 year rental with Williams for a couple years………add them to our staff & we’re elite!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, JD-TWINS said:

    Polanco, if they like, Winder - Moran - Sands - Rodriguez - Miranda - Larnach………..6 potential solid contributors and 5 under team control…….,couple former top prospects & a new power bat with potential!!

    Three arms to help fill the void left in the trade. Jorge Polanco…….they may use in an additional trade? Opens some slots on our 40 man as well. 

    For:

    Corbin Burnes & Devin Williams.

    They want to rebuild & shed salary - could be ideal!

    Burnes as a 1 year rental with Williams for a couple years………add them to our staff & we’re elite!

    The only player here that would pique my interest as a GM is Rodriguez - the rest are marginal prospects/major leaguers. Miranda was hurt/ineffective last year, Larnach is a replacement player, WAR-wise. Winder, Moran, and Sands are probably the 12th or 13th pitcher on a MLB staff.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, RJA said:

    Interesting list.  Like Jocko87, I would put Julien on the list somewhere in the top 6 or 7 (I am curious why you left him out, Nick), and I think Jenkins would bring back more than Rodriguez.  I think Jenkins is being viewed by a lot of baseball gurus as someone who could be a top 5 prospect in all of baseball by the end of the summer.  Kepler is an interesting case.  The question trade partners may have is whether he will be the player he was last summer, or more like the guy from the previous couple of years.  Still, his defense would be a positive.  Kirilloff simply has too many health issues to be on the list.  Raya is interesting as he has pitched a total of only 127 innings in two years.  I think he is one real strong minor league season with 90-100 innings away from being in top 10.  

    I can’t speak for Nick, but I feel that Julien is just scratching the surface and is, perhaps along with Lewis, the best offensive talent the Twins have. His incredible control of the strike zone and his consistent swing with power are a rare combination. For me, he is untouchable. The player, along with Lewis, that you build your franchise around. He’s the AB in the Twins order that I get most amped for!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, arby58 said:

    Add me to the chorus of 'why not Julien' from a trade chip perspective. On the plus side of value, he had a nice rookie year at the MLB level, so he jumps some of the players where it is conjecture as to whether they can hit MLB pitching. He also does well in the OBP area, and there is some pop to his bat. Plus, he's controllable. The downside is defense - and the Twins' log jam of players who might conceivably play 2B, which is still his natural position. That said, for a team looking for offense at that position, he should be plenty interesting as a trade chip. I would slot him at 6 as well.

    I assume you observed Julien’s vast improvement at 2B. I think he improved to a solid MLB 2nd baseman. Those "in the know" said he worked incredibly hard on his defense and it showed. He made a gold glove level play late in the season on a sensational leaping catch of a high line drive headed for a hit to the outfield. For me, he’s the player you build your future around. And, barring injury, Lewis.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    43 minutes ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    I hate the caretaker stuff.  Whats the point,  don't put it as a main article if everyone cannot read what the point of the article is.  Have a caretake section and move on.  

    I was perplexed as to why the article just suddenly quit after three players.

    I understand the need for the caretaker concept but I’m a 61 year Twins fan who just reached retirement age and took social security and retired 4-5 years early. Except for small royalties from my music and book, I live totally on SS (which is 1/4 of my previous working wage), which means you can’t afford to pay for Twins content.

    In fact, I gravitated to Twins Daily because the Star Tribune was pillaging my pocketbook and the Pioneer Press was not much better. I can’t subscribe to them and every other newspaper that I would like to read from that makes me pay a subscription fee to read even one article.

    That said, TD is excellent. That’s my starting point.

    It’s just disappointing to read the comments of my fellow Twins fans mentioning Julien and Wallner without having read past #3.

    Perhaps TD could consider an affordable deal for the fans that started following the Twins from 1961 to 196x and have a genuine need. That’s how I got in on the Athletic, a ridiculously low entry point, might have been 99 cents a month.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    25 minutes ago, Greglw3 said:

    I can’t speak for Nick, but I feel that Julien is just scratching the surface and is, perhaps along with Lewis, the best offensive talent the Twins have. His incredible control of the strike zone and his consistent swing with power are a rare combination. For me, he is untouchable. The player, along with Lewis, that you build your franchise around. He’s the AB in the Twins order that I get most amped for!

