Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Minnesota Twins 2018 Trade Deadline Report Card


    Tom Froemming

    What a whirlwind of a week it’s been. Now that the dust has settled on the trade deadline, let’s take a look at which affiliate each of these new pieces is headed to, try to rank the new prospects and hand out individual grades for each of the five deals Derek Falvey & Co. made.

    Image courtesy of © Jake Roth-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    All right, first thing’s first, here’s where all the players the Twins acquired are headed:

    Minnesota: Logan Forsythe

    Rochester: Chase De Jong, Tyler Austin.

    Chattanooga: Devin Smeltzer, Luke Raley, Jorge Alcala (on the DL)

    Fort Myers: Ryan Costello, Ernie De La Trinidad

    Cedar Rapids: Jhoan Duran, Gabriel Maciel

    Elizabethton: Luis Rijo, Gilberto Celestino

    So who are the best prospects the Twins acquired? Well 10 of the 12 guys the Twins added (everyone but Forsythe and Austin) still qualify for prospect status. I’m still getting up to speed on a lot of these guys, especially the ones acquired this week, so I’ll defer to another source.

    Baseball America published a fun list today. They ranked all the prospects dealt at the deadline, and the order they had the new guys in made a lot of sense to me.

    -Jorge Alcala

    -Gilberto Celestino

    -Jhoan Duran

    -Luke Raley

    -Chase De Jong

    -Luis Rijo

    -Devin Smeltzer

    -Gabriel Maciel

    -Ryan Costello

    -Ernie De La Trinidad

    Personally, I’d strongly consider putting Celestino on top. I also might put Rijo and Maciel above De Jong. Anyway, BA has capsules written up on those top three guys, and it’s just kind of interesting to see where they have them listed among all the prospects on the move. But, I’m going to make you click the link to go check out the rest of that stuff if you’re interested.

    All right, so let’s take a look at each trade individually. On each of these, I’m going to provide the link to the Twins Daily article published when the deals broke and also link to the Baseball Prospectus Transaction Analysis piece for each. Friend of the site Aaron Gleeman and the rest of the staff at B-Pro did an excellent job at breaking down each piece of each of these trades, so again, I’ll tip my cap to another outlet and encourage you to check those out. The grades though, those will be all me. Any grade disputes must be taken up with the Dean :)

    Friday, July 27

    Twins give: Eduardo Escobar

    Twins get: OF Ernie De La Trinidad, RHP Jhoan Duran, OF Gabriel Maciel

    Additional info: Twins Daily | Baseball Prospectus

    Tom’s grade: B

    Escobar was my favorite Twins player, but it just made too much sense to trade him away. It’s encouraging to hear the Twins approached him about an extension prior to shipping him off, and here’s hoping they engage with his camp again once he becomes a free agent.

    Eduardo was having a career year and will hit free agency at the end of the season, so it was difficult to envision the Twins netting a huge haul. I think Duran is a nice add, and he already made a great first impression, throwing seven no-hit innings in his Cedar Rapids debut. It sounds to me like he has a better chance at reaching the majors as a starter than Alcala does, though he doesn’t have quite as high of a ceiling.

    Maciel will skyrocket up prospect lists if he ever develops power. He’s a switch hitter who’s billed as a legit center fielder with elite speed, so even if the power never arrives he could be a fourth outfielder. De La Trinidad was a college draftee taken in the 19th round last year. His upside seems limited, but hitters hit. He’s got a career .874 OPS so far in the minors, so that at least makes him an intriguing throw-in.

    Friday, July 27

    Twins give: Ryan Pressly

    Twins get: RHP Jorge Alcala, OF Gilberto Celestino

    Additional info: Twins Daily | Baseball Prospectus

    Tom’s grade: A

    I love this deal. Pressly was the only player they moved who was going to still be under team control next season, but in parting with him, they acquired what I consider to be the two most valuable pieces among the dozen players that were acquired.

