Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    What Should the Twins Do About Their Bullpen?

    The Twins have played themselves into the playoff conversation. Now they have to decide whether a woefully undermanned bullpen is something to fix, or a reason to sell.

    Nick Nelson
    Image courtesy of Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    We knew coming into this year that the Minnesota Twins were going to have a bad bullpen. When you trade all of your best relievers and do little to replace them, that's inevitable. But it also seemed like there was a good chance this inevitably lackluster relief corps was not going to matter. 

    The Twins lost 90 games last year and their Vegas over/under this year had them in the same vicinity. If the team was going to be flat-out bad, then there wouldn't be many leads to protect, no postseason race in the balance. 

    Alas, here we are. As we head into July, the Twins are firmly on the radar of contention, four games below .500 but within spitting distance of playoff position. Through 88 games, Minnesota's offense has outscored every other American League team. Their rotation, if Bailey Ober can return at the level of a decent back-end starter, is solid one through five with a legitimate ace at the top.

    That is, theoretically, the makeup of a club that should be fancying itself a contender in one of the weakest AL competitive landscapes we can remember. But, that bullpen, whew. We knew it would be bad but it's been worse than bad, with the highest ERA in the majors at 5.43 and an egregious 6.94 mark in June. 

    In some ways, the impact of this this run-hemorrhaging relief corps has been muted, because a lot of their ugliest moments have come in lopsided games that were already more or less decided. That's why the Twins look relatively better by Win Probability Added, ranking 23rd in the majors versus dead last. But this unit is direly short on dependable options, and there's little doubt it will torpedo any chance of a legit second-half push as currently comprised — especially with the offense likely to come back to earth. The loss of Anthony Banda, who'd shaken off a slow start to post a 2.45 ERA in his past 30 appearances, is a devastating blow.

    Is there anything they can do? The trade deadline will represent an opportunity for modest additions and upgrades (I'm not expecting much more), but the Twins also need to sort out what they have and optimize internally for the final three months. Here's a look at their current relief corps and how they might proceed, in order of confidence level to play a valuable role. 

    Yoendrys Gómez
    He looks like a true find amid a sea of waiver claim flops. Certainly I'm not expecting him to keep up at his current level — the 3.4% HR/FB rate is a glaring regression red flag — but he's got a quality arsenal and he's thrived after being thrust into a high-leverage role. In an ideal scenario he's probably pitching in the seventh rather than closing, but he's a viable late-inning arm. That's one at least. 

    Andrew Morris
    The most promising success story in Minnesota's bullpen so far. In contrast to Gómez, Morris' surface numbers actually understate how well he's pitched: his 2.79 FIP and 2.97 xERA are well below the 3.89 ERA, and his Statcast sliders are blazing red. This looks like the prototype scenario for transitioning a marginal starter to a standout reliever, and the Twins will have to make it happen several more times.

    Eric Orze
    Big drop-off from the top two to number three on this list. Orze, like Morris, has underperformed his peripherals (3.18 FIP and 3.97 xERA vs. 5.08 ERA) but I'm less convinced there is a credible back-end relief arm here. His K-rate is under 20%, his control has been poor and to the extent his numbers are adequate, it's in large part because he's allowed only one home run in 39 innings. That's not sustainable. Nevertheless, the 28-year-old worth keeping around as a lower-leverage option.

    Taylor Rogers
    I'm torn on Rogers. At times he has looked completely cooked, including last Tuesday when he got clobbered by the Dodgers for five earned runs in one inning. But he's sort of a microcosm of the Twins bullpen at large: very bad overall, less so situationally. Many of his worst outings have come in situations like the Dodgers game, where the Twins were already down 7-2 when he entered. His experience and left-handedness are worth keeping in the mix with Banda down, but again, you'd much prefer if he was your third lefty relief option versus your first.

    Travis Adams
    Another guy I'm a bit torn on. Adams throws reasonably hard and his 29.9% K-rate outranks all Twins pitchers (including Joe Ryan) dating back to last year's trade deadline. At the same time, his fastball is crushable as a Coors Light, and he's got a 7.23 ERA and 5.22 FIP in 55 MLB innings. Adams had a mediocre 4.50 career ERA in the minors. He's the kind of guy who you'd be interested in seeing more of in a non-competitive season but a clear liability if the Twins are trying to consistently win.

