Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Keith Law and his thoughts on Kyle Gibson PART DEUX

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

By AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS
in Minnesota Twins Talk

Recommended Posts

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS College Ball

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

Provisional Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted
Encouraging. Then again, the standard for stuff being ready enough now to warrant consideration for a spot in the Twins rotation is... well... not high.

 

Now youre just being A DEBBIE DOWNER. Keith Law obviously thinks Gibsons Stuff is Major Leaugue ready...not just twins ready.

Jim Crikket First Round Pick

Jim Crikket

Provisional Member
Posted
Posted

Well then maybe the questioner should have specifically asked Keith when he thought Gibson would be "Major League ready" instead of when it would be reasonable to expect him to be in the Twins rotation! :)

 

Seriously, though... I wonder about the "built up durability" thing and what he means by that. I'm not even sure how one goes about building up durability. Stamina? sure. It could be that he's referring to the choice the Twins will have to make about just how they decide to utilize Gibson's ~150 innings. I'm certainly curious to find out the answer to that myself.

nicksaviking MVP

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted
Now all the front office needs to do is uncover a breakthrough in cloning technology.

 

While I'm looking forward to seeing him pitch, I'm not entirely sure having 5 Gibson's gives the Twins a top 15 rotation. Now if we make sure to snag Verlander's sweaty jock out of the visitors locker room to throw in our cloning machine.....

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS College Ball

AllhopeisgoneMNTWINS

Provisional Member
Posted
  • Author
Posted
Well then maybe the questioner should have specifically asked Keith when he thought Gibson would be "Major League ready" instead of when it would be reasonable to expect him to be in the Twins rotation! :)

 

Seriously, though... I wonder about the "built up durability" thing and what he means by that. I'm not even sure how one goes about building up durability. Stamina? sure. It could be that he's referring to the choice the Twins will have to make about just how they decide to utilize Gibson's ~150 innings. I'm certainly curious to find out the answer to that myself.

 

i figured that it was bulding up his Stamina, which isnt easy to do. Have the Twins come out and said how many innings they plan on giving Gibson this year?

Winston Smith FCL Twins

Winston Smith

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

I don't think it's being a debbie downer to expect a player to prove something before going all lady gaga over them.

 

My hope is he gives us a nice Brad Radke type career. However it wouldn't surprise me if he fizzles out.

 

You still have to prove it on the field!

Jim Crikket First Round Pick

Jim Crikket

Provisional Member
Posted
Posted

I thought I read somewhere that they were looking at about 150 innings out of him, but I don't remember where that came from. There's not a lot of point in trying to push him much higher than that. I just would hope they'd be smarter about how the ration out his limited innings than the Nationals were with their guy this year.

 

I also agree with Winston that enthusiasm should be tempered until we see results on a Big League field. I've had big hopes for Liam Hendriks, too, and those have certainly not yet been realized (though I haven't totally given up on him yet).

Kwak First Round Pick

Kwak

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

"...built up his durability." Isn't that true for all starting pitchers?--and isn't that what training and Spring Training Camp are designed to accomplish? If Gibson's stuff is "ready"--start him. Many 1st timers stumble,--so what he has "three options" to the minors so there should be no problem. How many innings to pitch this year? I can't say, but he could be shut down if that was deemed the right course of action--it is incredible to think the Twins will be leading the AL in Wins like the Nationals led the NL this past season.

raindog Draft Eligible

raindog

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

I fully expect Gibson to be in the opening day rotation. He'll be solid as long as his healthy. That's the only question mark in my mind. I also expect Wimmers to rebound. That would be huge, as we would at least have three solid starters.

John Bonnes MVP

John Bonnes

Site Manager
Posted
Posted
Now all the front office needs to do is uncover a breakthrough in cloning technology.

 

Actually, I'd giddy that they had a minor breakthrough in how to get their guys through a Tommy John recovery in any kind of expedient fashion. FWIW, Gibson seems to be light-years (or at least light-months) ahead of where Liriano was when he went through it a couple of years ago.