    Yes, Alcala was immediately placed on the DL with a right trap strain, but I think it’s a good sign that happened before he threw a single pitch in the Twins’ org. That suggests two things to me: 1) The Twins’ staff was able to uncover something in Alcala’s medicals and is getting out in front of this issue, and 2) I’d be willing to bet they used that information to leverage this deal with Houston.

    Celestino signed out of the Dominican Republic for a big bonus and he's living up to that billing so far. Not many guys put up the kind of numbers he was in the New York Penn League. He was fourth in batting average, sixth in OBP, seventh in slugging and was 14-for-14 on stolen base attempts in the NYPL.

    Pressly throws absolute filth and was having a strong season, but bullpen arms are so unpredictable and I feel like there are a lot of different ways the Twins could replace a guy like Pressly.

    Monday, July 30

    Twins give: Zach Duke

    Twins get: RHP Chase De Jong, 1B/3B Ryan Costello

    Additional info: Twins Daily | Baseball Prospectus

    Tom’s grade: C

    To Twins fans, Duke may not seem like much of a prize, but he is among the best left-handed specialists in baseball. Duke has faced 425 left-handed hitters since the start of the 2014 season, and southpaws have hit just .214/.286/.316 off him. Since he was on an expiring contract, Duke was never going to fetch anything similar to the Pressly haul, and I’m not real impressed with what the Twins netted from Seattle.

    De Jong might be an interesting candidate to stick in the bullpen and see what happens, but it’s very difficult to see him ever working his way into the picture here as a starter. Maybe Costello is going to make me eat my words someday, but he was a 31st-round pick last year. Despite that underwhelming pedigree, he certainly deserves respect for putting up some of the better power numbers in the Midwest League this season. Again, hitters hit.

    Monday, July 30

    Twins give: Lance Lynn

    Twins get: Tyler Austin, Luis Rijo

    Additional info: Twins Daily | Baseball Prospectus

    Tom’s grade: A

    I love this deal too, but for very different reasons than the Pressly trade. I just didn’t think Lynn had this kind of value. He fits the profile of exactly the type of pitcher a contending team should be looking to replace. Don’t get me wrong, he did really turn things around from May forward, but in my opinion he’s a second-division big league pitcher even at his best. Maybe the Yankees are onto something in using him in long relief, I don’t know.

    It’s worth noting that the Twins are paying half of Lynn’s salary, but this is still a really good return in my eyes. Tyler Austin could be a platoon 1B/RF/DH right now. The contact issues are a concern, but he crushes lefties and Target Field has been a pretty kind environment for right-handed power hitters.

    Honestly, if this was Lynn for Luis Rijo straight up I would have been impressed. Rijo has an insane 8.36 K:BB ratio in 125 ⅓ innings over his minor league career. He also tops out at 93 mph, so it’s not like it’s all just smoke and mirrors. And on top of all that, Lynn’s departure from the team opened up a spot for Adalberto Mejia to get a much-deserved chance in the rotation. Win, win, win, it’s looking all good here to me.

    Tuesday, July 31

    Twins give: Brian Dozier

    Twins get: 2B Logan Forsythe, OF/1B Luke Raley, LHP Devin Smeltzer

    Additional info: Twins Daily | Baseball Prospectus

    Tom’s grade: D

    I’m certain this was the best deal the Twins could get on July 31, less than an hour before the deadline. What I’m not certain of is if that was the best time to deal him. You never know how these things work out, and both Ian Kinsler and Jonathan Schoop entering the trade market late had to have complicated things, but I suspect the Twins could have gotten a better package if they had made the deal earlier, or may have even been able to find a better waiver trade partner this month.

    Of course, there was always the option to keep Dozier and extend a qualifying offer to him. Maybe he would have accepted, but I’m of the mind that there’s really no such thing as a bad one-year deal. Why did I think this was the Twins’ worst trade? Mainly because of who they were forced to take back.