    Marco Raya
    Called up last week, he's only made two relief appearances for the Twins but Raya has avoided melting into a puddle, and that's an accomplishment for a 23-year-old with a history of yips, getting his first taste of the majors. Raya has solid long-term potential but is a shaky bet to produce at an above-average level or deliver in key situations right now. Another guy best suited for taking lumps in a lost season versus pitching meaningful innings down the stretch.

    Kody Funderburk
    He can't throw strikes. Seventeen walks versus 11 strikeouts in 20 innings this year. Yuck. He's gotten decent enough results when in the strike zone, so Funderburk is maybe not worth giving up on, but you can't count on him under any circumstances at this point. We've reached the tier of the bullpen where the Twins have absolutely got to upgrade if they want to be any kind of threat.

    Cody Laweryson
    I've got nothing against Laweryson but I also haven't been given any real reason to believe. His velocity is lowest of any bullpen righty. He lacks a legit secondary pitch. Laweryson looks like a minor-leaguer pitching in the majors, which I guess is what should be expected from someone who made his MLB debut at 28, out of sheer need last September, and got designated for assignment by two bad teams during the offseason, passing through waivers the second time.

    There's your Twins bullpen. There are two remotely dependable options for late innings or high leverage, and even they carry a certain degree of blow-up potential. It's not impossible that Orze and Rogers could round into respectable form, but the bottom half of the relief corps needs major improvement if this team is going to make a push. Here are the possible reinforcements from within worth tracking:

    Kendry Rojas: Easily the most intriguing figure on the farm. He's shown electric stuff in six appearances for the Twins, even while struggling to command the zone. There's no bigger wild-card in the system with regards to the rest of this season, but the Twins have to decide how they want to proceed with the lefty. Can they afford to not have him stretched out when he's their only remaining line of defense in the rotation?

    Cole Sands: He experienced a setback with his forearm two weeks ago, stalling his rehab, but threw an encouraging bullpen session on June 27th, and could return this month. Aside from Rojas, Sands is likely the best hope for a difference-making internal add.

    David Festa: Higher potential impact than Sands but much lower odds of returning for a substantial portion of the second half. Dealing with a persistently balky right shoulder, Festa was still multiple weeks from facing live hitters at last check. He hasn't pitched in almost a full year.

    Mike Paredes: With Ober on track to rejoin the rotation, shifting Paredes into a relief role would be an option. He's performed admirably as a rotation plug, albeit with ugly underlying numbers. I'm not sure he's got the stuff to be anything more than a Laweryson-caliber piece out of the bullpen.

    C.J. Culpepper: A sleeper in Triple-A. He's got relatively high-caliber stuff with a 3.20 career ERA in the minors and a track record of keeping the ball in the park. But he has made only seven appearances above Double-A and strike-throwing can be an issue. Probably more of an interesting candidate for 2027 than this year.

    John Klein: The Twins liked him enough to protect him on the 40-man last offseason, but haven't shown much inclination to deploy him in their MLB bullpen this year. He's made three appearances for the Twins, two of them as an opener. In Triple-A he has allowed 13 home runs in 45 innings. Like Culpepper, he's being treated as more of a future-looking option.

    The Twins are thin on upside in their current bullpen and there's not a whole lot more looming in the minors, although Rojas is a notable exception and Sands has the capability to move the needle if he comes back healthy. What becomes clear through this exercise is that they need outside help if they're going to support a contention effort versus sabotaging it. 

    And it brings us to the defining question of this season, which the next several weeks may sort out: Is this a team worth investing in, at its core? There are major implications in trading away from the future value pool, even as light buyers, rather than adding to it as sellers. You don't want to end up severely regretting your decision by mid-August.

    If they're leaning in the "buy" direction, the front office would be wise to try and act sooner than later, because they are going to have a hard time staying in the range of competitiveness with this current assortment of relief arms.


    View our top trade candidates list, up to nearly 70 names and updated regularly!