    But if that was true he would be very highly ranked in a trade value column.  While I do agree that he has significant skills I don't think he's just scratching the surface.  He's closer to his ceiling than anyone on the list.  He's kinda a sell high guy for me.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the comments! There are several on Julien. To be honest I thought hard about ranking but ultimately edged him more toward the "will not get traded" category - I think if they deal anyone to clear the 2B logjam, Polanco or Lee are far more likely. I do think he'd probably fit in around 5th/6th on this list.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm not a big fan of the caretaker stuff either, so I'm commenting without seeing the entire list.  Was either Ryan or Ober included on this list?  They should be.

    I'm all in favor of trading for Corbin Burnes.  But any deal involving him has to be approached with a good idea we sign him for another 4-5 years.  With all the young position player talent we have and what's soon to come up, the Twins are in a unique position to pay for elite pitching at the top of their rotation and afford it for the next 4-5 years.

    I'm not trading Jenkins for anything.  I'd think long and hard about Rodriguez depending on what I was getting back.  Polanco is a spare part, but the opinion of Lee & Julien being duplicative is a good one.  Does Lewis ever play SS?  How long does Correa have before he would need to shift to 3B?  Are either Lewis or Lee good enough to replace Correa at SS once Carlos moves to 3B?  And finally, where does Julien fit in all of this?  Could he transition to 1B?  If he does, and you have Kepler for the short term (one more season at the longest) as well as Wallner, Em-Rod, Kirilloff and Jenkins, not to mention Larnach, left to play 2 corner OF spots.  And Larnach still has more trade value right now than Polanco, Miranda and Kirilloff and Kepler.  I'm trading larnach to somebody this winter.  Maybe to Miami for Cabrera.  

    Clearly, trades need to made and 40-man roster spots opened up.  If Ryan and Ober weren't included on the list, why not?  I'm in favor of dealing Ryan who I don't think will ever develop into a #2 or #3 but could still be a decent, and for the time being cost efficient pitcher.  But the Twins are looking a a solid 5-year window if they make the right choices this winter.  I'd rather have guys like Burnes, Montas or Giolito in my rotation going forward than wondering which version of Ryan shows up first half/second half or week to week.    

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Greglw3 said:

    I was perplexed as to why the article just suddenly quit after three players.

    I understand the need for the caretaker concept but I’m a 61 year Twins fan who just reached retirement age and took social security and retired 4-5 years early. Except for small royalties from my music and book, I live totally on SS (which is 1/4 of my previous working wage), which means you can’t afford to pay for Twins content.

    In fact, I gravitated to Twins Daily because the Star Tribune was pillaging my pocketbook and the Pioneer Press was not much better. I can’t subscribe to them and every other newspaper that I would like to read from that makes me pay a subscription fee to read even one article.

    That said, TD is excellent. That’s my starting point.

    It’s just disappointing to read the comments of my fellow Twins fans mentioning Julien and Wallner without having read past #3.

    Perhaps TD could consider an affordable deal for the fans that started following the Twins from 1961 to 196x and have a genuine need. That’s how I got in on the Athletic, a ridiculously low entry point, might have been 99 cents a month.

     

     

    1 hour ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    I hate the caretaker stuff.  Whats the point,  don't put it as a main article if everyone cannot read what the point of the article is.  Have a caretake section and move on.  

    I was kinda wondering the same thing.  I'm a caretaker so it appears different to me.  Now I'm discussing an article with someone who hasn't read the article?  No offense to non-caretakers but we get plenty of talking past each other because we aren't reading each others posts but now we are discussing stuff people can't read if if they were inclined.  Odd. 

    I'm a caretaker because the ad load is insane if not.  I'd be a fan of a caretaker only forum but now that I know most of this discussion is with people who haven't read it there isn't much reason to interact with it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    10 minutes ago, Jocko87 said:

    But if that was true he would be very highly ranked in a trade value column.  While I do agree that he has significant skills I don't think he's just scratching the surface.  He's closer to his ceiling than anyone on the list.  He's kinda a sell high guy for me.