    Logan Forsythe, the only major leaguer the Twins acquired in all these deals, actually has extreme negative trade value. This seems to defy logic, but the business of baseball is funny. His inclusion basically made this deal cash neutral. There was probably never going to be a deal with the Dodgers that didn’t have to include Forsythe, since they’re trying to avoid luxury tax penalties, but that’s exactly why you don’t make a deal with them in the first place.

    I typically don’t care much what happens to the Pohlad’s money (did you see how I just suggested they give Dozier $18 million?), but you’ve still got to acknowledge that money is an asset to a baseball team. If you get rid of Dozier, I think you need to find a way to get rid of that money too.

    If Forsythe’s not in this trade, I give it at least a C, maybe even a B. Heck, if I just look at this deal in a vacuum, which is what I originally did yesterday, I might give it a C. But when you zoom out and look at the big picture of what happened across baseball leading up to and on deadline day, it definitely feels like the Twins may have hurt their odds at maximizing a return. Tough thing for me to say from the outside looking in, but that’s how I feel.

    Raley is putting up really good numbers in Double A, but he’s already 24 and it’s just really hard to break into the bigs as a corner outfield/first base type. On the plus side, Raley also sounds like the type of guy in terms of makeup who goes out and proves idiots like me wrong, so I’m excited to see how this plays out.

    Smeltzer is left-handed, that’s always a plus. He’s also relatively close to the majors (he’s spent all year in Double A) and his strikeout numbers saw a boost when he recently shifted to the bullpen. However, it sounds like he has a fairly straight, fairly slow fastball, so …

    All right, so there’s my report card. The front office comes away with a 2.8 GPA. Not exactly Ivy League material, but in my eyes they get a solid passing grade for what was a difficult trade deadline to navigate for them. Maybe they also deserve some extra credit for the non-move they made by keeping Kyle Gibson.

    So now it’s your turn, how would you grade the Twins’ trade deadline?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     The big problem with taking Forsythe is that he’s taking a 25 man roster spot from someone (Gordon?) that could get some MLB experience in preparation for next year.

    Oh noes! Then cut him. The trade didn't provide salary relief, but we got a couple of guys, so that's the value with or without Forsythe. I'll never understand why someone's salary makes a difference on 25-man or 40-man decisions in situations like this. Sunk cost, and all that. In the past off-season, the FO office was perfectly happy to pay Dozier the $9M as part of having a shot at contention this year; the contention part didn't pan out, and the cost at this point is baked in.

     

    I really enjoyed this article. Question I have, does anyone think it is possible that Dozier asked to be traded so that he couldn't get stuck with a qualifying offer hanging over him when he entered free agency and the FO did the best they could to comply with his wishes and got back the best they could as a courtesy to Dozier and the time and performance for this team? We have seen recently what the qualifying offer does to free agents such as Moustakas last year.

    They could have done him a courtesy anyway by not putting the QO on him.  Nonetheless, I have a feeling that this move was a courtesy move, for all parties involved.  Andrew Friedman probably finished the transaction with a "Thanks, Derek, I owe you one."  One what, you ask?  I don't know.  Future considerations, like a Moscow Mule or probably something trendier.

     

     

     

    Escobar trade is the most difficult for me.  He seemed to be the sole of the clubhouse.  I hope the FO makes getting him back as a FA one of their top priorities.

     

    Sometimes you're the soul, and sometimes you're squashed by the sole.

     

    I’m hoping more like two weeks. It really makes zero sense to have him get playing time when the Twins could be evaluating Austudillo at the MLB level. Maybe someone will put in a waiver claim.

    Are we really talking or thinking Willians Astudillo has a future on the Twins? In the day and age of OBP the Twins are going to say hey lets give an roster spot to a 26 year old with a career MINOR league OBP of less than .300? 

    https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/ranking-the-prospects-traded-at-the-deadline-2/

     

    If you want to play "what if,' check out this article.  What if Fangraph's is right, and what if the Twins had done things different.