    View Trade Candidates

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Brandon Winokur

    Wichita Wind Surge - AA, 3B/CF
    On Sunday, Winokur went 3-for-4 with a walk, his third Surge homer and three RBI. He has reached base in all 14 AA games and hit .321/.375/.518 (.893) with a triple and 3 HR.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Well analyzed by Nick as usual. I agree with his bottom line. We basically have two quality relievers in Gomez and Morris, two adequate guys that can be in the back half of a decent bullpen in Orze and Rogers, an unknown in Raya, and three guys who really should be in AAA most of the season coming up only as necessary for injuries. That makes it hard to go on a long winning streak.
     

    I think the strategy is pretty obvious. We have a month before the trade deadline. We need to use that time to see whether there’s any reinforcements coming internally. That means getting CJ Culpepper, Rozek, Rojas, and maybe even Rashi up to the Twins. If we have reinforcements, those are probably the only possible guys along with Paredes if Ober comes back to the rotation and nobody else gets hurt.. Then by late July, we have some information about who we have, whether the team has a chance to be a dark horse WC contender, and how desperate the need. Jeffers will be traded if he’s healthy. We have to get one younger established MLB reliever as part of the return. If we can we also want to get one higher ceiling AAA starting pitching prospect that we can put in the bullpan for the rest of the year as well. We also look at some lower level trades that might let us a decent relief pitcher but I don’t hold out a lot of hope for anything more than that because of who we have to trade. Guys like Larnach and Bell might get you a pretty good sixth or seventh inning guy, but they’re not gonna get you quality late inning  relief help. We also have to pray that neither Gomez or Morris gets hurt.

    i’m against trading Ryan before the off-season and I don’t think they will trade Ryan unless we fall out of whatever one defines as contention. And frankly, if we fall out of contention to get to the 85 wins or so it will take to be a wildcard this year, then I don’t think trading for relief help matters. In that case, trade Jeffers, Ryan, Bell, and Larnach for the highest quality baseball players you can get regardless of what position they play.

     

    1 hour ago, terrydactyls said:

    The only teams that would be willing to trade a "capable" arm are teams that are building for the future.  And those teams sure ain't looking at Larnach, Bell, Wallner, or Lewis as their future saviors.  They would want at least one of Rodriguez, Culpepper, or Gonzales and an A ball pitcher.  As the Twins new GM, I'm not making that sort of trade.

    Exactly. Any team looking to add Larnach/Bell/Wallner to help this year's team isn't going to trade away an MLB reliever. 

    What ever trade that the Twins do this year should be about 2027 and later.

    No trades for anything helping for 2026.

    You need to be selective about non-40 roster call ups in 2026 because of the pending strike/lock-out.

    Enjoy 2026 for development of your core players.

    Trade Jeffers, Larnach, and Bell.

    Try to extend Ryan. Only trade him if he brings back a top 10 prospect in MLB plus more. It has to be a lopsided deal.

    1 hour ago, stringer bell said:

    One would have thought that the last two weeks plus would have moved them to clear “sell” territory, but they’ve played .600 baseball in the last 15 games (including nine road games). I fear that they will be paralyzed into inactivity at the break, which might be worse than a selloff. 

    I am concerned with this as well. Tom P going full Arte Moreno and chasing 80 wins this year only to prolong the rebuild. 

    I like Gomez and Morris. After that, it gets difficult. 

    Adams needs to be strictly a 1 inning guy. Without looking it up, I feel like most of the runs he gives up is after hes sent back out for more than 1 inning of work. 

    Laweryson and Funderburk gotta go. 

    When Ober comes back, give Paredes a look in the pen. Analytics dont look great, but so far hes been getting it done. 

    Having Rojas come up would help. Sands should be better if he can get healthy. 

    If it was my choice, Id be on the phone with Boston and trying to pry away Aroldis Chapman. Shutdown closer and under contract for next season. I would overpay for him if I had the opportunity. He is incredibly effective, reliable, and consistent. It allows Gomez to have the 8th. Morris the 7th. Obviously more work than that would be needed, but IMO its a heck of a start. Acquire another upgrade or 2 and the BP looks a lot better. 

    The terrible defense has a little to do with how bad the BP performs, too. For example yesterday's game against Houston. Laweryson would've got through that inning clean without the error being committed. Im hoping that the trade deadline will also clear out 1 or 2 of the poor defenders. Having Kriedler at SS everyday would help. Gray has been terrible. Keaschall to RF should help hide his poor defense a little, i hope. He made a nice catch yesterday. Lee at 3rd has been better than him at SS. Subtracting Larnach fron LF would help the defense too. Roden or any of the outfield waiting in AAA are all good on defense. 

