Twins Double Down on Roster Stagnation: Why Trade Talent or Upgrade When You Can Just Wait?

[Cody Christie]

Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-Imagn Images

 

The Minnesota Twins front office has officially entered what insiders are calling their “Hope-and-Hold” era, refusing to trade prospects with fringe potential while simultaneously declining to upgrade a 40-man roster already flush with replacement-level promise.

“We’re very proud of what we’ve built,” said President of Baseball Operations Derek Falvey, gesturing vaguely toward a roster carrying a team ERA north of 4.00. “Sure, the numbers might not be ideal right now, but every arm on this roster has the potential to be slightly below league average. You don’t give up on that kind of upside.”

The comments came amid growing frustration among fans and players alike as the team continues to cling tightly to mid-20s minor leaguers posting .694 OPS marks in Double-A, and relievers with walk rates nearing their K/9.

Why Trade for Proven Talent When You Can Dream on a Future Utility Guy?
Despite glaring needs and a logjam of questionably projectable players, the Twins have made it clear: no one is touching their precious top-25 prospects list, especially not those ranked in the 15–25 range.

“We’ve got a 24-year-old middle infielder hitting .244 in Wichita who we really think could someday be a fantastic bench option,” said Assistant GM Josh Kalk. “You don’t just trade that kind of ceiling for a boring, effective major league reliever.”

The team’s resistance to flipping B-tier talent for real upgrades has drawn the attention of former prospects like Nick Gordon, who was once untouchable in trade talks.

“Man, I remember when they wouldn’t trade me for two months of Chris Archer,” Gordon said, shaking his head. “Then I hit .270 for a year and they finally felt like I fulfilled the prophecy.”

Added Brent Rooker, “They said I had ‘impact power potential’ in the system. Now I have impact power… just for someone else.”

40-Man Roster: A Sacred Circle of Trust (and 5.23 FIPs)
The unwillingness to make roster improvements has extended beyond trades. Asked why the team hasn’t DFA’d struggling players to make room for potential contributors, Falvey doubled down on his protectionist philosophy.

“Every spot on our 40-man roster is valuable,” he explained. “Each player on it was chosen for a reason. That reason may have been a decent Arizona Fall League appearance three years ago, but still, there's a process.”

Pitching coach Pete Maki added context: “Sure, one of our guys gave up 11 earned runs in two innings last week, but he’s working through something. Mainly, being not that good. But we think he can be less not that good soon.”

Even as quality arms remain in St. Paul and the waiver wire teems with relievers under 30, the team remains loyal to its internal solutions.

“It’s like a family,” said Falvey. “A family that strikes out a lot, can’t hold a lead, and hasn’t returned a phone call from the Wild Card standings in weeks. But family nonetheless.”

No Change on the Horizon And That’s the Point
Manager Rocco Baldelli, when asked about the possibility of adding reinforcements, responded with his trademark calm indifference.

“I’ve gotten really close with the guys we’ve got,” Baldelli said. “Sometimes I even learn their names.”

He then looked over a bullpen usage chart filled with crossed-out names and quietly muttered, “I miss Ronny Henriquez.”

With the trade deadline approaching, rival GMs have reportedly stopped even bothering to ask about the Twins’ prospect pool. One anonymous executive noted: “They told me they’d only consider trading a 26-year-old Double-A outfielder hitting .218 if I included a top-5 pitching prospect and cash. I thought it was a joke. They were serious.”

In Minnesota, though, it’s not about the numbers because it’s about the dream. The dream that one day, that sixth-round pick from 2021 with a 1.48 WHIP might become a guy you sort of tolerate in your bullpen.

After all, as Falvey puts it: “You can’t put a value on eventual mediocrity.”

 

View full article

[CRF]

This article isn't satire...this is hitting it right on the screws! 

[TheLeviathan]

We literally have a thread right now where someone is arguing that "Do Nothing" is the way and those of us wanting to sell are in the wrong.