     

    For instance, maybe they jump in earlier and get Drury instead of Austin for Lynn.

     

    How did the Mets get the 8th best (Fangraphs) prospect for Cabrera?

     

    Still, what if's aside, not a bad haul in Fangraph's estimation.  Duran has "arguably the best stuff of any prospect traded."  So that could be good.

    Well, yes. I think some folks are factoring into their evaluation that the Twins haven't cut him yet. Is it fair to maybe make a conditional grade?

    Not sure. Trades and roster management are two facets of franchise management that seem nearly independent of one another. In this case there should be a plan that connects the two facets, but even if not, I think the trade can stand on its own: we got two prospects of some value that can be debated, and a major-league zero. I'm fine with ignoring the zero. If roster management turns it to a negative, that doesn't reflect on the trade itself.

    I really liked this report and I tend to side more with Tom's grades than Seth's more optimistic appraisal.  Of course I think we dawdled with Dozier and that hurt, plus Rodney should have moved on too and I would have taken offers for Odorizzi.  Sometimes it is what you did not do that really affects the overall grade which I would make a C.  (One exception - moving Lynn was terrific). 

     

    Well, yes. I think some folks are factoring into their evaluation that the Twins haven't cut him yet. Is it fair to maybe make a conditional grade?

    Not me. If they cut him today that doesn't change my grade at all, they still have to pay him that money. The only thing that might change my evaluation is if they were able to deal Forsythe this month, which is highly unlikely.

     

    Speaking of which, if anybody is curious about how waiver trades work, I wrote a primer for MLB Daily Dish back in 2012 that I believe is still accurate today. One of the things I've always found interesting is that any player not on the 40-man roster can still be dealt with no restrictions this month.

     

    Keep in mind De Jong was on the 40-man roster -- Seattle likely had to cut him anyway to make room, and he's marginal enough that they didn't really care if they lost him on waivers. I think that's how we got 2 players for Duke, rather than any particular demonstration of scouting/negotiating skill.

    De Jong seems to join a bottleneck of marginal pitchers on the Twins 40-man roster. If he was a waiver claim, I suspect we'd be a bit more skeptical of his usefulness than you are in this trade grade.

     

    I'm fine with that. Gives the Twins two months to evaluate them on a closer level and then they can make a decision on whether or (more likely) not they want to keep him on their 40-man roster. Same thing with Tyler Austin from the Yankees. Why not give guys a tryout. Obviously the higher-upside prospects are the younger guys, ,but never know when a guy will figure something out. Will it be in two months of working with Cliburn? Doubt it, but who knows.

     

    I've always thought the Twins should be more willing to do things and be creative at the back of the 40-man roster. If they need space, they can DFA him too. My assumption is he won't pitch for the Twins and will be DFAd in September or October. But they also got another piece for a lefty reliever who will be a free agent at seasons end. 

     

    Fangraphs has an ever so slightly different view of Alcala....

     

    Their overall rankings for the Twins' minors are here (and include the new players)...

     

    https://www.fangraphs.com/scoutboard.aspx?draft=&type=&pos=&team=min

     

    Overall, I like that the FO traded off guys that have expiring deals, and have plenty of depth to deal for a veteran or two next off season (or in August). 

    I'm not a big fan of their rankings, some of those are real eyebrow raisers. I love Blankenhorn, but him over Rooker? Sands, Rijo, Moya and Seltzer over Thorpe? Anyway, they must be certain Alcala ends up in the bullpen.

     

    The new MLB Pipeline org rankings have Alcala 11th, Celestino 14th, Maciel 17th, Raley 19th and Duran 23rd. So everybody's got these guys sorted out a little differently.

    I can see why the Dozier deal isn't thought of much, but we're talking about trading a slightly above replacement value 2B with 2 months of control. The Twins weren't getting big offers for him when he was playing well, but now that he's struggling, his price is even lower.