    1 hour ago, Twins_Fan_in_NJ said:

    Last year's sell-off is just so frustrating. If they would have kept Lou and Duran, they're in first place right now. I can understand wanting to get out of Correa's deal but they threw the baby out with the bathwater. There's a universe where Abel gets and stays healthy and where Rojas finds his command and all is forgiven. But those two things remain lottery tickets as opposed to two 'ace' closers.

    Put me in the camp of wanting to keep Ryan. I still want to see what the new CBA looks like and if there's any type of salary floor or something that would make keeping Ryan long-term more feasible for the Twins.

    Jeffers is likely gone. Caratini's play of late coupled with Jeffers' comments last summer, and I think the Twins are more than happy to send him packing. If he is going to the Yankees, there's young talent to be had there - I just hope the Twins identify the right prospects.

    Larnach is trickier, IMHO. You would definitely be selling high but even with his recent hot streak, how robust is the market? If you're not getting back a legitimate prospect, or a controllable arm for the pen, just hold onto him. 

    Duran and Varland do not add 5 wins this year to the Twins to put them into a precarious first place in the division. The Twins have blown 11 saves so far (16th in MLB).

    The Twins relievers have pitched 317.0 innings, Duran and Varland combined have 70 IP so less than 25% of all innings the Twins relievers have pitched. Meaning other Twins relievers (who are bad) still have to cover 247 innings.

    Duran and Varland in the bullpen probably makes the Twins viable as a potential back end playoff team auto-scheduled for a quick exit. I guess I don't care if the Twins are a 1 and done playoff team. Been there. Done that for 20 years now.

    1 hour ago, rdehring said:

    Great read, Nick.  The pen is biggest problem facing the Twins if they want to compete this year or next.  For that reason, I believe they should approach this year's deadline with one goal in mind, begin fixing the pen. 

    Although a total fix is near impossible, they likely will have a couple players who can or should be traded.  Players who can bring back a good, young bullpen arm with big league experience.  Guys doing well with a year or two experience.  If Ryan Jeffers won't sign an extension he must be dealt, especially now that Caratini/Jackson are doing so well.  Jeffers should have enough value to bring back a solid young reliever. 

    The Twins strength is their depth of corner outfielders.  Beginning to question whether trading Larnach is a good option, especially if they continue to compete for a playoff spot this year.  If not Larnach, someone needs to be moved.  With several prospects deserving the call, the team can't keep both Martin and Keaschall.  My belief is that Keaschall has too much promise to go, especially after last night's performance at the plate and in right field.  So, I would opt for Martin being the one leaving.  Can he bring back a solid young reliever?  Probably not, but with a medium prospect added, maybe.  That leaves Wallner, who I believe should only return to the Twins if he continues hitting very well in St. Paul and the DH spot is available.  He and a prospect won't bring back a top reliever, but maybe one better than what they now trot out every other day.

     

    I am all for keeping both Larnach and Keaschall.   Martin and Wallner can be traded, but I would go bigger and dangle Erod to see if we can bring back an established non-rental reliever.

    11 minutes ago, bean5302 said:

    Duran and Varland do not add 5 wins this year to the Twins to put them into a precarious first place in the division. The Twins have blown 11 saves so far (16th in MLB).

    The Twins relievers have pitched 317.0 innings, Duran and Varland combined have 70 IP so less than 25% of all innings the Twins relievers have pitched. Meaning other Twins relievers (who are bad) still have to cover 247 innings.

    Duran and Varland in the bullpen probably makes the Twins viable as a potential back end playoff team auto-scheduled for a quick exit. I guess I don't care if the Twins are a 1 and done playoff team. Been there. Done that for 20 years now.

    I think a lot of people look at Duran and Varland's WAR and subtract our negative WAR relievers to come to that conclusion of winning 5 extra games. It's not that easy of a calculation. Not to mention, their ERAs wouldn't be this pristine behind our rag tag defense. 

    4 hours ago, mike8791 said:

     Unfortunately, based on his 5 months as GM, there is little reason to believe Zoll has the chops to make wise trades - ones that can improve the team this year without hurting the longer term rebuild to contention.  