The Twins organization has won the propaganda war with its own fans.  Stagnation is ideal because we've given up on the hope of buying entirely and even selling is seen as "too risky"

We're doomed.

[BillyBallLives]

Can't fool us, you somehow got a transcript from the front office.

[Parfigliano]

Really channeling the FO mentality with this.

[Major League Ready]

How would trading any or all of the old / low potential prospects make us a contender?  We are a very long way from being a serious contender.  Getting this team even remotely into contention would require parting with Jenkins / Keashall / Matthews and a few other top prospects which would be monumental stupid.  

I could see complaining about them not selling but complaining they won't trade away the future to upgrade the current pile of mediocrity makes no sense.

[Rosterman]

Congrats! This didn't actially read as satire.

Heck, looking at the draft results, looks like we got a lot of multi-position shortstop prospects who could be future utilit guys, as well as low level right-handed bullpen arms.

What has really been daunting is the low number of minor league free agents the Twins sgnd this year, how afast many of em havebeen jettisoned. I just iwsh theyid push prospects a tad more. 

 

[Western SD Fan]

Our trusty snitch at the FO, TC Bear, is at it again!  Only one part was forgotten in this article, the FO, Rocco, and fans will vigorously defend ANYONE who has even a tangential connection to Minnesota.  Did your family take a vacation to Minnesota sometime in your lifetime?  The team will never abandon you dear player.  

[LyleCole]

On the current roster, I would sell everyone except Buxton, Lewis, Lopez, Duran, and Ryan.  Probably Ober too because with his 2025 his value is probably too low and we are better off just holding that card.

Castro, Larnach, Jeffers, France, Paddock.  If another team wanted them we should make the move.  

If the front office does not realize we are sellers and not contenders, they are out of the loop.

[Dman]

It feels like the twilight zone with this club.  It looked like they might be out of it to start the month and now it looks like they might be back in it.  Still this feels like a .500 club with little hope of unseating the true contenders.

They don't really have money to buy as they are already talking about trading guys that might be getting arb raises next year.  We can't sell because we are in the hunt for the wild card. so no chance to add prospects to get better or have more tradable assets for next season.

We are doomed to mediocrity.  Silver lining is that we are generally in the race so can always remain interested in the team I guess. 

[Reptevia]

I missed the sarcasm. 

[NotAboutWinning]

Do what you do best!

[Rufus]

So tired of the trade deadline hype.  Selling teams are not going to give up their assets for mediocre minor leaguers.  Where did that fantasy come from?   Selling teams are in the drivers seat and they can hold out for a kings ransom.  The only time I see a deadline trade being worth is a team like the Tigers this year,  A great team that needs serious bullpen help to really put them over the top.  It is going to take more than one player or two to give a team like the Twins there.   The time to deal for a team like the Twins is in the off season.   

[Major League Ready]

23 hours ago, Cody Christie said:

Why Trade for Proven Talent When You Can Dream on a Future Utility Guy?

Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-Imagn Images

The assumption that trading for established players would be far more effective than relying on prospects has been made here many times, Cody.  Have you ever looked at examples of successful teams and how they acquired those players?  It’s really quite easy to look up any successful team you like on Fangraphs and sort by WAR.  The acquisition method is listed.  If it’s a trade, you can look at WAR in all the years preceding the trade and determine if the player was acquired before or after they were proven players.  Baseball reference has more details on acquisition.

I will spare you looking them up but feel free to check the data.  I used a very liberal definition of proven.  If a player had produced 1.5 WAR in any season before being acquired they are considered proven.  Listed below are the below average revenue teams with the most wins since 2000.  The average WAR produced by proven players acquired in trade is 11.3%  Pablo would get us to about that number if he performs as expected.