    The problem is the return is worse than keeping Dozier. They swapped Dozier for a worse 2B making the same money on a rental deal, and 2 players that aren't special and probably won't factor into any plans for Minnesota.

     

    The other trades you can squint and see what Falvine was trying to accomplish. This trade is a head scratcher.

    Not me. If they cut him today that doesn't change my grade at all, they still have to pay him that money. The only thing that might change my evaluation is if they were able to deal Forsythe this month, which is highly unlikely.

    On the first part I disagree. If we were financially strapped because of that money yes but as is, no that money does not factor into how I would grade it.

     

    Second sentence, that is part of why he degrades the value of the trade to me. They won't just cut him right away. They will look for value in either flipping him or hoping he returns to pre dodger form. If they do flip him, fine, improve the grade to a C but I'm afraid we're stuck with him for the remainder of the year while they evaluate value in him or look for trade. (Hopefully he's already running through the waiver wire)

     

    The problem is the return is worse than keeping Dozier. They swapped Dozier for a worse 2B making the same money on a rental deal, and 2 players that aren't special and probably won't factor into any plans for Minnesota.

    The other trades you can squint and see what Falvine was trying to accomplish. This trade is a head scratcher.

    Kind of what I have been saying all along.   Its not that Dozier had a huge value to us but the Dodgers were stuck with OPS+ of 53 with Forsythe.    I just have a hard time believing the Dodgers wouldn't have given up more if the Twins hadn't blinked.  IMO they needed Dozier.   In the broadcast last night the Dodger announcers kept referring to Dozier as an all star gold glover.   In one game he may have given them more value than what they gave up.    They had him batting 5th.  They had Forsythe batting 8th in front of the pitcher.    Tells you what they think of the two respectively and I just have to believe they would  have parted with more for that kind of upgrade at their only glaring weakness.

     

    The problem is the return is worse than keeping Dozier. They swapped Dozier for a worse 2B making the same money on a rental deal, and 2 players that aren't special and probably won't factor into any plans for Minnesota.

    The other trades you can squint and see what Falvine was trying to accomplish. This trade is a head scratcher.

     

    I'mm 100% convinced this is a clubhouse trade.

    These trades give me a lot of confidence in the Front Office moving forward. The Pressly trade is the first time in my Twins fandom that I can remember them trading high on a player.

     

    Plus, it just made too much sense. Pressly lead MLB in appearances which could very well increase his injury risk and also, if it continues, increase his chances of having diminished stuff in the next couple seasons. The Twins also have several relievers in AAA that could, by this time next year, be thriving in the bullpen: Nick Anderson, Luke Bard, Alan Busenitz, John Curtiss, Jake Reed, Kohl Stewart, Gabriel Moya (now in MLB). Not all of these guys will stick, of course, but now the Twins can use Pressly's innings (and Duke's, and soon maybe Rodney's and Belisle's) to try them out. 

     

    Their timing on the Eduardo Escobar trade (considering how fast middle infielders moved later) also seemed brilliant.

     

    The Dozier trade was really the only disappointment as I was hoping for a little more. While they might have gotten a little more if they traded him earlier, I don't think it would have been substantially different. Dozier majorly underperformed this year and I wouldn't be surprised if, given some of his comments this year, his leadership skills were starting to be questioned. Also, Aaron Gleeman tweets his historically-bad "late and close" numbers all the time, something other teams have to be all to aware of. So overall, I think brining back a couple prospects and not having the qualifying offer on the table is a plus.

     

    One other thought. Kind of seems like the Luis Rijo acquisition replaces Luis Gil (traded to NYY for Jake Cave). I'm not going to pretend to know anything about Rookie ball prospects, but based on what people (like Seth) are saying, Rijo seems to have just as much if not more upside. If we think of the trade as Lynn and Gil and $ for Cave, Austin, and Rijo, I think it is even more impressive. 

