TheDean Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 I think you have to keep Milone. I still think he can be better than the majority of the AAAA filler and career #5s we've had lately. Bottom line is that I think he'll be worth more to the Twins than $2.5 mil. Guys get injured, so you need depth. You can't pass up an opportunity to keep a guy with a decent MLB track record approaching what should be his prime for only $2.5 mil and the option to stash him at AAA. A lot of teams would snap up that opportunity in a heartbeat on the free market I think.
Shane Wahl Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Uh, trading away Span and Revere in the same offseason was pretty bold. The Twins don't need to do *anything* bold . . . except for finally roll out the youth movement. Rosario-Hicks-Arcia OF, Vargas DH, Pinto C/PH/DH, May in the rotation, Meyer initially in the bullpen, etc. Sano soonish. Even Buxton and Berrios eventually. Zach Jones and Nick Burdi for sure with a taste this year. Kirby_waved_at_me, Major League Ready and Dantes929 3
Kirby_waved_at_me Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Uh, trading away Span and Revere in the same offseason was pretty bold. The Twins don't need to do *anything* bold . . . except for finally roll out the youth movement. Rosario-Hicks-Arcia OF, Vargas DH, Pinto C/PH/DH, May in the rotation, Meyer initially in the bullpen, etc. Sano soonish. Even Buxton and Berrios eventually. Zach Jones and Nick Burdi for sure with a taste this year.I'd be happy if they did even half that - a 2015 debut for Sano, May in the Rotation starting opening day, Rosario and Burdi sometime in 2015. To me that would be a lot (given the track record). In retrospect, May, Santana, Vargas, and Polanco all getting major league service time in 2014 was a pretty good step.
Brandon Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 The Twins will keep Deunsing. There's not a compelling reason to let him go. He doesn't make too much. Now if we had a 120million payroll and we were stretching for more then yes he would be cut or traded. But I am certain he has enough value to keep around for 1 more year. I wouldn't be surprised if we signed him to a 3 year 10-12 million extension either. Nunez is a keeper in that he can play everywhere and should be able to steal 10-20 bases. It all depends on what the Twins decide they want on the bench and I would do that in spring training and not now as we can cut him in spring and pay a 1/4 of the contract or something like that. Fien, Plouffe, and Schaefer are keepers. Though an argument could be made to let Schaeffer walk, I think they keep him cause he can play CF. Millone is the one I am concerned about keeping or not. I don't think he has the best talent or enough ability to necessarily stay in the majors and 2.5 million is getting a little high to make that type of decision. Only because we are under budget would I consider giving him a chance
Dantes929 Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 I'd be happy if they did even half that - a 2015 debut for Sano, May in the Rotation starting opening day, Rosario and Burdi sometime in 2015. To me that would be a lot (given the track record). In retrospect, May, Santana, Vargas, and Polanco all getting major league service time in 2014 was a pretty good step. I want that all as well along with hoping Buxton makes his debut but definitely want Meyer to get his shot as well even if he starts in the pen.
Dantes929 Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 To me, they have guys like Milone in the organization, If I were the Twins I would try to make a last ditch effor to unload Milone via trade. Fair enough. Name one other guy in the system that has as many as 83 starts in the AL with a sub 4.00 ERA.. Just basing quality on mph is pretty shortsighted. I'm not even saying Milone is great because I don't know but easy to check the stats to find that his career ERA so far in 83 starts is much better than the career major league ERA of any pitcher on the team including Hughes and Nolasco.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 The compelling reason to dump Duensing is to use the RP as a way to send players up and down to the minors, when they inevitably get tired (given the current SP rotation, that is likely). Plus, he's just not that good. At some point, you have to actually use your minor league system. It's time to stop relying on old guys that have no future with this team, and start using the minor league system. jokin, big dog and jorgenswest 3
Dantes929 Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Milone can't break a pane of glass with his fastball, so who cares if he has options?We need BETTER pitchers, not more of the same guys with 87 MPH fastballs. The guy is no Jamie Moyer. Duenslinger is on the bubble, but he is a better choice than Milone. Bye to Cola and Parm. I think we need to bring up the kids an let them play.Again, you may be right but how can you be so certain? Moyer's career ERA is 4.25 while Milone's is 3.98. I don't think I undervalue arm strength because I do value it. I just think most people overvalue it. San Fran is generally middle of the pack in velocity of fastballs and they throw them less than anyone. They also ranked in the lower half in strikeouts. Control and stuff (changing speeds, assortment and movement) count for just as much especially in a starting pitcher. All 87 mph pitchers are definitely not created equal.
dxpavelka Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Milone may "currently" slot in as our 6th or 7th starter but I don't see 5 Cy Young candidates slotted ahead of him and things change fast. Keep. Dantes929 1
jokin Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 1) The compelling reason to dump Duensing is to use the RP as a way to send players up and down to the minors, when they inevitably get tired (given the current SP rotation, that is likely). Plus, he's just not that good. At some point, you have to actually use your minor league system. 2) It's time to stop relying on old guys that have no future with this team, and start using the minor league system. 1) I'm still confounded that Ryan doesn't grasp this basic concept after 20-some years. 2) The general trend in baseball is getting your best pitchers and their live arms up to the majors and established before age 25 (the reasonable gamble being not wasting their best finite innings and years while they are in their 20s and before their arms possibly blow out).