    We agree to disagree.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, Nick Nelson said:

    Thanks for the comments! There are several on Julien. To be honest I thought hard about ranking but ultimately edged him more toward the "will not get traded" category - I think if they deal anyone to clear the 2B logjam, Polanco or Lee are far more likely. I do think he'd probably fit in around 5th/6th on this list.

    What puts Julien in the will not get traded category?  Especially ahead of Lee, where I would value them exactly opposite.  Lee is far more valuable in general but even more valuable to a team like the Twins.  They can't afford to throw their lot in with one tool players, not matter how good that tool might be.  Lee playing solid defense at 3 infield positions and not having to be platooned as a switch hitter makes his floor closer to Juliens ceiling as an all around ball player. 

    Add that to the example of trading Julien 1.0 last season I think he is among the most likely to be traded, which is another column.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was one of the 1st ones who advocated trading Arraez (not because I didn't like Arraez, on the contrary I like him very much, but it made a lot of sense to better the team). A ton of members diagreed with me but it turned out to be the greatest deal this FO has done.

    The suggestion I'd suggest a ton of members will disagree with me. And that is Jeffers. I know Vazquez has helped Jeffers a lot & the pitchers I believe like him but IMO Jeffers has peaked his value will never be this high again. There'd be a lot of teams interested in him.

    I see him regressing this coming year. And instead of having 3 up & down averageish years of Jeffers then years of absolute drought because we have no one in the system that comes close to stand out. We can go out & get an elite MLB ready catching prospect for 6+ competitive years. Vazquez has served his purpose last year but we still have 2 yrs of him. Why not take advantage of Vazquez's experience to mentor this prospect these 2 remaining years because Vazquez is untradable anyway. We can use Jeffers to get a SP we need. I'm not only looking at this coming season but many coming years. 

    Actually, I advocated something like this last offseason but with the addition of Vazquez & the rocket of Jeffers's value it makes more sense.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Lee and Julien should be considered integral in building on this year’s youth movement, especially given the uncertain salary situation. Both along with Jenkins should be untouchable in a trade. Julien should get better at defense if he puts in the work. But Larnach and Wallner could be valuable assets in a trade because of their power, with both being at least average position players with good arms. Miranda is a bounce back candidate, but wouldn’t draw much trade interest. Polanco and Kepler could both be on the move to save money, though Polanco is still the better hitter historically, and he might still be with the team in 2024. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Nick Nelson said:

    Thanks for the comments! There are several on Julien. To be honest I thought hard about ranking but ultimately edged him more toward the "will not get traded" category - I think if they deal anyone to clear the 2B logjam, Polanco or Lee are far more likely. I do think he'd probably fit in around 5th/6th on this list.

    Thanks for responding.  I guess I am confused about the list.  Frankly, I don't think there is any chance the Twins will trade either Lewis or Julien, or Duran for that matter, but if Lewis and Duran are on the list, I don't think you can say Julien shouldn't be as well.  I don't think he is more untouchable than Lewis.  Love your stuff.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    I hate the caretaker stuff.  Whats the point,  don't put it as a main article if everyone cannot read what the point of the article is.  Have a caretake section and move on.  

    A bean counter doesn’t understand sales pitches?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Agree with the room on Julien's value. Agree otherwise with the list, and with the premise that if you want a clear star, you are not getting them by packaging the sweepings of our 40-man (Larnach, Winder, Sands, Moran) or players with a lot of recent injury history (Kirilloff, Miranda), or even players with ups/downs and/or injury (Kepler, Polanco), though some of these might work for lesser deals. It is why I'd keep Polo and Max (and move Jorge toward 1B more than Julien).

    As to the Caretaker thing, exposing enough of that content to tease prospective buyers and give a sense of what is available behind the paywall is a great way to make sales. To answer one suggestion, there IS actually a Caretaker site within TD. For those who want a low cost option, Silver Caretaker is less than $4.25 a month for year-round professional content about our favorite team, and right now there is a 25% off sale going on. This site is what it is (a place I visit all year, and live on at times of the year), because there are professionals working here in tandem with great fans. That takes money, and unsupported sites are the ones that one day just aren't there. (FYI, I don't work for TD or really know anyone that does. Just love the site.)

