Mailbag: Extension-Palooza, Infield Log Jam, New Spring Format

Mauerpower · February 19, 2019

Per the athletic, an article about sano

For him to embrace it to the extent he did is significant,” Levine said. “We saw video accounts, photographic accounts. I got a chance to see him when I was down in the Dominican and literally lay hands on him as appropriately as possible, hug him and touch as many muscle groups as I could.

“When you then see him in spring training and it starts with the smile on his face, which feels exuberant and authentic. Then you see how he looks physically … it’s very encouraging that he took to heart the opportunity that was presented to him this offseason.”

MMMordabito · February 19, 2019

If Baldelli uses openers for Berrios, that's going to be a negative Mark in my book. I get it for Perez and probably even 5 inning Odorizzi and comeback trail Pineda. Berrios should pull a Bumgarner and walk right out of the stadium. As a fan, I'd like the opportunity to see him throw a complete game shutout or maybe get his first no hitter. Gerrit Cole is right. No one, except statheads, wants to watch a *@$# math equation.

Blackjack · February 19, 2019

Cody,

I like your Q&A/Mailbag article every week!!!

Is there any way to ask a question if I'm not on Twitter?? Like via email??

mikelink45 · February 19, 2019

If Baldelli uses openers for Berrios, that's going to be a negative Mark in my book. I get it for Perez and probably even 5 inning Odorizzi and comeback trail Pineda. Berrios should pull a Bumgarner and walk right out of the stadium. As a fan, I'd like the opportunity to see him throw a complete game shutout or maybe get his first no hitter. Gerrit Cole is right. No one, except statheads, wants to watch a *@$# math equation.

Amen brother! Right in line with you.

Jim Hahn · February 19, 2019

I don't think we will much of the opener used this year, by the Twins. In interviews both Baldelli and Falvey have avoided committing to it for this year. With veteran starters and questions about the depth of the bullpen, this strategy makes less sense for the Twins than perhaps other teams. We will see, but unless injuries intervene or the depth of the bullpen changes, using the opener may not be the best strategy for the Twins.

Steve Lein · February 19, 2019

I see an opener being used, but four out of six games in a week? I doubt that.

That's twice as much as anybody else has used one to this point. The Rays did it in about 50 games last year, but that's a projection for over 100 games with an opener.

The only starters I see this being used with are Mejia, Perez, and possibly Odorizzi. In other words, the back of the rotation. I don't see that happening with Berrios, Gibson, or Pineda.

Battle ur tail off · February 19, 2019

At this point in their careers, I think Max Kepler and Eddie Rosario are both trade worthy. Neither of them has shown me they are irreplaceable and there will certainly be some pressure from the minor leagues. Alex Kirilloff could make his debut in 2019 (see below) and this could put added pressure on some of the other young outfielders on the roster.

Your post here is great, but this comment about Rosario seems a little funny. It's almost as if you haven't watched games and just are typing this looking at numbers.

Rosario has been the heart and soul of this offense the past 2 seasons. He's a fixture if I'm the GM.

ashbury · February 19, 2019

Gerrit Cole is right. No one, except statheads, wants to watch a *@$# math equation.

I wonder what Cole yells at the opposing dugout when a lefty is brought in to pinch hit against him.

Tomj14 · February 19, 2019

If Baldelli uses openers for Berrios, that's going to be a negative Mark in my book. I get it for Perez and probably even 5 inning Odorizzi and comeback trail Pineda. Berrios should pull a Bumgarner and walk right out of the stadium. As a fan, I'd like the opportunity to see him throw a complete game shutout or maybe get his first no hitter. Gerrit Cole is right. No one, except statheads, wants to watch a *@$# math equation.

If they have told Berrios this why would he ever sign an extension with the Twins and not demand a trade.

Blackjack · February 19, 2019

If the opener strategy helps the Twins win games, I'm for it. Use the personnel to the best of their ability, if that means using an opener for them, so be it. Just win baby.

PseudoSABR · February 19, 2019

"I got a chance to see him when I was down in the Dominican and literally lay hands on him as appropriately as possible, hug him and touch as many muscle groups as I could."

Just a bit creepy!

Riverbrian · February 19, 2019

Use of an opener is just an adjustment in sequence.

It is nothing to be afraid of.

MMMordabito · February 19, 2019

Use of an opener is just an adjustment in sequence.

It is nothing to be afraid of.

Not afraid of the opener .... Just think it is poor strategy, bad baseball and less fun to watch when the primary pitcher would be someone like Gibson or Berrios .... You're basically just wasting a bullpen arm right out of the gate, when either of those guys is probably a better bet than the likely opener.

Berrios doesn't seem like the kind of player that would buy into this. He might give the lip service to his manager, but that is about it. If I was him, I would tell my agent to suspend all extension talks until he's guaranteed to start his games.