    Perhaps a nitpic, perhaps not..

    Jeremy Zoll has been the Twins GM since Nov 2024.

    4 hours ago, Czelgert said:

    The trade deadline is organizationally the most expensive time of the year to fix a bullpen.  Guys who can be picked up for low to medium salaries in the offseason are traded for solid prospects.  I deeply want this team to improve its bullpen for my own entertainment but now is not the time to move prospects to cover for poor offseason planning.

    Agree with this, completely. There is not enough depth in our assets to fix the bullpen via trade deadline. Moving Paredes might be a nice addition but Orze and Rogers cannot be counted on to get us to the 9th. Lawyerson.......getting better? Adams, has to be better options somewhere

    Question:

    When, if ever, is this front office going to take a true, committed long-term view?

    The Case:

    Blowing up the bullpen last year was a bold, necessary acknowledgment of where this team stood. It allowed us to restock the farm system with potential franchise-altering talent. But a full-scale rebuild takes patience. Why rush to "fix" the bullpen today before we’ve even verified that we have a stable, championship-level core of position players and starting pitching to build upon?

    Trading away assets right now just to patch over immediate, temporary leaks is shortsighted.

    Claim:

    Sacrificing tomorrow to band-aid today is exactly what keeps this franchise trapped in a continuous, exhausting cycle of mediocrity.

    2 hours ago, thelanges5 said:

    Larnach to SD for Bradgley Rodriguez. Opens a path for Roden or Jenkins

    Love what Larnach is doing right now for the Twins but I was also wondering about something with San Diego like your idea. Maybe Larnach for Jason Adam, although I too prefer B. Rodriguez.

    I have wondered about the Yankees coughing up something worthwhile (LaGrange?).

    When you gut your bullpen and don't commit the resources to fix it... you are left with a lot of tryouts and those tryouts will result in some discovery. 

    I'm enjoying the transition of Andrew Morris to the pen and I am hopeful that we have developing bullpen arm for the future. 

    I really like what I'm seeing out of Gomez. The return of Cole Sands will be a plus. 

    The rest of them... success and failure in doses and leaves the impression that the bullpen isn't deep enough and lacking enough late inning options and that isn't a good combination. 

    If the Twins are still in contention at the deadline. I'd expect them to add bullpen arms.

    If they are looking at good arms with years of service left. Who knows what it will cost but we can look at the returns for Duran, Jax and Varland as a guide for what it will cost in terms of prospects to acquire younger power arms with years of service remaining.   

    Nearly every contending team will be looking for bullpen arms to bolster for the stretch run and that will drive up the price on rentals as well. I always assume that most GM's are pretty disciplined so the price shouldn't go through the roof but there will be competition for any decent bullpen arm rental. Do we have a prospect that we are willing to part with that the trading team will like over the prospects that other teams are willing to part with.

    This is subjective and dependent on the team we are trading with. We won't give up Jenkins for a rental. Winokur for example... would we give him up? Will some team like Brandon Winokur... again for example.    

    If we have a Bad July and the team is not in contention. It's a completely different discussion. If Ryan, Jeffers, Bell get moved. I think it's fair to ask that a decent young bullpen arm be included in the deal. 

    I do not expect a Bad July. The bullpen certainly needs to be overcome but the team is hitting and producing runs. Our starting pitching has some depth to keep us in games. As much as I talk about it... I think Derek Shelton has done a good job of utilizing the roster. 

    I think the Twins will hit the deadline in search of bullpen help because I believe they will be in contention. That's going to bug some folks on Twinsdaily.

    Myself... I may not agree with the go for it declaration that was made during the offseason. However... Since they declared they are going for it. I do expect them to go for it if in contention. I would not want my front office wishy washy even if I disagree.   

    1 hour ago, bean5302 said:

    I guess I don't care if the Twins are a 1 and done playoff team. Been there. Done that for 20 years now.

    Hard to make a run without getting into the playoffs. While i can agree that losing in the first round or at all is disappointing, I'm more likely to enjoy a playoff team than a fourth or fifth place club. The Yankees haven't won since 2009. I guess their fans are edgy perhaps. No, that isn't a comparison but just opposite sides of a coin.