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    I hate the caretaker stuff.  Whats the point,  don't put it as a main article if everyone cannot read what the point of the article is.  Have a caretake section and move on.  

    Definitely a strange format. It seems to encourage comments without reading the whole article.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, old nurse said:

    A bean counter doesn’t understand sales pitches?

    I understand the idea.  However, I am part of other sports forums.  Most have a set up where there is a premium board and premium articles.  You can't read any of the premium articles unless a member and the discussion occurs in the premium forum.  This set up is just weird, I begin reading an article,  realize I have wasted my time, and then I can try to have a discussion with a 1/3 of the information available or move on.    

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have no interest in trading Lee, Rodriguez, Jenkins, Lewis, or Julien.  I think it would be a mistake to move so much future talent that could extend the current open window.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Greglw3 said:

    I was perplexed as to why the article just suddenly quit after three players.

    I understand the need for the caretaker concept but I’m a 61 year Twins fan who just reached retirement age and took social security and retired 4-5 years early. Except for small royalties from my music and book, I live totally on SS (which is 1/4 of my previous working wage), which means you can’t afford to pay for Twins content.

    In fact, I gravitated to Twins Daily because the Star Tribune was pillaging my pocketbook and the Pioneer Press was not much better. I can’t subscribe to them and every other newspaper that I would like to read from that makes me pay a subscription fee to read even one article.

    That said, TD is excellent. That’s my starting point.

    It’s just disappointing to read the comments of my fellow Twins fans mentioning Julien and Wallner without having read past #3.

    Perhaps TD could consider an affordable deal for the fans that started following the Twins from 1961 to 196x and have a genuine need. That’s how I got in on the Athletic, a ridiculously low entry point, might have been 99 cents a month.

     

    That fixed income is definitely a bitch.  I did the caretaker thing this year but I probably won't renew.  My property taxes just took a big leap upwards and the money is better spent elsewhere.  A lot of the caretaker-only articles were heavily data centered which I don't understand or find interesting.  I'm about ten years your senior and I really like your idea of a senior discount.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 hours ago, Jocko87 said:

    Julien is at least 6th on this list. Certainly ahead of Kepler and Polanco. I'd argue that Miranda, Larnach, Jax and Kirilloff would all slot higher in value as well despite struggles. Years of control is a multipler.

    Kepler and Polanco are stuck in the limbo zone of too good and too cheap. They can't bring enough value to be traded and their production is too good to be backfilled easily. They both break camp with the Twins.

     I think you trade Polanco and Kepler for lower returns than they really deserve, in order to create playing time for young guys and also to free up dollars for the likes of Burnes, Gray, Nola, etc.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    22 hours ago, Greglw3 said:

    I assume you observed Julien’s vast improvement at 2B. I think he improved to a solid MLB 2nd baseman. Those "in the know" said he worked incredibly hard on his defense and it showed. He made a gold glove level play late in the season on a sensational leaping catch of a high line drive headed for a hit to the outfield. For me, he’s the player you build your future around. And, barring injury, Lewis.

    If they keep Julien, they may as well trade Lee - only so much infield positions to go around, unless they decide to revisit the 'Lewis in centerfield' experiment. The advantages for Lee is he's a better defensive player (Julien's improvement notwithstanding), he's a switch hitter, and he's a couple years younger. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This may sound odd, but of the players Brooks Lee may offer you the best return.  He is rated highly.  Now he does offer better defense than Julien, however Julien has outperformed him at every level on an OBP and OPS standard and they have been on very similar tracks.   Unless someone were to want to way overpay for Julien,  those 2 likely offer your best trade value.  I see Lee as a good player in MLB but never elite, above average defense good contact hitter.   

    Lee, Julien and Jenkins are the organizations most valuable assets,  along with Pablo Lopez (but you wouldn't want to trade him).   You have several other depth pieces for infield, Polanco, Severino, Keaschall, Schobel.   You have to assume we will be trade a couple of our prospects.  The other player who likely offers a very good return is Soto and likely even higher than Raya.  Similar to a situation like the Reds, if you have a team that was very high on him,  they would be willing to give a cost controlled #2 pitcher for a couple years in exchange for the possibility at a high end starter.  

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...