There are 3 of 30 teams that are anomalies producing around 30%.  The 202 Diamondbacks are by far the biggest outlier.  No other teams even come close to their profile with 30% coming in trade and 44% from free agents.  They acquired Randy Johnson in free agency and he produced 8 WAR.  They acquired Curt Schilling in trade and he produced 9 WAR.  He produced 3 WAR the year before they traded for him.  They also had got more than expected out of some other free agents.  

The 2011 Tigers got 6.6 WAR from Miguel Cabrera and the 2018 Brewers got 7.7 WAR from Yelich (career year) and 3.7 from Travis Shaw.  Shaw produced 1.5 WAR in his 1st season, .4 WAR in his second season and was traded to Milwaukee.  As I said, I used a liberal definition but I doubt a player like Shaw is what you are advocating.

Does this help answer your question?

30	Teams		WINS	Drafted	Intl	TaP	Trade	FA	WAR
	2001	Athletics	102	65.9%	14.3%	11.4%	8.3%	0.0%
	2001	Mariners	116	0.0%	11.0%	18.7%	12.9%	57.4%
	2002	Athletics	103	36.0%	12%	43.0%	0%	9.0%	35.4
	2002	Dbacks	98	9.1%	8.9%	6.8%	30.7%	44.6%	43.6
	2002	Twins	94	59.8%	0.0%	35.0%	5.2%	0.0%	39.9
	2005	White Sox	99	33.2%	0.0%	31.0%	17.7%	18.2%	39.0
	2006	Tigers	95	39.0%	0.0%	28.5%	17.4%	15.0%	32.8
	2006	Twins	96	39.7%	3.3%	44.3%	12.7%	0.0%
	2007	Guardians	96	31.3%	36.5%	32.2%	0.0%	0.0%	38.3
	2008	Rays	97	45.7%	0.0%	33.2%	4.5%	16.6%
	2010	Rays	96	64.7%	0.0%	22.1%	9.1%	4.1%
	2010	Twins	94	50.4%	0.0%	20.8%	8.0%	20.8%	53.9
	2011	Brewers	96	31.0%	4.1%	30.0%	12.8%	22.1%
	2011	Dbacks	94	26.1%	22.2%	44.1%	3.9%	3.7%	33.6
	2011	Tigers	95	39.9%	0.0%	10.9%	29.0%	20.2%	33.6
	2012	Athletics	94	10.7%	0.0%	37.4%	5.3%	46.6%	40.7
	2012	Reds	97	38.1%	19.6%	18.3%	17.2%	6.8%	46.4
	2013	Pirates	94	46.7%	12.8%	0.0%	11.9%	28.6%	41.6
	2015	Pirates	98	36.9%	13.5%	3.2%	22.9%	23.6%	36.5
	2015	Royals	95	38.0%	9.0%	32.3%	11.7%	9.0%	40.4
	2016	Guardians	94	33.1%	22.7%	44.2%	0.0%	0.0%	47
	2017	Guardians	102	22.9%	20%	43.9%	8%	5.0%	38.3
	2018	Athletics	97	51.8%	0.0%	29.1%	19.0%	0.0%	30.0
	2018	Brewers	96	5.2%	0.0%	30.8%	34.8%	29.3%	33.3
	2019	Athletics	97	25.0%	0%	54.0%	10%	12.0%	38.6
	2019	Rays	96	18.6%	0%	45.8%	9%	26.0%
	2019	Twins	101	36.3%	24.7%	0.0%	9.1%	30.0%
	2021	Rays	100	25.0%	6%	45.8%	7%	16.0%	42.7
	2023	Orioles	101	51.2%	8.3%	32.7%	0.0%	7.7%	47.4
	2023	Rays	99	13.8%	9.8%	66.2%	0.0%	10.2%	41.3
			97.73	34.2%	8.6%	29.9%	11.3%	16.1%

* TaP - Traded as Prospect.  (acquired before ever producing 1.5 WAR in a season)

[MinnInPa]

there is no one on this roster that would bring in a player that would improve the roster..only "what if" prospects