Take a look at the Twins bullpen and tell me who you would sacrifice as a high leverage option and then still prefer over Berrios against the first three batters in a game (even if they are all left-handed).

Berrios wasn't the one gassed or injured at the end of last season. It was the likely opener fodder (Hildenberger, Moya, Reed, Mejia).

Riverbrian · February 19, 2019

Not afraid of the opener .... Just think it is poor strategy, bad baseball and less fun to watch when the primary pitcher would be someone like Gibson or Berrios .... You're basically just wasting a bullpen arm right out of the gate, when either of those guys is probably a better bet than the likely opener.

Berrios doesn't seem like the kind of player that would buy into this. He might give the lip service to his manager, but that is about it. If I was him, I would tell my agent to suspend all extension talks until he's guaranteed to start his games.

Take a look at the Twins bullpen and tell me who you would sacrifice as a high leverage option and then still prefer over Berrios against the first three batters in a game (even if they are all left-handed).

Berrios wasn't the one gassed or injured at the end of last season. It was the likely opener fodder (Hildenberger, Moya, Reed, Mejia).

The Rays didn’t use an opener for Snell.

Despite unquestioned success with the concept they still acquired Charlie Morton.

The Rays and every team will continue to look for traditional starters who can throw lots of quality innings.

The problem is that very few teams can staff a 5 man rotation with 5 guys who can throw quality innings and down with that ship they go like a bad auto-pilot.

The Rays just said enough of that. No more forcing a 5+ ERA in to a traditional starter role just to eat innings below par... and it worked and now others will follow.

The opener was just a creative solution but a partial solution. The opener is just sequencing... not a big deal in itself but it is what everyone is latching on to.

Take a look at the innings allocation of each pitcher on the Rays... that’s where the real story is. They blurred the lines between starter and reliever innings... and it worked.

Just another example that the traditional model of roster composition breing clearly outdated. Free agent compensation, positional flexibility, players who can both pitch and hit.

Cue Bob Dylan “The times they are a changin”. And it’s about time.

ahart10 · February 19, 2019

If Ohtani has been healthy all year and produced on both sides of the ball like he was preinjury does that make him a clear MVP candidate?

MMMordabito · February 19, 2019

The Rays didn’t use an opener for Snell.

Despite unquestioned success with the concept they still acquired Charlie Morton.

The Rays and every team will continue to look for traditional starters who can throw lots of quality innings.

The problem is that very few teams can staff a 5 man rotation with 5 guys who can throw quality innings and down with that ship they go like a bad auto-pilot.

The Rays just said enough of that. No more forcing a 5+ ERA in to a traditional starter role just to eat innings below par... and it worked and now others will follow.

The opener was just a creative solution but a partial solution. The opener is just sequencing... not a big deal in itself but it is what everyone is latching on to.

Take a look at the innings allocation of each pitcher on the Rays... that’s where the real story is. They blurred the lines between starter and reliever innings... and it worked.

Just another example that the traditional model of roster composition bring clearly outdated. Free agent compensation, positional flexibility, players who can both pitch and hit.

Cue Bob Dylan “The times they are a changin”. And it’s about time.

I don't think we disagree on very much, if anything.

My initial post was a reaction to this specific line from the mailbag article:

"I don’t think it will matter if the starter is Jose Berrios or someone at the back end of the rotation."

Everything you are hitting on makes sense.

Using an opener for Jose Berrios doesn't make sense, just like opening for Snell didn't make sense for the Rays. I'm taking it one step further in saying that it should never be an option for a top of the rotation starter that I'm at least hopeful Berrios will be.

Riverbrian · February 19, 2019

If Ohtani has been healthy all year and produced on both sides of the ball like he was preinjury does that make him a clear MVP candidate?

Yes

Take a look what is happening now. Rumors of Matt Davidson also pitching and rumors of Lorenzen also hitting for the Reds.

I’ll contend to all comers that baseball specialization was wrong for decades and decades.

Shohei was the first guy because Japan allowed him to. MLB would have never allowed it. They would force him into one or the other.

We would have seen multiple players with this skill set by now if the option wasn’t removed as a possibility for decades.

Same goes for the Bryant/Bellinger multiple positional talents.

Blackjack · February 19, 2019

Use of an opener is just an adjustment in sequence.

It is nothing to be afraid of.

Good way to look at it!!! And I agree!

Eris · February 20, 2019

I think the benefits of using the opener is related to how poorly a pitcher does the third time through the order. The use of the opener would mean that a pitcher can get deeper into the game without having to face the top of the order 3 times.

ashbury · February 20, 2019

I think the benefits of using the opener is related to how poorly a pitcher does the third time through the order. The use of the opener would mean that a pitcher can get deeper into the game without having to face the top of the order 3 times.