Dantes929 Verified Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 1) I'm still confounded that Ryan doesn't grasp this basic concept after 20-some years. 2) The general trend in baseball is getting your best pitchers and their live arms up to the majors and established before age 25 (the reasonable gamble being not wasting their best finite innings and years while they are in their 20s and before their arms possibly blow out). I agree with your position but aside from Meyer I really can't recall any pitcher that has been held back. Garza was certainly promoted quickly and I believe that Liriano was as well. May likely would have been promoted earlier if not for the injury to his leg. Leaves us with Meyer. I think you and I disagreed with who was promoted ahead of Meyer but I certainly agreed that he should have been promoted at some point. Still, he is really the only case I can think of.
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 Relief pitchers, not starters. I think there are guys that could be up here now, and not older RP that won't be sent to the minors (that was their issue last year, imo). Jokin and I were talking about RP. jokin 1
Seth Stohs Site Manager Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 I dunno. There's certainly a decent argument for keeping Duensing around since you know what you have, but I wouldn't say it's a "given" by any means. Finding lefties who can get same-sided hitters out isn't hard, and Duensing also happens to be completely terrible against righties, which really limits his utility especially at that price. Is there any reason to think Darnell can't do the job at least as well? That's going to be his future role, so might as well let him start settling into it while saving a couple mil. Here are his numbers against lefties in the minors the last two years: 2014 (AAA): .239/.289/.3172013 (AA/AAA): .220/.289.306 I definitely think that's the future role for Darnell. But what's $2 million to the Twins. It's nothing they'd get concerned about. Why lose a guy for nothing? I'd let Darnell start in Rochester and pitch in that lefty reliever role and get a few innings in. He can be called up if Duensing or Thielbar get hurt. He could be a long man. Hopefully the Twins would be able to trade Duensing at some point in June or July this year for anything, and then hand it over to Darnell. It's always nice to have a guy ready in Rochester. If you lose Duensing and hand the job to Darnell, then you've lost some depth. I'm not pretending Duensing isn't replaceable, he certainly is. I'd just rather try to get something from him while keeping depth. zenser 1
Mike Sixel Old-Timey Member Posted December 1, 2014 Posted December 1, 2014 so, when the bullpen is exhausted in August, and the RP are all veterans.... They should have traded "high" on Burton, Duensing by now....and also Fien and Perkins.
savvyspy Provisional Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 Duensing is just another replacement level bullpen arm. Hes not terrible but why pay him above market to lose 91 games instead of 93? Bring up the young guys and let them play.
B Richard Provisional Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 Oliveros is a righty. But I think Darnell could do the job. Held left-handed hitters to a 600 OPS in Triple-A this year. ...that would probably make him a bad LOOGY... (Oliveros, that is). No idea why I always thought he was a lefty. Darnell does seem like a solid candidate
DocBauer Old-Timey Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 Torn on Duensing and Milone. Personally, I don't feel either has a very long tenure left with the team. There are youngsters on the rise that are near ready, could be ready really soon, or should/could be ready by season's end. But in the current state of roster affairs, I could easily see both with the club for the time being. First, neither is really very expensive. I think both have a shot at the pen in 2015, though Milone has at least a limited shot at the rotation. Duensing is not old and is healthy and has a decent track record overall. He's a strong candidate for a bounce back season. But I could also see either, or both, allowed to leave or be traded. (trading seems more logical and obvious to me) I even wonder if St Louis could be interested in either as part of a trade as they have dealt away a couple pitchers already this offseason. Unless either of them really shines this season, my hunch is both of them, either or both depending how the rest of the offseason shakes out, is gone by 2016 regardless. Darnell, O'Rourke, Gilmartin and Rogers are just a couple youngsters that could be ready soon for a spot somewhere on the roster to join Thielbar. In fact, I'm not so sure Darnell isn't ready right now for a bullpen spot! My best guess at the end of the day, I believe both are offered and retained. That doesn't mean both are kept!
DocBauer Old-Timey Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 PS, why all the hate for Nunez? OK, so he's only so-so with the glove, but he's no butcher. He can hit a little, he has some pop, he can run, and he offers some positional flexibility. Isn't that what you want in a utility or second utility player on the roster? I don't think he's long term for the club, Beresford, Michael and Polanco could and should all push him at some point this season or the end of this season. But for the now, I'd hold on to him. In the context of professional sports, he's not going to cost you much of anything to bring in and have around. He might even surprise a little. There is enough potential available to do so. brvama 1
jorgenswest Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 The Yankees let Nunez go because he can't play 2B. They kept Anna and Solarte instead. In the few games Dozier missed, they moved Escobar over instead of using Nunez at 2B. He is more 3B/LF/emergency SS than true utility. I wouldn't mind if they sign him though. A trade of a Plouffe may open a temporary role. The salary might keep others from claiming when DFA'd and he can be stashed in Rochester.
