Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Pelfrey needs a big start


Recommended Posts

Posted

I think Pelfrey needs a big start tonight. If he has another short start, he needs to go to the pen. The Twins need to win games and not worry about preserving his marginal trade value.

 

I think he will step up tonight. If not, May needs to take his spot after the break.

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Not the first time, but Molitor feels forced to go with the starters late because of his lack of bullpen options. Pelfrey gave up three well-hit balls in the eighth, not unlike the start he made (and lost) the White Sox.

Provisional Member
Posted

 

Not the first time, but Molitor feels forced to go with the starters late because of his lack of bullpen options. Pelfrey gave up three well-hit balls in the eighth, not unlike the start he made (and lost) the White Sox.

 

Absolutely. Would have been nice to have a reliable lefty to start the 8th, or a reliable righty to face Kinsler.

Posted

I think Pelfrey extended his stay in the rotation with the pretty good outing against a good-hitting team. The bullpen has issues and needs help. Pelf hasn't been able to rise to the occasion late when trying to get the extra out. Not blaming him totally, but he shouldn't be in that situation again.

Posted

 

I think Pelfrey extended his stay in the rotation with the pretty good outing against a good-hitting team. The bullpen has issues and needs help. Pelf hasn't been able to rise to the occasion late when trying to get the extra out. Not blaming him totally, but he shouldn't be in that situation again.

I don't fault a guy for starting to struggle in the eighth inning. That's when the bullpen should step into the game and shut it down. That's their job.

Posted

He gave up 4 runs.......that's.....mediocre. He was in the game, you can't say "it wouldn't have happened if.....". It did happen.

 

that said, FREE TREVOR MAY....if he's in the pen, he should be in there for the 8th, imo.

 

Community Moderator
Posted

 

He gave up 4 runs.......that's.....mediocre. He was in the game, you can't say "it wouldn't have happened if.....". It did happen.

 

that said, FREE TREVOR MAY....if he's in the pen, he should be in there for the 8th, imo.

 

I thought it was pretty good start from Pelfrey.  He should have never been out there in the 8th inning, and really should have never been in there to face Gose.  Leadoff single, O'Rourke should have come in to face the lefty.  He really, really shouldn't have been left in after Gose squared one up on him either.  I will take 7 innings and 2 ER ball from Pelfrey anyday.  The offensive let them team down in this one.  They had Price on the ropes in the first 3 innings and failed to come away with anything.  

Old-Timey Member
Posted

Pelf earned himself anoth start or two. He wasn't the reason the twins lost, that's for sure.

Posted

 

He gave up 4 runs.......that's.....mediocre.

He should have given up three runs. If the bullpen is called upon to get a single out with a runner on second, it's their job to execute that task.

 

As we've seen far too often in the past month, the Twins offense and bullpen failed to come through with a win after the starter did his job.

 

Whether Pelfrey should have been out there for the eighth or not, if a guy pitches 7 2/3 innings and allows three runs, the team should win that game.

Posted

 

He should have given up three runs. If the bullpen is called upon to get a single guy out with a runner on second, it's their job to execute that task.

 

As we've seen far too often in the past month, the Twins offense and bullpen failed to come through with a win after the starter did their job.

 

Whether Pelfrey should have been out there for the eighth or not, if a guy pitches 7 2/3 innings and allows three runs, the team should win that game.

Putting Pelfrey out there in the 8th was something Gardy would do.

Posted

 

Putting Pelfrey out there in the 8th was something Gardy would do.

I'm finishing up the game now and while I wouldn't have called Pelfrey out there for the eighth, I understand Molitor's reluctance to go to the (shoddy) pen.

 

With that said, I will never understand why he called upon Boyer in that situation.

 

Either way, can't pin this one on Pelfrey. He did his job.

Provisional Member
Posted

Except he did pitch the 8th.......

 

that's like saying "Mauer hit a double in the first, I'll take that anytime, even if he did strikeout the next 5 ABS".

Not at all comparable.

Posted

 

He should have given up three runs. If the bullpen is called upon to get a single out with a runner on second, it's their job to execute that task.

 

As we've seen far too often in the past month, the Twins offense and bullpen failed to come through with a win after the starter did his job.

 

Whether Pelfrey should have been out there for the eighth or not, if a guy pitches 7 2/3 innings and allows three runs, the team should win that game.

 

Should have? He gave up 4. Are we not going to count lucky hits anymore, or lucky outs?