This is on the right track but I would add a little more. If the guy who would otherwise be your starting pitcher is like this, then there's no chance in the world he's pitching a complete game, and extremely unlikely to pitch even six full innings, even if he does pretty well within his limitations. So your bullpen is virtually certain to be used heavily. In that case, bite the bullet. Get a quality short man in there to face the top of the lineup right away. With luck, the "starter" you bring in for the second inning will do well with the lower portion of the lineup, and then get through the complete lineup two more times after that. This strategy potentially gets an extra inning or so out of the starter, compared to having to come rescue him when he gets in trouble the third time through the top of the lineup. Then you turn the game over to the bullpen as you otherwise would have to, when he's about to face the top of the lineup a third time (fourth time overall in the game).

It's basically matching up mediocrity against the bottom of the lineup, more times than against the top.

You don't do it with a starter who has a track record of holding his own. And you use this as carrot-and-stick with your shaky starter, to tell him that when he starts to demonstrate better staying power, for instance by letting him go ahead and face the top of the lineup a third time if the game is going well and you have a decent lead, then eventually you can take the training wheels off and let him start the game like normal.

It's training wheels for youngsters. A walker for the older starter who is just hanging on.

jorgenswest · February 20, 2019

The challenge with the opener is expecting a reliever to get through the teams best hitters at the top of the order.

It is going to take a very good reliever from a deep bullpen to make it work.

Edited February 20, 2019 by jorgenswest

ashbury · February 20, 2019

It is going to take a very good reliever from a deep bullpen to make it work.

Concur. I envision the third-best reliever in your bullpen for the role. A guy you would be calling into service anyway, only later, in a game you intend to try hard to win.

If you are sending Matty Belisle out there to begin the game, You're Doing It Wrong.

diehardtwinsfan · February 20, 2019

Concur. I envision the third-best reliever in your bullpen for the role. A guy you would be calling into service anyway, only later, in a game you intend to try hard to win.

If you are sending Matty Belisle out there to begin the game, You're Doing It Wrong.

I thought he was the closer.

Mike Sixel · February 20, 2019

The challenge with the opener is expecting a reliever to get through the teams best hitters at the top of the order.

It is going to take a very good reliever from a deep bullpen to make it work.

Is it? I wonder what the average pitcher can do in one inning? Say, 80 percent of the time? Especially if they only pitch one or two innings every other day? Edited February 20, 2019 by Mike Sixel

jorgenswest · February 20, 2019

Is it? I wonder what the average pitcher can do in one inning? Say, 80 percent of the time? Especially if they only pitch one or two innings every other day?

It depends heavily on whether they are pitching against the top of the order or the bottom half.

yarnivek1972 · February 20, 2019

I don’t know if Astudillo qualifies as a “surprise” to not make the opening day roster. CJ Cron not making the roster would be a surprise. Trevor Hildenberger not making the roster would be a surprise.

killertwinfan · February 20, 2019

I am probably too focused on the closer role. The idea of 3or 4 successful closers is a good one. My fear is that those same guys will also have too many blown saves.

wabene · February 20, 2019

Just a bit creepy!

I really like what I've seen from this FO so far. I will say their style of communication is a bit much for me. I'm all for proper grammar and large vocabularies. For example I cringe when Mike Zimmer speaks, football seems to frown on intellectualism (except Belichick). One of the things I like about baseball is it's embrace of the intellect. Funny when you realise that many players never went to college, I wonder what they think of the dynamic ivy league duo! I do appreciate well spoken people but only when they don't appear to be trying to be well spoken. This is something I've noted with some amusement and overall I've enjoyed watching them operate.

Physics Guy · February 20, 2019

Is it? I wonder what the average pitcher can do in one inning? Say, 80 percent of the time? Especially if they only pitch one or two innings every other day?

I also wonder if you play matchups. If Odorizzi would normally be the starter, but the team we are facing has a strong LH top of the lineup, open with Mejia or Rogers. I think Mejia could be a strong two inning "opener", especially against a LH hitting lineup.

Physics Guy · February 20, 2019

The opener should definitely not be used with Berrios and Gibson. Maybe not with Odorizzi at the beginning, but certainly if he continues to show he can't get through 6 innings. We don't know enough about Pineda at this point. Perez is certainly a candidate. I can't see 4 out of 6 days.

Kirilloff should not see the major league roster on this team unless we have a significant injury in the OF or Buxton fails miserably. Otherwise, I can't see the need to bring him up. Mid-May of 2020 is fine by me.

Sign In

Mailbag: Extension-Palooza, Infield Log Jam, New Spring Format

Twins Video

Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

Recent Twins Articles

Recent Twins Videos

Community Blogs

Forum Topics

Twins Top Prospects

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Featured Comments

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

Create an account

Sign in

How many games will the Minnesota Twins win in 2026?