Shane Wahl Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 Nunez is basically only a backup 3B. There is so little value there.Duensing making 2+ million bucks more than his replacement does actually matter to the Twins. A few million dollars a year means a different tier of free agent signing! I don't understand any defense for keeping Duensing around. He isn't even very good in the first place. Starting Darnell in Rochester is almost completely useless. First, they have plenty of starting pitchers between AA and AAA. Also, he isn't going to be a starter. His role is to try to survive as a LOOGY or long relief guy. That said, the potential upside is higher than whatever Duensing is right now. And it's for 1/5 or 1/6 the cost!
old nurse Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 Inherited runners scoredAnthony Swarzak P MIN 16Brian Duensing P MIN 13Michael Tonkin P MIN 6Runners strandedBrian Duensing P MIN 28Anthony Swarzak P MIN 19Michael Tonkin P MIN 16Runs allowedAnthony Swarzak P MIN 48Brian Duensing P MIN 20Michael Tonkin P MIN 13 Why Swarzak is looking for employment, Tonkin went to the minors and Duensing should be nervous
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 Inherited runners scoredAnthony Swarzak P MIN 16Brian Duensing P MIN 13Michael Tonkin P MIN 6Runners strandedBrian Duensing P MIN 28Anthony Swarzak P MIN 19Michael Tonkin P MIN 16Runs allowedAnthony Swarzak P MIN 48Brian Duensing P MIN 20Michael Tonkin P MIN 13 Why Swarzak is looking for employment, Tonkin went to the minors and Duensing should be nervous As a reference point. Swarzak pitched 86 innings. Duensing 54. Tonkin 19. ashbury and James 2
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 I think you have to keep Milone. I still think he can be better than the majority of the AAAA filler and career #5s we've had lately. Bottom line is that I think he'll be worth more to the Twins than $2.5 mil. Guys get injured, so you need depth. You can't pass up an opportunity to keep a guy with a decent MLB track record approaching what should be his prime for only $2.5 mil and the option to stash him at AAA. A lot of teams would snap up that opportunity in a heartbeat on the free market I think. That is my thought process as well. The guy will make $2.5M. That is not a lot of money. He is absolutely better than some of the AAAA types that will at some point come up and make 15-20 starts. And Milone has better than a snowballs chance at pitching at least league average and having a decent couple of years. I am not sure why we would cut him. ashbury 1
ashbury Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 I attended one game in Oakland where Milone pitched against our Twins. I will forever be grateful to him for demonstrating to my satisfaction that Pedro Florimon is not a major league hitter. He can have a roster spot on my team for as long as he likes. GCTF and Mike Sixel 2
Major League Ready Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 (edited) I don't understand why some disregard Milone so easily. I ran the stats for 2012-2013. There is very little difference in their numbers over that period between Nolasco, Masterson, Buehrle, and Milone. Of course, the others pitched more innings. He must at least have trade value but why would we let him go at this point. Give him a chance to establish some value at the same time we see what we have in May, Meyer, and eventually Berrios. You would have to believe we would be in pretty decent shape if he is our #5 starter. Edited December 2, 2014 by Major Leauge Ready
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted December 2, 2014 Posted December 2, 2014 I don't understand why some disregard Milone so easily. I ran the stats for 2012-2013. There is very little difference in their numbers over that period between Nolasco, Masterson, Buehrle, and Milone. Of course, the others pitched more innings. He must at least have trade value but why would we let him go at this point. Give him a chance to establish some value at the same time we see what we have in May, Meyer, and eventually Berrios. You would have to believe we would be in pretty decent shape if he is our #5 starter. It makes more sense to cut Milone. Then have a shortage of pitchers and trade for the same guy in June.
drock2190 Verified Member Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Milone also pitched in a very friendly park. I would rather take a chance on Medlen or Beachy from the Braves.
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Looks like we extended contracts to all of them http://www.twinkietown.com/2014/12/3/7325603/twins-will-tender-contracts-to-all-arbitration-eligible-players
jokin Old-Timey Member Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Milone also pitched in a very friendly park. I would rather take a chance on Medlen or Beachy from the Braves. Both are extreme FB/ P2C pitchers and benefited greatly from the Braves solid defense. I suspect Milone could sustain his good numbers in Oakland to Atlanta.
tobi0040 Verified Member Posted December 3, 2014 Posted December 3, 2014 Milone also pitched in a very friendly park. I would rather take a chance on Medlen or Beachy from the Braves. Great names, but I think both have had Tommy John twice. The track record is terrible for 2x TJ types.
Billy Amick Wichita Wind Surge - AA 1B/3B Despite hitting just .194, the 23-year-old ranks fourth in the Texas League in Home Runs (17) and sixth in RBI (50). Explore Billy Amick News >
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now