Aggies7 Old-Timey Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Hahaha such a bad miss of a call by Dick. A high majestic fly that should have been caught
glunn Community Moderator Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 We are back to needing more insurance runs.
MNT1996 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Great? No. He is very lucky through 6. When many balls put in play and not a hit, that's very low BABIP. Don't tell anyone under .200 BABIP is pitching great. He pitched great. 3 Hits and 0 runs through 6. He's not going to strike everybody out.
DocBauer Old-Timey Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Perez was great through 6, but the way he pitched in the 7th I think he deserved the 4 runs he's charged with.I can absolutely understand and accept a RP allowing an inherited run or two to score. It happens. But Harperm unfortunately, didn't have it tonight. Again, it happens. But Perez still didn't deserve all of those runs with how well he pitched.
Blake Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Author Posted July 6, 2019 It was a 7.1, but far east of L.A.About 60 miles NE of where we are.
MNT1996 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Commence the turnaround of opinions about Schoop
Squirrel Community Moderator Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 And that's what slump breaking looks like!
Blake Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Author Posted July 6, 2019 We are back to needing more insurance runs.Really? Last I looked, the Twins have 12 runs...
TwinsCD Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Thankfully, the kidnappers got their ransom and released Jonathan Schoop in time for his return for tonite's game.
yarnivek1972 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Great? No. He is very lucky through 6. When many balls put in play and not a hit, that's very low BABIP. Don't tell anyone under .200 BABIP is pitching great.Perez had 13 swinging strikes in 78 pitches through 6 innings. I’m not a math expert, but that’s a pretty good ratio. What he lacked tonight was a put away pitch at times. That said, his season K rate is over 8 per 9.
MNT1996 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 I'm really hoping Rocco doesn't put Stewart out there
DocBauer Old-Timey Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Come on people, Perez was awesome through 6! He ran out of gas and maybe should have been pulled earlier. And maybe Harper didn't have it tonight. But let's not pretend that wasn't a quality start!
LVTwinsfan Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 A much needed thrashing by our offense. Let’s hope pitching is coming soon
Aggies7 Old-Timey Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 And that's what slump breaking looks like!Resisting the urge to make a comment...
DocBauer Old-Timey Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 I'm not sure I remember hearing Launder in the booth before. I really like him there. And not just his stories. I like his perspective.
MNT1996 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Hopefully by the end of this month we see Giles or Smith in a Twins jersey
Danchat Old-Timey Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Great? No. He is very lucky through 6. When many balls put in play and not a hit, that's very low BABIP. Don't tell anyone under .200 BABIP is pitching great.IMO it depends on the type of contact a pitcher allows if they aren't striking out a bunch of guys. If Perez was getting a bunch of soft groundballs and pop-ups, that's good; but if there was lots of hard contact, then that wasn't quite as good. Strikeouts are great but they aren't the be all and end all.
howeda7 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Giving up a HR to Forsythe? Geeze Duffy.
MNT1996 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Duffey threw it where Garver wanted it
howeda7 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 I guess Mejia is starting Sunday. Figured they'd go with Stewart.
yarnivek1972 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 I guess Mejia is starting Sunday. Figured they'd go with Stewart.My guess is both go through the order once and then turn it over to everyone else.
Squirrel Community Moderator Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Resisting the urge to make a comment...Um, why? Was there some hidden meaning in that?
Mill1634 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 So, Stewart not the Sunday starter? Wonder if we see a bullpen day??
twinsbaby Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 So, Stewart not the Sunday starter? Wonder if we see a bullpen day??Probably Mejia will start to throw 3-4 innings (about 60 pitches). I hope Pineda can get bullpen rest tomorrow.
Hosken Bombo Disco Community Moderator Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 You are what your record says you are. He is who we thought he was. Etc. Agrees
MNT1996 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 I never knew how different Sano's splits home vs away are. wow
Shaitan Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Schoop is an interesting study. The kid is still only 27. Overall, his numbers this season are very close to his career year of 2017. His defense has been excellent, except for a handful of bad errors where he tried too hard to make a few plays he probably shouldn't have.But some think he is disappointing. [shaking my head]. And be appears to be a good and well liked teammate.Unfortunately, he may not be around in 2020 due to finances and rotation singings/re-signings, etc. But I'd love to have him back next season were it possible.I like him as a 7-8 hitter on a good team. I think he'd be exposed as a middle of the lineup hitter on a bad team.
MNT1996 Verified Member Posted July 6, 2019 Posted July 6, 2019 Atta boy Cron. Good to see a good game from him
Marek Houston Wichita Wind Surge - AA SS On Saturday, Houston went 3-for-5 and scored two runs. After a short slump, he is now back over .290 on the season. Explore Marek Houston News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.