     

    Overall grade: A

    I think the many locals have been overvaluing Mr. Dozier for a long time. I believe they got the very best they could've gotten. At his peak his offers were not good. 

     

    Getting Forsythe back... Someone has to play 2nd I guess. Nothing wrong with having another longtime player in the locker room that has seen and played in the biggest of games. 

     

    For those that think they should call up Gordon: Wake up!!! He isn't ready. It appears he isn't even ready for AAA. If he is called up he is getting moved in the wrong direction. 

     

    I would rather see if Rosario remembers how to play the infield before calling up Gordon. 

    over value Dozier?

     

    2nd most WAR at 2B over the last three years.....

     

    No one here has called him the best 2B in the game.....

     

    Frankly, I'm baffled that teams didn't want him more than they did last year. There must be a reason, other than on field performance. He was a better 2B, 1B, DH than most teams had....

     

    The problem is the return is worse than keeping Dozier. They swapped Dozier for a worse 2B making the same money on a rental deal, and 2 players that aren't special and probably won't factor into any plans for Minnesota.

    The other trades you can squint and see what Falvine was trying to accomplish. This trade is a head scratcher.

     

    You are assuming in your analysis that the 2 players WONT factor into any plans for MN. I do not think that is a given. They aren't high end prospects, but there's a chance Raley can be useful

    Are we really talking or thinking Willians Astudillo has a future on the Twins? In the day and age of OBP the Twins are going to say hey lets give an roster spot to a 26 year old with a career MINOR league OBP of less than .300?

    As a regular, probably not. Possibly as a reserve. That’s why I want to see him play. Can he field adequately everywhere? Anywhere? Can he hit enough to not be an automatic out? Those are questions that I feel need to be answered. At the MLB level. There’s no reason not to. We already know what Forsythe and Motter can do at the MLB level.

     

    over value Dozier?

     

    2nd most WAR at 2B over the last three years.....

     

    No one here has called him the best 2B in the game.....

     

    Frankly, I'm baffled that teams didn't want him more than they did last year. There must be a reason, other than on field performance. He was a better 2B, 1B, DH than most teams had....

    Yeah, Dozier's ok but he's no   Punto, Nishioka or  Lombardozzi.

     

    Kind of what I have been saying all along.   Its not that Dozier had a huge value to us but the Dodgers were stuck with OPS+ of 53 with Forsythe.    I just have a hard time believing the Dodgers wouldn't have given up more if the Twins hadn't blinked.  IMO they needed Dozier.   In the broadcast last night the Dodger announcers kept referring to Dozier as an all star gold glover.   In one game he may have given them more value than what they gave up.    They had him batting 5th.  They had Forsythe batting 8th in front of the pitcher.    Tells you what they think of the two respectively and I just have to believe they would  have parted with more for that kind of upgrade at their only glaring weakness.

     

    But the way Dozier played down the stretch the Twins lost all leverage.  The Brewers, Red Sox, Diamondbacks, Phillies, Indians, Rockies, Mariners, all could have had him and they either didn't offer anything for him or went with players they apparently thought were better.

     

    The Dodgers got a deal no doubt about it and they have a good plan for how to maximize Doziers strengths but what were we gonna do with another two months of Dozier?  They obviously didn't want to do the QO or they would have kept him.  They took what they could get.  Makes sense to me.

    These trades give me a lot of confidence in the Front Office moving forward.

    This is sort of separate from grading the trades themselves, but I wish they would have tried something sooner -- even something small, or "addition by subtraction" -- to salvage the 2018 season, beyond (or instead of) adding Belisle.

     

    If even 2 of these guys become the next Eddie Escobar, not a single person on this board is going to be sad about passing up on an 8% chance to get stomped by Houston.

    I was about to write that with the limited return we got for Dozier, I would have kept him for two months and hoped for a miracle - Dozier goes on a tear, Sano turns back into an all-star, Polanco gets back to where he was before the suspension, the duct tape holds in the bullpen, Buxton gets healthy starts hitting. 