Seth Stohs GOAT

Seth Stohs

Site Manager
Posted
Posted
Now all the front office needs to do is uncover a breakthrough in cloning technology.

 

Actually, I'd giddy that they had a minor breakthrough in how to get their guys through a Tommy John recovery in any kind of expedient fashion. FWIW, Gibson seems to be light-years (or at least light-months) ahead of where Liriano was when he went through it a couple of years ago.

 

Based on?? Gibson predictably didn't exactly pitch well in the AFL...5.40 ERA, I believe. Most encouraging is his velocity and his OK control. Obviously I think he'll be just fine.

The Greatest Poster Alive College Ball

The Greatest Poster Alive

Provisional Member
Posted
Posted

AFL was encouraging... not because he produced a dominating stat line, but because he got some work in, and will help accelerate his path to recovery. If Gibson is healthy enough for a rotation spot out of spring training that would really improve this rotation that has nobody owning a spot. (Diamond is the only guy on this roster i'd put money on being in the rotation right now)

glunn St Paul Saints

glunn

Community Moderator
Posted
Posted

Since the Twins are unlikely to contend next year, I would hope that they start him in Rochester where there is a lot less pressure. If he can perform there, then maybe Deduno gets sent down. :D

Seth Stohs GOAT

Seth Stohs

Site Manager
Posted
Posted
Since the Twins are unlikely to contend next year, I would hope that they start him in Rochester where there is a lot less pressure. If he can perform there, then maybe Deduno gets sent down. :D

 

It won't be Deduno since he's already off the 40 man roster. He would have to make an incredibly strong case.

 

Don't get me wrong. Gibson's AFL performance was very solid considering the hitter friendliness of the league and the most important thing for him was eating innings. If I'm correct, I think Liriano pitched in the Dominican League right after the New Year for a little bit and dominated.

gunnarthor MVP

gunnarthor

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
Why not in the bullpen in Minnesota? How is pitching in the minors less stressful?

 

Yeah, this is what I want. Get him used to the majors like they did with Santana and Liriano. They can move him into the rotation in June and still limit him to 130 or so innings.

Linus Wichita Wind Surge

Linus

Verified Member
Posted
Posted

If I'm the Twins, I start him in Rochester for two reasons: they want to limit his innings, and to not start the clock on his service time. Bring him up in June or whatever the timeframe is and we get an extra year of control, which could be huge if he turns out to be a quality MLB starter.

gunnarthor MVP

gunnarthor

Old-Timey Member
Posted
Posted
If I'm the Twins, I start him in Rochester for two reasons: they want to limit his innings, and to not start the clock on his service time. Bring him up in June or whatever the timeframe is and we get an extra year of control, which could be huge if he turns out to be a quality MLB starter.

 

Two things,

1) The Twins will still count his AAA innings. He'll be on a 130-150 inning limit and it won't matter where he throws those innings.

2) He's 25. We'll have control of him through his age 31 season, no matter what.

Brock Beauchamp GOAT

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
Posted
Posted

I don't think it matters whether he starts in Rochester or Minnesota but I'd prefer Rochester. If he starts there, that means the Twins have actually picked up some arms this offseason and won't have to rely on Kyle out of the gate. Plus, it will allow him to build up more arm strength/control in a setting where the pressure will undoubtedly be lower.

 

Either way, being disappointed one way or the other is premature. Kyle still has several months of rehab and innings in ST before the Twins need to make this decision.

TwinsFanInPhilly Prep Ball

TwinsFanInPhilly

Provisional Member
Posted
Posted
Good to know his stuff is ready but the Twins are still aren't going to throw him into the rotation at the beginning of the year. He will start in the bullpen or in Rochester.

 

Is this fact or speculation/opinion?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund
The Twins Daily Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Twins community on the internet.

Become a Caretaker

  • Member Statistics

    20,605
    Total Members
    48,845
    Most Online
    JackWP76
    Newest Member
    JackWP76
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...