    What strategy do you suggest? Do you have specific plans that are potentially feasible. I'm curious.

    1 hour ago, USAFChief said:

    Perhaps a nitpic, perhaps not..

    Jeremy Zoll has been the Twins GM since Nov 2024.

    And I according to Falvey when he was promoted he was very involved in trade talks and other negotiations for a few years prior to 2024.  It sounded like he was the GM prior to Levine leaving just not officially.

    For those advocating for a trade for Jeffers do you really want to count on Caratini as your full time catcher for the next year and half.  Yes he had a great June, but he also struggled when Jeffers first got hurt.  He has not started more than 87 games at catcher and that was 5 years.  And we will turn 34 next mid season, catchers do not age well.

    It may be a foregone conclusion that Jeffers will not be here, but I am fearful that Caratini could very well turn into another Vasquez at the plate the more exposure he gets.  I would prefer to keep Jeffers if possible.

    49 minutes ago, tony&rodney said:

    What strategy do you suggest? Do you have specific plans that are potentially feasible. I'm curious.

    In regards to the bullpen, keep doing what they're doing. Pick up intriguing DFA candidates, and sift through the internal options. By the end of this season, we should have a definitive answer whether Funderburk, Adams, Orze, and Laweryson can be relied upon for 2027 and beyond. If they're not, get them off the 40 man this offseason and bring in others instead. 

    4 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    For those advocating for a trade for Jeffers do you really want to count on Caratini as your full time catcher for the next year and half.  Yes he had a great June, but he also struggled when Jeffers first got hurt.  He has not started more than 87 games at catcher and that was 5 years.  And we will turn 34 next mid season, catchers do not age well.

    It may be a foregone conclusion that Jeffers will not be here, but I am fearful that Caratini could very well turn into another Vasquez at the plate the more exposure he gets.  I would prefer to keep Jeffers if possible.

    His defense is adequate, at least. How do you see us keeping Jeffers? Short of him remaining injured through September, (The Pablo Plan) I don't see a path there. Diaw, Tait, there are plans in place. Unlike a few years ago, catcher is one position I'm not so concerned with in the near and long term.

     

    For those advocating that they trade this season for bullpen help, I have a few questions:

    1. Who's the highest-quality prospect you're willing to give up for a bullpen piece?

    2. What does that quality of a prospect tend to get you historically in trade?

    3. Is that level of reliever going to meaningfully change their chances at a playoff run?

    4. If you don't like the answer to #3, does that change your view on whether they should be buyers?

    I don't know the answers to these myself, but I feel like I'm not willing to go far enough on #1 to make a difference on #3.  Maybe the equation changes if you're getting a nonrental, but then you're committing to an even higher prospect cost.

    8 minutes ago, Vanimal46 said:

    In regards to the bullpen, keep doing what they're doing. Pick up intriguing DFA candidates, and sift through the internal options. By the end of this season, we should have a definitive answer whether Funderburk, Adams, Orze, and Laweryson can be relied upon for 2027 and beyond. If they're not, get them off the 40 man this offseason and bring in others instead. 

    And also add a couple of arms that are fringe starters/good reliever conversion types as your second or third piece in trades.  As @Mike Sixelhas pointed out, the Yankees AAA has a few guys with some really nice peripherals that aren't going to be hard to add in as filler for someone like Jeffers that could supplement this plan.

    Unless Roden and Rojas for Varland is on the table.....pass on any trades for established guys.

    Relievers are at their highest "buy" point right now and the investment simply isn't worth the risk.  I'd argue you can sell and improve this pen AND not jeopardize the future.

    14 minutes ago, Patzky said:

    His defense is adequate, at least. How do you see us keeping Jeffers? Short of him remaining injured through September, (The Pablo Plan) I don't see a path there. Diaw, Tait, there are plans in place. Unlike a few years ago, catcher is one position I'm not so concerned with in the near and long term.

     

    I am split on keeping Jeffers because I am not sure there is a viable pathway to resigning him.  But I think we are going to miss him more than we realize next year.  We do have depth with Diaw and Tait but will they be ready to contribute at any point next year.  If they are not, then we need to hope for a short season because I don't think Caratini can hold up to catching for 100 to 120 games.  Again this was another head scratcher from Falvey.