     

    With all the disappointment this season, it's easy to forget there was a lot to like about the lineup at the end of last year.   I'd be happy to get stomped again in the playoffs this year. 

    You are assuming in your analysis that the 2 players WONT factor into any plans for MN. I do not think that is a given. They aren't high end prospects, but there's a chance Raley can be useful

    Possible I guess. Not likely. They sound like players a team can pick up at any point in the off-season. Nothing worth taking an obvious down grade from Dozier to Forsythe.

     

    Possible I guess. Not likely. They sound like players a team can pick up at any point in the off-season. Nothing worth taking an obvious down grade from Dozier to Forsythe.

     

    Again, none of us here as far as I know are professional scouts. They may have chosen those guys for a specific reason. Downgrade from Dozier to Forsythe is for 2 months in a season they aren't going to make the playoffs. Dozier obviously didn't garner a ton of interest, but if one of these prospects turns out who cares about that downgrade (even if they don't turn out, who cares?)

     

    Baseball America published a fun list today. They ranked all the prospects dealt at the deadline, and the order they had the new guys in made a lot of sense to me.
     

    -Jorge Alcala

    -Gilberto Celestino

    -Jhoan Duran

    -Luke Raley

    -Chase De Jong

    -Luis Rijo

    -Devin Smeltzer

    -Gabriel Maciel

    -Ryan Costello

    -Ernie De La Trinidad

     

     

    Geez, and here I was thinking De La Trinidad was one of my five favorites from this group! 

     

    Those guys who walk as much as they strikeout always seem to get shot at the big leagues. His draft position sure isn't going to help him in the eyes of evaluators though.

     

    Again, none of us here as far as I know are professional scouts. They may have chosen those guys for a specific reason. Downgrade from Dozier to Forsythe is for 2 months in a season they aren't going to make the playoffs. Dozier obviously didn't garner a ton of interest, but if one of these prospects turns out who cares about that downgrade (even if they don't turn out, who cares?)

     

    Yep even if the prospects don't turn out then the result is the same as keeping Dozier for two months. 

     

    I guess I don't understand why so many people are down on Raley.  His numbers aren't all that different from Rookers.  Rooker has a ton more doubles but that is about the only difference.  They both have 800 OPS's.  Raley is ranked 19 on MLB's site for our system so he is a top 30 prospect. Defensively it looks like he can handle both Corners and even play center field in a pinch so he is an athletic and versatile player.

     

    Maybe the Twins wanted Rooker insurance and got Raley who knows.  I am just happy they got something.

    The return on the Dozier trade is disappointing, but getting a couple of prospects in a situation where you otherwise would have gotten nothing is good.

     

    Otherwise I agree, these were good trades. If It were me, I would never let a guy like Pressly go except in his contract year, but I understand what they were thinking.

     

    Terry Ryan stuck to an ideal of never signing free agents, only feed the minors. But look here, the new crew signed free agents and flipped them later to feed the minors. When did Terry Ryan ever add 10-11 prospects in one week?

    Yep even if the prospects don't turn out then the result is the same as keeping Dozier for two months.

     

    I guess I don't understand why so many people are down on Raley. His numbers aren't all that different from Rookers. Rooker has a ton more doubles but that is about the only difference. They both have 800 OPS's. Raley is ranked 19 on MLB's site for our system so he is a top 30 prospect. Defensively it looks like he can handle both Corners and even play center field in a pinch so he is an athletic and versatile player.

     

    Maybe the Twins wanted Rooker insurance and got Raley who knows. I am just happy they got something.

    Other people on Fangraphs don't believe in Raley and say he struggles recognizing/hitting breaking balls.

     

    He is ranked #64 out of 65 on Fangraphs' recent article "Ranking the Prospects Traded at the Deadline"

     

    https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/ranking-the-prospects-traded-at-the-deadline-2/




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...