Jump to content
Can the Twins take advantage of a reeling Mets team? Join the discussion! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

terrydactyls

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,903

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by terrydactyls

  1. terrydactyls
    DocBauer, you beat me to it. Adding incentives might remove "betting on himself" as a reason not to sign an extension. He would have a base salary for the next 6-8 years that would provide a financially secure future PLUS the opportunity to add on a boatload of cash if he performs at the level he believes he can obtain. Sign him now.
  2. terrydactyls
    I cannot believe that you dare to use common sense and logic. That is not the Twins Daily way to contribute. Shame on you!!! 😁
  3. terrydactyls
    Do you actually believe that "everybody knew that Paddack's arm was ready to fall off & Pagan couldn't close" but they still made the trade? I truly doubt that was the case. I don't follow the Padres so I have no idea if they mismanaged Rogers. But based on the "everybody knew" comment, I would have to believe that isn't accurate either.
  4. terrydactyls
    Under the current CBA rules, is it possible for the front office to renegotiate Maeda's contract right now? If Maeda is agreeable to moving to the bullpen right now, sign him to a three-year $25M extension with a few relief-based incentives thrown in.
  5. terrydactyls
    Excellent point that half the league is below average defensively. It adds a great perspective to the conversation.
  6. terrydactyls
    Does anyone else think that the term "positive regression" is odd? Sounds like a contradiction in terms.
  7. terrydactyls
    Now that makes no sense at all. How does a team attempt "calculating (what) they will do in the future"? They thoroughly examine prior years to establish what they are willing to offer. It seems to that is exactly "signing a guy in free agency based on what they did in the past.". If the past isn't the determining factor, then you are making an offer based on nothing.
  8. terrydactyls
    I take exception to the last comment! Have you ever engaged in hand-to-hand combat at a budget meeting for the last donut? That, my friend, involves some serious torque!
  9. terrydactyls
    I don't understand how people can be so worried about the number of walks that Moran allows and then get all excited about pursuing Moore who also gives up a lot of walks. Why spend $10M on Moore when you already have a much younger version for $1M?
  10. terrydactyls
    The obsession with power appears to be hindering as many players as it helps. Why would any team go after a player and then try to change him into a player he isn't? Reminds me of when the Vikings gave up players and draft picks for the best I-back in the NFL and tried to turn him into a two-back player. That sure turned out well (for Dallas). Let Martin be himself and be satisfied with what he can bring to the team.
  11. terrydactyls
    Hubert Horatio Humphrey was the last public person who I actually felt was telling the truth (at least most of the time).
  12. terrydactyls
    All of your examples relate to 1B and OF. Trading Urshela doesn't impact those positions.
  13. terrydactyls
    Where are you seeing this "better depth" if not from the front office?
  14. terrydactyls
    No. I don't agree.
  15. terrydactyls
    Fulmer is Handy He Won't Cost a lot. But Prospects are Dandy So Use What You Got. Burma Shave
  16. terrydactyls
    Which do you feel is better? Maximize a player's potential or use a player's potential to maximize the team's potential? Personally, I prefer the latter. I would use Lewis at whatever position that places the best Twins team on the field. If Larnach proves to be a better right fielder than left fielder, then put Lewis in LF and Larnach in RF. If Miranda becomes the next Brooks Robinson (for you young folk, that means superior defense), Lewis never plays 3B and will be forever an outfielder. If that ends up becoming a problem of where to play Lee, Lewis, and Salas, the Twins will have valuable assets to trade.
  17. terrydactyls
    I would like to see Ricky Henderson.
  18. terrydactyls
    Does anyone know (and I mean factual, not "I read somewhere") if revealing health information on recuperating players violates HIPPA rules?
  19. terrydactyls
    If (and that's a BIG if) the Twins really need another pitcher, IMHO I think they should wait until the trade deadline. By July (or even June), the Twins will know what holes they need to fill. The need for a position player might be far greater than the need for a pitcher or possibly the currently assumed starting rotation is over performing and Paddock has made a couple successful starts after his long recovery period. Leave the minor leagues alone for now. However, if a really solid pitcher or position player can be acquired by trading Polanco, Kepler, and Gallo, (along with one good prospect outside our top ten), go for it.
  20. terrydactyls
    Miami doesn't want older players. I would remove Kepler and Pagan (7.1) and offer them Winder (8.3) and de Andrade (2.9). That would end up with the Twins overpaying (37.6 to 29.6). I think Luzardo is undervalued. Or, turn your sights to Pittsburgh and go big. Twins trade: Miranda (26.4) Ober (21.8) Larnach (14.6) Winder (8.3) Salas (20.5) Total 91.6 Pittsburgh trades: Reynolds (64.2) Bednar (21.9) Total 86.1 Again, it's a slight overpay, but close enough. The right-handed outfielder and relief pitcher problems are addressed.
  21. terrydactyls
    No I didn't. But I did play 1B for many years and I can tell a good one from a bad one. Arraez was far closer to the bad end of the spectrum than he was to the good end. I was listening to three former GM's discussing the trade. One of the better comments was that a team doesn't make a trade hoping to "win" the trade. They make a trade to make their team better. The second interesting comment was that both the Marlins and the Twins should be very pleased because the each got what the felt they needed and only lost players that were from a position of strength. (P.S. They also said that the extra two players that the Twins received were a complete shock to them and that the Twins' front office should be congratulated.)
  22. terrydactyls
    I would like to see the Last Vegas odds on which comes first: Arraez' knees give out or Lopez's shoulder explodes.
  23. terrydactyls
    The 1987 World Champion Twins only won 29 road games.
  24. terrydactyls
    While I am in agreement with most of what you eloquently presented, I would like to add to one of your statements. I believe that Minnesota "nice" could become an important selling point to free agents if the front office/ownership would loosen up the purse strings to: 1) make a few high-impact trades (Arraez and Kepler for Cabrera) to fill the relatively few holes that the Twins still have, and 2) extend all the young talent that appear to have bright futures. Success in the post-season, coupled with the far less stressful playing atmosphere, might be highly prized by enough free agents to turn the Twins into annual contenders.
  25. terrydactyls
    Arraez is the reigning AL batting champion, in 2022, Kepler out performed all Marlins' outfielders except one, and Polanco is better than any Marlins' current 2B. All three are starters for the Twins. Not exactly a bunch of "aging players we don't want". Regardless, as I said in my comment, I would make this the initial offer. You have to start someplace.
×
×
  • Create New...