    5 minutes ago, HarmonK03 said:

    I am split on keeping Jeffers because I am not sure there is a viable pathway to resigning him.  But I think we are going to miss him more than we realize next year.  We do have depth with Diaw and Tait but will they be ready to contribute at any point next year.  If they are not, then we need to hope for a short season because I don't think Caratini can hold up to catching for 100 to 120 games.  Again this was another head scratcher from Falvey.

    Ah I do agree the only way Jeffers stays if is his injury prevents his successful return. I love the guy but I don't wish that on him.

    6 hours ago, Czelgert said:

    The trade deadline is organizationally the most expensive time of the year to fix a bullpen.  Guys who can be picked up for low to medium salaries in the offseason are traded for solid prospects.  I deeply want this team to improve its bullpen for my own entertainment but now is not the time to move prospects to cover for poor offseason planning.

    Cheap free agent guys who were pretty good RP brought back Tyler Watson, Dakota Chalmers or cost Llewelyn Diaz. The exception was Felix Lopez having a career half season 

    Trade Larnach, and Jeffers for pitching (relief and starting).  Try to sign Ryan longterm  (if it isn’t feasible, trade him). Bring up Wallner, and Roden.    Demote Austin Martin.   Try to acquire something for the bullpen this year and next year.  
    These should be easy decisions to make.   Contenders should overpay.  
    Retaining Joe Ryan is the toughest decision if he can’t be signed to a reasonable longterm contract and if the Twins are in contention at the deadline 
     

    Another well written and thoughtful article Nick. But with all due respect to your intent, I think we should be talking about how to build the bullpen in an overall context, not simply aspirations to reach the playoffs this year. In reality, today and next year really overlap.

    IF the Twins can finish the season around .500 while introducing some young position players to go along with the young arms we've already had at least glimpses of, I'll consider this a solid season, regardless of sneaking in to the playoffs.

    I think the Twins, if they play their cards right, can sell AND buy a little at the deadline. For instance, does a competing team out there have need for Jeffers, Larnach, and Bell? I'd say definitely, probably, and probably. But they aren't going to trade an important, high leverage arm to acquire them. And a non contending team is going to want prospects...that I'm generally loathing in trading away...and not veterans they aren't going to have use for, and won't be around.

    But perhaps a contending team has a young, controllable #5 or #6 man that's similar to Varland before he had his big breakout, who is getting his feet wet, and has potential, but isn't one of their most important pen pieces. Further, what if one of those teams has a AAA arm...possibly a AA arm ready for promotion...that has either just begun a transition to the pen, or seems destined to do so. In other words, can Larnach bring back another team's Morris? THAT is how we can sell....and create room for top prospects that are ready...and also do some buying as well.

    INTERNALLY, the cupboard is pretty bare right now due to injury and arms already promoted. There's only a couple of arms left at AAA that might help still, and are as good or better than what's already on the roster.  So I see this as more about how to build the bullpen with a long lens, and not just this season. Where those 2 issues overlap, so much the better.

    GOMEZ and MORRIS: While some regression is probably due, I think we've seen enough of Gomez so far to believe he's not just "some guy" on a hot streak. He's young, controllable, and has solid stuff. And Morris is the same, and seems to keep improving.

    BANDA: While he's gone for a while now, he should be back before the season is done. He's untradable, a solid LH that still has control that won't require some huge salary bump, and SHOULD be brought back next season.

    ROJAS: I know the idea was for him to be an eventual SP. And maybe that still happens in the future,  maybe not. But Santana and Liriano did it, so maybe he can too. But he has POWERFUL 8th and 9th inning stuff written all over him in the future, possibly before the season is over. For now, he could have great value in the middle innings.

    SANDS: We saw in 2024 how good he CAN be. We saw glimpses in 2025 at times, and even early parts of this season. I don't think we have a handle on who he truly is, but we've seen flashes. He at least helps as a solid middle arm in the pen.

    FESTA: With a little luck...which the Twins are in short supply these days...he'll be healthy enough to pitch in August, September at the latest. That would help in his initial transformation to being a reliever. But if we have to wait until 2027, so be it. He's been dynamite his 1st turn through a lineup, and pretty good the 2nd time even. But injuries and troubles a 3rd time through an order just makes him destined for the pen. Some guys are just built for fewer IP more often rather than being a starter.