 

I do agree, the bullpen (or the manager's confidence/choices) needs to change.....

Provisional Member
Posted

 

What's the difference?

 

Pushing a guy beyond reasonable expectation vs. someone performing once and taking the rest of the game off? Sure, no difference.

Posted

Use Trevor May for those cheap win pickups, if you can. And there is no need to push your pitchers if you have a fine bullpen. Wait, the Twins don't have a fine bullpen.

 

Posted

In his last 5 starts, Pelfrey tossed a total of 23.4 innings.  So he should have been well rested. 

In the 7, he was still pitching well. 

He ended up throwing 110 pitches, so I'm guessing he was under 100 at the end of the 7th. 

 

Hindsight is a great thing, but as it stands, I don't see any reason to take him out.

Other than, Pelfrey being Pelfrey :banghead: 

The lose is on him and no one else.

Posted

 

In his last 5 starts, Pelfrey tossed a total of 23.4 innings.  So he should have been well rested. 

In the 7, he was still pitching well. 

He ended up throwing 110 pitches, so I'm guessing he was under 100 at the end of the 7th. 

 

Hindsight is a great thing, but as it stands, I don't see any reason to take him out.

Other than, Pelfrey being Pelfrey :banghead:

The lose is on him and no one else.

 

I think if you asked Molitor about that, he'd want a mulligan...

Provisional Member
Posted

 

In his last 5 starts, Pelfrey tossed a total of 23.4 innings.  So he should have been well rested. 

In the 7, he was still pitching well. 

He ended up throwing 110 pitches, so I'm guessing he was under 100 at the end of the 7th. 

 

Hindsight is a great thing, but as it stands, I don't see any reason to take him out.

Other than, Pelfrey being Pelfrey :banghead:

The lose is on him and no one else.

 

I put the loss on scoring 2 runs.

Posted

 

Should have? He gave up 4. Are we not going to count lucky hits anymore, or lucky outs?

 

I do agree, the bullpen (or the manager's confidence/choices) needs to change.....

He didn't give up four runs. He left the game with three runs on the board and the fourth run was entirely preventable.

 

So an arbitrary statistics says he gave up four runs. That doesn't matter to me and it shows the weakness of the ERA stat in extremely small sample sizes, not any weakness of Pelfrey's start (and it shows how utterly useless bullpen ERA can be, actually).

 

It's not like Mike left the game with the bases juiced and no outs. He left the game with a runner on second base and two outs. That's when the bullpen needs to step up and close out the inning by getting one. stinkin'. out.

 

It wasn't a lucky hit. It wasn't a fielding miscue. Boyer got in there and let a guy lace a double against him because Blaine Boyer is not a very good pitcher. I can't blame Mike Pelfrey for Blaine Boyer being bad at baseball.

Posted

I think Pelfrey's start was fine, he got knocked around a bit in the end, but the "loss" was more about Price continuing his ownership of the Twins' bats. The team had several chances to score runs early, and Price just happens to be better than the rest of the starting pitchers in either dugout.   

 

Price earned the win for his great pitching performance more than Pelfrey deserved a loss for his adequate start.

 

That being said, the bullpen is the bigger concern, and maybe Pelfrey in the pen and May in the rotation makes the team better?

Posted

When you get right down to it, what grates on me the most about that game is Molitor's management of it.

 

The score is 3-2 and maybe should be 2-2 because Pelfrey should have been pulled after seven.

 

Whatever, so it's 3-2 and you have six outs to score one run. That's manageable. A guy is on second base. A walk doesn't matter. All you need to do is get one out and if you can avoid putting the ball in play, the chances of getting that out go higher.

 

So Molitor calls on the guy who puts the ball in play more than anybody else on the team. A guy who hasn't been very good recently. He doesn't call on May, Fien, or even Graham. Instead, he calls on the right-handed reliever who is most ill-equipped to get out of that inning without allowing a run.

 

I like Molitor. I like a lot of what he's done but that's some pretty shoddy management right there.

Twins Daily Contributor
Posted

I've said it before, I'll say it again. ..lose late with a reliever, it's on the reliever. Lose late with a starter, it's on the manager.

 

I'll give Molitor a small bit of slack here...none of us want the to see the bullpen in a close game, I'm sure he doesn't either. But you can't let your starter lose the game in the 8th. You just cant.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

×
×
  • Create New...