    CJ CULPEPPER: I'm a believer. He's been very effective when healthy. He seems to be taking to his new pen role well. I believe he needs most or all of July to hone and adapt, but he's got the STUFF to be another good pen transition story. Late July or August 1st for his debut? 

    Pause for a moment and add those guys up. While there are injury factors there, and inexperience, the STUFF and POTENTIAL of those 7 could have a pretty decent bullpen by August, or certainly to begin 2027. A bullpen that is experienced and ready to help a team to the playoffs? That's very debatable. But it's a bullpen better than TODAY, with about as much STUFF and potential as the pen they had the last couple of years before blowing it up.

    RAYA: I was pleasantly surprised the Twins didn't use him and then send him down right away after his 40+ pitch debut. From EVERYTHING we've always read and heard about him, he's got some pretty serious STUFF in his arsenal, but consistency/command has always been an issue. (Not to mention LENGTH as a SP). But he really turned a corner in May. Unless he just absolutely imploded, I'm for giving him all the rope he needs to see if he can start to reach his potential. They also have the luxury of sending him back down for a reset if needed, and bring him back up later. There's only a couple of arms sitting at AAA that come close to matching his potential. 

    KLEIN: He's been pretty disappointing this season, but he's still got solid offerings and good K numbers. The HR ball has definitely messed with him this season. And perhaps I'm imagining it, but it seems like his first couple of IP are usually productive, and THEN he allows a big hit. But what might he accomplish oy throwing 1-2 IP?

    I think there's some nice potential in both Raya and Klein. Raya appears more ready.

    PAREDES: Look, he's nothing special. Despite a nice and versatile career in the Twins' MILB system, he's kind of a throwback, control, pitch to contact pitcher. His career in the Twins bullpen might be short lived. But for NOW, if Ober can come back as the 5th SP for the Twins and continue his earlier season trend of ALSO being an effective, throwback, smart, experienced, pitch to contact arm, Paredes could be a solid 2-3 IP every 2-3 days are to help fill out the pen as the 8th man. At least he's healthy and can be part of the "now" bullpen.

    EVERYONE ELSE: IF Funderburk could get his control down FINALLY, he can be a decent option. Adams and Laweryson just don't have enough pute stuff to have a bright future. But if they can avoid BB...especially to leadoff hitters...and keep the ball in the park, they can at least help fill the middle innings. I've seen enough from the Jeckyl/Hyde Orze to think he's got room to improve and be a potential 6th/7th man in future bullpens. But I can also see him squeezed out by 2027 as well. But all of these guys provide some depth options at least. And Rogers, also Jeckyl/Hyde, is probably done after this season. Not even sure he has minimum trade value.

    But when you look at all the above, without adding any FA, you can see the makings of an end of season, going in to 2027, bullpen, that would be VASTLY different than the pen we started with this season. It would also be fairly young, inexpensive, and offer some real upside potential.

    And potential trades of Jeffers, Larnach, and Bell, might offer up a a decent arm or two as I detailed previously. So there could be another pre-breakout Varland or Morris or two that we might acquire.

    When I see Roden, Jenkins, Gonzalez and Mendez healthy and performing well at St Paul...Rodriguez won't be ready until some time in August...I don't believe moving Jeffers, Larnach, and Bell is ownership or the FO throwing in the towel for 2026. It would be a "re-tool" in mid stride to promote talented TOP prospects internally to actually/potentially help the team, while building for 2027.

    *NOTE: I'm only leaving K-Pepper out of the conversation because his promotion isn't affected by these trades.

    IMO, I don't believe Ryan will be traded unless they get a "blown away" offer. THAT would be a WHITE FLAG that ownership and the FO have simply given up on the season. An already thin rotation would become DESIMATED. And I don't think they want to go down that path.

    I'd ONLY trade prospects if the return was a quality pen arm with potential and years of control. My current belief is to utilize the young arms on hand. I understand fully that some of the potential arms I've listed aren't quite ready YET, and a couple are on the IL. But I don't want to move prospects just yet when I've felt all along that this season was going to be a transition year. 

    We've already seen improvement and debuts from several young arms. It's time to lean in to them, but also debut the young, talented prospects as well. 

     

     

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...